Lowest Twelve Frequencies of Sandwich Plates Using Third-Order Shear-Normal Deformation Theory
We delineate effects of 1) face-to-core stiffness ratio (FCSR) and mass density ratio (FCDR) in square laminates and sandwich plates and 2) the fiber and transverse direction elastic modulus ratio E1/E2 in cross-ply laminates on the first 12 distinct frequencies found by analytically solving the thr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIAA journal 2020-04, Vol.58 (4), p.1821-1835 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1835 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1821 |
container_title | AIAA journal |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Alanbay, Berkan Batra, Romesh C Kapania, Rakesh K |
description | We delineate effects of 1) face-to-core stiffness ratio (FCSR) and mass density ratio (FCDR) in square laminates and sandwich plates and 2) the fiber and transverse direction elastic modulus ratio E1/E2 in cross-ply laminates on the first 12 distinct frequencies found by analytically solving the three-dimensional linear elasticity theory equations and using an equivalent single-layer third-order shear and normal deformation plate theory (TSNDT). Whereas the elasticity equations for simply supported plates are solved by using Srivinas and Rao’s approach, the TSNDT equations are numerically solved by using weighted Jacobi polynomials and the Ritz method. We note that previous studies have generally compared only the fundamental frequency. For [0°/90°/0°/90°/0°] square laminates with a side-length/plate-thickness ratio of 100 (10), the maximum error in the TSNDT predicted first 12 frequencies is less than 0.4% (7%). For a FCSR less than 20, the maximum difference in predictions from the two approaches for the first six distinct frequencies is 5.4%. However, the FCDR has little effect on the difference between frequencies from the two methods. The frequencies and mode shapes presented herein should help us better understand the dynamic behavior of laminated and sandwich plates and provide benchmark results for others to assess their theories. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.J058920 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2383211028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2383211028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-e96641156fee6d568d6686575450481e3da7e76e3e951a6a056e9b2cc586a8be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkF1LwzAYhYMoOKcX_oOAIHiRmTdp0vRS5uYHwwnbwCtL1r51HV0zk86xf2_HBl549X7wcA7nEHINvCcURPfQe-XKJIKfkA4oKZk06uOUdDjnwCBS4pxchLBsLxEb6JDPkdtiaOh0i9UP0qHH7w3WWYmBuoJObJ1vy2xB3yvbtK9ZKOsvOl2UPmdjn6OnkwVaz96cX9mKPmKxX5rS1S2Ezu8uyVlhq4BXx9kls-Fg2n9mo_HTS_9hxKwwpmGYaB0BKF0g6lxpk2tttIpVpHhkAGVuY4w1SkwUWG250pjMRZYpo62Zo-ySm4Pu2rs2QGjSpdv4urVMhTRSAHBhWuruQGXeheCxSNe-XFm_S4Gn-_pSSI_1teztgbWltX9q_8FfIbVs9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2383211028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lowest Twelve Frequencies of Sandwich Plates Using Third-Order Shear-Normal Deformation Theory</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Alanbay, Berkan ; Batra, Romesh C ; Kapania, Rakesh K</creator><creatorcontrib>Alanbay, Berkan ; Batra, Romesh C ; Kapania, Rakesh K</creatorcontrib><description>We delineate effects of 1) face-to-core stiffness ratio (FCSR) and mass density ratio (FCDR) in square laminates and sandwich plates and 2) the fiber and transverse direction elastic modulus ratio E1/E2 in cross-ply laminates on the first 12 distinct frequencies found by analytically solving the three-dimensional linear elasticity theory equations and using an equivalent single-layer third-order shear and normal deformation plate theory (TSNDT). Whereas the elasticity equations for simply supported plates are solved by using Srivinas and Rao’s approach, the TSNDT equations are numerically solved by using weighted Jacobi polynomials and the Ritz method. We note that previous studies have generally compared only the fundamental frequency. For [0°/90°/0°/90°/0°] square laminates with a side-length/plate-thickness ratio of 100 (10), the maximum error in the TSNDT predicted first 12 frequencies is less than 0.4% (7%). For a FCSR less than 20, the maximum difference in predictions from the two approaches for the first six distinct frequencies is 5.4%. However, the FCDR has little effect on the difference between frequencies from the two methods. The frequencies and mode shapes presented herein should help us better understand the dynamic behavior of laminated and sandwich plates and provide benchmark results for others to assess their theories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J058920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Deformation effects ; Density ratio ; Laminates ; Mathematical analysis ; Modulus of elasticity ; Plate theory ; Polynomials ; Resonant frequencies ; Ritz method ; Stiffness ; Thickness ratio ; Three dimensional analysis</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2020-04, Vol.58 (4), p.1821-1835</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 by Batra, Kapania, and Alanbay. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the eISSN to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 by Batra, Kapania, and Alanbay. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-385X to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-e96641156fee6d568d6686575450481e3da7e76e3e951a6a056e9b2cc586a8be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-e96641156fee6d568d6686575450481e3da7e76e3e951a6a056e9b2cc586a8be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alanbay, Berkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batra, Romesh C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapania, Rakesh K</creatorcontrib><title>Lowest Twelve Frequencies of Sandwich Plates Using Third-Order Shear-Normal Deformation Theory</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>We delineate effects of 1) face-to-core stiffness ratio (FCSR) and mass density ratio (FCDR) in square laminates and sandwich plates and 2) the fiber and transverse direction elastic modulus ratio E1/E2 in cross-ply laminates on the first 12 distinct frequencies found by analytically solving the three-dimensional linear elasticity theory equations and using an equivalent single-layer third-order shear and normal deformation plate theory (TSNDT). Whereas the elasticity equations for simply supported plates are solved by using Srivinas and Rao’s approach, the TSNDT equations are numerically solved by using weighted Jacobi polynomials and the Ritz method. We note that previous studies have generally compared only the fundamental frequency. For [0°/90°/0°/90°/0°] square laminates with a side-length/plate-thickness ratio of 100 (10), the maximum error in the TSNDT predicted first 12 frequencies is less than 0.4% (7%). For a FCSR less than 20, the maximum difference in predictions from the two approaches for the first six distinct frequencies is 5.4%. However, the FCDR has little effect on the difference between frequencies from the two methods. The frequencies and mode shapes presented herein should help us better understand the dynamic behavior of laminated and sandwich plates and provide benchmark results for others to assess their theories.</description><subject>Deformation effects</subject><subject>Density ratio</subject><subject>Laminates</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Plate theory</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Resonant frequencies</subject><subject>Ritz method</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Thickness ratio</subject><subject>Three dimensional analysis</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkF1LwzAYhYMoOKcX_oOAIHiRmTdp0vRS5uYHwwnbwCtL1r51HV0zk86xf2_HBl549X7wcA7nEHINvCcURPfQe-XKJIKfkA4oKZk06uOUdDjnwCBS4pxchLBsLxEb6JDPkdtiaOh0i9UP0qHH7w3WWYmBuoJObJ1vy2xB3yvbtK9ZKOsvOl2UPmdjn6OnkwVaz96cX9mKPmKxX5rS1S2Ezu8uyVlhq4BXx9kls-Fg2n9mo_HTS_9hxKwwpmGYaB0BKF0g6lxpk2tttIpVpHhkAGVuY4w1SkwUWG250pjMRZYpo62Zo-ySm4Pu2rs2QGjSpdv4urVMhTRSAHBhWuruQGXeheCxSNe-XFm_S4Gn-_pSSI_1teztgbWltX9q_8FfIbVs9Q</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Alanbay, Berkan</creator><creator>Batra, Romesh C</creator><creator>Kapania, Rakesh K</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Lowest Twelve Frequencies of Sandwich Plates Using Third-Order Shear-Normal Deformation Theory</title><author>Alanbay, Berkan ; Batra, Romesh C ; Kapania, Rakesh K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-e96641156fee6d568d6686575450481e3da7e76e3e951a6a056e9b2cc586a8be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Deformation effects</topic><topic>Density ratio</topic><topic>Laminates</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Plate theory</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Resonant frequencies</topic><topic>Ritz method</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Thickness ratio</topic><topic>Three dimensional analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alanbay, Berkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batra, Romesh C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapania, Rakesh K</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alanbay, Berkan</au><au>Batra, Romesh C</au><au>Kapania, Rakesh K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lowest Twelve Frequencies of Sandwich Plates Using Third-Order Shear-Normal Deformation Theory</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1821</spage><epage>1835</epage><pages>1821-1835</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>We delineate effects of 1) face-to-core stiffness ratio (FCSR) and mass density ratio (FCDR) in square laminates and sandwich plates and 2) the fiber and transverse direction elastic modulus ratio E1/E2 in cross-ply laminates on the first 12 distinct frequencies found by analytically solving the three-dimensional linear elasticity theory equations and using an equivalent single-layer third-order shear and normal deformation plate theory (TSNDT). Whereas the elasticity equations for simply supported plates are solved by using Srivinas and Rao’s approach, the TSNDT equations are numerically solved by using weighted Jacobi polynomials and the Ritz method. We note that previous studies have generally compared only the fundamental frequency. For [0°/90°/0°/90°/0°] square laminates with a side-length/plate-thickness ratio of 100 (10), the maximum error in the TSNDT predicted first 12 frequencies is less than 0.4% (7%). For a FCSR less than 20, the maximum difference in predictions from the two approaches for the first six distinct frequencies is 5.4%. However, the FCDR has little effect on the difference between frequencies from the two methods. The frequencies and mode shapes presented herein should help us better understand the dynamic behavior of laminated and sandwich plates and provide benchmark results for others to assess their theories.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J058920</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-1452 |
ispartof | AIAA journal, 2020-04, Vol.58 (4), p.1821-1835 |
issn | 0001-1452 1533-385X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2383211028 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Deformation effects Density ratio Laminates Mathematical analysis Modulus of elasticity Plate theory Polynomials Resonant frequencies Ritz method Stiffness Thickness ratio Three dimensional analysis |
title | Lowest Twelve Frequencies of Sandwich Plates Using Third-Order Shear-Normal Deformation Theory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A35%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lowest%20Twelve%20Frequencies%20of%20Sandwich%20Plates%20Using%20Third-Order%20Shear-Normal%20Deformation%20Theory&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Alanbay,%20Berkan&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1821&rft.epage=1835&rft.pages=1821-1835&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J058920&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2383211028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2383211028&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |