Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks
Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2018-11, Vol.10 (11), p.4083 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 4083 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Li, Chenggang Wang, Wuhong Guo, Hongwei Dietrich, André |
description | Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are considered. An empirical study was conducted to determine cultural differences between young Chinese and German drivers with respect to (a) preferences for 18 selected IVS and (b) behavioral effects in six secondary driving tasks. Data from 232 Chinese and 94 German drivers were collected through an online questionnaire and the results indicate that young Chinese drivers value most of the selected IVS designs more significantly than the Germans do, except in categories such as radio, navigation and autonomous emergency braking. In addition, rotary with a display screen is the most preferred interaction modality for both groups. As for behavioral effects when performing secondary tasks, young Chinese drivers are more likely to engage in safety-related scenarios while the Germans in efficiency-related scenarios. An ordinal logistic regression analysis suggested a strong correlation between secondary tasks (looking up navigation, dialing the phone and connecting Bluetooth) and behavioral degradation for young Chinese drivers, whereas the six secondary tasks seem to affect German drivers minimally. Based on the preference analysis and attitudes to behavioral impacts, implications for the design of IVS are discussed to better satisfy needs from drivers of different cultural backgrounds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su10114083 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2389159012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2389159012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-a896033131be07d57d0d5530df29e1df607adef56a765ffee63ac31b0d0301f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKw0AQhhdRsNRefIIFb0J0NusmzbHGqoWCQqvgKWyzszY1zdadpJCTvoav55OYUkHnMnP4-Of_f8ZOBVxImcAlNQKEuIKhPGC9EGIRCFBw-O8-ZgOiFXQjpUhE1GMfqXdEQdqUdeN1yUeVLlsqiDvLX1xTvfIbX2zR0_fnF3_0aNFjlSNx6zyfVMEzLou8RD5rqcY1cV0Zfo1LvS3cTm5sLeY18VQ3hIYvWj7D3FVG-5bPNb3RCTuyuiQc_O4-e7odz9P7YPpwN0lH0yAPE1UHephEO89SLBBio2IDRikJxoYJCmMjiLVBqyIdR6r7iZHUeQeDAQnCStlnZ3vdjXfvDVKdrVzju7CUhXKYCJWACDvqfE_lu1a6tNnGF-vObCYg23Wc_XUsfwAdhnAp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2389159012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Li, Chenggang ; Wang, Wuhong ; Guo, Hongwei ; Dietrich, André</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenggang ; Wang, Wuhong ; Guo, Hongwei ; Dietrich, André</creatorcontrib><description>Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are considered. An empirical study was conducted to determine cultural differences between young Chinese and German drivers with respect to (a) preferences for 18 selected IVS and (b) behavioral effects in six secondary driving tasks. Data from 232 Chinese and 94 German drivers were collected through an online questionnaire and the results indicate that young Chinese drivers value most of the selected IVS designs more significantly than the Germans do, except in categories such as radio, navigation and autonomous emergency braking. In addition, rotary with a display screen is the most preferred interaction modality for both groups. As for behavioral effects when performing secondary tasks, young Chinese drivers are more likely to engage in safety-related scenarios while the Germans in efficiency-related scenarios. An ordinal logistic regression analysis suggested a strong correlation between secondary tasks (looking up navigation, dialing the phone and connecting Bluetooth) and behavioral degradation for young Chinese drivers, whereas the six secondary tasks seem to affect German drivers minimally. Based on the preference analysis and attitudes to behavioral impacts, implications for the design of IVS are discussed to better satisfy needs from drivers of different cultural backgrounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su10114083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Autonomous navigation ; Behavior ; Bluetooth ; Correlation analysis ; Cross cultural studies ; Cultural differences ; Cultural factors ; Design ; Digital music ; Drivers ; Information processing ; Information systems ; Navigation ; Preference analysis ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Researchers</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2018-11, Vol.10 (11), p.4083</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-a896033131be07d57d0d5530df29e1df607adef56a765ffee63ac31b0d0301f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-a896033131be07d57d0d5530df29e1df607adef56a765ffee63ac31b0d0301f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4216-8322</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wuhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, André</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are considered. An empirical study was conducted to determine cultural differences between young Chinese and German drivers with respect to (a) preferences for 18 selected IVS and (b) behavioral effects in six secondary driving tasks. Data from 232 Chinese and 94 German drivers were collected through an online questionnaire and the results indicate that young Chinese drivers value most of the selected IVS designs more significantly than the Germans do, except in categories such as radio, navigation and autonomous emergency braking. In addition, rotary with a display screen is the most preferred interaction modality for both groups. As for behavioral effects when performing secondary tasks, young Chinese drivers are more likely to engage in safety-related scenarios while the Germans in efficiency-related scenarios. An ordinal logistic regression analysis suggested a strong correlation between secondary tasks (looking up navigation, dialing the phone and connecting Bluetooth) and behavioral degradation for young Chinese drivers, whereas the six secondary tasks seem to affect German drivers minimally. Based on the preference analysis and attitudes to behavioral impacts, implications for the design of IVS are discussed to better satisfy needs from drivers of different cultural backgrounds.</description><subject>Autonomous navigation</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Bluetooth</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Digital music</subject><subject>Drivers</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Preference analysis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKw0AQhhdRsNRefIIFb0J0NusmzbHGqoWCQqvgKWyzszY1zdadpJCTvoav55OYUkHnMnP4-Of_f8ZOBVxImcAlNQKEuIKhPGC9EGIRCFBw-O8-ZgOiFXQjpUhE1GMfqXdEQdqUdeN1yUeVLlsqiDvLX1xTvfIbX2zR0_fnF3_0aNFjlSNx6zyfVMEzLou8RD5rqcY1cV0Zfo1LvS3cTm5sLeY18VQ3hIYvWj7D3FVG-5bPNb3RCTuyuiQc_O4-e7odz9P7YPpwN0lH0yAPE1UHephEO89SLBBio2IDRikJxoYJCmMjiLVBqyIdR6r7iZHUeQeDAQnCStlnZ3vdjXfvDVKdrVzju7CUhXKYCJWACDvqfE_lu1a6tNnGF-vObCYg23Wc_XUsfwAdhnAp</recordid><startdate>20181107</startdate><enddate>20181107</enddate><creator>Li, Chenggang</creator><creator>Wang, Wuhong</creator><creator>Guo, Hongwei</creator><creator>Dietrich, André</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4216-8322</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181107</creationdate><title>Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks</title><author>Li, Chenggang ; Wang, Wuhong ; Guo, Hongwei ; Dietrich, André</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-a896033131be07d57d0d5530df29e1df607adef56a765ffee63ac31b0d0301f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Autonomous navigation</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Bluetooth</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Digital music</topic><topic>Drivers</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Preference analysis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wuhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, André</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Chenggang</au><au>Wang, Wuhong</au><au>Guo, Hongwei</au><au>Dietrich, André</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2018-11-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4083</spage><pages>4083-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are considered. An empirical study was conducted to determine cultural differences between young Chinese and German drivers with respect to (a) preferences for 18 selected IVS and (b) behavioral effects in six secondary driving tasks. Data from 232 Chinese and 94 German drivers were collected through an online questionnaire and the results indicate that young Chinese drivers value most of the selected IVS designs more significantly than the Germans do, except in categories such as radio, navigation and autonomous emergency braking. In addition, rotary with a display screen is the most preferred interaction modality for both groups. As for behavioral effects when performing secondary tasks, young Chinese drivers are more likely to engage in safety-related scenarios while the Germans in efficiency-related scenarios. An ordinal logistic regression analysis suggested a strong correlation between secondary tasks (looking up navigation, dialing the phone and connecting Bluetooth) and behavioral degradation for young Chinese drivers, whereas the six secondary tasks seem to affect German drivers minimally. Based on the preference analysis and attitudes to behavioral impacts, implications for the design of IVS are discussed to better satisfy needs from drivers of different cultural backgrounds.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su10114083</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4216-8322</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2018-11, Vol.10 (11), p.4083 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2389159012 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Autonomous navigation Behavior Bluetooth Correlation analysis Cross cultural studies Cultural differences Cultural factors Design Digital music Drivers Information processing Information systems Navigation Preference analysis Questionnaires Regression analysis Researchers |
title | Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A14%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-Cultural%20Analysis%20of%20Young%20Drivers%E2%80%99%20Preferences%20for%20In-Vehicle%20Systems%20and%20Behavioral%20Effects%20Caused%20by%20Secondary%20Tasks&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Li,%20Chenggang&rft.date=2018-11-07&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4083&rft.pages=4083-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su10114083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2389159012%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2389159012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |