Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry

Beaches are characterized by high morphodynamic activity, and high-frequency measurements are needed to understand their states and rates of change. Ideally, beach survey methods should be at once accurate, rapid and low-cost. Recently, unmanned aerial systems (drones) have been increasingly utilize...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geo-marine letters 2020-04, Vol.40 (2), p.255-268
Hauptverfasser: Casella, Elisa, Drechsel, Jan, Winter, Christian, Benninghoff, Markus, Rovere, Alessio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 268
container_issue 2
container_start_page 255
container_title Geo-marine letters
container_volume 40
creator Casella, Elisa
Drechsel, Jan
Winter, Christian
Benninghoff, Markus
Rovere, Alessio
description Beaches are characterized by high morphodynamic activity, and high-frequency measurements are needed to understand their states and rates of change. Ideally, beach survey methods should be at once accurate, rapid and low-cost. Recently, unmanned aerial systems (drones) have been increasingly utilized to measure beach topography. In this paper, we present a review of the state of art in drones and photogrammetry for beach surveys and the respective achieved measurement quality (where reported). We then show how drones with a minimal configuration and a low-cost setup can meet the high accuracy and rapidity required for beach surveys. To test a minimal drone and ground control point configuration, we used consumer-grade equipment to perform the same flight path with different cameras and at different altitudes. We then used photogrammetry to produce digital elevation models of the beach. Using a GNSS-RTK system, we collected 2950 independent control points to evaluate the accuracy of the digital elevation models. Results show that, once a few potential sources of uncertainties in the final digital elevation model are taken into account, the average RMSE(z) of the digital elevation models was ~5 cm, with a survey efficiency of ca. 3 m 2  min −1 . Digital elevation models taken at different times were used to calculate the before–after sediment budget following a storm that hit a sandy coast in Sylt Island at the German North Sea coast.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00367-020-00638-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2383879859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2383879859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a452t-9c5a0313b4f52097ce5d3c734e41c63b7b99ff1bc3ffb3d28e157a63589b58c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKd_wFPAc_RL0jTpcQx1wsCLnkOSJt2Ga2rSCv33dlbw5um7PO_7fjwI3VK4pwDyIQPwUhJgQABKrog6QwtacEYoFfIcLYDJkkBRwiW6yvkAAIVUdIE2K-eGZNyIY8DZtDW23rgd7mMXm2S63YjzkL78uG8bbEdcp9j6jE9gt4v9iTkefZ_Ga3QRzEf2N793id6fHt_WG7J9fX5Zr7bEFIL1pHLCAKfcFkEwqKTzouZO8sIX1JXcSltVIVDreAiW10z56X9TcqEqK5QDvkR3c2-X4ufgc68PcUjtNKkZV1zJSolqothMuRRzTj7oLu2PJo2agj4Z07MxPRnTP8a0mkJ8DuUJbhuf_qr_SX0DUiZueA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2383879859</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Casella, Elisa ; Drechsel, Jan ; Winter, Christian ; Benninghoff, Markus ; Rovere, Alessio</creator><creatorcontrib>Casella, Elisa ; Drechsel, Jan ; Winter, Christian ; Benninghoff, Markus ; Rovere, Alessio</creatorcontrib><description>Beaches are characterized by high morphodynamic activity, and high-frequency measurements are needed to understand their states and rates of change. Ideally, beach survey methods should be at once accurate, rapid and low-cost. Recently, unmanned aerial systems (drones) have been increasingly utilized to measure beach topography. In this paper, we present a review of the state of art in drones and photogrammetry for beach surveys and the respective achieved measurement quality (where reported). We then show how drones with a minimal configuration and a low-cost setup can meet the high accuracy and rapidity required for beach surveys. To test a minimal drone and ground control point configuration, we used consumer-grade equipment to perform the same flight path with different cameras and at different altitudes. We then used photogrammetry to produce digital elevation models of the beach. Using a GNSS-RTK system, we collected 2950 independent control points to evaluate the accuracy of the digital elevation models. Results show that, once a few potential sources of uncertainties in the final digital elevation model are taken into account, the average RMSE(z) of the digital elevation models was ~5 cm, with a survey efficiency of ca. 3 m 2  min −1 . Digital elevation models taken at different times were used to calculate the before–after sediment budget following a storm that hit a sandy coast in Sylt Island at the German North Sea coast.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-0460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00367-020-00638-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Beaches ; Cameras ; Coasts ; Configurations ; Control equipment ; Digital Elevation Models ; Drone aircraft ; Drones ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Elevation ; Geology ; Low cost ; Model accuracy ; Original ; Photogrammetry ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Storms ; Surveying ; Surveys ; Topography ; Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><ispartof>Geo-marine letters, 2020-04, Vol.40 (2), p.255-268</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>Geo-Marine Letters is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a452t-9c5a0313b4f52097ce5d3c734e41c63b7b99ff1bc3ffb3d28e157a63589b58c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a452t-9c5a0313b4f52097ce5d3c734e41c63b7b99ff1bc3ffb3d28e157a63589b58c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8948-2442</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00367-020-00638-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00367-020-00638-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casella, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drechsel, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benninghoff, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovere, Alessio</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry</title><title>Geo-marine letters</title><addtitle>Geo-Mar Lett</addtitle><description>Beaches are characterized by high morphodynamic activity, and high-frequency measurements are needed to understand their states and rates of change. Ideally, beach survey methods should be at once accurate, rapid and low-cost. Recently, unmanned aerial systems (drones) have been increasingly utilized to measure beach topography. In this paper, we present a review of the state of art in drones and photogrammetry for beach surveys and the respective achieved measurement quality (where reported). We then show how drones with a minimal configuration and a low-cost setup can meet the high accuracy and rapidity required for beach surveys. To test a minimal drone and ground control point configuration, we used consumer-grade equipment to perform the same flight path with different cameras and at different altitudes. We then used photogrammetry to produce digital elevation models of the beach. Using a GNSS-RTK system, we collected 2950 independent control points to evaluate the accuracy of the digital elevation models. Results show that, once a few potential sources of uncertainties in the final digital elevation model are taken into account, the average RMSE(z) of the digital elevation models was ~5 cm, with a survey efficiency of ca. 3 m 2  min −1 . Digital elevation models taken at different times were used to calculate the before–after sediment budget following a storm that hit a sandy coast in Sylt Island at the German North Sea coast.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Control equipment</subject><subject>Digital Elevation Models</subject><subject>Drone aircraft</subject><subject>Drones</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Low cost</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><issn>0276-0460</issn><issn>1432-1157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKd_wFPAc_RL0jTpcQx1wsCLnkOSJt2Ga2rSCv33dlbw5um7PO_7fjwI3VK4pwDyIQPwUhJgQABKrog6QwtacEYoFfIcLYDJkkBRwiW6yvkAAIVUdIE2K-eGZNyIY8DZtDW23rgd7mMXm2S63YjzkL78uG8bbEdcp9j6jE9gt4v9iTkefZ_Ga3QRzEf2N793id6fHt_WG7J9fX5Zr7bEFIL1pHLCAKfcFkEwqKTzouZO8sIX1JXcSltVIVDreAiW10z56X9TcqEqK5QDvkR3c2-X4ufgc68PcUjtNKkZV1zJSolqothMuRRzTj7oLu2PJo2agj4Z07MxPRnTP8a0mkJ8DuUJbhuf_qr_SX0DUiZueA</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Casella, Elisa</creator><creator>Drechsel, Jan</creator><creator>Winter, Christian</creator><creator>Benninghoff, Markus</creator><creator>Rovere, Alessio</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8948-2442</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry</title><author>Casella, Elisa ; Drechsel, Jan ; Winter, Christian ; Benninghoff, Markus ; Rovere, Alessio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a452t-9c5a0313b4f52097ce5d3c734e41c63b7b99ff1bc3ffb3d28e157a63589b58c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Control equipment</topic><topic>Digital Elevation Models</topic><topic>Drone aircraft</topic><topic>Drones</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Low cost</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casella, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drechsel, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benninghoff, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovere, Alessio</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Geo-marine letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casella, Elisa</au><au>Drechsel, Jan</au><au>Winter, Christian</au><au>Benninghoff, Markus</au><au>Rovere, Alessio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry</atitle><jtitle>Geo-marine letters</jtitle><stitle>Geo-Mar Lett</stitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>255-268</pages><issn>0276-0460</issn><eissn>1432-1157</eissn><abstract>Beaches are characterized by high morphodynamic activity, and high-frequency measurements are needed to understand their states and rates of change. Ideally, beach survey methods should be at once accurate, rapid and low-cost. Recently, unmanned aerial systems (drones) have been increasingly utilized to measure beach topography. In this paper, we present a review of the state of art in drones and photogrammetry for beach surveys and the respective achieved measurement quality (where reported). We then show how drones with a minimal configuration and a low-cost setup can meet the high accuracy and rapidity required for beach surveys. To test a minimal drone and ground control point configuration, we used consumer-grade equipment to perform the same flight path with different cameras and at different altitudes. We then used photogrammetry to produce digital elevation models of the beach. Using a GNSS-RTK system, we collected 2950 independent control points to evaluate the accuracy of the digital elevation models. Results show that, once a few potential sources of uncertainties in the final digital elevation model are taken into account, the average RMSE(z) of the digital elevation models was ~5 cm, with a survey efficiency of ca. 3 m 2  min −1 . Digital elevation models taken at different times were used to calculate the before–after sediment budget following a storm that hit a sandy coast in Sylt Island at the German North Sea coast.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00367-020-00638-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8948-2442</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0276-0460
ispartof Geo-marine letters, 2020-04, Vol.40 (2), p.255-268
issn 0276-0460
1432-1157
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2383879859
source SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Accuracy
Beaches
Cameras
Coasts
Configurations
Control equipment
Digital Elevation Models
Drone aircraft
Drones
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Elevation
Geology
Low cost
Model accuracy
Original
Photogrammetry
Polls & surveys
Storms
Surveying
Surveys
Topography
Unmanned aerial vehicles
title Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A15%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20sand%20beach%20topography%20surveying%20by%20drones%20and%20photogrammetry&rft.jtitle=Geo-marine%20letters&rft.au=Casella,%20Elisa&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=255-268&rft.issn=0276-0460&rft.eissn=1432-1157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00367-020-00638-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2383879859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2383879859&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true