Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah

The medieval expression of Jewish esotericism known as Kabbalah is distinguished by its imaging of the divine as ten hypostatic sefirot that structure the Godhead and generate the cosmos. Since Gershom Scholem, the preeminent twentieth-century scholar of Kabbalah, declared the term sefirah (sg.) as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Harvard theological review 2020-04, Vol.113 (2), p.230-262
1. Verfasser: Chajes, J. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 262
container_issue 2
container_start_page 230
container_title The Harvard theological review
container_volume 113
creator Chajes, J. H.
description The medieval expression of Jewish esotericism known as Kabbalah is distinguished by its imaging of the divine as ten hypostatic sefirot that structure the Godhead and generate the cosmos. Since Gershom Scholem, the preeminent twentieth-century scholar of Kabbalah, declared the term sefirah (sg.) as deriving from “sapphire”—pointedly rejecting its connection to the Greek σφαῖρα—scholars have paid scant attention to the profound indebtedness of the visual and verbal lexicon of the kabbalists to the Greco-Arabic scientific tradition. The present paper seeks to redress this neglect through an examination of the appropriation of the diagrammatic-iconographical and rhetorical languages of astronomy and natural philosophy in medieval and early modern kabbalistic discourse. This study will place particular emphasis on the adoption-adaptation and ontologization of the dominant schemata of these most prestigious fields of medieval science by classical kabbalists, what it reveals about their self-understanding, and how it contributed to the perception of Kabbalah as a “divine science” well into the early modern period.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0017816020000061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2387247435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2387247435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f3e21b238860d74b0b438ebee188a8e89e2e22f2e9e915299298e509826ad2d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUE1Pg0AU3BhNxOoP8LaJ16L7BeweG7Ta2EQT9EwWeAgNsHUfPfjvhdab7_Be5s1kMhlCbjm754wnDxmbtuYxE2yemJ-RgKskClXEk3MSzHQ485fkCnF31CgVkPds34AHXNIM6ta7kS6pHSo6NkA3vf1qB9vRFY7eDa5vywk8tli6g0egrqZpZxGP71dbFLazzTW5qG2HcPN3F-Rz_fSRvoTbt-dNutqGpYziMawlCF4IqXXMqkQVrFBSQwHAtbYatAEBQtQCDBgeCWOE0RAxo0VsK1FpuSB3J9-9d98HwDHfTammtJhProlQiZLRpOInVekdooc63_u2t_4n5yyfi8v_FSd_AbMhXkY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2387247435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals</source><creator>Chajes, J. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chajes, J. H.</creatorcontrib><description>The medieval expression of Jewish esotericism known as Kabbalah is distinguished by its imaging of the divine as ten hypostatic sefirot that structure the Godhead and generate the cosmos. Since Gershom Scholem, the preeminent twentieth-century scholar of Kabbalah, declared the term sefirah (sg.) as deriving from “sapphire”—pointedly rejecting its connection to the Greek σφαῖρα—scholars have paid scant attention to the profound indebtedness of the visual and verbal lexicon of the kabbalists to the Greco-Arabic scientific tradition. The present paper seeks to redress this neglect through an examination of the appropriation of the diagrammatic-iconographical and rhetorical languages of astronomy and natural philosophy in medieval and early modern kabbalistic discourse. This study will place particular emphasis on the adoption-adaptation and ontologization of the dominant schemata of these most prestigious fields of medieval science by classical kabbalists, what it reveals about their self-understanding, and how it contributed to the perception of Kabbalah as a “divine science” well into the early modern period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0017816020000061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>10th century ; 16th century ; Academic discourse ; Arabic language ; Esotericism ; Greek language ; Hebrew language ; Jewish people ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of language ; Science</subject><ispartof>The Harvard theological review, 2020-04, Vol.113 (2), p.230-262</ispartof><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f3e21b238860d74b0b438ebee188a8e89e2e22f2e9e915299298e509826ad2d83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chajes, J. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah</title><title>The Harvard theological review</title><description>The medieval expression of Jewish esotericism known as Kabbalah is distinguished by its imaging of the divine as ten hypostatic sefirot that structure the Godhead and generate the cosmos. Since Gershom Scholem, the preeminent twentieth-century scholar of Kabbalah, declared the term sefirah (sg.) as deriving from “sapphire”—pointedly rejecting its connection to the Greek σφαῖρα—scholars have paid scant attention to the profound indebtedness of the visual and verbal lexicon of the kabbalists to the Greco-Arabic scientific tradition. The present paper seeks to redress this neglect through an examination of the appropriation of the diagrammatic-iconographical and rhetorical languages of astronomy and natural philosophy in medieval and early modern kabbalistic discourse. This study will place particular emphasis on the adoption-adaptation and ontologization of the dominant schemata of these most prestigious fields of medieval science by classical kabbalists, what it reveals about their self-understanding, and how it contributed to the perception of Kabbalah as a “divine science” well into the early modern period.</description><subject>10th century</subject><subject>16th century</subject><subject>Academic discourse</subject><subject>Arabic language</subject><subject>Esotericism</subject><subject>Greek language</subject><subject>Hebrew language</subject><subject>Jewish people</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of language</subject><subject>Science</subject><issn>0017-8160</issn><issn>1475-4517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplUE1Pg0AU3BhNxOoP8LaJ16L7BeweG7Ta2EQT9EwWeAgNsHUfPfjvhdab7_Be5s1kMhlCbjm754wnDxmbtuYxE2yemJ-RgKskClXEk3MSzHQ485fkCnF31CgVkPds34AHXNIM6ta7kS6pHSo6NkA3vf1qB9vRFY7eDa5vywk8tli6g0egrqZpZxGP71dbFLazzTW5qG2HcPN3F-Rz_fSRvoTbt-dNutqGpYziMawlCF4IqXXMqkQVrFBSQwHAtbYatAEBQtQCDBgeCWOE0RAxo0VsK1FpuSB3J9-9d98HwDHfTammtJhProlQiZLRpOInVekdooc63_u2t_4n5yyfi8v_FSd_AbMhXkY</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Chajes, J. H.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah</title><author>Chajes, J. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f3e21b238860d74b0b438ebee188a8e89e2e22f2e9e915299298e509826ad2d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>10th century</topic><topic>16th century</topic><topic>Academic discourse</topic><topic>Arabic language</topic><topic>Esotericism</topic><topic>Greek language</topic><topic>Hebrew language</topic><topic>Jewish people</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of language</topic><topic>Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chajes, J. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Religion Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Harvard theological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chajes, J. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah</atitle><jtitle>The Harvard theological review</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>230-262</pages><issn>0017-8160</issn><eissn>1475-4517</eissn><abstract>The medieval expression of Jewish esotericism known as Kabbalah is distinguished by its imaging of the divine as ten hypostatic sefirot that structure the Godhead and generate the cosmos. Since Gershom Scholem, the preeminent twentieth-century scholar of Kabbalah, declared the term sefirah (sg.) as deriving from “sapphire”—pointedly rejecting its connection to the Greek σφαῖρα—scholars have paid scant attention to the profound indebtedness of the visual and verbal lexicon of the kabbalists to the Greco-Arabic scientific tradition. The present paper seeks to redress this neglect through an examination of the appropriation of the diagrammatic-iconographical and rhetorical languages of astronomy and natural philosophy in medieval and early modern kabbalistic discourse. This study will place particular emphasis on the adoption-adaptation and ontologization of the dominant schemata of these most prestigious fields of medieval science by classical kabbalists, what it reveals about their self-understanding, and how it contributed to the perception of Kabbalah as a “divine science” well into the early modern period.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0017816020000061</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-8160
ispartof The Harvard theological review, 2020-04, Vol.113 (2), p.230-262
issn 0017-8160
1475-4517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2387247435
source Cambridge University Press Journals
subjects 10th century
16th century
Academic discourse
Arabic language
Esotericism
Greek language
Hebrew language
Jewish people
Philosophy
Philosophy of language
Science
title Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T23%3A26%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spheres,%20Sefirot%20,%20and%20the%20Imaginal%20Astronomical%20Discourse%20of%20Classical%20Kabbalah&rft.jtitle=The%20Harvard%20theological%20review&rft.au=Chajes,%20J.%20H.&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=230-262&rft.issn=0017-8160&rft.eissn=1475-4517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0017816020000061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2387247435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2387247435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true