4CPS-039 Nosocomial infection by multiresistant pathogens in kidney transplant patients

Background and importanceImmunosuppression related to organ transplant is a risk factor for multidrug resistant infections.Aim and objectivesTo evaluate the prevalence of nosocomial infections (NI) by multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens, aetiologic agents and treatments given to a cohort of patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2020-03, Vol.27 (Suppl 1), p.A65-A66
Hauptverfasser: Morales Lara, MJ, Tamayo Bermejo, R, Luna Higuera, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A66
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A65
container_title European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice
container_volume 27
creator Morales Lara, MJ
Tamayo Bermejo, R
Luna Higuera, A
description Background and importanceImmunosuppression related to organ transplant is a risk factor for multidrug resistant infections.Aim and objectivesTo evaluate the prevalence of nosocomial infections (NI) by multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens, aetiologic agents and treatments given to a cohort of patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT).Material and methodsA retrospective observational study was carried out in a cohort of patients having undergone a KT during 2016–2017. Variables collected: demographics, clinical (type of KT and aetiologic agent) and therapeutic (induction immunosuppressant treatments and empirical and targeted antimicrobials) data.ResultsSixty-four patients who had undergone a KT (84.4% from a cadaver, 7.8% from a live donor and 7.8% kidney–pancreas) were included (mean age 53.6±15.3 years, 72.9% men).The most frequent induction immunosuppressant treatments were: basiliximab+mycophenolate–mofetil+steroid+tacrolimus (31.2%) and thymoglobulin+mycophenolate-mofetil+steroid+tacrolimus (65.6%).Eight of 64 patients developed NI by MDR pathogens during hospitalisation as a result of the KT (prevalence 12.5%), isolating a total of 10 multiresistant causative agents: Escherichia coli (30%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae (extended spectrum beta lactamase producing, oxa-48 carbapenemase producing (20% each) and carbapenemase producing (10%)).The sources of NI were: urinary tract (50%), central venous catheter (30%) and abdominal (20%).Based on patient symptoms, empirical administered antibiotics were: ceftazidime (30%), ciprofloxacin (20%), ceftriaxone (20%), meropenem, levofloxacin (10%) and piperacillin–tazobactam (10%). In all cases, once the aetiologic agent was isolated, targeted treatment was used.It is worth noting the use of ceftazidime–avibactam in two cases of infection with MDR carbapenemase oxa-48 producing K pneumoniae. None of the patients died due to the NI. Of the patients treated with the immunosuppressant regimen that included basiliximab, 40% developed NI by MDR pathogens in contrast with the group that received the regimen including thymoglobulin (2.5%). This difference was significant (p=0.0875).Conclusion and relevanceIn our cohort of patients there was a high prevalence of NI by MDR pathogens, with K pneumoniae the most frequent. Ceftazidime was the most commonly used antibiotic as an empirical treatment, and urinary infections the most prevalent within our population. There seems to be a correlation betwee
doi_str_mv 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-eahpconf.140
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2382400736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2382400736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1260-a932d79ff357ad0104f45743386385f21fed35a1493273de097626ef4330e01f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpP0SwThk_Uy9RxaNSBUjAgpXlNDZxSewQu4vu2PCjfAmp2rKakeZo7tVB6BLDFGMqrs267mrdtzkBArnRdbcK3k4xgxM0IsCKXErBTv93Ls7RJEZXAqd0JhmVI_TO5s8vOVD5-_3zGGJYhdbpJnPemlVywWflNms3TXK9iS4m7VPW6VSHD-PjQGWfrvJmm6Ve-9g1h7MzPsULdGZ1E83kMMfo7e72df6QL5_uF_ObZV5iIiDXkpKqkNZSXugKMDDLeMGGgoLOuCXYmopyjdnAFbQyIAtBhLEDAQawpWN0tf_b9eFrY2JS67Dp_RCpCJ0RBlBQMVB8T5XtWnW9a3W_VRjUTqQ6ilQ7keooUg0i6R_3Jmwt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2382400736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>4CPS-039 Nosocomial infection by multiresistant pathogens in kidney transplant patients</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Morales Lara, MJ ; Tamayo Bermejo, R ; Luna Higuera, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Morales Lara, MJ ; Tamayo Bermejo, R ; Luna Higuera, A</creatorcontrib><description>Background and importanceImmunosuppression related to organ transplant is a risk factor for multidrug resistant infections.Aim and objectivesTo evaluate the prevalence of nosocomial infections (NI) by multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens, aetiologic agents and treatments given to a cohort of patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT).Material and methodsA retrospective observational study was carried out in a cohort of patients having undergone a KT during 2016–2017. Variables collected: demographics, clinical (type of KT and aetiologic agent) and therapeutic (induction immunosuppressant treatments and empirical and targeted antimicrobials) data.ResultsSixty-four patients who had undergone a KT (84.4% from a cadaver, 7.8% from a live donor and 7.8% kidney–pancreas) were included (mean age 53.6±15.3 years, 72.9% men).The most frequent induction immunosuppressant treatments were: basiliximab+mycophenolate–mofetil+steroid+tacrolimus (31.2%) and thymoglobulin+mycophenolate-mofetil+steroid+tacrolimus (65.6%).Eight of 64 patients developed NI by MDR pathogens during hospitalisation as a result of the KT (prevalence 12.5%), isolating a total of 10 multiresistant causative agents: Escherichia coli (30%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae (extended spectrum beta lactamase producing, oxa-48 carbapenemase producing (20% each) and carbapenemase producing (10%)).The sources of NI were: urinary tract (50%), central venous catheter (30%) and abdominal (20%).Based on patient symptoms, empirical administered antibiotics were: ceftazidime (30%), ciprofloxacin (20%), ceftriaxone (20%), meropenem, levofloxacin (10%) and piperacillin–tazobactam (10%). In all cases, once the aetiologic agent was isolated, targeted treatment was used.It is worth noting the use of ceftazidime–avibactam in two cases of infection with MDR carbapenemase oxa-48 producing K pneumoniae. None of the patients died due to the NI. Of the patients treated with the immunosuppressant regimen that included basiliximab, 40% developed NI by MDR pathogens in contrast with the group that received the regimen including thymoglobulin (2.5%). This difference was significant (p=0.0875).Conclusion and relevanceIn our cohort of patients there was a high prevalence of NI by MDR pathogens, with K pneumoniae the most frequent. Ceftazidime was the most commonly used antibiotic as an empirical treatment, and urinary infections the most prevalent within our population. There seems to be a correlation between developing an infection by MDR pathogens and the induction immunosuppressant treatments that included basiliximab, although prospective studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these preliminary results.References and/or acknowledgementsNo conflict of interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-9956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-9964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-eahpconf.140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Kidney transplants ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Nosocomial infections ; Pathogens ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Urinary tract infections</subject><ispartof>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2020-03, Vol.27 (Suppl 1), p.A65-A66</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2020 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morales Lara, MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamayo Bermejo, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna Higuera, A</creatorcontrib><title>4CPS-039 Nosocomial infection by multiresistant pathogens in kidney transplant patients</title><title>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</title><description>Background and importanceImmunosuppression related to organ transplant is a risk factor for multidrug resistant infections.Aim and objectivesTo evaluate the prevalence of nosocomial infections (NI) by multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens, aetiologic agents and treatments given to a cohort of patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT).Material and methodsA retrospective observational study was carried out in a cohort of patients having undergone a KT during 2016–2017. Variables collected: demographics, clinical (type of KT and aetiologic agent) and therapeutic (induction immunosuppressant treatments and empirical and targeted antimicrobials) data.ResultsSixty-four patients who had undergone a KT (84.4% from a cadaver, 7.8% from a live donor and 7.8% kidney–pancreas) were included (mean age 53.6±15.3 years, 72.9% men).The most frequent induction immunosuppressant treatments were: basiliximab+mycophenolate–mofetil+steroid+tacrolimus (31.2%) and thymoglobulin+mycophenolate-mofetil+steroid+tacrolimus (65.6%).Eight of 64 patients developed NI by MDR pathogens during hospitalisation as a result of the KT (prevalence 12.5%), isolating a total of 10 multiresistant causative agents: Escherichia coli (30%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae (extended spectrum beta lactamase producing, oxa-48 carbapenemase producing (20% each) and carbapenemase producing (10%)).The sources of NI were: urinary tract (50%), central venous catheter (30%) and abdominal (20%).Based on patient symptoms, empirical administered antibiotics were: ceftazidime (30%), ciprofloxacin (20%), ceftriaxone (20%), meropenem, levofloxacin (10%) and piperacillin–tazobactam (10%). In all cases, once the aetiologic agent was isolated, targeted treatment was used.It is worth noting the use of ceftazidime–avibactam in two cases of infection with MDR carbapenemase oxa-48 producing K pneumoniae. None of the patients died due to the NI. Of the patients treated with the immunosuppressant regimen that included basiliximab, 40% developed NI by MDR pathogens in contrast with the group that received the regimen including thymoglobulin (2.5%). This difference was significant (p=0.0875).Conclusion and relevanceIn our cohort of patients there was a high prevalence of NI by MDR pathogens, with K pneumoniae the most frequent. Ceftazidime was the most commonly used antibiotic as an empirical treatment, and urinary infections the most prevalent within our population. There seems to be a correlation between developing an infection by MDR pathogens and the induction immunosuppressant treatments that included basiliximab, although prospective studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these preliminary results.References and/or acknowledgementsNo conflict of interest.</description><subject>Kidney transplants</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><issn>2047-9956</issn><issn>2047-9964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpP0SwThk_Uy9RxaNSBUjAgpXlNDZxSewQu4vu2PCjfAmp2rKakeZo7tVB6BLDFGMqrs267mrdtzkBArnRdbcK3k4xgxM0IsCKXErBTv93Ls7RJEZXAqd0JhmVI_TO5s8vOVD5-_3zGGJYhdbpJnPemlVywWflNms3TXK9iS4m7VPW6VSHD-PjQGWfrvJmm6Ve-9g1h7MzPsULdGZ1E83kMMfo7e72df6QL5_uF_ObZV5iIiDXkpKqkNZSXugKMDDLeMGGgoLOuCXYmopyjdnAFbQyIAtBhLEDAQawpWN0tf_b9eFrY2JS67Dp_RCpCJ0RBlBQMVB8T5XtWnW9a3W_VRjUTqQ6ilQ7keooUg0i6R_3Jmwt</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Morales Lara, MJ</creator><creator>Tamayo Bermejo, R</creator><creator>Luna Higuera, A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>4CPS-039 Nosocomial infection by multiresistant pathogens in kidney transplant patients</title><author>Morales Lara, MJ ; Tamayo Bermejo, R ; Luna Higuera, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1260-a932d79ff357ad0104f45743386385f21fed35a1493273de097626ef4330e01f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Kidney transplants</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morales Lara, MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamayo Bermejo, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna Higuera, A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morales Lara, MJ</au><au>Tamayo Bermejo, R</au><au>Luna Higuera, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>4CPS-039 Nosocomial infection by multiresistant pathogens in kidney transplant patients</atitle><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A65</spage><epage>A66</epage><pages>A65-A66</pages><issn>2047-9956</issn><eissn>2047-9964</eissn><abstract>Background and importanceImmunosuppression related to organ transplant is a risk factor for multidrug resistant infections.Aim and objectivesTo evaluate the prevalence of nosocomial infections (NI) by multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens, aetiologic agents and treatments given to a cohort of patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT).Material and methodsA retrospective observational study was carried out in a cohort of patients having undergone a KT during 2016–2017. Variables collected: demographics, clinical (type of KT and aetiologic agent) and therapeutic (induction immunosuppressant treatments and empirical and targeted antimicrobials) data.ResultsSixty-four patients who had undergone a KT (84.4% from a cadaver, 7.8% from a live donor and 7.8% kidney–pancreas) were included (mean age 53.6±15.3 years, 72.9% men).The most frequent induction immunosuppressant treatments were: basiliximab+mycophenolate–mofetil+steroid+tacrolimus (31.2%) and thymoglobulin+mycophenolate-mofetil+steroid+tacrolimus (65.6%).Eight of 64 patients developed NI by MDR pathogens during hospitalisation as a result of the KT (prevalence 12.5%), isolating a total of 10 multiresistant causative agents: Escherichia coli (30%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae (extended spectrum beta lactamase producing, oxa-48 carbapenemase producing (20% each) and carbapenemase producing (10%)).The sources of NI were: urinary tract (50%), central venous catheter (30%) and abdominal (20%).Based on patient symptoms, empirical administered antibiotics were: ceftazidime (30%), ciprofloxacin (20%), ceftriaxone (20%), meropenem, levofloxacin (10%) and piperacillin–tazobactam (10%). In all cases, once the aetiologic agent was isolated, targeted treatment was used.It is worth noting the use of ceftazidime–avibactam in two cases of infection with MDR carbapenemase oxa-48 producing K pneumoniae. None of the patients died due to the NI. Of the patients treated with the immunosuppressant regimen that included basiliximab, 40% developed NI by MDR pathogens in contrast with the group that received the regimen including thymoglobulin (2.5%). This difference was significant (p=0.0875).Conclusion and relevanceIn our cohort of patients there was a high prevalence of NI by MDR pathogens, with K pneumoniae the most frequent. Ceftazidime was the most commonly used antibiotic as an empirical treatment, and urinary infections the most prevalent within our population. There seems to be a correlation between developing an infection by MDR pathogens and the induction immunosuppressant treatments that included basiliximab, although prospective studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these preliminary results.References and/or acknowledgementsNo conflict of interest.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-eahpconf.140</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2047-9956
ispartof European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2020-03, Vol.27 (Suppl 1), p.A65-A66
issn 2047-9956
2047-9964
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2382400736
source PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Kidney transplants
Monoclonal antibodies
Nosocomial infections
Pathogens
Transplants & implants
Urinary tract infections
title 4CPS-039 Nosocomial infection by multiresistant pathogens in kidney transplant patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A24%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=4CPS-039%E2%80%85Nosocomial%20infection%20by%20multiresistant%20pathogens%20in%20kidney%20transplant%20patients&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20hospital%20pharmacy.%20Science%20and%20practice&rft.au=Morales%20Lara,%20MJ&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A65&rft.epage=A66&rft.pages=A65-A66&rft.issn=2047-9956&rft.eissn=2047-9964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-eahpconf.140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2382400736%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2382400736&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true