Monetary policy trilemma, inflation targeting and global financial crisis

We empirically investigate the validity of the monetary policy trilemma postulation for emerging market (EME) and advanced (AE) economies under different exchange rate and monetary policy regimes before and after the recent global financial crisis (GFC). Consistent with the dilemma proposition, dome...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of finance and economics 2020-04, Vol.25 (2), p.286-296
Hauptverfasser: Gülşen, Eda, Özmen, Erdal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 296
container_issue 2
container_start_page 286
container_title International journal of finance and economics
container_volume 25
creator Gülşen, Eda
Özmen, Erdal
description We empirically investigate the validity of the monetary policy trilemma postulation for emerging market (EME) and advanced (AE) economies under different exchange rate and monetary policy regimes before and after the recent global financial crisis (GFC). Consistent with the dilemma proposition, domestic interest rates are determined by global financial conditions and the FED rate even under floating exchange rate regimes (ERR) in the long‐run. The impact of the FED rates is higher in EME than AE and EME are much more sensitive to global financial cycle under managed than floating ERR. The spillover from the FED rate substantially increases after the GFC in EME with floating ERR and AE. The results from the monetary policy reaction functions based on equilibrium correction mechanism specifications suggest that domestic interest rates respond to inflation and output gaps especially under inflation targeting (IT) in the short‐run. The response to inflation gap tends to be smaller in IT AE after the GFC.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijfe.1752
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2387307010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2387307010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-65d40827e7b4f04707506e2a0a6ce33e6f3dc6799a547dde986a83940a48aad93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKsH_0HAk-C2k80m2RyltFqpeNFzSHeTkrJNarJF-u-btV49zYP53gzvIXRPYEIAyqnbWjMhgpUXaERAyoIQVl8OWvBCUhDX6CalLQBwJmCElu_Bm17HI96HzjVH3EfXmd1OP2Hnbad7FzzO-43pnd9g7Vu86cJad9g6r33jsmqiSy7doiuru2Tu_uYYfS3mn7PXYvXxspw9r4qGclYWnLUV1KUwYl1ZqAQIBtyUGjRvDKWGW9o2XEipWSXa1sia65rKCnRVa91KOkYP57v7GL4PJvVqGw7R55eqpLXIEYFAph7PVBNDStFYtY9ul3MqAmpoSg1NqaGpzE7P7E-OfvwfVMu3xfzXcQI0S2pI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2387307010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monetary policy trilemma, inflation targeting and global financial crisis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gülşen, Eda ; Özmen, Erdal</creator><creatorcontrib>Gülşen, Eda ; Özmen, Erdal</creatorcontrib><description>We empirically investigate the validity of the monetary policy trilemma postulation for emerging market (EME) and advanced (AE) economies under different exchange rate and monetary policy regimes before and after the recent global financial crisis (GFC). Consistent with the dilemma proposition, domestic interest rates are determined by global financial conditions and the FED rate even under floating exchange rate regimes (ERR) in the long‐run. The impact of the FED rates is higher in EME than AE and EME are much more sensitive to global financial cycle under managed than floating ERR. The spillover from the FED rate substantially increases after the GFC in EME with floating ERR and AE. The results from the monetary policy reaction functions based on equilibrium correction mechanism specifications suggest that domestic interest rates respond to inflation and output gaps especially under inflation targeting (IT) in the short‐run. The response to inflation gap tends to be smaller in IT AE after the GFC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-9307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1158</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.1752</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Economic crisis ; Emerging markets ; Exchange rate regimes ; Floating exchange rates ; Foreign exchange rates ; global financial crisis ; Inflation ; inflation targeting ; Interest rates ; International finance ; Monetary policy ; policy trilemma</subject><ispartof>International journal of finance and economics, 2020-04, Vol.25 (2), p.286-296</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-65d40827e7b4f04707506e2a0a6ce33e6f3dc6799a547dde986a83940a48aad93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-65d40827e7b4f04707506e2a0a6ce33e6f3dc6799a547dde986a83940a48aad93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9333-8339</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijfe.1752$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijfe.1752$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gülşen, Eda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özmen, Erdal</creatorcontrib><title>Monetary policy trilemma, inflation targeting and global financial crisis</title><title>International journal of finance and economics</title><description>We empirically investigate the validity of the monetary policy trilemma postulation for emerging market (EME) and advanced (AE) economies under different exchange rate and monetary policy regimes before and after the recent global financial crisis (GFC). Consistent with the dilemma proposition, domestic interest rates are determined by global financial conditions and the FED rate even under floating exchange rate regimes (ERR) in the long‐run. The impact of the FED rates is higher in EME than AE and EME are much more sensitive to global financial cycle under managed than floating ERR. The spillover from the FED rate substantially increases after the GFC in EME with floating ERR and AE. The results from the monetary policy reaction functions based on equilibrium correction mechanism specifications suggest that domestic interest rates respond to inflation and output gaps especially under inflation targeting (IT) in the short‐run. The response to inflation gap tends to be smaller in IT AE after the GFC.</description><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Exchange rate regimes</subject><subject>Floating exchange rates</subject><subject>Foreign exchange rates</subject><subject>global financial crisis</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>inflation targeting</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>International finance</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>policy trilemma</subject><issn>1076-9307</issn><issn>1099-1158</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKsH_0HAk-C2k80m2RyltFqpeNFzSHeTkrJNarJF-u-btV49zYP53gzvIXRPYEIAyqnbWjMhgpUXaERAyoIQVl8OWvBCUhDX6CalLQBwJmCElu_Bm17HI96HzjVH3EfXmd1OP2Hnbad7FzzO-43pnd9g7Vu86cJad9g6r33jsmqiSy7doiuru2Tu_uYYfS3mn7PXYvXxspw9r4qGclYWnLUV1KUwYl1ZqAQIBtyUGjRvDKWGW9o2XEipWSXa1sia65rKCnRVa91KOkYP57v7GL4PJvVqGw7R55eqpLXIEYFAph7PVBNDStFYtY9ul3MqAmpoSg1NqaGpzE7P7E-OfvwfVMu3xfzXcQI0S2pI</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Gülşen, Eda</creator><creator>Özmen, Erdal</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9333-8339</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Monetary policy trilemma, inflation targeting and global financial crisis</title><author>Gülşen, Eda ; Özmen, Erdal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-65d40827e7b4f04707506e2a0a6ce33e6f3dc6799a547dde986a83940a48aad93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Exchange rate regimes</topic><topic>Floating exchange rates</topic><topic>Foreign exchange rates</topic><topic>global financial crisis</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>inflation targeting</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>International finance</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>policy trilemma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gülşen, Eda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özmen, Erdal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of finance and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gülşen, Eda</au><au>Özmen, Erdal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monetary policy trilemma, inflation targeting and global financial crisis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of finance and economics</jtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>286-296</pages><issn>1076-9307</issn><eissn>1099-1158</eissn><abstract>We empirically investigate the validity of the monetary policy trilemma postulation for emerging market (EME) and advanced (AE) economies under different exchange rate and monetary policy regimes before and after the recent global financial crisis (GFC). Consistent with the dilemma proposition, domestic interest rates are determined by global financial conditions and the FED rate even under floating exchange rate regimes (ERR) in the long‐run. The impact of the FED rates is higher in EME than AE and EME are much more sensitive to global financial cycle under managed than floating ERR. The spillover from the FED rate substantially increases after the GFC in EME with floating ERR and AE. The results from the monetary policy reaction functions based on equilibrium correction mechanism specifications suggest that domestic interest rates respond to inflation and output gaps especially under inflation targeting (IT) in the short‐run. The response to inflation gap tends to be smaller in IT AE after the GFC.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ijfe.1752</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9333-8339</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-9307
ispartof International journal of finance and economics, 2020-04, Vol.25 (2), p.286-296
issn 1076-9307
1099-1158
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2387307010
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Economic crisis
Emerging markets
Exchange rate regimes
Floating exchange rates
Foreign exchange rates
global financial crisis
Inflation
inflation targeting
Interest rates
International finance
Monetary policy
policy trilemma
title Monetary policy trilemma, inflation targeting and global financial crisis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T22%3A02%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monetary%20policy%20trilemma,%20inflation%20targeting%20and%20global%20financial%20crisis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20finance%20and%20economics&rft.au=G%C3%BCl%C5%9Fen,%20Eda&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=286-296&rft.issn=1076-9307&rft.eissn=1099-1158&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijfe.1752&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2387307010%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2387307010&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true