The Development of a Quasi-Loss and Damage Compensatory System for Developing Countries through Climate Litigation
The Paris Agreement of COP21 distinctly recognises the issue of climate change loss and damage with Article 8 in the main text and Paragraph 51 in its decision text. The Parties at COP22 in Marrakesh 2016 approved a strategic workstream for the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage’s Ex...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Carbon & climate law review : CCLR 2020, Vol.14 (1), p.56-69 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 69 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 56 |
container_title | Carbon & climate law review : CCLR |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Marke, Alastair Ramanand, Sarisha Akdag, Kamil Daniel |
description | The Paris Agreement of COP21 distinctly recognises the issue of climate change loss and damage with Article 8 in the main text and Paragraph 51 in its decision text. The Parties at COP22 in Marrakesh 2016 approved a strategic workstream for the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage’s Executive Committee to guide the implementation of the Mechanism’s function of enhancing action and support (including finance, technology and capacity-building) to address loss and damage, with the next progress review in 2019. International negotiations on loss and damage did not see considerable progress at COP23 in Bonn. Financial interests still took priority at COP24 to halt accounting mechanisms. COP25 also failed with a lack of consensus amongst post-2020 tasks such as art 6. With reference to some evolving legal principles in other related fields of international law and civil environment cases in Germany, United States, India and China, this paper will examine possible options to prove causal links between the economic activities of developed countries and loss and damage associated with the impact of climate change for developing countries against the backdrop of the Sendai Framework. An alternative standard of proof for climate change loss and damage-related litigations would culminate into a quasi-loss-and-damage compensatory response for countries more vulnerable to the impact of climate change. It could support the implementation and amplify the effectiveness of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21552/cclr/2020/1/8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2389141360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26910935</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26910935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c191t-a80805446b185422fdbabb4428b0cb621c42ceccb0d47c792fa09e86820384783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwsiFZYmBKe3ac1B5Ry5cUCSHKbDmu06ZK4mI7qP3vcSmU6Yb7vXf3HkLXBEaUZBkda924MQUKYzLmJ2hAiYCE0xRO0YDwnCVCADtHF96vAXKWAhsgN18ZPDNfprGb1nQB2wor_NYrXyeF9R6rboFnqlVLg6e23ZjOq2DdDr_vfDAtrqz7k9fdMiJ9F1xtPA4rZ_vlCk-bulXB4KIO9VKF2naX6KxSjTdXv3OIPh4f5tPnpHh9epneF4kmgoREceCQMZaXhGeM0mpRqrJkjPISdJlTohnVRusSFmyiJ4JWCoThOaeQcjbh6RDdHnw3zn72xge5tr3r4klJUy4II2kOkRodKO1iXGcquXHxY7eTBORPr3Lfq9z3Konc294dBI3ZbmOcI_-PAZEAIpI3B3LtY2VHjuaCxG2WfgMYK4Ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2389141360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Development of a Quasi-Loss and Damage Compensatory System for Developing Countries through Climate Litigation</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Marke, Alastair ; Ramanand, Sarisha ; Akdag, Kamil Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Marke, Alastair ; Ramanand, Sarisha ; Akdag, Kamil Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>The Paris Agreement of COP21 distinctly recognises the issue of climate change loss and damage with Article 8 in the main text and Paragraph 51 in its decision text. The Parties at COP22 in Marrakesh 2016 approved a strategic workstream for the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage’s Executive Committee to guide the implementation of the Mechanism’s function of enhancing action and support (including finance, technology and capacity-building) to address loss and damage, with the next progress review in 2019. International negotiations on loss and damage did not see considerable progress at COP23 in Bonn. Financial interests still took priority at COP24 to halt accounting mechanisms. COP25 also failed with a lack of consensus amongst post-2020 tasks such as art 6. With reference to some evolving legal principles in other related fields of international law and civil environment cases in Germany, United States, India and China, this paper will examine possible options to prove causal links between the economic activities of developed countries and loss and damage associated with the impact of climate change for developing countries against the backdrop of the Sendai Framework. An alternative standard of proof for climate change loss and damage-related litigations would culminate into a quasi-loss-and-damage compensatory response for countries more vulnerable to the impact of climate change. It could support the implementation and amplify the effectiveness of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1864-9904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-8230</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21552/cclr/2020/1/8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Adaptation ; Capacity development ; Climate adaptation ; Climate change ; Compensation ; Developed countries ; Developing countries ; Disaster management ; Disaster risk ; Emergency preparedness ; Emissions ; Environmental impact ; Environmental law ; Environmental protection ; Federal court decisions ; Greenhouse effect ; Impact damage ; Industrialized nations ; International agreements ; International law ; LDCs ; Liability ; Litigation ; Negotiations ; Paris Agreement ; Principles ; Risk management ; Risk reduction</subject><ispartof>Carbon & climate law review : CCLR, 2020, Vol.14 (1), p.56-69</ispartof><rights>copyright by Lexxion</rights><rights>Copyright Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 2020</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26910935$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26910935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27923,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marke, Alastair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanand, Sarisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akdag, Kamil Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>The Development of a Quasi-Loss and Damage Compensatory System for Developing Countries through Climate Litigation</title><title>Carbon & climate law review : CCLR</title><description>The Paris Agreement of COP21 distinctly recognises the issue of climate change loss and damage with Article 8 in the main text and Paragraph 51 in its decision text. The Parties at COP22 in Marrakesh 2016 approved a strategic workstream for the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage’s Executive Committee to guide the implementation of the Mechanism’s function of enhancing action and support (including finance, technology and capacity-building) to address loss and damage, with the next progress review in 2019. International negotiations on loss and damage did not see considerable progress at COP23 in Bonn. Financial interests still took priority at COP24 to halt accounting mechanisms. COP25 also failed with a lack of consensus amongst post-2020 tasks such as art 6. With reference to some evolving legal principles in other related fields of international law and civil environment cases in Germany, United States, India and China, this paper will examine possible options to prove causal links between the economic activities of developed countries and loss and damage associated with the impact of climate change for developing countries against the backdrop of the Sendai Framework. An alternative standard of proof for climate change loss and damage-related litigations would culminate into a quasi-loss-and-damage compensatory response for countries more vulnerable to the impact of climate change. It could support the implementation and amplify the effectiveness of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Capacity development</subject><subject>Climate adaptation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Disaster management</subject><subject>Disaster risk</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Impact damage</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Paris Agreement</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><issn>1864-9904</issn><issn>2190-8230</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwsiFZYmBKe3ac1B5Ry5cUCSHKbDmu06ZK4mI7qP3vcSmU6Yb7vXf3HkLXBEaUZBkda924MQUKYzLmJ2hAiYCE0xRO0YDwnCVCADtHF96vAXKWAhsgN18ZPDNfprGb1nQB2wor_NYrXyeF9R6rboFnqlVLg6e23ZjOq2DdDr_vfDAtrqz7k9fdMiJ9F1xtPA4rZ_vlCk-bulXB4KIO9VKF2naX6KxSjTdXv3OIPh4f5tPnpHh9epneF4kmgoREceCQMZaXhGeM0mpRqrJkjPISdJlTohnVRusSFmyiJ4JWCoThOaeQcjbh6RDdHnw3zn72xge5tr3r4klJUy4II2kOkRodKO1iXGcquXHxY7eTBORPr3Lfq9z3Konc294dBI3ZbmOcI_-PAZEAIpI3B3LtY2VHjuaCxG2WfgMYK4Ng</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Marke, Alastair</creator><creator>Ramanand, Sarisha</creator><creator>Akdag, Kamil Daniel</creator><general>Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH</general><general>Lexxion Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>The Development of a Quasi-Loss and Damage Compensatory System for Developing Countries through Climate Litigation</title><author>Marke, Alastair ; Ramanand, Sarisha ; Akdag, Kamil Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c191t-a80805446b185422fdbabb4428b0cb621c42ceccb0d47c792fa09e86820384783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Capacity development</topic><topic>Climate adaptation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Disaster management</topic><topic>Disaster risk</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Impact damage</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Paris Agreement</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marke, Alastair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanand, Sarisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akdag, Kamil Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Carbon & climate law review : CCLR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marke, Alastair</au><au>Ramanand, Sarisha</au><au>Akdag, Kamil Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Development of a Quasi-Loss and Damage Compensatory System for Developing Countries through Climate Litigation</atitle><jtitle>Carbon & climate law review : CCLR</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>56-69</pages><issn>1864-9904</issn><eissn>2190-8230</eissn><abstract>The Paris Agreement of COP21 distinctly recognises the issue of climate change loss and damage with Article 8 in the main text and Paragraph 51 in its decision text. The Parties at COP22 in Marrakesh 2016 approved a strategic workstream for the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage’s Executive Committee to guide the implementation of the Mechanism’s function of enhancing action and support (including finance, technology and capacity-building) to address loss and damage, with the next progress review in 2019. International negotiations on loss and damage did not see considerable progress at COP23 in Bonn. Financial interests still took priority at COP24 to halt accounting mechanisms. COP25 also failed with a lack of consensus amongst post-2020 tasks such as art 6. With reference to some evolving legal principles in other related fields of international law and civil environment cases in Germany, United States, India and China, this paper will examine possible options to prove causal links between the economic activities of developed countries and loss and damage associated with the impact of climate change for developing countries against the backdrop of the Sendai Framework. An alternative standard of proof for climate change loss and damage-related litigations would culminate into a quasi-loss-and-damage compensatory response for countries more vulnerable to the impact of climate change. It could support the implementation and amplify the effectiveness of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH</pub><doi>10.21552/cclr/2020/1/8</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1864-9904 |
ispartof | Carbon & climate law review : CCLR, 2020, Vol.14 (1), p.56-69 |
issn | 1864-9904 2190-8230 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2389141360 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Accounting Adaptation Capacity development Climate adaptation Climate change Compensation Developed countries Developing countries Disaster management Disaster risk Emergency preparedness Emissions Environmental impact Environmental law Environmental protection Federal court decisions Greenhouse effect Impact damage Industrialized nations International agreements International law LDCs Liability Litigation Negotiations Paris Agreement Principles Risk management Risk reduction |
title | The Development of a Quasi-Loss and Damage Compensatory System for Developing Countries through Climate Litigation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T08%3A14%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Development%20of%20a%20Quasi-Loss%20and%20Damage%20Compensatory%20System%20for%20Developing%20Countries%20through%20Climate%20Litigation&rft.jtitle=Carbon%20&%20climate%20law%20review%20:%20CCLR&rft.au=Marke,%20Alastair&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=56-69&rft.issn=1864-9904&rft.eissn=2190-8230&rft_id=info:doi/10.21552/cclr/2020/1/8&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26910935%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2389141360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26910935&rfr_iscdi=true |