Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks

Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2018-11, Vol.10 (11), p.4083
Hauptverfasser: Li, Chenggang, Wang, Wuhong, Guo, Hongwei, Dietrich, André
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 4083
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 10
creator Li, Chenggang
Wang, Wuhong
Guo, Hongwei
Dietrich, André
description Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are considered. An empirical study was conducted to determine cultural differences between young Chinese and German drivers with respect to (a) preferences for 18 selected IVS and (b) behavioral effects in six secondary driving tasks. Data from 232 Chinese and 94 German drivers were collected through an online questionnaire and the results indicate that young Chinese drivers value most of the selected IVS designs more significantly than the Germans do, except in categories such as radio, navigation and autonomous emergency braking. In addition, rotary with a display screen is the most preferred interaction modality for both groups. As for behavioral effects when performing secondary tasks, young Chinese drivers are more likely to engage in safety-related scenarios while the Germans in efficiency-related scenarios. An ordinal logistic regression analysis suggested a strong correlation between secondary tasks (looking up navigation, dialing the phone and connecting Bluetooth) and behavioral degradation for young Chinese drivers, whereas the six secondary tasks seem to affect German drivers minimally. Based on the preference analysis and attitudes to behavioral impacts, implications for the design of IVS are discussed to better satisfy needs from drivers of different cultural backgrounds.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su10114083
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2389159012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2389159012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-a896033131be07d57d0d5530df29e1df607adef56a765ffee63ac31b0d0301f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKw0AQhhdRsNRefIIFb0J0NusmzbHGqoWCQqvgKWyzszY1zdadpJCTvoav55OYUkHnMnP4-Of_f8ZOBVxImcAlNQKEuIKhPGC9EGIRCFBw-O8-ZgOiFXQjpUhE1GMfqXdEQdqUdeN1yUeVLlsqiDvLX1xTvfIbX2zR0_fnF3_0aNFjlSNx6zyfVMEzLou8RD5rqcY1cV0Zfo1LvS3cTm5sLeY18VQ3hIYvWj7D3FVG-5bPNb3RCTuyuiQc_O4-e7odz9P7YPpwN0lH0yAPE1UHephEO89SLBBio2IDRikJxoYJCmMjiLVBqyIdR6r7iZHUeQeDAQnCStlnZ3vdjXfvDVKdrVzju7CUhXKYCJWACDvqfE_lu1a6tNnGF-vObCYg23Wc_XUsfwAdhnAp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2389159012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Li, Chenggang ; Wang, Wuhong ; Guo, Hongwei ; Dietrich, André</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenggang ; Wang, Wuhong ; Guo, Hongwei ; Dietrich, André</creatorcontrib><description>Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are considered. An empirical study was conducted to determine cultural differences between young Chinese and German drivers with respect to (a) preferences for 18 selected IVS and (b) behavioral effects in six secondary driving tasks. Data from 232 Chinese and 94 German drivers were collected through an online questionnaire and the results indicate that young Chinese drivers value most of the selected IVS designs more significantly than the Germans do, except in categories such as radio, navigation and autonomous emergency braking. In addition, rotary with a display screen is the most preferred interaction modality for both groups. As for behavioral effects when performing secondary tasks, young Chinese drivers are more likely to engage in safety-related scenarios while the Germans in efficiency-related scenarios. An ordinal logistic regression analysis suggested a strong correlation between secondary tasks (looking up navigation, dialing the phone and connecting Bluetooth) and behavioral degradation for young Chinese drivers, whereas the six secondary tasks seem to affect German drivers minimally. Based on the preference analysis and attitudes to behavioral impacts, implications for the design of IVS are discussed to better satisfy needs from drivers of different cultural backgrounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su10114083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Autonomous navigation ; Behavior ; Bluetooth ; Correlation analysis ; Cross cultural studies ; Cultural differences ; Cultural factors ; Design ; Digital music ; Drivers ; Information processing ; Information systems ; Navigation ; Preference analysis ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Researchers</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2018-11, Vol.10 (11), p.4083</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-a896033131be07d57d0d5530df29e1df607adef56a765ffee63ac31b0d0301f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-a896033131be07d57d0d5530df29e1df607adef56a765ffee63ac31b0d0301f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4216-8322</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wuhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, André</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are considered. An empirical study was conducted to determine cultural differences between young Chinese and German drivers with respect to (a) preferences for 18 selected IVS and (b) behavioral effects in six secondary driving tasks. Data from 232 Chinese and 94 German drivers were collected through an online questionnaire and the results indicate that young Chinese drivers value