Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway
ABSTRACT Objectives Single umbilical artery (SUA) is associated with congenital malformations in most organ systems, but reported findings have not been consistent. While it has been suggested that genetic and persisting environmental factors influence the development of SUA, it is not known whether...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2020-04, Vol.55 (4), p.510-515 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 515 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 510 |
container_title | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Ebbing, C. Kessler, J. Moster, D. Rasmussen, S. |
description | ABSTRACT
Objectives
Single umbilical artery (SUA) is associated with congenital malformations in most organ systems, but reported findings have not been consistent. While it has been suggested that genetic and persisting environmental factors influence the development of SUA, it is not known whether there is an increased risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy of the same woman. The aims of this study were to investigate the occurrence of, and risk factors for, SUA in Norway, to assess its association with congenital malformations and trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and to study the risk of recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancies.
Methods
This was a population‐based study of all (n = 918 933) singleton pregnancies of > 16 weeks' gestation recorded in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2014. To identify risk factors and congenital malformations associated with SUA, generalized estimating equations and logistic regression were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs. ORs were also calculated for the recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancy.
Results
The occurrence of SUA in our population was 0.46% (4241/918 933). Parity ≥ 4, smoking, maternal pregestational diabetes, epilepsy, chronic hypertension, previous Cesarean delivery and conception by assisted reproductive technology increased the odds of having SUA. There was a particularly strong association between SUA and gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis in the neonate, with ORs of 25.8 (95% CI, 17.0–39.1) and 20.3 (95% CI, 13.4–30.9) for esophageal and anorectal atresia or stenosis, respectively, followed by an OR of 5.9 (95% CI, 1.9–18.5) for renal agenesis. SUA was associated with an up to 7–8 times increased risk of congenital heart defects. There was an association with microcephaly, congenital hydrocephalus and other congenital malformations of the brain and spinal cord. Diaphragmatic hernia, limb reductions and cleft lip or palate had a weaker association with SUA, with ORs ranging from 4.8 to 2.8. The associations with trisomy 18 and 13 were equally strong (OR 14.4 (95% CI, 9.3–22.4) and OR 13.6 (95% CI, 6.7–27.8), respectively), and the risk of trisomy 21 was doubled (OR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2–3.6)). Pregnancies with SUA, with or without an associated malformation, had a 2‐fold increased risk for SUA in a subsequent pregnancy.
Conclusions
SUA is associated strongly with gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis, suggesting common developmental mechanisms. The increased risk of recurrenc |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/uog.20359 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2384490292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2384490292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-eeb9530ef37cc1750263440da48970407b9e6b861146ad20a4a49433a7943cba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EglIYeAFkiYkh7flPnZgNVVCQKjpAZ8tJnMoliYudqMrGI_CMPAmhBTaWu5Pu0-90H0IXBEYEgI5btxpRYBN5gAaECxlBDJNDNAApIIqFpCfoNIQ1AAjOxDE6YYQwSoQYIPVs61VpcFultrSZLrH2jfEd1nWOvQ2v2BU4c_XK1Lbpt5UuC-cr3VhX3-CN27Tlbv58_0h1MDkOTZt32Nb4yfmt7s7QUaHLYM5_-hAt7-9epg_RfDF7nN7Oo4wliYyMSeWEgSlYnGUkngAVjHPINU9kDBziVBqRJoL07-mcguaaS86YjvuapZoN0dU-d-PdW2tCo9au9XV_UlGWcC6BStpT13sq8y4Ebwq18bbSvlME1LdK1atUO5U9e_mT2KaVyf_IX3c9MN4DW1ua7v8ktVzM9pFfddV-Rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2384490292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Ebbing, C. ; Kessler, J. ; Moster, D. ; Rasmussen, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ebbing, C. ; Kessler, J. ; Moster, D. ; Rasmussen, S.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Objectives
Single umbilical artery (SUA) is associated with congenital malformations in most organ systems, but reported findings have not been consistent. While it has been suggested that genetic and persisting environmental factors influence the development of SUA, it is not known whether there is an increased risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy of the same woman. The aims of this study were to investigate the occurrence of, and risk factors for, SUA in Norway, to assess its association with congenital malformations and trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and to study the risk of recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancies.
Methods
This was a population‐based study of all (n = 918 933) singleton pregnancies of > 16 weeks' gestation recorded in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2014. To identify risk factors and congenital malformations associated with SUA, generalized estimating equations and logistic regression were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs. ORs were also calculated for the recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancy.
Results
The occurrence of SUA in our population was 0.46% (4241/918 933). Parity ≥ 4, smoking, maternal pregestational diabetes, epilepsy, chronic hypertension, previous Cesarean delivery and conception by assisted reproductive technology increased the odds of having SUA. There was a particularly strong association between SUA and gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis in the neonate, with ORs of 25.8 (95% CI, 17.0–39.1) and 20.3 (95% CI, 13.4–30.9) for esophageal and anorectal atresia or stenosis, respectively, followed by an OR of 5.9 (95% CI, 1.9–18.5) for renal agenesis. SUA was associated with an up to 7–8 times increased risk of congenital heart defects. There was an association with microcephaly, congenital hydrocephalus and other congenital malformations of the brain and spinal cord. Diaphragmatic hernia, limb reductions and cleft lip or palate had a weaker association with SUA, with ORs ranging from 4.8 to 2.8. The associations with trisomy 18 and 13 were equally strong (OR 14.4 (95% CI, 9.3–22.4) and OR 13.6 (95% CI, 6.7–27.8), respectively), and the risk of trisomy 21 was doubled (OR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2–3.6)). Pregnancies with SUA, with or without an associated malformation, had a 2‐fold increased risk for SUA in a subsequent pregnancy.
Conclusions
SUA is associated strongly with gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis, suggesting common developmental mechanisms. The increased risk of recurrence of SUA suggests that genetic and/or persisting environmental factors influence the risk. We found that SUA had equally strong associations with trisomies 13 and 18. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.20359</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31132166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Anorectal ; Cesarean section ; Cleft lip/palate ; Congenital defects ; Diabetes mellitus ; Environmental factors ; Epilepsy ; Esophagus ; Gestation ; Gynecology ; Health risk assessment ; Hernia ; Hydrocephalus ; Hypertension ; intestinal atresia ; malformations ; Mathematical analysis ; Microcephaly ; Obstetrics ; Population studies ; Population-based studies ; Pregnancy ; recurrence ; Reproductive technologies ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; single umbilical artery ; Spinal cord ; Stenosis ; SUA ; Trisomy ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; umbilical cord</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2020-04, Vol.55 (4), p.510-515</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-eeb9530ef37cc1750263440da48970407b9e6b861146ad20a4a49433a7943cba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-eeb9530ef37cc1750263440da48970407b9e6b861146ad20a4a49433a7943cba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4331-1250</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fuog.20359$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fuog.20359$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31132166$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ebbing, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moster, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Objectives
Single umbilical artery (SUA) is associated with congenital malformations in most organ systems, but reported findings have not been consistent. While it has been suggested that genetic and persisting environmental factors influence the development of SUA, it is not known whether there is an increased risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy of the same woman. The aims of this study were to investigate the occurrence of, and risk factors for, SUA in Norway, to assess its association with congenital malformations and trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and to study the risk of recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancies.
Methods
This was a population‐based study of all (n = 918 933) singleton pregnancies of > 16 weeks' gestation recorded in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2014. To identify risk factors and congenital malformations associated with SUA, generalized estimating equations and logistic regression were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs. ORs were also calculated for the recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancy.
Results
The occurrence of SUA in our population was 0.46% (4241/918 933). Parity ≥ 4, smoking, maternal pregestational diabetes, epilepsy, chronic hypertension, previous Cesarean delivery and conception by assisted reproductive technology increased the odds of having SUA. There was a particularly strong association between SUA and gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis in the neonate, with ORs of 25.8 (95% CI, 17.0–39.1) and 20.3 (95% CI, 13.4–30.9) for esophageal and anorectal atresia or stenosis, respectively, followed by an OR of 5.9 (95% CI, 1.9–18.5) for renal agenesis. SUA was associated with an up to 7–8 times increased risk of congenital heart defects. There was an association with microcephaly, congenital hydrocephalus and other congenital malformations of the brain and spinal cord. Diaphragmatic hernia, limb reductions and cleft lip or palate had a weaker association with SUA, with ORs ranging from 4.8 to 2.8. The associations with trisomy 18 and 13 were equally strong (OR 14.4 (95% CI, 9.3–22.4) and OR 13.6 (95% CI, 6.7–27.8), respectively), and the risk of trisomy 21 was doubled (OR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2–3.6)). Pregnancies with SUA, with or without an associated malformation, had a 2‐fold increased risk for SUA in a subsequent pregnancy.
Conclusions
SUA is associated strongly with gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis, suggesting common developmental mechanisms. The increased risk of recurrence of SUA suggests that genetic and/or persisting environmental factors influence the risk. We found that SUA had equally strong associations with trisomies 13 and 18. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</description><subject>Anorectal</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Cleft lip/palate</subject><subject>Congenital defects</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>intestinal atresia</subject><subject>malformations</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Microcephaly</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>single umbilical artery</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Stenosis</subject><subject>SUA</subject><subject>Trisomy</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>umbilical cord</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EglIYeAFkiYkh7flPnZgNVVCQKjpAZ8tJnMoliYudqMrGI_CMPAmhBTaWu5Pu0-90H0IXBEYEgI5btxpRYBN5gAaECxlBDJNDNAApIIqFpCfoNIQ1AAjOxDE6YYQwSoQYIPVs61VpcFultrSZLrH2jfEd1nWOvQ2v2BU4c_XK1Lbpt5UuC-cr3VhX3-CN27Tlbv58_0h1MDkOTZt32Nb4yfmt7s7QUaHLYM5_-hAt7-9epg_RfDF7nN7Oo4wliYyMSeWEgSlYnGUkngAVjHPINU9kDBziVBqRJoL07-mcguaaS86YjvuapZoN0dU-d-PdW2tCo9au9XV_UlGWcC6BStpT13sq8y4Ebwq18bbSvlME1LdK1atUO5U9e_mT2KaVyf_IX3c9MN4DW1ua7v8ktVzM9pFfddV-Rg</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Ebbing, C.</creator><creator>Kessler, J.</creator><creator>Moster, D.</creator><creator>Rasmussen, S.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4331-1250</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway</title><author>Ebbing, C. ; Kessler, J. ; Moster, D. ; Rasmussen, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-eeb9530ef37cc1750263440da48970407b9e6b861146ad20a4a49433a7943cba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anorectal</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Cleft lip/palate</topic><topic>Congenital defects</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>intestinal atresia</topic><topic>malformations</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Microcephaly</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>single umbilical artery</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Stenosis</topic><topic>SUA</topic><topic>Trisomy</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>umbilical cord</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ebbing, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moster, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ebbing, C.</au><au>Kessler, J.</au><au>Moster, D.</au><au>Rasmussen, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>510</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>510-515</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Objectives
Single umbilical artery (SUA) is associated with congenital malformations in most organ systems, but reported findings have not been consistent. While it has been suggested that genetic and persisting environmental factors influence the development of SUA, it is not known whether there is an increased risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy of the same woman. The aims of this study were to investigate the occurrence of, and risk factors for, SUA in Norway, to assess its association with congenital malformations and trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and to study the risk of recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancies.
Methods
This was a population‐based study of all (n = 918 933) singleton pregnancies of > 16 weeks' gestation recorded in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2014. To identify risk factors and congenital malformations associated with SUA, generalized estimating equations and logistic regression were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs. ORs were also calculated for the recurrence of SUA in subsequent pregnancy.
Results
The occurrence of SUA in our population was 0.46% (4241/918 933). Parity ≥ 4, smoking, maternal pregestational diabetes, epilepsy, chronic hypertension, previous Cesarean delivery and conception by assisted reproductive technology increased the odds of having SUA. There was a particularly strong association between SUA and gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis in the neonate, with ORs of 25.8 (95% CI, 17.0–39.1) and 20.3 (95% CI, 13.4–30.9) for esophageal and anorectal atresia or stenosis, respectively, followed by an OR of 5.9 (95% CI, 1.9–18.5) for renal agenesis. SUA was associated with an up to 7–8 times increased risk of congenital heart defects. There was an association with microcephaly, congenital hydrocephalus and other congenital malformations of the brain and spinal cord. Diaphragmatic hernia, limb reductions and cleft lip or palate had a weaker association with SUA, with ORs ranging from 4.8 to 2.8. The associations with trisomy 18 and 13 were equally strong (OR 14.4 (95% CI, 9.3–22.4) and OR 13.6 (95% CI, 6.7–27.8), respectively), and the risk of trisomy 21 was doubled (OR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2–3.6)). Pregnancies with SUA, with or without an associated malformation, had a 2‐fold increased risk for SUA in a subsequent pregnancy.
Conclusions
SUA is associated strongly with gastrointestinal atresia or stenosis, suggesting common developmental mechanisms. The increased risk of recurrence of SUA suggests that genetic and/or persisting environmental factors influence the risk. We found that SUA had equally strong associations with trisomies 13 and 18. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>31132166</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.20359</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4331-1250</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-7692 |
ispartof | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2020-04, Vol.55 (4), p.510-515 |
issn | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2384490292 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Anorectal Cesarean section Cleft lip/palate Congenital defects Diabetes mellitus Environmental factors Epilepsy Esophagus Gestation Gynecology Health risk assessment Hernia Hydrocephalus Hypertension intestinal atresia malformations Mathematical analysis Microcephaly Obstetrics Population studies Population-based studies Pregnancy recurrence Reproductive technologies Risk analysis Risk factors single umbilical artery Spinal cord Stenosis SUA Trisomy Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound umbilical cord |
title | Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population‐based study in Norway |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A28%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single%20umbilical%20artery%20and%20risk%20of%20congenital%20malformation:%20population%E2%80%90based%20study%20in%20Norway&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Ebbing,%20C.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=510&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=510-515&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.20359&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2384490292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2384490292&rft_id=info:pmid/31132166&rfr_iscdi=true |