Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model

Water quality monitoring is an important component of water resources management. In order to predict two water quality variables, namely dissolved oxygen (DO; mg/L) and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a; µg/L) in the Small Prespa Lake in Greece, two standalone deep learning (DL) models, the long short-term memo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment 2020-02, Vol.34 (2), p.415-433
Hauptverfasser: Barzegar, Rahim, Aalami, Mohammad Taghi, Adamowski, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 433
container_issue 2
container_start_page 415
container_title Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment
container_volume 34
creator Barzegar, Rahim
Aalami, Mohammad Taghi
Adamowski, Jan
description Water quality monitoring is an important component of water resources management. In order to predict two water quality variables, namely dissolved oxygen (DO; mg/L) and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a; µg/L) in the Small Prespa Lake in Greece, two standalone deep learning (DL) models, the long short-term memory (LSTM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) models, along with their hybrid, the CNN–LSTM model, were developed. The main novelty of this study was to build a coupled CNN–LSTM model to predict water quality variables. Two traditional machine learning models, support-vector regression (SVR) and decision tree (DT), were also developed to compare with the DL models. Time series of the physicochemical water quality variables, specifically pH, oxidation–reduction potential (ORP; mV), water temperature (°C), electrical conductivity (EC; µS/cm), DO and Chl-a, were obtained using a sensor at 15-min intervals from June 1, 2012 to May 31, 2013 for model development. Lag times of up to one (t − 1) and two (t − 2) for input variables pH, ORP, water temperature, and EC were used to predict DO and Chl-a concentrations, respectively. Each model’s performance in both training and testing phases was assessed using statistical metrics including the correlation coefficient ( r ), root mean square error ( RMSE ), mean absolute error ( MAE ), their normalized equivalents ( RRMSE , RMAE ; %), percentage of bias (PBIAS), Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient ( E NS ), Willmott’s Index, and graphical plots (Taylor diagram, box plot and spider diagram). Results showed that LSTM outperformed the CNN model for DO prediction, but the standalone DL models yielded similar performances for Chl-a prediction. Generally, the hybrid CNN–LSTM models outperformed the standalone models (LSTM, CNN, SVR and DT models) in predicting both DO and Chl-a. By integrating the LSTM and CNN models, the hybrid model successfully captured both the low and high levels of the water quality variables, particularly for the DO concentrations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00477-020-01776-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2383880261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2383880261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-21a68f39de69ac9a87471fe6ffeefd36e14d43b0f4c23ffab3eb94118da5bacf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EElXpCzBZYjb4ltuIKi6VShlaFhbLiY9bozRJ7QTUjXfgDXkSUoJgY_rP8H3_kX6Ezhm9ZJQmV4FSmSSEckooS5KY8CM0YlLERPAoO_69JT1FkxBc3kuRyDJGR-h5ual9S1rwW_ym-8C7Tpeu3eNX7Z3OS8CNB-OK1tUV7oKr1ljjzT73zuDpYvH5_jFfrh6wAWhwCdpXB2JbGyjP0InVZYDJT47R0-3NanpP5o93s-n1nBQijVrCmY5TKzIDcaaLTKeJTJiF2FoAa0QMTBopcmplwYW1OheQZ5Kx1Ogo14UVY3Qx9Da-3nUQWvVSd77qXyouUpGmlMesp_hAFb4OwYNVjXdb7feKUXWYUQ0zqn5G9T1jb4-RGKTQw9Ua_F_1P9YXJT13Xg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2383880261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Barzegar, Rahim ; Aalami, Mohammad Taghi ; Adamowski, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Barzegar, Rahim ; Aalami, Mohammad Taghi ; Adamowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Water quality monitoring is an important component of water resources management. In order to predict two water quality variables, namely dissolved oxygen (DO; mg/L) and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a; µg/L) in the Small Prespa Lake in Greece, two standalone deep learning (DL) models, the long short-term memory (LSTM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) models, along with their hybrid, the CNN–LSTM model, were developed. The main novelty of this study was to build a coupled CNN–LSTM model to predict water quality variables. Two traditional machine learning models, support-vector regression (SVR) and decision tree (DT), were also developed to compare with the DL models. Time series of the physicochemical water quality variables, specifically pH, oxidation–reduction potential (ORP; mV), water temperature (°C), electrical conductivity (EC; µS/cm), DO and Chl-a, were obtained using a sensor at 15-min intervals from June 1, 2012 to May 31, 2013 for model development. Lag times of up to one (t − 1) and two (t − 2) for input variables pH, ORP, water temperature, and EC were used to predict DO and Chl-a concentrations, respectively. Each model’s performance in both training and testing phases was assessed using statistical metrics including the correlation coefficient ( r ), root mean square error ( RMSE ), mean absolute error ( MAE ), their normalized equivalents ( RRMSE , RMAE ; %), percentage of bias (PBIAS), Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient ( E NS ), Willmott’s Index, and graphical plots (Taylor diagram, box plot and spider diagram). Results showed that LSTM outperformed the CNN model for DO prediction, but the standalone DL models yielded similar performances for Chl-a prediction. Generally, the hybrid CNN–LSTM models outperformed the standalone models (LSTM, CNN, SVR and DT models) in predicting both DO and Chl-a. By integrating the LSTM and CNN models, the hybrid model successfully captured both the low and high levels of the water quality variables, particularly for the DO concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00477-020-01776-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Artificial neural networks ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Chlorophyll ; Computational Intelligence ; Computer Science ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Decision trees ; Deep learning ; Dissolved oxygen ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Electrical conductivity ; Electrical resistivity ; Environment ; Environmental monitoring ; Learning algorithms ; Long short-term memory ; Machine learning ; Math. Appl. in Environmental Science ; Neural networks ; Original Paper ; Oxidation ; pH effects ; Physics ; Predictions ; Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes ; Regression analysis ; Root-mean-square errors ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics for Engineering ; Variables ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water monitoring ; Water Pollution Control ; Water quality ; Water quality management ; Water resources ; Water resources management ; Water temperature</subject><ispartof>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 2020-02, Vol.34 (2), p.415-433</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-21a68f39de69ac9a87471fe6ffeefd36e14d43b0f4c23ffab3eb94118da5bacf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-21a68f39de69ac9a87471fe6ffeefd36e14d43b0f4c23ffab3eb94118da5bacf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1941-2991</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00477-020-01776-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00477-020-01776-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barzegar, Rahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aalami, Mohammad Taghi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model</title><title>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment</title><addtitle>Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess</addtitle><description>Water quality monitoring is an important component of water resources management. In order to predict two water quality variables, namely dissolved oxygen (DO; mg/L) and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a; µg/L) in the Small Prespa Lake in Greece, two standalone deep learning (DL) models, the long short-term memory (LSTM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) models, along with their hybrid, the CNN–LSTM model, were developed. The main novelty of this study was to build a coupled CNN–LSTM model to predict water quality variables. Two traditional machine learning models, support-vector regression (SVR) and decision tree (DT), were also developed to compare with the DL models. Time series of the physicochemical water quality variables, specifically pH, oxidation–reduction potential (ORP; mV), water temperature (°C), electrical conductivity (EC; µS/cm), DO and Chl-a, were obtained using a sensor at 15-min intervals from June 1, 2012 to May 31, 2013 for model development. Lag times of up to one (t − 1) and two (t − 2) for input variables pH, ORP, water temperature, and EC were used to predict DO and Chl-a concentrations, respectively. Each model’s performance in both training and testing phases was assessed using statistical metrics including the correlation coefficient ( r ), root mean square error ( RMSE ), mean absolute error ( MAE ), their normalized equivalents ( RRMSE , RMAE ; %), percentage of bias (PBIAS), Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient ( E NS ), Willmott’s Index, and graphical plots (Taylor diagram, box plot and spider diagram). Results showed that LSTM outperformed the CNN model for DO prediction, but the standalone DL models yielded similar performances for Chl-a prediction. Generally, the hybrid CNN–LSTM models outperformed the standalone models (LSTM, CNN, SVR and DT models) in predicting both DO and Chl-a. By integrating the LSTM and CNN models, the hybrid model successfully captured both the low and high levels of the water quality variables, particularly for the DO concentrations.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Computational Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Dissolved oxygen</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electrical conductivity</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Long short-term memory</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water monitoring</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality management</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><issn>1436-3240</issn><issn>1436-3259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EElXpCzBZYjb4ltuIKi6VShlaFhbLiY9bozRJ7QTUjXfgDXkSUoJgY_rP8H3_kX6Ezhm9ZJQmV4FSmSSEckooS5KY8CM0YlLERPAoO_69JT1FkxBc3kuRyDJGR-h5ual9S1rwW_ym-8C7Tpeu3eNX7Z3OS8CNB-OK1tUV7oKr1ljjzT73zuDpYvH5_jFfrh6wAWhwCdpXB2JbGyjP0InVZYDJT47R0-3NanpP5o93s-n1nBQijVrCmY5TKzIDcaaLTKeJTJiF2FoAa0QMTBopcmplwYW1OheQZ5Kx1Ogo14UVY3Qx9Da-3nUQWvVSd77qXyouUpGmlMesp_hAFb4OwYNVjXdb7feKUXWYUQ0zqn5G9T1jb4-RGKTQw9Ua_F_1P9YXJT13Xg</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Barzegar, Rahim</creator><creator>Aalami, Mohammad Taghi</creator><creator>Adamowski, Jan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1941-2991</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model</title><author>Barzegar, Rahim ; Aalami, Mohammad Taghi ; Adamowski, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-21a68f39de69ac9a87471fe6ffeefd36e14d43b0f4c23ffab3eb94118da5bacf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Computational Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Dissolved oxygen</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electrical conductivity</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Long short-term memory</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water monitoring</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality management</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barzegar, Rahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aalami, Mohammad Taghi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering &amp; Technology Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barzegar, Rahim</au><au>Aalami, Mohammad Taghi</au><au>Adamowski, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model</atitle><jtitle>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment</jtitle><stitle>Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess</stitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>415</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>415-433</pages><issn>1436-3240</issn><eissn>1436-3259</eissn><abstract>Water quality monitoring is an important component of water resources management. In order to predict two water quality variables, namely dissolved oxygen (DO; mg/L) and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a; µg/L) in the Small Prespa Lake in Greece, two standalone deep learning (DL) models, the long short-term memory (LSTM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) models, along with their hybrid, the CNN–LSTM model, were developed. The main novelty of this study was to build a coupled CNN–LSTM model to predict water quality variables. Two traditional machine learning models, support-vector regression (SVR) and decision tree (DT), were also developed to compare with the DL models. Time series of the physicochemical water quality variables, specifically pH, oxidation–reduction potential (ORP; mV), water temperature (°C), electrical conductivity (EC; µS/cm), DO and Chl-a, were obtained using a sensor at 15-min intervals from June 1, 2012 to May 31, 2013 for model development. Lag times of up to one (t − 1) and two (t − 2) for input variables pH, ORP, water temperature, and EC were used to predict DO and Chl-a concentrations, respectively. Each model’s performance in both training and testing phases was assessed using statistical metrics including the correlation coefficient ( r ), root mean square error ( RMSE ), mean absolute error ( MAE ), their normalized equivalents ( RRMSE , RMAE ; %), percentage of bias (PBIAS), Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient ( E NS ), Willmott’s Index, and graphical plots (Taylor diagram, box plot and spider diagram). Results showed that LSTM outperformed the CNN model for DO prediction, but the standalone DL models yielded similar performances for Chl-a prediction. Generally, the hybrid CNN–LSTM models outperformed the standalone models (LSTM, CNN, SVR and DT models) in predicting both DO and Chl-a. By integrating the LSTM and CNN models, the hybrid model successfully captured both the low and high levels of the water quality variables, particularly for the DO concentrations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00477-020-01776-2</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1941-2991</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1436-3240
ispartof Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 2020-02, Vol.34 (2), p.415-433
issn 1436-3240
1436-3259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2383880261
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aquatic Pollution
Artificial neural networks
Chemistry and Earth Sciences
Chlorophyll
Computational Intelligence
Computer Science
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Decision trees
Deep learning
Dissolved oxygen
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Electrical conductivity
Electrical resistivity
Environment
Environmental monitoring
Learning algorithms
Long short-term memory
Machine learning
Math. Appl. in Environmental Science
Neural networks
Original Paper
Oxidation
pH effects
Physics
Predictions
Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes
Regression analysis
Root-mean-square errors
Statistical analysis
Statistics for Engineering
Variables
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water monitoring
Water Pollution Control
Water quality
Water quality management
Water resources
Water resources management
Water temperature
title Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A03%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-term%20water%20quality%20variable%20prediction%20using%20a%20hybrid%20CNN%E2%80%93LSTM%20deep%20learning%20model&rft.jtitle=Stochastic%20environmental%20research%20and%20risk%20assessment&rft.au=Barzegar,%20Rahim&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=415&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=415-433&rft.issn=1436-3240&rft.eissn=1436-3259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00477-020-01776-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2383880261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2383880261&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true