As-Hg Compound Pollution: Rice Growth, Yield, and Environmental Safety Limits

With rapid economic and industrial development, the potentially toxic element (PTE) pollution of farmlands in China has become increasingly serious. Based on the Hakanson potential ecological risk index (RI) and national food pollutant limit standards (GB 2762-2017), the effects of exogenous potenti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2020-04, Vol.12 (7), p.2868
Hauptverfasser: Cao, Mengzhuo, He, Shanying, Islam, Ejazul, Hong, Chunlai, Wang, Weiping, Yao, Yanlai, Chen, Xiaoyang, Zhu, Fengxiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2868
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 12
creator Cao, Mengzhuo
He, Shanying
Islam, Ejazul
Hong, Chunlai
Wang, Weiping
Yao, Yanlai
Chen, Xiaoyang
Zhu, Fengxiang
description With rapid economic and industrial development, the potentially toxic element (PTE) pollution of farmlands in China has become increasingly serious. Based on the Hakanson potential ecological risk index (RI) and national food pollutant limit standards (GB 2762-2017), the effects of exogenous potentially toxic elements (PTEs), i.e., arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg), on rice growth were studied. Common varieties of hybrid (YY 538, CY 84) and conventional (XS 134, JH 218) rice were grown in pots having representative paddy soil from Zhejiang Province, China. The results showed that As and Hg in soil significantly inhibited growth; however, the plant height of hybrid rice was less affected. Further, there were significant correlations between concentrations of PTEs in soil and rice grains; however, hybrid rice had a stronger ability to absorb and accumulate PTEs. The comprehensive potential ecological RI of soil PTEs was 39.4–89.9, which is below the level of ‘minor ecological hazard’, and the contribution rate of Hg was 79.9%–84.2%; as such, Hg posed the greatest potential ecological risk in the study area. The ecological risk limits of As and Hg in the safe production of different rice varieties decreased in the order XS 134 > JH 218 > YY 538 > CY 84. The ecological risk limits of As and Hg for conventional rice were higher, and the risk limits of As and Hg for hybrid rice were lower, than the limit of the soil environmental quality assessment index in the national “Soil quality control criteria for soil pollution in agricultural land (for trial implementation) (Trial)” (GB15618-2018). The health risk limit of soil As in the typical paddy soil of China decreased in the order XS 134 > JH 218 > CY 84 > YY 538. The health risk limit of Hg decreased in the order XS 134 > JH 218 > YY 538 > CY 84. The health risk limit of As was lower, whereas the risk limit of Hg was higher, than the limit of the soil environmental quality evaluation index in the national “Soil quality control criteria for soil pollution in agricultural land (for trial implementation) (Trial)”(GB15618-2018).
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su12072868
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2387147756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2387147756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-2b9290005b292344733aafcdff5ec8b365de846255f792e680029a421357c1dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLxDAUhYMoOIyz8RcE3MlU82iaxt1Q5iFUFB8LVyVNE83QNmOSKvPvrYygd3PO4uOcywHgHKMrSgW6DgMmiJM8y4_AZHQ4wYih43_-FMxC2KLxKMUCZxNwtwjJ5g0Wrtu5oW_gg2vbIVrX38BHqzRce_cV3-fw1eq2mUM5Isv-03rXd7qPsoVP0ui4h6XtbAxn4MTINujZr07By2r5XGyS8n59WyzKRBHBYkJqQcT4BKuJIDRNOaVSGtUYw7TKa5qxRudpRhgzXBCd5QgRIVOCKeMKN4pOwcUhd-fdx6BDrLZu8P1YWRGac5xyzrKRujxQyrsQvDbVzttO-n2FUfWzWPW3GP0GBD1bbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2387147756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>As-Hg Compound Pollution: Rice Growth, Yield, and Environmental Safety Limits</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Cao, Mengzhuo ; He, Shanying ; Islam, Ejazul ; Hong, Chunlai ; Wang, Weiping ; Yao, Yanlai ; Chen, Xiaoyang ; Zhu, Fengxiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Cao, Mengzhuo ; He, Shanying ; Islam, Ejazul ; Hong, Chunlai ; Wang, Weiping ; Yao, Yanlai ; Chen, Xiaoyang ; Zhu, Fengxiang</creatorcontrib><description>With rapid economic and industrial development, the potentially toxic element (PTE) pollution of farmlands in China has become increasingly serious. Based on the Hakanson potential ecological risk index (RI) and national food pollutant limit standards (GB 2762-2017), the effects of exogenous potentially toxic elements (PTEs), i.e., arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg), on rice growth were studied. Common varieties of hybrid (YY 538, CY 84) and conventional (XS 134, JH 218) rice were grown in pots having representative paddy soil from Zhejiang Province, China. The results showed that As and Hg in soil significantly inhibited growth; however, the plant height of hybrid rice was less affected. Further, there were significant correlations between concentrations of PTEs in soil and rice grains; however, hybrid rice had a stronger ability to absorb and accumulate PTEs. The comprehensive potential ecological RI of soil PTEs was 39.4–89.9, which is below the level of ‘minor ecological hazard’, and the contribution rate of Hg was 79.9%–84.2%; as such, Hg posed the greatest potential ecological risk in the study area. The ecological risk limits of As and Hg in the safe production of different rice varieties decreased in the order XS 134 &gt; JH 218 &gt; YY 538 &gt; CY 84. The ecological risk limits of As and Hg for conventional rice were higher, and the risk limits of As and Hg for hybrid rice were lower, than the limit of the soil environmental quality assessment index in the national “Soil quality control criteria for soil pollution in agricultural land (for trial implementation) (Trial)” (GB15618-2018). The health risk limit of soil As in the typical paddy soil of China decreased in the order XS 134 &gt; JH 218 &gt; CY 84 &gt; YY 538. The health risk limit of Hg decreased in the order XS 134 &gt; JH 218 &gt; YY 538 &gt; CY 84. The health risk limit of As was lower, whereas the risk limit of Hg was higher, than the limit of the soil environmental quality evaluation index in the national “Soil quality control criteria for soil pollution in agricultural land (for trial implementation) (Trial)”(GB15618-2018).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12072868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural equipment ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural pollution ; Agricultural production ; Agricultural resources ; Agriculture ; Arsenic ; Crop yield ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental quality ; Environmental quality assessment ; Environmental risk ; Experiments ; Fertilizers ; Health risks ; Industrial development ; Industrial pollution ; Land pollution ; Mercury ; Pollutants ; Pollution ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Rice ; Rice fields ; Risk assessment ; Sewage irrigation ; Soil contamination ; Soil pollution ; Soil properties ; Soil quality ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.12 (7), p.2868</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-2b9290005b292344733aafcdff5ec8b365de846255f792e680029a421357c1dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-2b9290005b292344733aafcdff5ec8b365de846255f792e680029a421357c1dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cao, Mengzhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Shanying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Ejazul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Chunlai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yanlai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaoyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Fengxiang</creatorcontrib><title>As-Hg Compound Pollution: Rice Growth, Yield, and Environmental Safety Limits</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>With rapid economic and industrial development, the potentially toxic element (PTE) pollution of farmlands in China has become increasingly serious. Based on the Hakanson potential ecological risk index (RI) and national food pollutant limit standards (GB 2762-2017), the effects of exogenous potentially toxic elements (PTEs), i.e., arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg), on rice growth were studied. Common varieties of hybrid (YY 538, CY 84) and conventional (XS 134, JH 218) rice were grown in pots having representative paddy soil from Zhejiang Province, China. The results showed that As and Hg in soil significantly inhibited growth; however, the plant height of hybrid rice was less affected. Further, there were significant correlations between concentrations of PTEs in soil and rice grains; however, hybrid rice had a stronger ability to absorb and accumulate PTEs. The comprehensive potential ecological RI of soil PTEs was 39.4–89.9, which is below the level of ‘minor ecological hazard’, and the contribution rate of Hg was 79.9%–84.2%; as such, Hg posed the greatest potential ecological risk in the study area. The ecological risk limits of As and Hg in the safe production of different rice varieties decreased in the order XS 134 &gt; JH 218 &gt; YY 538 &gt; CY 84. The ecological risk limits of As and Hg for conventional rice were higher, and the risk limits of As and Hg for hybrid rice were lower, than the limit of the soil environmental quality assessment index in the national “Soil quality control criteria for soil pollution in agricultural land (for trial implementation) (Trial)” (GB15618-2018). The health risk limit of soil As in the typical paddy soil of China decreased in the order XS 134 &gt; JH 218 &gt; CY 84 &gt; YY 538. The health risk limit of Hg decreased in the order XS 134 &gt; JH 218 &gt; YY 538 &gt; CY 84. The health risk limit of As was lower, whereas the risk limit of Hg was higher, than the limit of the soil environmental quality evaluation index in the national “Soil quality control criteria for soil pollution in agricultural land (for trial implementation) (Trial)”(GB15618-2018).</description><subject>Agricultural equipment</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural pollution</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agricultural resources</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Environmental quality assessment</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Industrial pollution</subject><subject>Land pollution</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Rice fields</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Sewage irrigation</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLxDAUhYMoOIyz8RcE3MlU82iaxt1Q5iFUFB8LVyVNE83QNmOSKvPvrYygd3PO4uOcywHgHKMrSgW6DgMmiJM8y4_AZHQ4wYih43_-FMxC2KLxKMUCZxNwtwjJ5g0Wrtu5oW_gg2vbIVrX38BHqzRce_cV3-fw1eq2mUM5Isv-03rXd7qPsoVP0ui4h6XtbAxn4MTINujZr07By2r5XGyS8n59WyzKRBHBYkJqQcT4BKuJIDRNOaVSGtUYw7TKa5qxRudpRhgzXBCd5QgRIVOCKeMKN4pOwcUhd-fdx6BDrLZu8P1YWRGac5xyzrKRujxQyrsQvDbVzttO-n2FUfWzWPW3GP0GBD1bbg</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Cao, Mengzhuo</creator><creator>He, Shanying</creator><creator>Islam, Ejazul</creator><creator>Hong, Chunlai</creator><creator>Wang, Weiping</creator><creator>Yao, Yanlai</creator><creator>Chen, Xiaoyang</creator><creator>Zhu, Fengxiang</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>As-Hg Compound Pollution: Rice Growth, Yield, and Environmental Safety Limits</title><author>Cao, Mengzhuo ; He, Shanying ; Islam, Ejazul ; Hong, Chunlai ; Wang, Weiping ; Yao, Yanlai ; Chen, Xiaoyang ; Zhu, Fengxiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-2b9290005b292344733aafcdff5ec8b365de846255f792e680029a421357c1dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural equipment</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural pollution</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agricultural resources</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Environmental quality assessment</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Industrial pollution</topic><topic>Land pollution</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Rice fields</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Sewage irrigation</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cao, Mengzhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Shanying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Ejazul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Chunlai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yanlai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaoyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Fengxiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cao, Mengzhuo</au><au>He, Shanying</au><au>Islam, Ejazul</au><au>Hong, Chunlai</au><au>Wang, Weiping</au><au>Yao, Yanlai</au><au>Chen, Xiaoyang</au><au>Zhu, Fengxiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>As-Hg Compound Pollution: Rice Growth, Yield, and Environmental Safety Limits</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2868</spage><pages>2868-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>With rapid economic and industrial development, the potentially toxic element (PTE) pollution of farmlands in China has become increasingly serious. Based on the Hakanson potential ecological risk index (RI) and national food pollutant limit standards (GB 2762-2017), the effects of exogenous potentially toxic elements (PTEs), i.e., arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg), on rice growth were studied. Common varieties of hybrid (YY 538, CY 84) and conventional (XS 134, JH 218) rice were grown in pots having representative paddy soil from Zhejiang Province, China. The results showed that As and Hg in soil significantly inhibited growth; however, the plant height of hybrid rice was less affected. Further, there were significant correlations between concentrations of PTEs in soil and rice grains; however, hybrid rice had a stronger ability to absorb and accumulate PTEs. The comprehensive potential ecological RI of soil PTEs was 39.4–89.9, which is below the level of ‘minor ecological hazard’, and the contribution rate of Hg was 79.9%–84.2%; as such, Hg posed the greatest potential ecological risk in the study area. The ecological risk limits of As and Hg in the safe production of different rice varieties decreased in the order XS 134 &gt; JH 218 &gt; YY 538 &gt; CY 84. The ecological risk limits of As and Hg for conventional rice were higher, and the risk limits of As and Hg for hybrid rice were lower, than the limit of the soil environmental quality assessment index in the national “Soil quality control criteria for soil pollution in agricultural land (for trial implementation) (Trial)” (GB15618-2018). The health risk limit of soil As in the typical paddy soil of China decreased in the order XS 134 &gt; JH 218 &gt; CY 84 &gt; YY 538. The health risk limit of Hg decreased in the order XS 134 &gt; JH 218 &gt; YY 538 &gt; CY 84. The health risk limit of As was lower, whereas the risk limit of Hg was higher, than the limit of the soil environmental quality evaluation index in the national “Soil quality control criteria for soil pollution in agricultural land (for trial implementation) (Trial)”(GB15618-2018).</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12072868</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.12 (7), p.2868
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2387147756
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Agricultural equipment
Agricultural land
Agricultural pollution
Agricultural production
Agricultural resources
Agriculture
Arsenic
Crop yield
Environmental assessment
Environmental quality
Environmental quality assessment
Environmental risk
Experiments
Fertilizers
Health risks
Industrial development
Industrial pollution
Land pollution
Mercury
Pollutants
Pollution
Quality assessment
Quality control
Rice
Rice fields
Risk assessment
Sewage irrigation
Soil contamination
Soil pollution
Soil properties
Soil quality
Sustainability
title As-Hg Compound Pollution: Rice Growth, Yield, and Environmental Safety Limits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A53%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=As-Hg%20Compound%20Pollution:%20Rice%20Growth,%20Yield,%20and%20Environmental%20Safety%20Limits&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Cao,%20Mengzhuo&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2868&rft.pages=2868-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12072868&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2387147756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2387147756&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true