A Large Ensemble Approach to Quantifying Internal Model Variability Within the WRF Numerical Model
The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) community model is widely used to explore cross‐scale atmospheric features. Although WRF uncertainty studies exist, these usually involve ensembles where different physics options are selected (e.g., the boundary layer scheme) or adjusting individual parame...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2020-04, Vol.125 (7), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Bassett, R. Young, P. J. Blair, G. S. Samreen, F. Simm, W. |
description | The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) community model is widely used to explore cross‐scale atmospheric features. Although WRF uncertainty studies exist, these usually involve ensembles where different physics options are selected (e.g., the boundary layer scheme) or adjusting individual parameters. Uncertainty from perturbing initial conditions, which generates internal model variability (IMV), has rarely been considered. Moreover, many off‐line WRF research studies generate conclusions based on a single model run without addressing any form of uncertainty. To demonstrate the importance of IMV, or noise, we present a 4‐month case study of summer 2018 over London, UK, using a 244‐member initial condition ensemble. Simply by changing the model start time, a median 2‐m temperature range or IMV of 1.2 °C was found (occasionally exceeding 8 °C). During our analysis, episodes of high and low IMV were found for all variables explored, explained by a relationship with the boundary condition data. Periods of slower wind speed input contained increased IMV, and vice versa, which we hypothesis is related to how strongly the boundary conditions influence the nested region. We also show the importance of IMV effects for the uncertainty of derived variables like the urban heat island, whose median variation in magnitude is 1 °C. Finally, a realistic ensemble size to capture the majority of WRF IMV is also estimated, essential considering the high computational overheads (244 members equaled 140,000 CPU hours). We envisage that highlighting considerable IMV in this repeatable manner will help advance best practices for the WRF and wider regional climate modeling community.
Plain Language Summary
The Weather Research and Forecasting model is typically used to dynamically downscale atmospheric conditions for limited geographical regions (e.g., southern United Kingdom), using one or more nested grids of increasing resolution, and with externally provided boundary conditions (e.g., from reanalysis data). Research applications of the model (i.e., separate to forecasting) are wide ranging from hurricanes to urban heat islands. However, despite the model being constrained at its boundaries, subtle modifications to initial conditions (e.g., soil moisture) may propagate and lead to different results. We generate an ensemble of 244 different initial conditions simply by changing the model start time and show large differences in modeled temperature and other meteorological f |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019JD031286 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2388902481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2388902481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-e898c8f6623744d24833d3279e519696dca179d7695f4a5f37ecc2c4b3464b4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOHR3_oCAt1bz1TS5HPtyYyoOdd6VNE23jK6dSYr039sxFa98b8578XB4OABcYXSLEZF3BGE5HyGKieAnoEcwl5GQkp_-_sn7Oeh7v0XdCURZzHogG8CFcmsDx5U3u6w0cLDfu1rpDQw1fG5UFWzR2moNZ1UwrlIlfKhzU8I35azKbGlDC1c2bGwFw8bA1XICH5udcVb_oJfgrFClN_3vvACvk_HL8D5aPE1nw8Ei0geVyAgptCg4JzRhLCdMUJpTkkgTY8klz7XCicwTLuOCqbigidGaaJZRxlnGCnoBro-9nf9HY3xIt3VzMPYpoUJI1FXijro5UtrV3jtTpHtnd8q1KUbpYcj075AdTo_4py1N-y-bzqfLUcwxYfQLQ0Zyjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388902481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Large Ensemble Approach to Quantifying Internal Model Variability Within the WRF Numerical Model</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bassett, R. ; Young, P. J. ; Blair, G. S. ; Samreen, F. ; Simm, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bassett, R. ; Young, P. J. ; Blair, G. S. ; Samreen, F. ; Simm, W.</creatorcontrib><description>The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) community model is widely used to explore cross‐scale atmospheric features. Although WRF uncertainty studies exist, these usually involve ensembles where different physics options are selected (e.g., the boundary layer scheme) or adjusting individual parameters. Uncertainty from perturbing initial conditions, which generates internal model variability (IMV), has rarely been considered. Moreover, many off‐line WRF research studies generate conclusions based on a single model run without addressing any form of uncertainty. To demonstrate the importance of IMV, or noise, we present a 4‐month case study of summer 2018 over London, UK, using a 244‐member initial condition ensemble. Simply by changing the model start time, a median 2‐m temperature range or IMV of 1.2 °C was found (occasionally exceeding 8 °C). During our analysis, episodes of high and low IMV were found for all variables explored, explained by a relationship with the boundary condition data. Periods of slower wind speed input contained increased IMV, and vice versa, which we hypothesis is related to how strongly the boundary conditions influence the nested region. We also show the importance of IMV effects for the uncertainty of derived variables like the urban heat island, whose median variation in magnitude is 1 °C. Finally, a realistic ensemble size to capture the majority of WRF IMV is also estimated, essential considering the high computational overheads (244 members equaled 140,000 CPU hours). We envisage that highlighting considerable IMV in this repeatable manner will help advance best practices for the WRF and wider regional climate modeling community.
Plain Language Summary
The Weather Research and Forecasting model is typically used to dynamically downscale atmospheric conditions for limited geographical regions (e.g., southern United Kingdom), using one or more nested grids of increasing resolution, and with externally provided boundary conditions (e.g., from reanalysis data). Research applications of the model (i.e., separate to forecasting) are wide ranging from hurricanes to urban heat islands. However, despite the model being constrained at its boundaries, subtle modifications to initial conditions (e.g., soil moisture) may propagate and lead to different results. We generate an ensemble of 244 different initial conditions simply by changing the model start time and show large differences in modeled temperature and other meteorological fields across a fixed analysis period. This effect, rarely considered by the Weather Research and Forecasting modeling community (perhaps due to large computational requirements), should be reflected in all future research.
Key Points
A 244‐member ensemble is used to show internal model variability within the Weather Research and Forecasting model
Over 8 °C hourly differences between members were found (median 1.2 °C) simply by changing the model start times
This overlooked feature has implications for how users should run one of the most widely used regional climate models</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JD031286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Atmospheric conditions ; Atmospheric models ; Best practices ; Boundary conditions ; Boundary layers ; Climate models ; Computer applications ; ensemble ; Forecasting ; Geophysics ; Heat islands ; Hurricanes ; Initial conditions ; internal model variability (IMV) ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Numerical models ; Parameter uncertainty ; Physics ; regional climate model (RCM) ; Regional climate models ; Regional climates ; Soil ; Soil conditions ; Soil moisture ; Temperature ; Temperature range ; Uncertainty ; Urban heat islands ; Variability ; Weather ; Weather effects ; Weather forecasting ; Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2020-04, Vol.125 (7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. The Authors.</rights><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-e898c8f6623744d24833d3279e519696dca179d7695f4a5f37ecc2c4b3464b4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-e898c8f6623744d24833d3279e519696dca179d7695f4a5f37ecc2c4b3464b4f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6212-1906 ; 0000-0002-9522-0713 ; 0000-0002-5334-7951 ; 0000-0002-9741-671X ; 0000-0002-5608-8887</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JD031286$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JD031286$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bassett, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blair, G. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samreen, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simm, W.</creatorcontrib><title>A Large Ensemble Approach to Quantifying Internal Model Variability Within the WRF Numerical Model</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) community model is widely used to explore cross‐scale atmospheric features. Although WRF uncertainty studies exist, these usually involve ensembles where different physics options are selected (e.g., the boundary layer scheme) or adjusting individual parameters. Uncertainty from perturbing initial conditions, which generates internal model variability (IMV), has rarely been considered. Moreover, many off‐line WRF research studies generate conclusions based on a single model run without addressing any form of uncertainty. To demonstrate the importance of IMV, or noise, we present a 4‐month case study of summer 2018 over London, UK, using a 244‐member initial condition ensemble. Simply by changing the model start time, a median 2‐m temperature range or IMV of 1.2 °C was found (occasionally exceeding 8 °C). During our analysis, episodes of high and low IMV were found for all variables explored, explained by a relationship with the boundary condition data. Periods of slower wind speed input contained increased IMV, and vice versa, which we hypothesis is related to how strongly the boundary conditions influence the nested region. We also show the importance of IMV effects for the uncertainty of derived variables like the urban heat island, whose median variation in magnitude is 1 °C. Finally, a realistic ensemble size to capture the majority of WRF IMV is also estimated, essential considering the high computational overheads (244 members equaled 140,000 CPU hours). We envisage that highlighting considerable IMV in this repeatable manner will help advance best practices for the WRF and wider regional climate modeling community.
Plain Language Summary
The Weather Research and Forecasting model is typically used to dynamically downscale atmospheric conditions for limited geographical regions (e.g., southern United Kingdom), using one or more nested grids of increasing resolution, and with externally provided boundary conditions (e.g., from reanalysis data). Research applications of the model (i.e., separate to forecasting) are wide ranging from hurricanes to urban heat islands. However, despite the model being constrained at its boundaries, subtle modifications to initial conditions (e.g., soil moisture) may propagate and lead to different results. We generate an ensemble of 244 different initial conditions simply by changing the model start time and show large differences in modeled temperature and other meteorological fields across a fixed analysis period. This effect, rarely considered by the Weather Research and Forecasting modeling community (perhaps due to large computational requirements), should be reflected in all future research.
Key Points
A 244‐member ensemble is used to show internal model variability within the Weather Research and Forecasting model
Over 8 °C hourly differences between members were found (median 1.2 °C) simply by changing the model start times
This overlooked feature has implications for how users should run one of the most widely used regional climate models</description><subject>Atmospheric conditions</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Best practices</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>ensemble</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Heat islands</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Initial conditions</subject><subject>internal model variability (IMV)</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>regional climate model (RCM)</subject><subject>Regional climate models</subject><subject>Regional climates</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature range</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Urban heat islands</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather effects</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOHR3_oCAt1bz1TS5HPtyYyoOdd6VNE23jK6dSYr039sxFa98b8578XB4OABcYXSLEZF3BGE5HyGKieAnoEcwl5GQkp_-_sn7Oeh7v0XdCURZzHogG8CFcmsDx5U3u6w0cLDfu1rpDQw1fG5UFWzR2moNZ1UwrlIlfKhzU8I35azKbGlDC1c2bGwFw8bA1XICH5udcVb_oJfgrFClN_3vvACvk_HL8D5aPE1nw8Ei0geVyAgptCg4JzRhLCdMUJpTkkgTY8klz7XCicwTLuOCqbigidGaaJZRxlnGCnoBro-9nf9HY3xIt3VzMPYpoUJI1FXijro5UtrV3jtTpHtnd8q1KUbpYcj075AdTo_4py1N-y-bzqfLUcwxYfQLQ0Zyjw</recordid><startdate>20200416</startdate><enddate>20200416</enddate><creator>Bassett, R.</creator><creator>Young, P. J.</creator><creator>Blair, G. S.</creator><creator>Samreen, F.</creator><creator>Simm, W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6212-1906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9522-0713</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5334-7951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9741-671X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5608-8887</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200416</creationdate><title>A Large Ensemble Approach to Quantifying Internal Model Variability Within the WRF Numerical Model</title><author>Bassett, R. ; Young, P. J. ; Blair, G. S. ; Samreen, F. ; Simm, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-e898c8f6623744d24833d3279e519696dca179d7695f4a5f37ecc2c4b3464b4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric conditions</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Best practices</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>ensemble</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Heat islands</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Initial conditions</topic><topic>internal model variability (IMV)</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>regional climate model (RCM)</topic><topic>Regional climate models</topic><topic>Regional climates</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature range</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Urban heat islands</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather effects</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bassett, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blair, G. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samreen, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simm, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bassett, R.</au><au>Young, P. J.</au><au>Blair, G. S.</au><au>Samreen, F.</au><au>Simm, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Large Ensemble Approach to Quantifying Internal Model Variability Within the WRF Numerical Model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2020-04-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) community model is widely used to explore cross‐scale atmospheric features. Although WRF uncertainty studies exist, these usually involve ensembles where different physics options are selected (e.g., the boundary layer scheme) or adjusting individual parameters. Uncertainty from perturbing initial conditions, which generates internal model variability (IMV), has rarely been considered. Moreover, many off‐line WRF research studies generate conclusions based on a single model run without addressing any form of uncertainty. To demonstrate the importance of IMV, or noise, we present a 4‐month case study of summer 2018 over London, UK, using a 244‐member initial condition ensemble. Simply by changing the model start time, a median 2‐m temperature range or IMV of 1.2 °C was found (occasionally exceeding 8 °C). During our analysis, episodes of high and low IMV were found for all variables explored, explained by a relationship with the boundary condition data. Periods of slower wind speed input contained increased IMV, and vice versa, which we hypothesis is related to how strongly the boundary conditions influence the nested region. We also show the importance of IMV effects for the uncertainty of derived variables like the urban heat island, whose median variation in magnitude is 1 °C. Finally, a realistic ensemble size to capture the majority of WRF IMV is also estimated, essential considering the high computational overheads (244 members equaled 140,000 CPU hours). We envisage that highlighting considerable IMV in this repeatable manner will help advance best practices for the WRF and wider regional climate modeling community.
Plain Language Summary
The Weather Research and Forecasting model is typically used to dynamically downscale atmospheric conditions for limited geographical regions (e.g., southern United Kingdom), using one or more nested grids of increasing resolution, and with externally provided boundary conditions (e.g., from reanalysis data). Research applications of the model (i.e., separate to forecasting) are wide ranging from hurricanes to urban heat islands. However, despite the model being constrained at its boundaries, subtle modifications to initial conditions (e.g., soil moisture) may propagate and lead to different results. We generate an ensemble of 244 different initial conditions simply by changing the model start time and show large differences in modeled temperature and other meteorological fields across a fixed analysis period. This effect, rarely considered by the Weather Research and Forecasting modeling community (perhaps due to large computational requirements), should be reflected in all future research.
Key Points
A 244‐member ensemble is used to show internal model variability within the Weather Research and Forecasting model
Over 8 °C hourly differences between members were found (median 1.2 °C) simply by changing the model start times
This overlooked feature has implications for how users should run one of the most widely used regional climate models</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JD031286</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6212-1906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9522-0713</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5334-7951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9741-671X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5608-8887</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2020-04, Vol.125 (7), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2388902481 |
source | Wiley Journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Atmospheric conditions Atmospheric models Best practices Boundary conditions Boundary layers Climate models Computer applications ensemble Forecasting Geophysics Heat islands Hurricanes Initial conditions internal model variability (IMV) Mathematical models Modelling Numerical models Parameter uncertainty Physics regional climate model (RCM) Regional climate models Regional climates Soil Soil conditions Soil moisture Temperature Temperature range Uncertainty Urban heat islands Variability Weather Weather effects Weather forecasting Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Wind speed |
title | A Large Ensemble Approach to Quantifying Internal Model Variability Within the WRF Numerical Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T16%3A09%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Large%20Ensemble%20Approach%20to%20Quantifying%20Internal%20Model%20Variability%20Within%20the%20WRF%20Numerical%20Model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Bassett,%20R.&rft.date=2020-04-16&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JD031286&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2388902481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388902481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |