Influence of the European Semester on national public sector reforms under conditions of fiscal consolidation: The policy of conditionality in Italy 2011–2015

This article applies the Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier “governance by conditionality” framework to public sector reform in a European Union (EU) country subject to implicit rather than explicit conditionality in the context of severe fiscal consolidation. It analyses the reform programmes of the gov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public policy and administration 2020-04, Vol.35 (2), p.201-223
Hauptverfasser: Di Mascio, Fabrizio, Natalini, Alessandro, Ongaro, Edoardo, Stolfi, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 223
container_issue 2
container_start_page 201
container_title Public policy and administration
container_volume 35
creator Di Mascio, Fabrizio
Natalini, Alessandro
Ongaro, Edoardo
Stolfi, Francesco
description This article applies the Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier “governance by conditionality” framework to public sector reform in a European Union (EU) country subject to implicit rather than explicit conditionality in the context of severe fiscal consolidation. It analyses the reform programmes of the governments that alternated in power in Italy over 2011–2015, focusing on three major areas of public sector reform – fiscal consolidation, labour market reform and liberalization – in the context of the Country-Specific Recommendations–National Reform Plan (CSR-NRP) cycle. We show that the EU has influenced governance (budget institutions and the governance structure of the NRP process) as well as the content of reforms. These results are consistent with the Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier framework regarding the importance of external incentives in explaining adoption and implementation of reforms. Our findings confirm not only the importance of material conditions and their credibility in explaining the fit between EU recommendations and domestic reforms, but also the significance of the strategic usage of Europe by domestic policy makers, which has become more important as the legitimacy of the EU has decreased among voters. We conclude with some reflections on the implications of our research for the ongoing debate on the reform of the European Semester, in particular with regard to the question of how to ensure a higher fit between EU recommendation and domestic policies.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0952076718814892
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2389148202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0952076718814892</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2389148202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-72e1895ae5d560741302443d160a12e40af741824edaac01363bcc3a015260f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EEqWwZ2mJdWD8yIsdqnhUqsSCso5cZwKuUjvYyaI77sAFOBsnwaEIJCRWI898_z8zHkJOGZwzlucXUKYc8ixnRcFkUfI9MmG5LBPJSr5PJmM5GeuH5CiENUDKOU8n5H1um3ZAq5G6hvbPSK8H7zpUlj7gBkOPnjpLreqNs6ql3bBqjaYBde889dg4vwl0sHXktLO1GbkwejUm6CiIyeBaU38ZXNJl7NDFt96OzI9CtabfUmPpvFftlnJg7OP1LYb0mBw0qg148h2n5PHmejm7Sxb3t_PZ1SLRAso-yTmyokwVpnWaQS6ZAC6lqFkGinGUoJqYLLjEWikNTGRipbVQsQPPoJFiSs52vp13L0NcvFq7wcfBQsVFUcY_5cAjBTtKexdCXL_qvNkov60YVOMdqr93iJJkJwnqCX9N_-U_AaKmiPo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2389148202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of the European Semester on national public sector reforms under conditions of fiscal consolidation: The policy of conditionality in Italy 2011–2015</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Di Mascio, Fabrizio ; Natalini, Alessandro ; Ongaro, Edoardo ; Stolfi, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Mascio, Fabrizio ; Natalini, Alessandro ; Ongaro, Edoardo ; Stolfi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>This article applies the Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier “governance by conditionality” framework to public sector reform in a European Union (EU) country subject to implicit rather than explicit conditionality in the context of severe fiscal consolidation. It analyses the reform programmes of the governments that alternated in power in Italy over 2011–2015, focusing on three major areas of public sector reform – fiscal consolidation, labour market reform and liberalization – in the context of the Country-Specific Recommendations–National Reform Plan (CSR-NRP) cycle. We show that the EU has influenced governance (budget institutions and the governance structure of the NRP process) as well as the content of reforms. These results are consistent with the Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier framework regarding the importance of external incentives in explaining adoption and implementation of reforms. Our findings confirm not only the importance of material conditions and their credibility in explaining the fit between EU recommendations and domestic reforms, but also the significance of the strategic usage of Europe by domestic policy makers, which has become more important as the legitimacy of the EU has decreased among voters. We conclude with some reflections on the implications of our research for the ongoing debate on the reform of the European Semester, in particular with regard to the question of how to ensure a higher fit between EU recommendation and domestic policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-0767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-4192</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0952076718814892</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Austerity policy ; Coordination ; Governance ; Labor market ; Legitimacy ; Liberalization ; Market economies ; National debt ; Policy making ; Public sector ; Reforms ; Voters</subject><ispartof>Public policy and administration, 2020-04, Vol.35 (2), p.201-223</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-72e1895ae5d560741302443d160a12e40af741824edaac01363bcc3a015260f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-72e1895ae5d560741302443d160a12e40af741824edaac01363bcc3a015260f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6165-6335</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0952076718814892$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0952076718814892$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27853,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Mascio, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natalini, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongaro, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolfi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of the European Semester on national public sector reforms under conditions of fiscal consolidation: The policy of conditionality in Italy 2011–2015</title><title>Public policy and administration</title><description>This article applies the Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier “governance by conditionality” framework to public sector reform in a European Union (EU) country subject to implicit rather than explicit conditionality in the context of severe fiscal consolidation. It analyses the reform programmes of the governments that alternated in power in Italy over 2011–2015, focusing on three major areas of public sector reform – fiscal consolidation, labour market reform and liberalization – in the context of the Country-Specific Recommendations–National Reform Plan (CSR-NRP) cycle. We show that the EU has influenced governance (budget institutions and the governance structure of the NRP process) as well as the content of reforms. These results are consistent with the Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier framework regarding the importance of external incentives in explaining adoption and implementation of reforms. Our findings confirm not only the importance of material conditions and their credibility in explaining the fit between EU recommendations and domestic reforms, but also the significance of the strategic usage of Europe by domestic policy makers, which has become more important as the legitimacy of the EU has decreased among voters. We conclude with some reflections on the implications of our research for the ongoing debate on the reform of the European Semester, in particular with regard to the question of how to ensure a higher fit between EU recommendation and domestic policies.</description><subject>Austerity policy</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Liberalization</subject><subject>Market economies</subject><subject>National debt</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Voters</subject><issn>0952-0767</issn><issn>1749-4192</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EEqWwZ2mJdWD8yIsdqnhUqsSCso5cZwKuUjvYyaI77sAFOBsnwaEIJCRWI898_z8zHkJOGZwzlucXUKYc8ixnRcFkUfI9MmG5LBPJSr5PJmM5GeuH5CiENUDKOU8n5H1um3ZAq5G6hvbPSK8H7zpUlj7gBkOPnjpLreqNs6ql3bBqjaYBde889dg4vwl0sHXktLO1GbkwejUm6CiIyeBaU38ZXNJl7NDFt96OzI9CtabfUmPpvFftlnJg7OP1LYb0mBw0qg148h2n5PHmejm7Sxb3t_PZ1SLRAso-yTmyokwVpnWaQS6ZAC6lqFkGinGUoJqYLLjEWikNTGRipbVQsQPPoJFiSs52vp13L0NcvFq7wcfBQsVFUcY_5cAjBTtKexdCXL_qvNkov60YVOMdqr93iJJkJwnqCX9N_-U_AaKmiPo</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Di Mascio, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Natalini, Alessandro</creator><creator>Ongaro, Edoardo</creator><creator>Stolfi, Francesco</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6165-6335</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Influence of the European Semester on national public sector reforms under conditions of fiscal consolidation: The policy of conditionality in Italy 2011–2015</title><author>Di Mascio, Fabrizio ; Natalini, Alessandro ; Ongaro, Edoardo ; Stolfi, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-72e1895ae5d560741302443d160a12e40af741824edaac01363bcc3a015260f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Austerity policy</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Liberalization</topic><topic>Market economies</topic><topic>National debt</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Voters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Mascio, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natalini, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongaro, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolfi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public policy and administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Mascio, Fabrizio</au><au>Natalini, Alessandro</au><au>Ongaro, Edoardo</au><au>Stolfi, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of the European Semester on national public sector reforms under conditions of fiscal consolidation: The policy of conditionality in Italy 2011–2015</atitle><jtitle>Public policy and administration</jtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>201-223</pages><issn>0952-0767</issn><eissn>1749-4192</eissn><abstract>This article applies the Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier “governance by conditionality” framework to public sector reform in a European Union (EU) country subject to implicit rather than explicit conditionality in the context of severe fiscal consolidation. It analyses the reform programmes of the governments that alternated in power in Italy over 2011–2015, focusing on three major areas of public sector reform – fiscal consolidation, labour market reform and liberalization – in the context of the Country-Specific Recommendations–National Reform Plan (CSR-NRP) cycle. We show that the EU has influenced governance (budget institutions and the governance structure of the NRP process) as well as the content of reforms. These results are consistent with the Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier framework regarding the importance of external incentives in explaining adoption and implementation of reforms. Our findings confirm not only the importance of material conditions and their credibility in explaining the fit between EU recommendations and domestic reforms, but also the significance of the strategic usage of Europe by domestic policy makers, which has become more important as the legitimacy of the EU has decreased among voters. We conclude with some reflections on the implications of our research for the ongoing debate on the reform of the European Semester, in particular with regard to the question of how to ensure a higher fit between EU recommendation and domestic policies.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0952076718814892</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6165-6335</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-0767
ispartof Public policy and administration, 2020-04, Vol.35 (2), p.201-223
issn 0952-0767
1749-4192
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2389148202
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Austerity policy
Coordination
Governance
Labor market
Legitimacy
Liberalization
Market economies
National debt
Policy making
Public sector
Reforms
Voters
title Influence of the European Semester on national public sector reforms under conditions of fiscal consolidation: The policy of conditionality in Italy 2011–2015
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T14%3A12%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20the%20European%20Semester%20on%20national%20public%20sector%20reforms%20under%20conditions%20of%20fiscal%20consolidation:%20The%20policy%20of%20conditionality%20in%20Italy%202011%E2%80%932015&rft.jtitle=Public%20policy%20and%20administration&rft.au=Di%20Mascio,%20Fabrizio&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=201-223&rft.issn=0952-0767&rft.eissn=1749-4192&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0952076718814892&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2389148202%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2389148202&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0952076718814892&rfr_iscdi=true