Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?
We consider the challenges and trade-offs involved in the manufacturing of engineered proteins. Manufacturing these proteins involves high risk of financial losses due to the purity and yield trade-offs, uncertainty in the process outcomes, and high operating costs. In this setting, the biomanufactu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Manufacturing & service operations management 2020-03, Vol.22 (2), p.330-345 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 345 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 330 |
container_title | Manufacturing & service operations management |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Martagan, Tugce Krishnamurthy, Ananth Leland, Peter A. |
description | We consider the challenges and trade-offs involved in the manufacturing of engineered proteins. Manufacturing these proteins involves high risk of financial losses due to the purity and yield trade-offs, uncertainty in the process outcomes, and high operating costs. In this setting, the biomanufacturer must determine how much protein to manufacture in the upstream fermentation operations, and then how much of it to waste in each subsequent purification operation because of the purity–yield trade-offs. We develop a Markov decision model to optimize three layers of interdependent decisions in protein manufacturing: the optimal amount of protein to be produced in upstream operations, the optimal choice of chromatography technique to be used in downstream operations, and the optimal choice of pooling windows during chromatography. The proposed stochastic model dynamically optimizes these three layers of interdependent decisions to maximize the expected profit. The structural analysis derives functional relationships between the purity–yield trade-offs and operating costs, and characterizes the optimal operating policies. The optimal policy also suggests when the biomanufacturer is better off failing early and cutting losses. We use a state aggregation scheme to reduce the computational efforts, and quantify the savings obtained from the use of the optimization model in industry practice at Aldevron. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/msom.2018.0740 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2391969495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2391969495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3fc85db2f69d22b5bcdbf57de1210513be53e5f5fa2799f6e7f736900184d2353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMltidvBnErMAqgpFagVDEaPlJL6SisTFToT49ySEnelOuue9Oz0IXTKaMJ5n1030TcIpyxOaSXqEZkzxlCip8-PfXhCZMnmKzmLcUzpwlM_Q3ca2dle3O7wNtnLEA0Rct_gl-M4NdRj3YMuuDwNzg1f-C2_68h13Hr_Z2Lnbc3QC9iO6i786R68Py-1iRdbPj0-L-zUpJaMdEVDmqio4pLrivFBFWRWgssoxzqhionBKOAUKLM-0htRlkIlUj2_Kigsl5uhq2nsI_rN3sTN734d2OGm40EynWuqRSiaqDD7G4MAcQt3Y8G0YNaMlM1oyoyUzWhoCZArULfjQxP_4H8v2aIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2391969495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?</title><source>Informs</source><creator>Martagan, Tugce ; Krishnamurthy, Ananth ; Leland, Peter A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martagan, Tugce ; Krishnamurthy, Ananth ; Leland, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><description>We consider the challenges and trade-offs involved in the manufacturing of engineered proteins. Manufacturing these proteins involves high risk of financial losses due to the purity and yield trade-offs, uncertainty in the process outcomes, and high operating costs. In this setting, the biomanufacturer must determine how much protein to manufacture in the upstream fermentation operations, and then how much of it to waste in each subsequent purification operation because of the purity–yield trade-offs. We develop a Markov decision model to optimize three layers of interdependent decisions in protein manufacturing: the optimal amount of protein to be produced in upstream operations, the optimal choice of chromatography technique to be used in downstream operations, and the optimal choice of pooling windows during chromatography. The proposed stochastic model dynamically optimizes these three layers of interdependent decisions to maximize the expected profit. The structural analysis derives functional relationships between the purity–yield trade-offs and operating costs, and characterizes the optimal operating policies. The optimal policy also suggests when the biomanufacturer is better off failing early and cutting losses. We use a state aggregation scheme to reduce the computational efforts, and quantify the savings obtained from the use of the optimization model in industry practice at Aldevron.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-4614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/msom.2018.0740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Chromatography ; Cost control ; Decision making models ; Manufacturing ; Markov analysis ; Mathematical models ; Operating costs ; Optimization ; protein manufacturing ; Proteins ; quality requirement ; random yield ; stochastic optimization</subject><ispartof>Manufacturing & service operations management, 2020-03, Vol.22 (2), p.330-345</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar/Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3fc85db2f69d22b5bcdbf57de1210513be53e5f5fa2799f6e7f736900184d2353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3fc85db2f69d22b5bcdbf57de1210513be53e5f5fa2799f6e7f736900184d2353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4396-7102</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/msom.2018.0740$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3679,27901,27902,62589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martagan, Tugce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Ananth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leland, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><title>Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?</title><title>Manufacturing & service operations management</title><description>We consider the challenges and trade-offs involved in the manufacturing of engineered proteins. Manufacturing these proteins involves high risk of financial losses due to the purity and yield trade-offs, uncertainty in the process outcomes, and high operating costs. In this setting, the biomanufacturer must determine how much protein to manufacture in the upstream fermentation operations, and then how much of it to waste in each subsequent purification operation because of the purity–yield trade-offs. We develop a Markov decision model to optimize three layers of interdependent decisions in protein manufacturing: the optimal amount of protein to be produced in upstream operations, the optimal choice of chromatography technique to be used in downstream operations, and the optimal choice of pooling windows during chromatography. The proposed stochastic model dynamically optimizes these three layers of interdependent decisions to maximize the expected profit. The structural analysis derives functional relationships between the purity–yield trade-offs and operating costs, and characterizes the optimal operating policies. The optimal policy also suggests when the biomanufacturer is better off failing early and cutting losses. We use a state aggregation scheme to reduce the computational efforts, and quantify the savings obtained from the use of the optimization model in industry practice at Aldevron.</description><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Markov analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>protein manufacturing</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>quality requirement</subject><subject>random yield</subject><subject>stochastic optimization</subject><issn>1523-4614</issn><issn>1526-5498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMltidvBnErMAqgpFagVDEaPlJL6SisTFToT49ySEnelOuue9Oz0IXTKaMJ5n1030TcIpyxOaSXqEZkzxlCip8-PfXhCZMnmKzmLcUzpwlM_Q3ca2dle3O7wNtnLEA0Rct_gl-M4NdRj3YMuuDwNzg1f-C2_68h13Hr_Z2Lnbc3QC9iO6i786R68Py-1iRdbPj0-L-zUpJaMdEVDmqio4pLrivFBFWRWgssoxzqhionBKOAUKLM-0htRlkIlUj2_Kigsl5uhq2nsI_rN3sTN734d2OGm40EynWuqRSiaqDD7G4MAcQt3Y8G0YNaMlM1oyoyUzWhoCZArULfjQxP_4H8v2aIc</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Martagan, Tugce</creator><creator>Krishnamurthy, Ananth</creator><creator>Leland, Peter A.</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4396-7102</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?</title><author>Martagan, Tugce ; Krishnamurthy, Ananth ; Leland, Peter A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3fc85db2f69d22b5bcdbf57de1210513be53e5f5fa2799f6e7f736900184d2353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Markov analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>protein manufacturing</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>quality requirement</topic><topic>random yield</topic><topic>stochastic optimization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martagan, Tugce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Ananth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leland, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Manufacturing & service operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martagan, Tugce</au><au>Krishnamurthy, Ananth</au><au>Leland, Peter A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?</atitle><jtitle>Manufacturing & service operations management</jtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>330</spage><epage>345</epage><pages>330-345</pages><issn>1523-4614</issn><eissn>1526-5498</eissn><abstract>We consider the challenges and trade-offs involved in the manufacturing of engineered proteins. Manufacturing these proteins involves high risk of financial losses due to the purity and yield trade-offs, uncertainty in the process outcomes, and high operating costs. In this setting, the biomanufacturer must determine how much protein to manufacture in the upstream fermentation operations, and then how much of it to waste in each subsequent purification operation because of the purity–yield trade-offs. We develop a Markov decision model to optimize three layers of interdependent decisions in protein manufacturing: the optimal amount of protein to be produced in upstream operations, the optimal choice of chromatography technique to be used in downstream operations, and the optimal choice of pooling windows during chromatography. The proposed stochastic model dynamically optimizes these three layers of interdependent decisions to maximize the expected profit. The structural analysis derives functional relationships between the purity–yield trade-offs and operating costs, and characterizes the optimal operating policies. The optimal policy also suggests when the biomanufacturer is better off failing early and cutting losses. We use a state aggregation scheme to reduce the computational efforts, and quantify the savings obtained from the use of the optimization model in industry practice at Aldevron.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/msom.2018.0740</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4396-7102</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1523-4614 |
ispartof | Manufacturing & service operations management, 2020-03, Vol.22 (2), p.330-345 |
issn | 1523-4614 1526-5498 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2391969495 |
source | Informs |
subjects | Chromatography Cost control Decision making models Manufacturing Markov analysis Mathematical models Operating costs Optimization protein manufacturing Proteins quality requirement random yield stochastic optimization |
title | Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A08%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20Trade-offs%20in%20Protein%20Manufacturing:%20How%20Much%20to%20Waste?&rft.jtitle=Manufacturing%20&%20service%20operations%20management&rft.au=Martagan,%20Tugce&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=330&rft.epage=345&rft.pages=330-345&rft.issn=1523-4614&rft.eissn=1526-5498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/msom.2018.0740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2391969495%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2391969495&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |