Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?

We consider the challenges and trade-offs involved in the manufacturing of engineered proteins. Manufacturing these proteins involves high risk of financial losses due to the purity and yield trade-offs, uncertainty in the process outcomes, and high operating costs. In this setting, the biomanufactu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Manufacturing & service operations management 2020-03, Vol.22 (2), p.330-345
Hauptverfasser: Martagan, Tugce, Krishnamurthy, Ananth, Leland, Peter A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 345
container_issue 2
container_start_page 330
container_title Manufacturing & service operations management
container_volume 22
creator Martagan, Tugce
Krishnamurthy, Ananth
Leland, Peter A.
description We consider the challenges and trade-offs involved in the manufacturing of engineered proteins. Manufacturing these proteins involves high risk of financial losses due to the purity and yield trade-offs, uncertainty in the process outcomes, and high operating costs. In this setting, the biomanufacturer must determine how much protein to manufacture in the upstream fermentation operations, and then how much of it to waste in each subsequent purification operation because of the purity–yield trade-offs. We develop a Markov decision model to optimize three layers of interdependent decisions in protein manufacturing: the optimal amount of protein to be produced in upstream operations, the optimal choice of chromatography technique to be used in downstream operations, and the optimal choice of pooling windows during chromatography. The proposed stochastic model dynamically optimizes these three layers of interdependent decisions to maximize the expected profit. The structural analysis derives functional relationships between the purity–yield trade-offs and operating costs, and characterizes the optimal operating policies. The optimal policy also suggests when the biomanufacturer is better off failing early and cutting losses. We use a state aggregation scheme to reduce the computational efforts, and quantify the savings obtained from the use of the optimization model in industry practice at Aldevron.
doi_str_mv 10.1287/msom.2018.0740
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2391969495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2391969495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3fc85db2f69d22b5bcdbf57de1210513be53e5f5fa2799f6e7f736900184d2353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMltidvBnErMAqgpFagVDEaPlJL6SisTFToT49ySEnelOuue9Oz0IXTKaMJ5n1030TcIpyxOaSXqEZkzxlCip8-PfXhCZMnmKzmLcUzpwlM_Q3ca2dle3O7wNtnLEA0Rct_gl-M4NdRj3YMuuDwNzg1f-C2_68h13Hr_Z2Lnbc3QC9iO6i786R68Py-1iRdbPj0-L-zUpJaMdEVDmqio4pLrivFBFWRWgssoxzqhionBKOAUKLM-0htRlkIlUj2_Kigsl5uhq2nsI_rN3sTN734d2OGm40EynWuqRSiaqDD7G4MAcQt3Y8G0YNaMlM1oyoyUzWhoCZArULfjQxP_4H8v2aIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2391969495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?</title><source>Informs</source><creator>Martagan, Tugce ; Krishnamurthy, Ananth ; Leland, Peter A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martagan, Tugce ; Krishnamurthy, Ananth ; Leland, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><description>We consider the challenges and trade-offs involved in the manufacturing of engineered proteins. Manufacturing these proteins involves high risk of financial losses due to the purity and yield trade-offs, uncertainty in the process outcomes, and high operating costs. In this setting, the biomanufacturer must determine how much protein to manufacture in the upstream fermentation operations, and then how much of it to waste in each subsequent purification operation because of the purity–yield trade-offs. We develop a Markov decision model to optimize three layers of interdependent decisions in protein manufacturing: the optimal amount of protein to be produced in upstream operations, the optimal choice of chromatography technique to be used in downstream operations, and the optimal choice of pooling windows during chromatography. The proposed stochastic model dynamically optimizes these three layers of interdependent decisions to maximize the expected profit. The structural analysis derives functional relationships between the purity–yield trade-offs and operating costs, and characterizes the optimal operating policies. The optimal policy also suggests when the biomanufacturer is better off failing early and cutting losses. We use a state aggregation scheme to reduce the computational efforts, and quantify the savings obtained from the use of the optimization model in industry practice at Aldevron.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-4614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/msom.2018.0740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Chromatography ; Cost control ; Decision making models ; Manufacturing ; Markov analysis ; Mathematical models ; Operating costs ; Optimization ; protein manufacturing ; Proteins ; quality requirement ; random yield ; stochastic optimization</subject><ispartof>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management, 2020-03, Vol.22 (2), p.330-345</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar/Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3fc85db2f69d22b5bcdbf57de1210513be53e5f5fa2799f6e7f736900184d2353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3fc85db2f69d22b5bcdbf57de1210513be53e5f5fa2799f6e7f736900184d2353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4396-7102</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/msom.2018.0740$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3679,27901,27902,62589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martagan, Tugce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Ananth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leland, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><title>Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?</title><title>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management</title><description>We consider the challenges and trade-offs involved in the manufacturing of engineered proteins. Manufacturing these proteins involves high risk of financial losses due to the purity and yield trade-offs, uncertainty in the process outcomes, and high operating costs. In this setting, the biomanufacturer must determine how much protein to manufacture in the upstream fermentation operations, and then how much of it to waste in each subsequent purification operation because of the purity–yield trade-offs. We develop a Markov decision model to optimize three layers of interdependent decisions in protein manufacturing: the optimal amount of protein to be produced in upstream operations, the optimal choice of chromatography technique to be used in downstream operations, and the optimal choice of pooling windows during chromatography. The proposed stochastic model dynamically optimizes these three layers of interdependent decisions to maximize the expected profit. The structural analysis derives functional relationships between the purity–yield trade-offs and operating costs, and characterizes the optimal operating policies. The optimal policy also suggests when the biomanufacturer is better off failing early and cutting losses. We use a state aggregation scheme to reduce the computational efforts, and quantify the savings obtained from the use of the optimization model in industry practice at Aldevron.</description><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Markov analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>protein manufacturing</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>quality requirement</subject><subject>random yield</subject><subject>stochastic optimization</subject><issn>1523-4614</issn><issn>1526-5498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMltidvBnErMAqgpFagVDEaPlJL6SisTFToT49ySEnelOuue9Oz0IXTKaMJ5n1030TcIpyxOaSXqEZkzxlCip8-PfXhCZMnmKzmLcUzpwlM_Q3ca2dle3O7wNtnLEA0Rct_gl-M4NdRj3YMuuDwNzg1f-C2_68h13Hr_Z2Lnbc3QC9iO6i786R68Py-1iRdbPj0-L-zUpJaMdEVDmqio4pLrivFBFWRWgssoxzqhionBKOAUKLM-0htRlkIlUj2_Kigsl5uhq2nsI_rN3sTN734d2OGm40EynWuqRSiaqDD7G4MAcQt3Y8G0YNaMlM1oyoyUzWhoCZArULfjQxP_4H8v2aIc</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Martagan, Tugce</creator><creator>Krishnamurthy, Ananth</creator><creator>Leland, Peter A.</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4396-7102</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?</title><author>Martagan, Tugce ; Krishnamurthy, Ananth ; Leland, Peter A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3fc85db2f69d22b5bcdbf57de1210513be53e5f5fa2799f6e7f736900184d2353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Markov analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>protein manufacturing</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>quality requirement</topic><topic>random yield</topic><topic>stochastic optimization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martagan, Tugce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Ananth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leland, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martagan, Tugce</au><au>Krishnamurthy, Ananth</au><au>Leland, Peter A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?</atitle><jtitle>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management</jtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>330</spage><epage>345</epage><pages>330-345</pages><issn>1523-4614</issn><eissn>1526-5498</eissn><abstract>We consider the challenges and trade-offs involved in the manufacturing of engineered proteins. Manufacturing these proteins involves high risk of financial losses due to the purity and yield trade-offs, uncertainty in the process outcomes, and high operating costs. In this setting, the biomanufacturer must determine how much protein to manufacture in the upstream fermentation operations, and then how much of it to waste in each subsequent purification operation because of the purity–yield trade-offs. We develop a Markov decision model to optimize three layers of interdependent decisions in protein manufacturing: the optimal amount of protein to be produced in upstream operations, the optimal choice of chromatography technique to be used in downstream operations, and the optimal choice of pooling windows during chromatography. The proposed stochastic model dynamically optimizes these three layers of interdependent decisions to maximize the expected profit. The structural analysis derives functional relationships between the purity–yield trade-offs and operating costs, and characterizes the optimal operating policies. The optimal policy also suggests when the biomanufacturer is better off failing early and cutting losses. We use a state aggregation scheme to reduce the computational efforts, and quantify the savings obtained from the use of the optimization model in industry practice at Aldevron.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/msom.2018.0740</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4396-7102</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-4614
ispartof Manufacturing & service operations management, 2020-03, Vol.22 (2), p.330-345
issn 1523-4614
1526-5498
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2391969495
source Informs
subjects Chromatography
Cost control
Decision making models
Manufacturing
Markov analysis
Mathematical models
Operating costs
Optimization
protein manufacturing
Proteins
quality requirement
random yield
stochastic optimization
title Managing Trade-offs in Protein Manufacturing: How Much to Waste?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A08%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20Trade-offs%20in%20Protein%20Manufacturing:%20How%20Much%20to%20Waste?&rft.jtitle=Manufacturing%20&%20service%20operations%20management&rft.au=Martagan,%20Tugce&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=330&rft.epage=345&rft.pages=330-345&rft.issn=1523-4614&rft.eissn=1526-5498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/msom.2018.0740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2391969495%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2391969495&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true