Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway

ABSTRACT Objectives Single umbilical artery (SUA) is associated with congenital malformations in most organ systems, but reported findings have not been consistent. While it has been suggested that genetic and persisting environmental factors influence the development of SUA, it is not known whether...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2020-04, Vol.55 (4), p.510-515
Hauptverfasser: Ebbing, C., Kessler, J., Moster, D., Rasmussen, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 515
container_issue 4
container_start_page 510
container_title Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
container_volume 55
creator Ebbing, C.
Kessler, J.
Moster, D.
Rasmussen, S.
description ABSTRACT Objectives Single umbilical artery (SUA) is associated with congenital malformations in most organ systems, but reported findings have not been consistent. While it has been suggested that genetic and persisting environmental factors influence the development of SUA, it is not known whether there is an increased risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy of the same woman. The aims of this study were to investigate the occurrence of, and risk factors for, SUA in Norway, to assess its association with congenital malformations and trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and to study the risk of recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancies. Methods This was a population‐based study of all (n = 918 933) singleton pregnancies of > 16 weeks' gestation recorded in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2014. To identify risk factors and congenital malformations associated with SUA, generalized estimating equations and logistic regression were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs. ORs were also calculated for the recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancy. Results The occurrence of SUA in our population was 0.46% (4241/918 933). Parity ≥ 4, smoking, maternal pregestational diabetes, epilepsy, chronic hypertension, previous Cesarean delivery and conception by assisted reproductive technology increased the odds of having SUA. There was a particularly strong association between SUA and gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis in the neonate, with ORs of 25.8 (95% CI, 17.0–39.1) and 20.3 (95% CI, 13.4–30.9) for esophageal and anorectal atresia or stenosis, respectively, followed by an OR of 5.9 (95% CI, 1.9–18.5) for renal agenesis. SUA was associated with an up to 7–8 times increased risk of congenital heart defects. There was an association with microcephaly, congenital hydrocephalus and other congenital malformations of the brain and spinal cord. Diaphragmatic hernia, limb reductions and cleft lip or palate had a weaker association with SUA, with ORs ranging from 4.8 to 2.8. The associations with trisomy 18 and 13 were equally strong (OR 14.4 (95% CI, 9.3–22.4) and OR 13.6 (95% CI, 6.7–27.8), respectively), and the risk of trisomy 21 was doubled (OR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2–3.6)). Pregnancies with SUA, with or without an associated malformation, had a 2‐fold increased risk for SUA in a subsequent pregnancy. Conclusions SUA is associated strongly with gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis, suggesting common developmental mechanisms. The increased risk of recurrenc
doi_str_mv 10.1002/uog.20359
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2384490292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2384490292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-eeb9530ef37cc1750263440da48970407b9e6b861146ad20a4a49433a7943cba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EglIYeAFkiYkh7flPnZgNVVCQKjpAZ8tJnMoliYudqMrGI_CMPAmhBTaWu5Pu0-90H0IXBEYEgI5btxpRYBN5gAaECxlBDJNDNAApIIqFpCfoNIQ1AAjOxDE6YYQwSoQYIPVs61VpcFultrSZLrH2jfEd1nWOvQ2v2BU4c_XK1Lbpt5UuC-cr3VhX3-CN27Tlbv58_0h1MDkOTZt32Nb4yfmt7s7QUaHLYM5_-hAt7-9epg_RfDF7nN7Oo4wliYyMSeWEgSlYnGUkngAVjHPINU9kDBziVBqRJoL07-mcguaaS86YjvuapZoN0dU-d-PdW2tCo9au9XV_UlGWcC6BStpT13sq8y4Ebwq18bbSvlME1LdK1atUO5U9e_mT2KaVyf_IX3c9MN4DW1ua7v8ktVzM9pFfddV-Rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2384490292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Ebbing, C. ; Kessler, J. ; Moster, D. ; Rasmussen, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ebbing, C. ; Kessler, J. ; Moster, D. ; Rasmussen, S.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objectives Single umbilical artery (SUA) is associated with congenital malformations in most organ systems, but reported findings have not been consistent. While it has been suggested that genetic and persisting environmental factors influence the development of SUA, it is not known whether there is an increased risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy of the same woman. The aims of this study were to investigate the occurrence of, and risk factors for, SUA in Norway, to assess its association with congenital malformations and trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and to study the risk of recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancies. Methods This was a population‐based study of all (n = 918 933) singleton pregnancies of &gt; 16 weeks' gestation recorded in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2014. To identify risk factors and congenital malformations associated with SUA, generalized estimating equations and logistic regression were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs. ORs were also calculated for the recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancy. Results The occurrence of SUA in our population was 0.46% (4241/918 933). Parity ≥ 4, smoking, maternal pregestational diabetes, epilepsy, chronic hypertension, previous Cesarean delivery and conception by assisted reproductive technology increased the odds of having SUA. There was a particularly strong association between SUA and gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis in the neonate, with ORs of 25.8 (95% CI, 17.0–39.1) and 20.3 (95% CI, 13.4–30.9) for esophageal and anorectal atresia or stenosis, respectively, followed by an OR of 5.9 (95% CI, 1.9–18.5) for renal agenesis. SUA was associated with an up to 7–8 times increased risk of congenital heart defects. There was an association with microcephaly, congenital hydrocephalus and other congenital malformations of the brain and spinal cord. Diaphragmatic hernia, limb reductions and cleft lip or palate had a weaker association with SUA, with ORs ranging from 4.8 to 2.8. The associations with trisomy 18 and 13 were equally strong (OR 14.4 (95% CI, 9.3–22.4) and OR 13.6 (95% CI, 6.7–27.8), respectively), and the risk of trisomy 21 was doubled (OR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2–3.6)). Pregnancies with SUA, with or without an associated malformation, had a 2‐fold increased risk for SUA in a subsequent pregnancy. Conclusions SUA is associated strongly with gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis, suggesting common developmental mechanisms. The increased risk of recurrence of SUA suggests that genetic and/or persisting environmental factors influence the risk. We found that SUA had equally strong associations with trisomies 13 and 18. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.20359</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31132166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Anorectal ; Cesarean section ; Cleft lip/palate ; Congenital defects ; Diabetes mellitus ; Environmental factors ; Epilepsy ; Esophagus ; Gestation ; Gynecology ; Health risk assessment ; Hernia ; Hydrocephalus ; Hypertension ; intestinal atresia ; malformations ; Mathematical analysis ; Microcephaly ; Obstetrics ; Population studies ; Population-based studies ; Pregnancy ; recurrence ; Reproductive technologies ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; single umbilical artery ; Spinal cord ; Stenosis ; SUA ; Trisomy ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; umbilical cord</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology, 2020-04, Vol.55 (4), p.510-515</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-eeb9530ef37cc1750263440da48970407b9e6b861146ad20a4a49433a7943cba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-eeb9530ef37cc1750263440da48970407b9e6b861146ad20a4a49433a7943cba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4331-1250</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fuog.20359$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fuog.20359$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31132166$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ebbing, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moster, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objectives Single umbilical artery (SUA) is associated with congenital malformations in most organ systems, but reported findings have not been consistent. While it has been suggested that genetic and persisting environmental factors influence the development of SUA, it is not known whether there is an increased risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy of the same woman. The aims of this study were to investigate the occurrence of, and risk factors for, SUA in Norway, to assess its association with congenital malformations and trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and to study the risk of recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancies. Methods This was a population‐based study of all (n = 918 933) singleton pregnancies of &gt; 16 weeks' gestation recorded in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2014. To identify risk factors and congenital malformations associated with SUA, generalized estimating equations and logistic regression were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs. ORs were also calculated for the recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancy. Results The occurrence of SUA in our population was 0.46% (4241/918 933). Parity ≥ 4, smoking, maternal pregestational diabetes, epilepsy, chronic hypertension, previous Cesarean delivery and conception by assisted reproductive technology increased the odds of having SUA. There was a particularly strong association between SUA and gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis in the neonate, with ORs of 25.8 (95% CI, 17.0–39.1) and 20.3 (95% CI, 13.4–30.9) for esophageal and anorectal atresia or stenosis, respectively, followed by an OR of 5.9 (95% CI, 1.9–18.5) for renal agenesis. SUA was associated with an up to 7–8 times increased risk of congenital heart defects. There was an association with microcephaly, congenital hydrocephalus and other congenital malformations of the brain and spinal cord. Diaphragmatic hernia, limb reductions and cleft lip or palate had a weaker association with SUA, with ORs ranging from 4.8 to 2.8. The associations with trisomy 18 and 13 were equally strong (OR 14.4 (95% CI, 9.3–22.4) and OR 13.6 (95% CI, 6.7–27.8), respectively), and the risk of trisomy 21 was doubled (OR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2–3.6)). Pregnancies with SUA, with or without an associated malformation, had a 2‐fold increased risk for SUA in a subsequent pregnancy. Conclusions SUA is associated strongly with gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis, suggesting common developmental mechanisms. The increased risk of recurrence of SUA suggests that genetic and/or persisting environmental factors influence the risk. We found that SUA had equally strong associations with trisomies 13 and 18. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</description><subject>Anorectal</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Cleft lip/palate</subject><subject>Congenital defects</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>intestinal atresia</subject><subject>malformations</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Microcephaly</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>single umbilical artery</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Stenosis</subject><subject>SUA</subject><subject>Trisomy</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>umbilical cord</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EglIYeAFkiYkh7flPnZgNVVCQKjpAZ8tJnMoliYudqMrGI_CMPAmhBTaWu5Pu0-90H0IXBEYEgI5btxpRYBN5gAaECxlBDJNDNAApIIqFpCfoNIQ1AAjOxDE6YYQwSoQYIPVs61VpcFultrSZLrH2jfEd1nWOvQ2v2BU4c_XK1Lbpt5UuC-cr3VhX3-CN27Tlbv58_0h1MDkOTZt32Nb4yfmt7s7QUaHLYM5_-hAt7-9epg_RfDF7nN7Oo4wliYyMSeWEgSlYnGUkngAVjHPINU9kDBziVBqRJoL07-mcguaaS86YjvuapZoN0dU-d-PdW2tCo9au9XV_UlGWcC6BStpT13sq8y4Ebwq18bbSvlME1LdK1atUO5U9e_mT2KaVyf_IX3c9MN4DW1ua7v8ktVzM9pFfddV-Rg</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Ebbing, C.