most of the selected IVS designs more significantly than the Germans do, except in categories such as radio, navigation and autonomous emergency braking. In addition, rotary with a display screen is the most preferred interaction modality for both groups. As for behavioral effects when performing secondary tasks, young Chinese drivers are more likely to engage in safety-related scenarios while the Germans in efficiency-related scenarios. An ordinal logistic regression analysis suggested a strong correlation between secondary tasks (looking up navigation, dialing the phone and connecting Bluetooth) and behavioral degradation for young Chinese drivers, whereas the six secondary tasks seem to affect German drivers minimally. Based on the preference analysis and attitudes to behavioral impacts, implications for the design of IVS are discussed to better satisfy needs from drivers of different cultural backgrounds.</description><subject>Autonomous navigation</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Bluetooth</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Digital music</subject><subject>Drivers</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Preference analysis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKw0AQhhdRsNRefIIFb0J0NusmzbHGqoWCQqvgKWyzszY1zdadpJCTvoav55OYUkHnMnP4-Of_f8ZOBVxImcAlNQKEuIKhPGC9EGIRCFBw-O8-ZgOiFXQjpUhE1GMfqXdEQdqUdeN1yUeVLlsqiDvLX1xTvfIbX2zR0_fnF3_0aNFjlSNx6zyfVMEzLou8RD5rqcY1cV0Zfo1LvS3cTm5sLeY18VQ3hIYvWj7D3FVG-5bPNb3RCTuyuiQc_O4-e7odz9P7YPpwN0lH0yAPE1UHephEO89SLBBio2IDRikJxoYJCmMjiLVBqyIdR6r7iZHUeQeDAQnCStlnZ3vdjXfvDVKdrVzju7CUhXKYCJWACDvqfE_lu1a6tNnGF-vObCYg23Wc_XUsfwAdhnAp</recordid><startdate>20181107</startdate><enddate>20181107</enddate><creator>Li, Chenggang</creator><creator>Wang, Wuhong</creator><creator>Guo, Hongwei</creator><creator>Dietrich, André</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4216-8322</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181107</creationdate><title>Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks</title><author>Li, Chenggang ; Wang, Wuhong ; Guo, Hongwei ; Dietrich, André</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-a896033131be07d57d0d5530df29e1df607adef56a765ffee63ac31b0d0301f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Autonomous navigation</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Bluetooth</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Digital music</topic><topic>Drivers</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Preference analysis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wuhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, André</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Chenggang</au><au>Wang, Wuhong</au><au>Guo, Hongwei</au><au>Dietrich, André</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2018-11-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4083</spage><pages>4083-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are considered. An empirical study was conducted to determine cultural differences between young Chinese and German drivers with respect to (a) preferences for 18 selected IVS and (b) behavioral effects in six secondary driving tasks. Data from 232 Chinese and 94 German drivers were collected through an online questionnaire and the results indicate that young Chinese drivers value most of the selected IVS designs more significantly than the Germans do, except in categories such as radio, navigation and autonomous emergency braking. In addition, rotary with a display screen is the most preferred interaction modality for both groups. As for behavioral effects when performing secondary tasks, young Chinese drivers are more likely to engage in safety-related scenarios while the Germans in efficiency-related scenarios. An ordinal logistic regression analysis suggested a strong correlation between secondary tasks (looking up navigation, dialing the phone and connecting Bluetooth) and behavioral degradation for young Chinese drivers, whereas the six secondary tasks seem to affect German drivers minimally. Based on the preference analysis and attitudes to behavioral impacts, implications for the design of IVS are discussed to better satisfy needs from drivers of different cultural backgrounds.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su10114083</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4216-8322</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2018-11, Vol.10 (11), p.4083
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2389159012
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Autonomous navigation
Behavior
Bluetooth
Correlation analysis
Cross cultural studies
Cultural differences
Cultural factors
Design
Digital music
Drivers
Information processing
Information systems
Navigation
Preference analysis
Questionnaires
Regression analysis
Researchers
title Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A14%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-Cultural%20Analysis%20of%20Young%20Drivers%E2%80%99%20Preferences%20for%20In-Vehicle%20Systems%20and%20Behavioral%20Effects%20Caused%20by%20Secondary%20Tasks&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Li,%20Chenggang&rft.date=2018-11-07&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4083&rft.pages=4083-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su10114083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2389159012%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2389159012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true