Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah
The medieval expression of Jewish esotericism known as Kabbalah is distinguished by its imaging of the divine as ten hypostatic sefirot that structure the Godhead and generate the cosmos. Since Gershom Scholem, the preeminent twentieth-century scholar of Kabbalah, declared the term sefirah (sg.) as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Harvard theological review 2020-04, Vol.113 (2), p.230-262 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 262 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 230 |
container_title | The Harvard theological review |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | Chajes, J. H. |
description | The medieval expression of Jewish esotericism known as Kabbalah is distinguished by its imaging of the divine as ten hypostatic
sefirot
that structure the Godhead and generate the cosmos. Since Gershom Scholem, the preeminent twentieth-century scholar of Kabbalah, declared the term
sefirah
(sg.) as deriving from “sapphire”—pointedly rejecting its connection to the Greek σφαῖρα—scholars have paid scant attention to the profound indebtedness of the visual and verbal lexicon of the kabbalists to the Greco-Arabic scientific tradition. The present paper seeks to redress this neglect through an examination of the appropriation of the diagrammatic-iconographical and rhetorical languages of astronomy and natural philosophy in medieval and early modern kabbalistic discourse. This study will place particular emphasis on the adoption-adaptation and ontologization of the dominant schemata of these most prestigious fields of medieval science by classical kabbalists, what it reveals about their self-understanding, and how it contributed to the perception of Kabbalah as a “divine science” well into the early modern period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0017816020000061 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2387247435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2387247435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f3e21b238860d74b0b438ebee188a8e89e2e22f2e9e915299298e509826ad2d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUE1Pg0AU3BhNxOoP8LaJ16L7BeweG7Ta2EQT9EwWeAgNsHUfPfjvhdab7_Be5s1kMhlCbjm754wnDxmbtuYxE2yemJ-RgKskClXEk3MSzHQ485fkCnF31CgVkPds34AHXNIM6ta7kS6pHSo6NkA3vf1qB9vRFY7eDa5vywk8tli6g0egrqZpZxGP71dbFLazzTW5qG2HcPN3F-Rz_fSRvoTbt-dNutqGpYziMawlCF4IqXXMqkQVrFBSQwHAtbYatAEBQtQCDBgeCWOE0RAxo0VsK1FpuSB3J9-9d98HwDHfTammtJhProlQiZLRpOInVekdooc63_u2t_4n5yyfi8v_FSd_AbMhXkY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2387247435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals</source><creator>Chajes, J. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chajes, J. H.</creatorcontrib><description>The medieval expression of Jewish esotericism known as Kabbalah is distinguished by its imaging of the divine as ten hypostatic
sefirot
that structure the Godhead and generate the cosmos. Since Gershom Scholem, the preeminent twentieth-century scholar of Kabbalah, declared the term
sefirah
(sg.) as deriving from “sapphire”—pointedly rejecting its connection to the Greek σφαῖρα—scholars have paid scant attention to the profound indebtedness of the visual and verbal lexicon of the kabbalists to the Greco-Arabic scientific tradition. The present paper seeks to redress this neglect through an examination of the appropriation of the diagrammatic-iconographical and rhetorical languages of astronomy and natural philosophy in medieval and early modern kabbalistic discourse. This study will place particular emphasis on the adoption-adaptation and ontologization of the dominant schemata of these most prestigious fields of medieval science by classical kabbalists, what it reveals about their self-understanding, and how it contributed to the perception of Kabbalah as a “divine science” well into the early modern period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0017816020000061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>10th century ; 16th century ; Academic discourse ; Arabic language ; Esotericism ; Greek language ; Hebrew language ; Jewish people ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of language ; Science</subject><ispartof>The Harvard theological review, 2020-04, Vol.113 (2), p.230-262</ispartof><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f3e21b238860d74b0b438ebee188a8e89e2e22f2e9e915299298e509826ad2d83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chajes, J. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah</title><title>The Harvard theological review</title><description>The medieval expression of Jewish esotericism known as Kabbalah is distinguished by its imaging of the divine as ten hypostatic
sefirot
that structure the Godhead and generate the cosmos. Since Gershom Scholem, the preeminent twentieth-century scholar of Kabbalah, declared the term
sefirah
(sg.) as deriving from “sapphire”—pointedly rejecting its connection to the Greek σφαῖρα—scholars have paid scant attention to the profound indebtedness of the visual and verbal lexicon of the kabbalists to the Greco-Arabic scientific tradition. The present paper seeks to redress this neglect through an examination of the appropriation of the diagrammatic-iconographical and rhetorical languages of astronomy and natural philosophy in medieval and early modern kabbalistic discourse. This study will place particular emphasis on the adoption-adaptation and ontologization of the dominant schemata of these most prestigious fields of medieval science by classical kabbalists, what it reveals about their self-understanding, and how it contributed to the perception of Kabbalah as a “divine science” well into the early modern period.</description><subject>10th century</subject><subject>16th century</subject><subject>Academic discourse</subject><subject>Arabic language</subject><subject>Esotericism</subject><subject>Greek language</subject><subject>Hebrew language</subject><subject>Jewish people</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of language</subject><subject>Science</subject><issn>0017-8160</issn><issn>1475-4517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplUE1Pg0AU3BhNxOoP8LaJ16L7BeweG7Ta2EQT9EwWeAgNsHUfPfjvhdab7_Be5s1kMhlCbjm754wnDxmbtuYxE2yemJ-RgKskClXEk3MSzHQ485fkCnF31CgVkPds34AHXNIM6ta7kS6pHSo6NkA3vf1qB9vRFY7eDa5vywk8tli6g0egrqZpZxGP71dbFLazzTW5qG2HcPN3F-Rz_fSRvoTbt-dNutqGpYziMawlCF4IqXXMqkQVrFBSQwHAtbYatAEBQtQCDBgeCWOE0RAxo0VsK1FpuSB3J9-9d98HwDHfTammtJhProlQiZLRpOInVekdooc63_u2t_4n5yyfi8v_FSd_AbMhXkY</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Chajes, J. H.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah</title><author>Chajes, J. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f3e21b238860d74b0b438ebee188a8e89e2e22f2e9e915299298e509826ad2d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>10th century</topic><topic>16th century</topic><topic>Academic discourse</topic><topic>Arabic language</topic><topic>Esotericism</topic><topic>Greek language</topic><topic>Hebrew language</topic><topic>Jewish people</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of language</topic><topic>Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chajes, J. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Religion Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Harvard theological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chajes, J. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah</atitle><jtitle>The Harvard theological review</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>230-262</pages><issn>0017-8160</issn><eissn>1475-4517</eissn><abstract>The medieval expression of Jewish esotericism known as Kabbalah is distinguished by its imaging of the divine as ten hypostatic
sefirot
that structure the Godhead and generate the cosmos. Since Gershom Scholem, the preeminent twentieth-century scholar of Kabbalah, declared the term
sefirah
(sg.) as deriving from “sapphire”—pointedly rejecting its connection to the Greek σφαῖρα—scholars have paid scant attention to the profound indebtedness of the visual and verbal lexicon of the kabbalists to the Greco-Arabic scientific tradition. The present paper seeks to redress this neglect through an examination of the appropriation of the diagrammatic-iconographical and rhetorical languages of astronomy and natural philosophy in medieval and early modern kabbalistic discourse. This study will place particular emphasis on the adoption-adaptation and ontologization of the dominant schemata of these most prestigious fields of medieval science by classical kabbalists, what it reveals about their self-understanding, and how it contributed to the perception of Kabbalah as a “divine science” well into the early modern period.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0017816020000061</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-8160 |
ispartof | The Harvard theological review, 2020-04, Vol.113 (2), p.230-262 |
issn | 0017-8160 1475-4517 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2387247435 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals |
subjects | 10th century 16th century Academic discourse Arabic language Esotericism Greek language Hebrew language Jewish people Philosophy Philosophy of language Science |
title | Spheres, Sefirot , and the Imaginal Astronomical Discourse of Classical Kabbalah |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T23%3A26%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spheres,%20Sefirot%20,%20and%20the%20Imaginal%20Astronomical%20Discourse%20of%20Classical%20Kabbalah&rft.jtitle=The%20Harvard%20theological%20review&rft.au=Chajes,%20J.%20H.&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=230-262&rft.issn=0017-8160&rft.eissn=1475-4517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0017816020000061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2387247435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2387247435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |