EEG-Based Analysis of Air Traffic Conflict: Investigating Controllers’ Situation Awareness, Stress Level and Brain Activity during Conflict Resolution
The effects of air traffic conflict geometry have been well investigated in prior studies, particularly in the context of the pilot, though little in the context of the air traffic control officer (ATCO). No study to date has investigated the effects of conflict geometry on human factors variables o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of navigation 2020-05, Vol.73 (3), p.678-696 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 696 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 678 |
| container_title | Journal of navigation |
| container_volume | 73 |
| creator | Trapsilawati, Fitri Herliansyah, Muhammad Kusumawan Nugraheni, Agustyandini Sekar Asih Nur Sari Fatikasari, Mifta Priani Tissamodie, Gharsina |
| description | The effects of air traffic conflict geometry have been well investigated in prior studies, particularly in the context of the pilot, though little in the context of the air traffic control officer (ATCO). No study to date has investigated the effects of conflict geometry on human factors variables of ATCOs through objective and physiological approaches. This study examines the effects of conflict geometries on ATCO situation awareness, stress level and brain activity during conflict resolution. Fifteen participants were instructed to resolve six different conflict geometries: crossing level, crossing non-level, converging level, converging non-level, overtaking level, and overtaking non-level. The results indicate that converging and crossing conflicts led to lower situation awareness (SA), higher stress level, and higher theta activation at the temporal and parietal lobes. Level conflict led to lower SA. The findings offer two implications, providing insights for the formal guidelines in ATC conflict resolution training and provision of inputs for the conflict resolution aid development. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0373463319000882 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2386735095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2386735095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5e53f1c3e2a2752e9295cb907c3858c7f654e5601955164979a341ff46b7be073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkcFKAzEURYMoWKsf4C7g1tFkMkkm7qal1kJBsHU9pGlSUsZJTTKV2fkZ-nt-iTO2O1cX3j3cx3sXgGuM7jDC_H6BCCcZIwQLhFCepydggDMmEs5zegoGvZ30_jm4CGHbM1lOB-BrMpkmIxn0Gha1rNpgA3QGFtbDpZfGWAXHrjaVVfEBzuq9DtFuZLT1pp9H76pK-_Dz-Q0XNjad4WpYfEivax3CLVxE3ymc672uoKzXcOSl7QgV7d7GFq4bf4z6WwFfdHBV06dcgjMjq6CvjjoEr4-T5fgpmT9PZ-NiniiCWUyopsRgRXQqU05TLVJB1UogrkhOc8UNo5mmDGFBKWaZ4EKSDBuTsRVfacTJENwccnfevTfdeeXWNb57RShTkjNOKBK0o_CBUt6F4LUpd96-Sd-WGJV9AeW_AsgvobR6Ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386735095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EEG-Based Analysis of Air Traffic Conflict: Investigating Controllers’ Situation Awareness, Stress Level and Brain Activity during Conflict Resolution</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Trapsilawati, Fitri ; Herliansyah, Muhammad Kusumawan ; Nugraheni, Agustyandini Sekar Asih Nur Sari ; Fatikasari, Mifta Priani ; Tissamodie, Gharsina</creator><creatorcontrib>Trapsilawati, Fitri ; Herliansyah, Muhammad Kusumawan ; Nugraheni, Agustyandini Sekar Asih Nur Sari ; Fatikasari, Mifta Priani ; Tissamodie, Gharsina</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of air traffic conflict geometry have been well investigated in prior studies, particularly in the context of the pilot, though little in the context of the air traffic control officer (ATCO). No study to date has investigated the effects of conflict geometry on human factors variables of ATCOs through objective and physiological approaches. This study examines the effects of conflict geometries on ATCO situation awareness, stress level and brain activity during conflict resolution. Fifteen participants were instructed to resolve six different conflict geometries: crossing level, crossing non-level, converging level, converging non-level, overtaking level, and overtaking non-level. The results indicate that converging and crossing conflicts led to lower situation awareness (SA), higher stress level, and higher theta activation at the temporal and parietal lobes. Level conflict led to lower SA. The findings offer two implications, providing insights for the formal guidelines in ATC conflict resolution training and provision of inputs for the conflict resolution aid development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0373-4633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0373463319000882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Air ; Air traffic control ; Aircraft ; Brain ; Brain research ; Conflict resolution ; Conflicts ; Context ; Convergence ; Geometry ; Human factors ; Literature reviews ; Navigation ; Physiological effects ; Physiology ; Resolution ; Situational awareness ; Stress measurement ; Studies ; Traffic conflicts ; Training</subject><ispartof>Journal of navigation, 2020-05, Vol.73 (3), p.678-696</ispartof><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5e53f1c3e2a2752e9295cb907c3858c7f654e5601955164979a341ff46b7be073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5e53f1c3e2a2752e9295cb907c3858c7f654e5601955164979a341ff46b7be073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trapsilawati, Fitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herliansyah, Muhammad Kusumawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nugraheni, Agustyandini Sekar Asih Nur Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatikasari, Mifta Priani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tissamodie, Gharsina</creatorcontrib><title>EEG-Based Analysis of Air Traffic Conflict: Investigating Controllers’ Situation Awareness, Stress Level and Brain Activity during Conflict Resolution</title><title>Journal of navigation</title><description>The effects of air traffic conflict geometry have been well investigated in prior studies, particularly in the context of the pilot, though little in the context of the air traffic control officer (ATCO). No study to date has investigated the effects of conflict geometry on human factors variables of ATCOs through objective and physiological approaches. This study examines the effects of conflict geometries on ATCO situation awareness, stress level and brain activity during conflict resolution. Fifteen participants were instructed to resolve six different conflict geometries: crossing level, crossing non-level, converging level, converging non-level, overtaking level, and overtaking non-level. The results indicate that converging and crossing conflicts led to lower situation awareness (SA), higher stress level, and higher theta activation at the temporal and parietal lobes. Level conflict led to lower SA. The findings offer two implications, providing insights for the formal guidelines in ATC conflict resolution training and provision of inputs for the conflict resolution aid development.</description><subject>Air</subject><subject>Air traffic control</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Conflicts</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Convergence</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Physiological effects</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Situational awareness</subject><subject>Stress measurement</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Traffic conflicts</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0373-4633</issn><issn>1469-7785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkcFKAzEURYMoWKsf4C7g1tFkMkkm7qal1kJBsHU9pGlSUsZJTTKV2fkZ-nt-iTO2O1cX3j3cx3sXgGuM7jDC_H6BCCcZIwQLhFCepydggDMmEs5zegoGvZ30_jm4CGHbM1lOB-BrMpkmIxn0Gha1rNpgA3QGFtbDpZfGWAXHrjaVVfEBzuq9DtFuZLT1pp9H76pK-_Dz-Q0XNjad4WpYfEivax3CLVxE3ymc672uoKzXcOSl7QgV7d7GFq4bf4z6WwFfdHBV06dcgjMjq6CvjjoEr4-T5fgpmT9PZ-NiniiCWUyopsRgRXQqU05TLVJB1UogrkhOc8UNo5mmDGFBKWaZ4EKSDBuTsRVfacTJENwccnfevTfdeeXWNb57RShTkjNOKBK0o_CBUt6F4LUpd96-Sd-WGJV9AeW_AsgvobR6Ew</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Trapsilawati, Fitri</creator><creator>Herliansyah, Muhammad Kusumawan</creator><creator>Nugraheni, Agustyandini Sekar Asih Nur Sari</creator><creator>Fatikasari, Mifta Priani</creator><creator>Tissamodie, Gharsina</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>EEG-Based Analysis of Air Traffic Conflict: Investigating Controllers’ Situation Awareness, Stress Level and Brain Activity during Conflict Resolution</title><author>Trapsilawati, Fitri ; Herliansyah, Muhammad Kusumawan ; Nugraheni, Agustyandini Sekar Asih Nur Sari ; Fatikasari, Mifta Priani ; Tissamodie, Gharsina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5e53f1c3e2a2752e9295cb907c3858c7f654e5601955164979a341ff46b7be073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air</topic><topic>Air traffic control</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Conflicts</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Convergence</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Physiological effects</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Situational awareness</topic><topic>Stress measurement</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Traffic conflicts</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trapsilawati, Fitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herliansyah, Muhammad Kusumawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nugraheni, Agustyandini Sekar Asih Nur Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatikasari, Mifta Priani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tissamodie, Gharsina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of navigation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trapsilawati, Fitri</au><au>Herliansyah, Muhammad Kusumawan</au><au>Nugraheni, Agustyandini Sekar Asih Nur Sari</au><au>Fatikasari, Mifta Priani</au><au>Tissamodie, Gharsina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EEG-Based Analysis of Air Traffic Conflict: Investigating Controllers’ Situation Awareness, Stress Level and Brain Activity during Conflict Resolution</atitle><jtitle>Journal of navigation</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>696</epage><pages>678-696</pages><issn>0373-4633</issn><eissn>1469-7785</eissn><abstract>The effects of air traffic conflict geometry have been well investigated in prior studies, particularly in the context of the pilot, though little in the context of the air traffic control officer (ATCO). No study to date has investigated the effects of conflict geometry on human factors variables of ATCOs through objective and physiological approaches. This study examines the effects of conflict geometries on ATCO situation awareness, stress level and brain activity during conflict resolution. Fifteen participants were instructed to resolve six different conflict geometries: crossing level, crossing non-level, converging level, converging non-level, overtaking level, and overtaking non-level. The results indicate that converging and crossing conflicts led to lower situation awareness (SA), higher stress level, and higher theta activation at the temporal and parietal lobes. Level conflict led to lower SA. The findings offer two implications, providing insights for the formal guidelines in ATC conflict resolution training and provision of inputs for the conflict resolution aid development.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0373463319000882</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0373-4633 |
| ispartof | Journal of navigation, 2020-05, Vol.73 (3), p.678-696 |
| issn | 0373-4633 1469-7785 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2386735095 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Air Air traffic control Aircraft Brain Brain research Conflict resolution Conflicts Context Convergence Geometry Human factors Literature reviews Navigation Physiological effects Physiology Resolution Situational awareness Stress measurement Studies Traffic conflicts Training |
| title | EEG-Based Analysis of Air Traffic Conflict: Investigating Controllers’ Situation Awareness, Stress Level and Brain Activity during Conflict Resolution |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A40%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EEG-Based%20Analysis%20of%20Air%20Traffic%20Conflict:%20Investigating%20Controllers%E2%80%99%20Situation%20Awareness,%20Stress%20Level%20and%20Brain%20Activity%20during%20Conflict%20Resolution&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20navigation&rft.au=Trapsilawati,%20Fitri&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=696&rft.pages=678-696&rft.issn=0373-4633&rft.eissn=1469-7785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0373463319000882&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2386735095%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386735095&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |