Metamodels for Evaluating, Calibrating and Applying Agent-Based Models: A Review

The recent advancement of agent-based modeling is characterized by higher demands on the parameterization, evaluation and documentation of these computationally expensive models. Accordingly, there is also a growing request for "easy to go" applications just mimicking the input-output beha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of artificial societies and social simulation 2020-04, Vol.23 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Pietzsch, Bruno, Fiedler, Sebastian, Mertens, Kai G., Richter, Markus, Scherer, Cédric, Widyastuti, Kirana, Wimmler, Marie-Christin, Zakharova, Liubov, Berger, Uta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of artificial societies and social simulation
container_volume 23
creator Pietzsch, Bruno
Fiedler, Sebastian
Mertens, Kai G.
Richter, Markus
Scherer, Cédric
Widyastuti, Kirana
Wimmler, Marie-Christin
Zakharova, Liubov
Berger, Uta
description The recent advancement of agent-based modeling is characterized by higher demands on the parameterization, evaluation and documentation of these computationally expensive models. Accordingly, there is also a growing request for "easy to go" applications just mimicking the input-output behavior of such models. Metamodels are being increasingly used for these tasks. In this paper, we provide an overview of common metamodel types and the purposes of their usage in an agent-based modeling context. To guide modelers in the selection and application of metamodels for their own needs, we further assessed their implementation effort and performance. We performed a literature research in January 2019 using four different databases. Five different terms paraphrasing metamodels (approximation, emulator, meta-model, metamodel and surrogate) were used to capture the whole range of relevant literature in all disciplines. All metamodel applications found were then categorized into specific metamodel types and rated by different junior and senior researches from varying disciplines (including forest sciences, landscape ecology, or economics) regarding the implementation effort and performance. Specifically, we captured the metamodel performance according to (i) the consideration of uncertainties, (ii) the suitability assessment provided by the authors for the particular purpose, and (iii) the number of valuation criteria provided for suitability assessment. We selected 40 distinct metamodel applications from studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2005 to 2019. These were used for the sensitivity analysis, calibration and upscaling of agent-based models, as well to mimic their prediction for different scenarios. This review provides information about the most applicable metamodel types for each purpose and forms a first guidance for the implementation and validation of metamodels for agent-based models.
doi_str_mv 10.18564/jasss.4274
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2393598825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2393598825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-b507ccfa9493b17d888007a922d3b517309976fbf3aea530ee134458f2e8e12c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRsFZX_oEBl5o6z8yMu1jqA1oU0fUwSe6UlDSJM2ml_942deHqngPnnAsfQteUTKiWqbhfuRjjRDAlTtCIipQkSjB5-k-fo4sYV4QwzlI5Qu8L6N26LaGO2LcBz7au3ri-apZ3eOrqKg-Dwa4pcdZ19e5gsiU0ffLoIpR4MXQfcIY_YFvBzyU6866OcPV3x-jrafY5fUnmb8-v02yeFMzoPsklUUXhnRGG51SVWmtClDOMlTyXVHFijEp97rkDJzkBoFwIqT0DDZQVfIxujrtdaL83EHu7ajeh2b-0jBsujdZM7lO3x1QR2hgDeNuFau3CzlJiB2R2QGYPyPgvc2leVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2393598825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metamodels for Evaluating, Calibrating and Applying Agent-Based Models: A Review</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pietzsch, Bruno ; Fiedler, Sebastian ; Mertens, Kai G. ; Richter, Markus ; Scherer, Cédric ; Widyastuti, Kirana ; Wimmler, Marie-Christin ; Zakharova, Liubov ; Berger, Uta</creator><creatorcontrib>Pietzsch, Bruno ; Fiedler, Sebastian ; Mertens, Kai G. ; Richter, Markus ; Scherer, Cédric ; Widyastuti, Kirana ; Wimmler, Marie-Christin ; Zakharova, Liubov ; Berger, Uta</creatorcontrib><description>The recent advancement of agent-based modeling is characterized by higher demands on the parameterization, evaluation and documentation of these computationally expensive models. Accordingly, there is also a growing request for "easy to go" applications just mimicking the input-output behavior of such models. Metamodels are being increasingly used for these tasks. In this paper, we provide an overview of common metamodel types and the purposes of their usage in an agent-based modeling context. To guide modelers in the selection and application of metamodels for their own needs, we further assessed their implementation effort and performance. We performed a literature research in January 2019 using four different databases. Five different terms paraphrasing metamodels (approximation, emulator, meta-model, metamodel and surrogate) were used to capture the whole range of relevant literature in all disciplines. All metamodel applications found were then categorized into specific metamodel types and rated by different junior and senior researches from varying disciplines (including forest sciences, landscape ecology, or economics) regarding the implementation effort and performance. Specifically, we captured the metamodel performance according to (i) the consideration of uncertainties, (ii) the suitability assessment provided by the authors for the particular purpose, and (iii) the number of valuation criteria provided for suitability assessment. We selected 40 distinct metamodel applications from studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2005 to 2019. These were used for the sensitivity analysis, calibration and upscaling of agent-based models, as well to mimic their prediction for different scenarios. This review provides information about the most applicable metamodel types for each purpose and forms a first guidance for the implementation and validation of metamodels for agent-based models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-7425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-7425</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18564/jasss.4274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Guildford: Department of Sociology, University of Surrey</publisher><subject>Agents ; Application ; Ecology ; Implementation ; Sensitivity analysis ; Suitability ; Validity ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>Journal of artificial societies and social simulation, 2020-04, Vol.23 (2)</ispartof><rights>Copyright Department of Sociology, University of Surrey Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-b507ccfa9493b17d888007a922d3b517309976fbf3aea530ee134458f2e8e12c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pietzsch, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertens, Kai G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widyastuti, Kirana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmler, Marie-Christin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakharova, Liubov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Uta</creatorcontrib><title>Metamodels for Evaluating, Calibrating and Applying Agent-Based Models: A Review</title><title>Journal of artificial societies and social simulation</title><description>The recent advancement of agent-based modeling is characterized by higher demands on the parameterization, evaluation and documentation of these computationally expensive models. Accordingly, there is also a growing request for "easy to go" applications just mimicking the input-output behavior of such models. Metamodels are being increasingly used for these tasks. In this paper, we provide an overview of common metamodel types and the purposes of their usage in an agent-based modeling context. To guide modelers in the selection and application of metamodels for their own needs, we further assessed their implementation effort and performance. We performed a literature research in January 2019 using four different databases. Five different terms paraphrasing metamodels (approximation, emulator, meta-model, metamodel and surrogate) were used to capture the whole range of relevant literature in all disciplines. All metamodel applications found were then categorized into specific metamodel types and rated by different junior and senior researches from varying disciplines (including forest sciences, landscape ecology, or economics) regarding the implementation effort and performance. Specifically, we captured the metamodel performance according to (i) the consideration of uncertainties, (ii) the suitability assessment provided by the authors for the particular purpose, and (iii) the number of valuation criteria provided for suitability assessment. We selected 40 distinct metamodel applications from studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2005 to 2019. These were used for the sensitivity analysis, calibration and upscaling of agent-based models, as well to mimic their prediction for different scenarios. This review provides information about the most applicable metamodel types for each purpose and forms a first guidance for the implementation and validation of metamodels for agent-based models.</description><subject>Agents</subject><subject>Application</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Suitability</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>1460-7425</issn><issn>1460-7425</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRsFZX_oEBl5o6z8yMu1jqA1oU0fUwSe6UlDSJM2ml_942deHqngPnnAsfQteUTKiWqbhfuRjjRDAlTtCIipQkSjB5-k-fo4sYV4QwzlI5Qu8L6N26LaGO2LcBz7au3ri-apZ3eOrqKg-Dwa4pcdZ19e5gsiU0ffLoIpR4MXQfcIY_YFvBzyU6866OcPV3x-jrafY5fUnmb8-v02yeFMzoPsklUUXhnRGG51SVWmtClDOMlTyXVHFijEp97rkDJzkBoFwIqT0DDZQVfIxujrtdaL83EHu7ajeh2b-0jBsujdZM7lO3x1QR2hgDeNuFau3CzlJiB2R2QGYPyPgvc2leVA</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Pietzsch, Bruno</creator><creator>Fiedler, Sebastian</creator><creator>Mertens, Kai G.</creator><creator>Richter, Markus</creator><creator>Scherer, Cédric</creator><creator>Widyastuti, Kirana</creator><creator>Wimmler, Marie-Christin</creator><creator>Zakharova, Liubov</creator><creator>Berger, Uta</creator><general>Department of Sociology, University of Surrey</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Metamodels for Evaluating, Calibrating and Applying Agent-Based Models: A Review</title><author>Pietzsch, Bruno ; Fiedler, Sebastian ; Mertens, Kai G. ; Richter, Markus ; Scherer, Cédric ; Widyastuti, Kirana ; Wimmler, Marie-Christin ; Zakharova, Liubov ; Berger, Uta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-b507ccfa9493b17d888007a922d3b517309976fbf3aea530ee134458f2e8e12c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agents</topic><topic>Application</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Suitability</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pietzsch, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertens, Kai G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widyastuti, Kirana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmler, Marie-Christin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakharova, Liubov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Uta</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of artificial societies and social simulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pietzsch, Bruno</au><au>Fiedler, Sebastian</au><au>Mertens, Kai G.</au><au>Richter, Markus</au><au>Scherer, Cédric</au><au>Widyastuti, Kirana</au><au>Wimmler, Marie-Christin</au><au>Zakharova, Liubov</au><au>Berger, Uta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Metamodels for Evaluating, Calibrating and Applying Agent-Based Models: A Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of artificial societies and social simulation</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>1460-7425</issn><eissn>1460-7425</eissn><abstract>The recent advancement of agent-based modeling is characterized by higher demands on the parameterization, evaluation and documentation of these computationally expensive models. Accordingly, there is also a growing request for "easy to go" applications just mimicking the input-output behavior of such models. Metamodels are being increasingly used for these tasks. In this paper, we provide an overview of common metamodel types and the purposes of their usage in an agent-based modeling context. To guide modelers in the selection and application of metamodels for their own needs, we further assessed their implementation effort and performance. We performed a literature research in January 2019 using four different databases. Five different terms paraphrasing metamodels (approximation, emulator, meta-model, metamodel and surrogate) were used to capture the whole range of relevant literature in all disciplines. All metamodel applications found were then categorized into specific metamodel types and rated by different junior and senior researches from varying disciplines (including forest sciences, landscape ecology, or economics) regarding the implementation effort and performance. Specifically, we captured the metamodel performance according to (i) the consideration of uncertainties, (ii) the suitability assessment provided by the authors for the particular purpose, and (iii) the number of valuation criteria provided for suitability assessment. We selected 40 distinct metamodel applications from studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2005 to 2019. These were used for the sensitivity analysis, calibration and upscaling of agent-based models, as well to mimic their prediction for different scenarios. This review provides information about the most applicable metamodel types for each purpose and forms a first guidance for the implementation and validation of metamodels for agent-based models.</abstract><cop>Guildford</cop><pub>Department of Sociology, University of Surrey</pub><doi>10.18564/jasss.4274</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-7425
ispartof Journal of artificial societies and social simulation, 2020-04, Vol.23 (2)
issn 1460-7425
1460-7425
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2393598825
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agents
Application
Ecology
Implementation
Sensitivity analysis
Suitability
Validity
Valuation
title Metamodels for Evaluating, Calibrating and Applying Agent-Based Models: A Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T12%3A45%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metamodels%20for%20Evaluating,%20Calibrating%20and%20Applying%20Agent-Based%20Models:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20artificial%20societies%20and%20social%20simulation&rft.au=Pietzsch,%20Bruno&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=1460-7425&rft.eissn=1460-7425&rft_id=info:doi/10.18564/jasss.4274&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2393598825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2393598825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true