</creator><creator>Kessler, J.</creator><creator>Moster, D.</creator><creator>Rasmussen, S.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4331-1250</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway</title><author>Ebbing, C. ; Kessler, J. ; Moster, D. ; Rasmussen, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-eeb9530ef37cc1750263440da48970407b9e6b861146ad20a4a49433a7943cba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anorectal</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Cleft lip/palate</topic><topic>Congenital defects</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>intestinal atresia</topic><topic>malformations</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Microcephaly</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>single umbilical artery</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Stenosis</topic><topic>SUA</topic><topic>Trisomy</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>umbilical cord</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ebbing, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moster, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ebbing, C.</au><au>Kessler, J.</au><au>Moster, D.</au><au>Rasmussen, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>510</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>510-515</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objectives Single umbilical artery (SUA) is associated with congenital malformations in most organ systems, but reported findings have not been consistent. While it has been suggested that genetic and persisting environmental factors influence the development of SUA, it is not known whether there is an increased risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy of the same woman. The aims of this study were to investigate the occurrence of, and risk factors for, SUA in Norway, to assess its association with congenital malformations and trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and to study the risk of recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancies. Methods This was a population‐based study of all (n = 918 933) singleton pregnancies of &gt; 16 weeks' gestation recorded in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2014. To identify risk factors and congenital malformations associated with SUA, generalized estimating equations and logistic regression were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs. ORs were also calculated for the recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancy. Results The occurrence of SUA in our population was 0.46% (4241/918 933). Parity ≥ 4, smoking, maternal pregestational diabetes, epilepsy, chronic hypertension, previous Cesarean delivery and conception by assisted reproductive technology increased the odds of having SUA. There was a particularly strong association between SUA and gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis in the neonate, with ORs of 25.8 (95% CI, 17.0–39.1) and 20.3 (95% CI, 13.4–30.9) for esophageal and anorectal atresia or stenosis, respectively, followed by an OR of 5.9 (95% CI, 1.9–18.5) for renal agenesis. SUA was associated with an up to 7–8 times increased risk of congenital heart defects. There was an association with microcephaly, congenital hydrocephalus and other congenital malformations of the brain and spinal cord. Diaphragmatic hernia, limb reductions and cleft lip or palate had a weaker association with SUA, with ORs ranging from 4.8 to 2.8. The associations with trisomy 18 and 13 were equally strong (OR 14.4 (95% CI, 9.3–22.4) and OR 13.6 (95% CI, 6.7–27.8), respectively), and the risk of trisomy 21 was doubled (OR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2–3.6)). Pregnancies with SUA, with or without an associated malformation, had a 2‐fold increased risk for SUA in a subsequent pregnancy. Conclusions SUA is associated strongly with gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis, suggesting common developmental mechanisms. The increased risk of recurrence of SUA suggests that genetic and/or persisting environmental factors influence the risk. We found that SUA had equally strong associations with trisomies 13 and 18. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>31132166</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.20359</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4331-1250</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7692
ispartof Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2020-04, Vol.55 (4), p.510-515
issn 0960-7692
1469-0705
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2384490292
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Anorectal
Cesarean section
Cleft lip/palate
Congenital defects
Diabetes mellitus
Environmental factors
Epilepsy
Esophagus
Gestation
Gynecology
Health risk assessment
Hernia
Hydrocephalus
Hypertension
intestinal atresia
malformations
Mathematical analysis
Microcephaly
Obstetrics
Population studies
Population-based studies
Pregnancy
recurrence
Reproductive technologies
Risk analysis
Risk factors
single umbilical artery
Spinal cord
Stenosis
SUA
Trisomy
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
umbilical cord
title Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A28%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single%20umbilical%20artery%20and%20risk%20of%20congenital%20malformation:%20population%E2%80%90based%20study%20in%20Norway&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Ebbing,%20C.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=510&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=510-515&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.20359&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2384490292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2384490292&rft_id=info:pmid/31132166&rfr_iscdi=true