5PSQ-025 Pharmaceutical intervention for the optimisation of the use of antibiotics in a tertiary hospital
Background and importanceOne of the main factors that increases antibiotic pressure and contributes to the development of bacterial resistance is an increase in duration of antibiotic treatment. Strategies to reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment should be implemented when it is not necessary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2020-03, Vol.27 (Suppl 1), p.A161-A161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A161 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A161 |
container_title | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Ortiz Latorre, JL Toscano Guzmán, MD Gómez Delgado, M Moya Carmona, I |
description | Background and importanceOne of the main factors that increases antibiotic pressure and contributes to the development of bacterial resistance is an increase in duration of antibiotic treatment. Strategies to reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment should be implemented when it is not necessary to continue.Aim and objectivesThe aim of this study was to systematically review patients with antibiotic prescriptions with a duration of more than 10 days and to analyse the degree of acceptance of the interventions performed.Material and methodsA prospective interventional study was conducted between February and April 2019. Twice a week, all patients receiving antibiotic treatment for >10 days were selected. These patients were analysed by two pharmacists. They checked if the patient needed to continue with antibiotic treatment. To assess the need for antibiotic treatment, they reviewed inflammatory markers (leucocytes and C reactive protein), microbiological cultures and clinical parameters, such as fever and blood pressure values. They also assessed if the patient‘s clinical situation had improved.The pharmacist intervention consisted of a message (with a recommendation to suspend treatment, through the electronic prescription programme) sent to the responsible physician, for those patients whose pharmacist considered that it was not necessary to continue antibiotic treatment.ResultsA total of 162 patients were selected (55.1% men, median age 66 years). The intervention with a proposal for suspension of treatment was performed in 63 patients. The medical staff accepted 73% (46) of the interventions and 37% (17) were denied. The most prescribed antibiotics were ceftriaxone (20.98%), piperacillin–tazobactam (14.19%), levofloxacin (7.40%) and metronidazole (7.40%). The number of interventions accepted by the services were: surgery 13 (28.2%), pneumology 12 (26.0%), internal medicine 11 (23.9%), digestive 7 (15.2%), oncology 3 (6.5%) and neurology 1 (6.5%).Conclusion and relevanceThe review by the pharmacy service of antibiotic treatments longer than 10 days avoided longer durations than necessary, in addition to reducing antibiotic pressure. This is important to decrease adverse effects and prevent the development of bacterial resistance.References and/or acknowledgementsNo conflict of interest. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-eahpconf.342 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2382939840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2382939840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1262-17a11a8e03ab80d4cdac45ba0a7c0ef9591f289d900daf8872238e0f347a64143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNtKxDAQhoMouKz7DkWvu-bUQy5l8QQLrqjXYdomNKVtapMK3nnji_okpruuVzMM3z8zfAhdErwmhKXXqqmHGsYuppjiWEE9lLbXa8bpCVpQzLNYiJSf_vdJeo5WzpkCJ4zlgjOxQG2ye3mOMU1-vr538zIo1eRNCW1keq_GD9V7Y_tI2zHytYrs4E1nHOyHVu9nk1NzC4EsjA1hF7IRRCHuDYyfUW3dYDy0F-hMQ-vU6q8u0dvd7evmId4-3T9ubrZxQWhKY5IBIZArzKDIccXLCkqeFIAhK7HSIhFE01xUAuMKdJ5nlLJAa8YzSDnhbImuDnuH0b5PynnZ2Gnsw0kZSCqYyDkOVHKgiq6Rw2i68KokWM5u5dGtnN3Ko1sZ3LJftKtz0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2382939840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>5PSQ-025 Pharmaceutical intervention for the optimisation of the use of antibiotics in a tertiary hospital</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ortiz Latorre, JL ; Toscano Guzmán, MD ; Gómez Delgado, M ; Moya Carmona, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Ortiz Latorre, JL ; Toscano Guzmán, MD ; Gómez Delgado, M ; Moya Carmona, I</creatorcontrib><description>Background and importanceOne of the main factors that increases antibiotic pressure and contributes to the development of bacterial resistance is an increase in duration of antibiotic treatment. Strategies to reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment should be implemented when it is not necessary to continue.Aim and objectivesThe aim of this study was to systematically review patients with antibiotic prescriptions with a duration of more than 10 days and to analyse the degree of acceptance of the interventions performed.Material and methodsA prospective interventional study was conducted between February and April 2019. Twice a week, all patients receiving antibiotic treatment for >10 days were selected. These patients were analysed by two pharmacists. They checked if the patient needed to continue with antibiotic treatment. To assess the need for antibiotic treatment, they reviewed inflammatory markers (leucocytes and C reactive protein), microbiological cultures and clinical parameters, such as fever and blood pressure values. They also assessed if the patient‘s clinical situation had improved.The pharmacist intervention consisted of a message (with a recommendation to suspend treatment, through the electronic prescription programme) sent to the responsible physician, for those patients whose pharmacist considered that it was not necessary to continue antibiotic treatment.ResultsA total of 162 patients were selected (55.1% men, median age 66 years). The intervention with a proposal for suspension of treatment was performed in 63 patients. The medical staff accepted 73% (46) of the interventions and 37% (17) were denied. The most prescribed antibiotics were ceftriaxone (20.98%), piperacillin–tazobactam (14.19%), levofloxacin (7.40%) and metronidazole (7.40%). The number of interventions accepted by the services were: surgery 13 (28.2%), pneumology 12 (26.0%), internal medicine 11 (23.9%), digestive 7 (15.2%), oncology 3 (6.5%) and neurology 1 (6.5%).Conclusion and relevanceThe review by the pharmacy service of antibiotic treatments longer than 10 days avoided longer durations than necessary, in addition to reducing antibiotic pressure. This is important to decrease adverse effects and prevent the development of bacterial resistance.References and/or acknowledgementsNo conflict of interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-9956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-9964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-eahpconf.342</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Drug stores ; Intervention ; Patients</subject><ispartof>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2020-03, Vol.27 (Suppl 1), p.A161-A161</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2020 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ortiz Latorre, JL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toscano Guzmán, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez Delgado, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moya Carmona, I</creatorcontrib><title>5PSQ-025 Pharmaceutical intervention for the optimisation of the use of antibiotics in a tertiary hospital</title><title>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</title><description>Background and importanceOne of the main factors that increases antibiotic pressure and contributes to the development of bacterial resistance is an increase in duration of antibiotic treatment. Strategies to reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment should be implemented when it is not necessary to continue.Aim and objectivesThe aim of this study was to systematically review patients with antibiotic prescriptions with a duration of more than 10 days and to analyse the degree of acceptance of the interventions performed.Material and methodsA prospective interventional study was conducted between February and April 2019. Twice a week, all patients receiving antibiotic treatment for >10 days were selected. These patients were analysed by two pharmacists. They checked if the patient needed to continue with antibiotic treatment. To assess the need for antibiotic treatment, they reviewed inflammatory markers (leucocytes and C reactive protein), microbiological cultures and clinical parameters, such as fever and blood pressure values. They also assessed if the patient‘s clinical situation had improved.The pharmacist intervention consisted of a message (with a recommendation to suspend treatment, through the electronic prescription programme) sent to the responsible physician, for those patients whose pharmacist considered that it was not necessary to continue antibiotic treatment.ResultsA total of 162 patients were selected (55.1% men, median age 66 years). The intervention with a proposal for suspension of treatment was performed in 63 patients. The medical staff accepted 73% (46) of the interventions and 37% (17) were denied. The most prescribed antibiotics were ceftriaxone (20.98%), piperacillin–tazobactam (14.19%), levofloxacin (7.40%) and metronidazole (7.40%). The number of interventions accepted by the services were: surgery 13 (28.2%), pneumology 12 (26.0%), internal medicine 11 (23.9%), digestive 7 (15.2%), oncology 3 (6.5%) and neurology 1 (6.5%).Conclusion and relevanceThe review by the pharmacy service of antibiotic treatments longer than 10 days avoided longer durations than necessary, in addition to reducing antibiotic pressure. This is important to decrease adverse effects and prevent the development of bacterial resistance.References and/or acknowledgementsNo conflict of interest.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>2047-9956</issn><issn>2047-9964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kNtKxDAQhoMouKz7DkWvu-bUQy5l8QQLrqjXYdomNKVtapMK3nnji_okpruuVzMM3z8zfAhdErwmhKXXqqmHGsYuppjiWEE9lLbXa8bpCVpQzLNYiJSf_vdJeo5WzpkCJ4zlgjOxQG2ye3mOMU1-vr538zIo1eRNCW1keq_GD9V7Y_tI2zHytYrs4E1nHOyHVu9nk1NzC4EsjA1hF7IRRCHuDYyfUW3dYDy0F-hMQ-vU6q8u0dvd7evmId4-3T9ubrZxQWhKY5IBIZArzKDIccXLCkqeFIAhK7HSIhFE01xUAuMKdJ5nlLJAa8YzSDnhbImuDnuH0b5PynnZ2Gnsw0kZSCqYyDkOVHKgiq6Rw2i68KokWM5u5dGtnN3Ko1sZ3LJftKtz0Q</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Ortiz Latorre, JL</creator><creator>Toscano Guzmán, MD</creator><creator>Gómez Delgado, M</creator><creator>Moya Carmona, I</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>5PSQ-025 Pharmaceutical intervention for the optimisation of the use of antibiotics in a tertiary hospital</title><author>Ortiz Latorre, JL ; Toscano Guzmán, MD ; Gómez Delgado, M ; Moya Carmona, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1262-17a11a8e03ab80d4cdac45ba0a7c0ef9591f289d900daf8872238e0f347a64143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ortiz Latorre, JL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toscano Guzmán, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez Delgado, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moya Carmona, I</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ortiz Latorre, JL</au><au>Toscano Guzmán, MD</au><au>Gómez Delgado, M</au><au>Moya Carmona, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>5PSQ-025 Pharmaceutical intervention for the optimisation of the use of antibiotics in a tertiary hospital</atitle><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A161</spage><epage>A161</epage><pages>A161-A161</pages><issn>2047-9956</issn><eissn>2047-9964</eissn><abstract>Background and importanceOne of the main factors that increases antibiotic pressure and contributes to the development of bacterial resistance is an increase in duration of antibiotic treatment. Strategies to reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment should be implemented when it is not necessary to continue.Aim and objectivesThe aim of this study was to systematically review patients with antibiotic prescriptions with a duration of more than 10 days and to analyse the degree of acceptance of the interventions performed.Material and methodsA prospective interventional study was conducted between February and April 2019. Twice a week, all patients receiving antibiotic treatment for >10 days were selected. These patients were analysed by two pharmacists. They checked if the patient needed to continue with antibiotic treatment. To assess the need for antibiotic treatment, they reviewed inflammatory markers (leucocytes and C reactive protein), microbiological cultures and clinical parameters, such as fever and blood pressure values. They also assessed if the patient‘s clinical situation had improved.The pharmacist intervention consisted of a message (with a recommendation to suspend treatment, through the electronic prescription programme) sent to the responsible physician, for those patients whose pharmacist considered that it was not necessary to continue antibiotic treatment.ResultsA total of 162 patients were selected (55.1% men, median age 66 years). The intervention with a proposal for suspension of treatment was performed in 63 patients. The medical staff accepted 73% (46) of the interventions and 37% (17) were denied. The most prescribed antibiotics were ceftriaxone (20.98%), piperacillin–tazobactam (14.19%), levofloxacin (7.40%) and metronidazole (7.40%). The number of interventions accepted by the services were: surgery 13 (28.2%), pneumology 12 (26.0%), internal medicine 11 (23.9%), digestive 7 (15.2%), oncology 3 (6.5%) and neurology 1 (6.5%).Conclusion and relevanceThe review by the pharmacy service of antibiotic treatments longer than 10 days avoided longer durations than necessary, in addition to reducing antibiotic pressure. This is important to decrease adverse effects and prevent the development of bacterial resistance.References and/or acknowledgementsNo conflict of interest.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-eahpconf.342</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-9956 |
ispartof | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2020-03, Vol.27 (Suppl 1), p.A161-A161 |
issn | 2047-9956 2047-9964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2382939840 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibiotics Drug stores Intervention Patients |
title | 5PSQ-025 Pharmaceutical intervention for the optimisation of the use of antibiotics in a tertiary hospital |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T11%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=5PSQ-025%E2%80%85Pharmaceutical%20intervention%20for%20the%20optimisation%20of%20the%20use%20of%20antibiotics%20in%20a%20tertiary%20hospital&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20hospital%20pharmacy.%20Science%20and%20practice&rft.au=Ortiz%20Latorre,%20JL&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A161&rft.epage=A161&rft.pages=A161-A161&rft.issn=2047-9956&rft.eissn=2047-9964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-eahpconf.342&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2382939840%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2382939840&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |