Enhancing responsiveness and consistency: Comparing the collective use of discretion and discretionary room at inspectorates in England and the Netherlands

Discretion used to be considered a feature of individuals, but growing literature shows that it has collective features as well. To develop an understanding of the individual and cooperative work of inspectors in using discretion and the discretionary room granted to them, we compared two inspectora...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regulation & governance 2017-03, Vol.11 (1), p.81-94
Hauptverfasser: Rutz, Suzanne, Mathew, Dinah, Robben, Paul, Bont, Antoinette
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 94
container_issue 1
container_start_page 81
container_title Regulation & governance
container_volume 11
creator Rutz, Suzanne
Mathew, Dinah
Robben, Paul
Bont, Antoinette
description Discretion used to be considered a feature of individuals, but growing literature shows that it has collective features as well. To develop an understanding of the individual and cooperative work of inspectors in using discretion and the discretionary room granted to them, we compared two inspectorates: the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England and the Joint Inspectorate for Youth (JIY) in the Netherlands. Our analysis reveals that inspectors engage with colleagues, managers, and stakeholders to include other perspectives, gain mandate, and broaden their repertoire. At the CQC, inspectors use their discretion collectively; on their own initiative, they involve others in balancing and interpreting rules to reach judgments. At the JIY, teamwork is central and regulatory teams are granted collective discretionary room. We argue that collective work permits both responsiveness and consistency. In studying the judgments of inspectors and other street‐level bureaucrats, it is vital to look at collective work and how it combines consistency and responsiveness.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/rego.12101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2389081524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1873084541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2861-5aea654964e519327fb7aa1ae6641d9fa5aa0dde3817d62abe98fecd988783db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9KAzEQxhdRsFYvPkHA89bMZv8k3qSsVSgWRM8h3cy2W7bJmmyVPosva7YVvRmYZL7kNzOEL4qugU4grFuHKzuBBCicRCMoUh5nQsDpb87ZeXTh_YbSnCYJG0VfpVkrUzVmRRz6zhrffKBB74kymlSD9j2aan9HpnbbKTeQ_RrDU9ti1Qea7DwSWxPd-Mph31hzqP2Tyu2Js3ZLVE8a47tQZp3q0QdFSrNqB3yIoe8zht0NV_4yOqtV6_Hq5xxHbw_l6_Qxni9mT9P7edwlPIc4U6jyLBV5ihkIlhT1slAKFOZ5ClrUKlOKao2MQ6HzRC1R8BorLTgvONNLNo5ujn07Z9936Hu5sTtnwkiZMC4ohyxJ_6OAF4zyNEshUHCkPpsW97JzzTZ8XwKVgz9y8Ece_JEv5WxxyNg3x-2JVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1873084541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing responsiveness and consistency: Comparing the collective use of discretion and discretionary room at inspectorates in England and the Netherlands</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Rutz, Suzanne ; Mathew, Dinah ; Robben, Paul ; Bont, Antoinette</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutz, Suzanne ; Mathew, Dinah ; Robben, Paul ; Bont, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><description>Discretion used to be considered a feature of individuals, but growing literature shows that it has collective features as well. To develop an understanding of the individual and cooperative work of inspectors in using discretion and the discretionary room granted to them, we compared two inspectorates: the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England and the Joint Inspectorate for Youth (JIY) in the Netherlands. Our analysis reveals that inspectors engage with colleagues, managers, and stakeholders to include other perspectives, gain mandate, and broaden their repertoire. At the CQC, inspectors use their discretion collectively; on their own initiative, they involve others in balancing and interpreting rules to reach judgments. At the JIY, teamwork is central and regulatory teams are granted collective discretionary room. We argue that collective work permits both responsiveness and consistency. In studying the judgments of inspectors and other street‐level bureaucrats, it is vital to look at collective work and how it combines consistency and responsiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-5983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rego.12101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Evanston: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cooperation ; discretion ; discretionary room ; inspectors ; Interest groups ; Quality of care ; Regulation ; street‐level bureaucrats ; Teams ; Teamwork ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Regulation &amp; governance, 2017-03, Vol.11 (1), p.81-94</ispartof><rights>2015 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frego.12101$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frego.12101$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutz, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Dinah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robben, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bont, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing responsiveness and consistency: Comparing the collective use of discretion and discretionary room at inspectorates in England and the Netherlands</title><title>Regulation &amp; governance</title><description>Discretion used to be considered a feature of individuals, but growing literature shows that it has collective features as well. To develop an understanding of the individual and cooperative work of inspectors in using discretion and the discretionary room granted to them, we compared two inspectorates: the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England and the Joint Inspectorate for Youth (JIY) in the Netherlands. Our analysis reveals that inspectors engage with colleagues, managers, and stakeholders to include other perspectives, gain mandate, and broaden their repertoire. At the CQC, inspectors use their discretion collectively; on their own initiative, they involve others in balancing and interpreting rules to reach judgments. At the JIY, teamwork is central and regulatory teams are granted collective discretionary room. We argue that collective work permits both responsiveness and consistency. In studying the judgments of inspectors and other street‐level bureaucrats, it is vital to look at collective work and how it combines consistency and responsiveness.</description><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>discretion</subject><subject>discretionary room</subject><subject>inspectors</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>street‐level bureaucrats</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1748-5983</issn><issn>1748-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9KAzEQxhdRsFYvPkHA89bMZv8k3qSsVSgWRM8h3cy2W7bJmmyVPosva7YVvRmYZL7kNzOEL4qugU4grFuHKzuBBCicRCMoUh5nQsDpb87ZeXTh_YbSnCYJG0VfpVkrUzVmRRz6zhrffKBB74kymlSD9j2aan9HpnbbKTeQ_RrDU9ti1Qea7DwSWxPd-Mph31hzqP2Tyu2Js3ZLVE8a47tQZp3q0QdFSrNqB3yIoe8zht0NV_4yOqtV6_Hq5xxHbw_l6_Qxni9mT9P7edwlPIc4U6jyLBV5ihkIlhT1slAKFOZ5ClrUKlOKao2MQ6HzRC1R8BorLTgvONNLNo5ujn07Z9936Hu5sTtnwkiZMC4ohyxJ_6OAF4zyNEshUHCkPpsW97JzzTZ8XwKVgz9y8Ece_JEv5WxxyNg3x-2JVQ</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Rutz, Suzanne</creator><creator>Mathew, Dinah</creator><creator>Robben, Paul</creator><creator>Bont, Antoinette</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Enhancing responsiveness and consistency: Comparing the collective use of discretion and discretionary room at inspectorates in England and the Netherlands</title><author>Rutz, Suzanne ; Mathew, Dinah ; Robben, Paul ; Bont, Antoinette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2861-5aea654964e519327fb7aa1ae6641d9fa5aa0dde3817d62abe98fecd988783db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>discretion</topic><topic>discretionary room</topic><topic>inspectors</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>street‐level bureaucrats</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutz, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Dinah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robben, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bont, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Regulation &amp; governance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutz, Suzanne</au><au>Mathew, Dinah</au><au>Robben, Paul</au><au>Bont, Antoinette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing responsiveness and consistency: Comparing the collective use of discretion and discretionary room at inspectorates in England and the Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>Regulation &amp; governance</jtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>81-94</pages><issn>1748-5983</issn><eissn>1748-5991</eissn><abstract>Discretion used to be considered a feature of individuals, but growing literature shows that it has collective features as well. To develop an understanding of the individual and cooperative work of inspectors in using discretion and the discretionary room granted to them, we compared two inspectorates: the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England and the Joint Inspectorate for Youth (JIY) in the Netherlands. Our analysis reveals that inspectors engage with colleagues, managers, and stakeholders to include other perspectives, gain mandate, and broaden their repertoire. At the CQC, inspectors use their discretion collectively; on their own initiative, they involve others in balancing and interpreting rules to reach judgments. At the JIY, teamwork is central and regulatory teams are granted collective discretionary room. We argue that collective work permits both responsiveness and consistency. In studying the judgments of inspectors and other street‐level bureaucrats, it is vital to look at collective work and how it combines consistency and responsiveness.</abstract><cop>Evanston</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/rego.12101</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-5983
ispartof Regulation & governance, 2017-03, Vol.11 (1), p.81-94
issn 1748-5983
1748-5991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2389081524
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Cooperation
discretion
discretionary room
inspectors
Interest groups
Quality of care
Regulation
street‐level bureaucrats
Teams
Teamwork
Youth
title Enhancing responsiveness and consistency: Comparing the collective use of discretion and discretionary room at inspectorates in England and the Netherlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T19%3A44%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20responsiveness%20and%20consistency:%20Comparing%20the%20collective%20use%20of%20discretion%20and%20discretionary%20room%20at%20inspectorates%20in%20England%20and%20the%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=Regulation%20&%20governance&rft.au=Rutz,%20Suzanne&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=81-94&rft.issn=1748-5983&rft.eissn=1748-5991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rego.12101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1873084541%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1873084541&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true