Fandom, forgiveness and future support: YouTube apologies as crisis communication
PurposeThis study examined how audience characteristics and attitudes relate to their perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness of apologies by public figures posted on YouTube.Design/methodology/approachFour hundred twenty-seven adult participants recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk comp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of communication management (London, England) England), 2020-04, Vol.24 (1), p.1-18 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of communication management (London, England) |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Kelso Sandlin, Jean Gracyalny, Monica L |
description | PurposeThis study examined how audience characteristics and attitudes relate to their perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness of apologies by public figures posted on YouTube.Design/methodology/approachFour hundred twenty-seven adult participants recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk completed an online survey via Qualtrics. Participants were randomly assigned to view two of four public figure apologies posted on YouTube.FindingsResults indicated that audience fandom and perceived reputation and attractiveness of the public figure were related to perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness; and perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness were related to intentions of future support.Research limitations/implications“Sameness” between the public figure and audience did not garner a more favorable response to the apology, and this is not consistent with earlier studies. For race similarity, the results could have been a reflection of the low number of non-White participants. However, results could indicate that “sameness” is not as simplistic as demographic sameness, such as race, sex or age.Practical implicationsThe authors’ findings elevate the importance of gathering and benchmarking pre-crisis attitudinal research to better equip and inform communication professionals for crisis response. In addition, the study suggests that a public figure's strong reputation and fanbase provide a type of inoculation, lessening reputational damage.Social implicationsThe finding that perceived attractiveness relates positively to perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness is consistent with psychological research indicating attractiveness has many positive social implications – even in mediated communication.Originality/valueEvidence suggests social media apologies matter. Communication professionals need to approach apology opportunities with a keen awareness that relational outcomes and intentions of future support can shift based on social media audiences' attitudes related to the public figure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0096 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2392928290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2392928290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-6e01a590244830a0b65d3b2c1302affa702d2a8c198261a907546aa47c5fb41b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtKxDAUhoMoOF4ewF3BrdGTS9PGnQyOF0YGYQRdhbRNhg7TpiaN4NubMm4EV__h8P3nwIfQBYFrQqC8eZ6vXjAITIFIDCDFAZoRXpQYypweppkJhmnO34_RSQhbAJILKGbodaH7xnVXmXV-036Z3oSQpVVm4xi9yUIcBufH2-zDxXWsTKYHt3Ob1iQqZLVvQ5vCdV3s21qPrevP0JHVu2DOf_MUvS3u1_NHvFw9PM3vlrhmhI9YGCA6l0A5LxloqETesIrWhAHV1uoCaEN1WRNZUkG0hCLnQmte1LmtOKnYKbrc3x28-4wmjGrrou_TS0WZpJKWVEKiyJ6qvQvBG6sG33bafysCajKnJnMKhJrMqclc6sC-Yzrj9a75t_JHNvsBywRvXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2392928290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fandom, forgiveness and future support: YouTube apologies as crisis communication</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Kelso Sandlin, Jean ; Gracyalny, Monica L</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelso Sandlin, Jean ; Gracyalny, Monica L</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis study examined how audience characteristics and attitudes relate to their perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness of apologies by public figures posted on YouTube.Design/methodology/approachFour hundred twenty-seven adult participants recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk completed an online survey via Qualtrics. Participants were randomly assigned to view two of four public figure apologies posted on YouTube.FindingsResults indicated that audience fandom and perceived reputation and attractiveness of the public figure were related to perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness; and perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness were related to intentions of future support.Research limitations/implications“Sameness” between the public figure and audience did not garner a more favorable response to the apology, and this is not consistent with earlier studies. For race similarity, the results could have been a reflection of the low number of non-White participants. However, results could indicate that “sameness” is not as simplistic as demographic sameness, such as race, sex or age.Practical implicationsThe authors’ findings elevate the importance of gathering and benchmarking pre-crisis attitudinal research to better equip and inform communication professionals for crisis response. In addition, the study suggests that a public figure's strong reputation and fanbase provide a type of inoculation, lessening reputational damage.Social implicationsThe finding that perceived attractiveness relates positively to perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness is consistent with psychological research indicating attractiveness has many positive social implications – even in mediated communication.Originality/valueEvidence suggests social media apologies matter. Communication professionals need to approach apology opportunities with a keen awareness that relational outcomes and intentions of future support can shift based on social media audiences' attitudes related to the public figure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-254X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Apologies ; Attitudes ; Audiences ; Business communications ; Communication ; Digital media ; Electronic commerce ; Environmental scanning ; Literature reviews ; Management of crises ; Perceptions ; Public relations ; Reputations ; Social networks ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Journal of communication management (London, England), 2020-04, Vol.24 (1), p.1-18</ispartof><rights>Jean Kelso Sandlin and Monica L. Gracyalny</rights><rights>Jean Kelso Sandlin and Monica L. Gracyalny. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-6e01a590244830a0b65d3b2c1302affa702d2a8c198261a907546aa47c5fb41b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-6e01a590244830a0b65d3b2c1302affa702d2a8c198261a907546aa47c5fb41b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1773-206X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0096/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,27901,27902,52664</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelso Sandlin, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gracyalny, Monica L</creatorcontrib><title>Fandom, forgiveness and future support: YouTube apologies as crisis communication</title><title>Journal of communication management (London, England)</title><description>PurposeThis study examined how audience characteristics and attitudes relate to their perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness of apologies by public figures posted on YouTube.Design/methodology/approachFour hundred twenty-seven adult participants recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk completed an online survey via Qualtrics. Participants were randomly assigned to view two of four public figure apologies posted on YouTube.FindingsResults indicated that audience fandom and perceived reputation and attractiveness of the public figure were related to perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness; and perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness were related to intentions of future support.Research limitations/implications“Sameness” between the public figure and audience did not garner a more favorable response to the apology, and this is not consistent with earlier studies. For race similarity, the results could have been a reflection of the low number of non-White participants. However, results could indicate that “sameness” is not as simplistic as demographic sameness, such as race, sex or age.Practical implicationsThe authors’ findings elevate the importance of gathering and benchmarking pre-crisis attitudinal research to better equip and inform communication professionals for crisis response. In addition, the study suggests that a public figure's strong reputation and fanbase provide a type of inoculation, lessening reputational damage.Social implicationsThe finding that perceived attractiveness relates positively to perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness is consistent with psychological research indicating attractiveness has many positive social implications – even in mediated communication.Originality/valueEvidence suggests social media apologies matter. Communication professionals need to approach apology opportunities with a keen awareness that relational outcomes and intentions of future support can shift based on social media audiences' attitudes related to the public figure.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Apologies</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Business communications</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Environmental scanning</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Management of crises</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Public relations</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>1363-254X</issn><issn>1478-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>XDTOA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMtKxDAUhoMoOF4ewF3BrdGTS9PGnQyOF0YGYQRdhbRNhg7TpiaN4NubMm4EV__h8P3nwIfQBYFrQqC8eZ6vXjAITIFIDCDFAZoRXpQYypweppkJhmnO34_RSQhbAJILKGbodaH7xnVXmXV-036Z3oSQpVVm4xi9yUIcBufH2-zDxXWsTKYHt3Ob1iQqZLVvQ5vCdV3s21qPrevP0JHVu2DOf_MUvS3u1_NHvFw9PM3vlrhmhI9YGCA6l0A5LxloqETesIrWhAHV1uoCaEN1WRNZUkG0hCLnQmte1LmtOKnYKbrc3x28-4wmjGrrou_TS0WZpJKWVEKiyJ6qvQvBG6sG33bafysCajKnJnMKhJrMqclc6sC-Yzrj9a75t_JHNvsBywRvXw</recordid><startdate>20200422</startdate><enddate>20200422</enddate><creator>Kelso Sandlin, Jean</creator><creator>Gracyalny, Monica L</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>XDTOA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1773-206X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200422</creationdate><title>Fandom, forgiveness and future support: YouTube apologies as crisis communication</title><author>Kelso Sandlin, Jean ; Gracyalny, Monica L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-6e01a590244830a0b65d3b2c1302affa702d2a8c198261a907546aa47c5fb41b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Apologies</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Business communications</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Environmental scanning</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Management of crises</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Public relations</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelso Sandlin, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gracyalny, Monica L</creatorcontrib><collection>Emerald Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of communication management (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelso Sandlin, Jean</au><au>Gracyalny, Monica L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fandom, forgiveness and future support: YouTube apologies as crisis communication</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communication management (London, England)</jtitle><date>2020-04-22</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>1-18</pages><issn>1363-254X</issn><eissn>1478-0852</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis study examined how audience characteristics and attitudes relate to their perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness of apologies by public figures posted on YouTube.Design/methodology/approachFour hundred twenty-seven adult participants recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk completed an online survey via Qualtrics. Participants were randomly assigned to view two of four public figure apologies posted on YouTube.FindingsResults indicated that audience fandom and perceived reputation and attractiveness of the public figure were related to perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness; and perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness were related to intentions of future support.Research limitations/implications“Sameness” between the public figure and audience did not garner a more favorable response to the apology, and this is not consistent with earlier studies. For race similarity, the results could have been a reflection of the low number of non-White participants. However, results could indicate that “sameness” is not as simplistic as demographic sameness, such as race, sex or age.Practical implicationsThe authors’ findings elevate the importance of gathering and benchmarking pre-crisis attitudinal research to better equip and inform communication professionals for crisis response. In addition, the study suggests that a public figure's strong reputation and fanbase provide a type of inoculation, lessening reputational damage.Social implicationsThe finding that perceived attractiveness relates positively to perceptions of sincerity and forgiveness is consistent with psychological research indicating attractiveness has many positive social implications – even in mediated communication.Originality/valueEvidence suggests social media apologies matter. Communication professionals need to approach apology opportunities with a keen awareness that relational outcomes and intentions of future support can shift based on social media audiences' attitudes related to the public figure.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0096</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1773-206X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1363-254X |
ispartof | Journal of communication management (London, England), 2020-04, Vol.24 (1), p.1-18 |
issn | 1363-254X 1478-0852 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2392928290 |
source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
subjects | Advocacy Apologies Attitudes Audiences Business communications Communication Digital media Electronic commerce Environmental scanning Literature reviews Management of crises Perceptions Public relations Reputations Social networks Stakeholders |
title | Fandom, forgiveness and future support: YouTube apologies as crisis communication |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T01%3A49%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fandom,%20forgiveness%20and%20future%20support:%20YouTube%20apologies%20as%20crisis%20communication&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communication%20management%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Kelso%20Sandlin,%20Jean&rft.date=2020-04-22&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=1-18&rft.issn=1363-254X&rft.eissn=1478-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0096&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2392928290%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2392928290&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |