Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?
Growing human-wildlife conflicts and legal conservation obligations increased the need for precise information on Eurasian otter ( Lutra lutra ) population parameters for species status assessment and wildlife management measures. Scat surveys have become the method of choice to monitor species dist...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mammal research 2020-04, Vol.65 (2), p.191-202 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 202 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 191 |
container_title | Mammal research |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Sittenthaler, Marcia Schöll, Eva Maria Leeb, Christoph Haring, Elisabeth Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie Hackländer, Klaus |
description | Growing human-wildlife conflicts and legal conservation obligations increased the need for precise information on Eurasian otter (
Lutra lutra
) population parameters for species status assessment and wildlife management measures. Scat surveys have become the method of choice to monitor species distribution range, abundance and habitat use. Although methodological concerns exist, scat abundance is often used as main indicator for otter population estimates and trends. To evaluate whether scat counts serve as good proxy for otter densities in linear stream habitats, we modelled the relationship between old/fresh scat abundance and otter numbers on two spatial scales, including also seasonal effects. Actual otter densities and marking behaviour were ascertained by genotyping of otter faeces collected at 218 marking sites along 132.6 km of four salmonid streams. Otter densities in our study areas ranged from 0.16 to 0.28 otters per stream kilometre. The age of scats and the level of spatial scale were determining factors when evaluating the suitability of scat abundance as index for otter densities. Covering large parts of an otter’s territory, fresh scat abundance increased with otter density, irrespectively of season. On the spatial scale of single marking sites, the relationship was not well supported, and no relationship could be found when using old scats in the models. Otter marking behaviour and differences in marking site use intensity, as well as seasonal differences in traceability and accumulation of old scats were discussed to bias the relationship between scat abundance and otter numbers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2380112309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2380112309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7213e1700ed3ccc9e3825c4f16f410ee08793afc0156caac6118b59a570b896f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUuP0zAQjhBIrHb3D3AaiQscws7YaR5cEFotD6mIC0jcrIk7ab2kTrGdov4m_iTuBsGNy8x3-B6j-YriGeErQmxuImldVyUqLBGrti5Pj4oLRV1Xqoq-Pf6LkZ4W1zHeIyI1lVKdvih-feLw3fkt9LLjo5vmAOw3YMXHOcI0wN0cODr2MKUkIcKL9ZwCw3ieL8F5CO4owXmBHfcucYqv4eeOE9isiTYD7me_YW8lPlj7yZfOH7PpUWArXpKzEHl_GM9nJBlHyMncT3NaMsHP-z5Hv7kqngw8Rrn-sy-Lr-_uvtx-KNef33-8fbsura51KhtFWqhBlI221naiW7Wy1UD1UBGKYNt0mgeLtKots62J2n7V8arBvu3qQV8WzxffQ5h-zBKTuc9_8TnSKN0ikdLYZZZaWDZMMQYZzCG4PYeTITTnXszSi8m9mIdezCmL9CKKmey3Ev5Z_0f1G5B2k9Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2380112309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sittenthaler, Marcia ; Schöll, Eva Maria ; Leeb, Christoph ; Haring, Elisabeth ; Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie ; Hackländer, Klaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Sittenthaler, Marcia ; Schöll, Eva Maria ; Leeb, Christoph ; Haring, Elisabeth ; Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie ; Hackländer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><description>Growing human-wildlife conflicts and legal conservation obligations increased the need for precise information on Eurasian otter (
Lutra lutra
) population parameters for species status assessment and wildlife management measures. Scat surveys have become the method of choice to monitor species distribution range, abundance and habitat use. Although methodological concerns exist, scat abundance is often used as main indicator for otter population estimates and trends. To evaluate whether scat counts serve as good proxy for otter densities in linear stream habitats, we modelled the relationship between old/fresh scat abundance and otter numbers on two spatial scales, including also seasonal effects. Actual otter densities and marking behaviour were ascertained by genotyping of otter faeces collected at 218 marking sites along 132.6 km of four salmonid streams. Otter densities in our study areas ranged from 0.16 to 0.28 otters per stream kilometre. The age of scats and the level of spatial scale were determining factors when evaluating the suitability of scat abundance as index for otter densities. Covering large parts of an otter’s territory, fresh scat abundance increased with otter density, irrespectively of season. On the spatial scale of single marking sites, the relationship was not well supported, and no relationship could be found when using old scats in the models. Otter marking behaviour and differences in marking site use intensity, as well as seasonal differences in traceability and accumulation of old scats were discussed to bias the relationship between scat abundance and otter numbers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2199-2401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-241X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animal Ecology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Evolutionary Biology ; Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management ; Genotyping ; Geographical distribution ; Habitat utilization ; Life Sciences ; Lutra lutra ; Lutrinae ; Marking behavior ; Original Paper ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Mammal research, 2020-04, Vol.65 (2), p.191-202</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7213e1700ed3ccc9e3825c4f16f410ee08793afc0156caac6118b59a570b896f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7213e1700ed3ccc9e3825c4f16f410ee08793afc0156caac6118b59a570b896f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7727-6246 ; 0000-0003-3414-1576 ; 0000-0003-3096-5885 ; 0000-0002-6774-435X ; 0000-0001-7918-7143 ; 0000-0002-5411-1879</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sittenthaler, Marcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöll, Eva Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeb, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haring, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackländer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><title>Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?</title><title>Mammal research</title><addtitle>Mamm Res</addtitle><description>Growing human-wildlife conflicts and legal conservation obligations increased the need for precise information on Eurasian otter (
Lutra lutra
) population parameters for species status assessment and wildlife management measures. Scat surveys have become the method of choice to monitor species distribution range, abundance and habitat use. Although methodological concerns exist, scat abundance is often used as main indicator for otter population estimates and trends. To evaluate whether scat counts serve as good proxy for otter densities in linear stream habitats, we modelled the relationship between old/fresh scat abundance and otter numbers on two spatial scales, including also seasonal effects. Actual otter densities and marking behaviour were ascertained by genotyping of otter faeces collected at 218 marking sites along 132.6 km of four salmonid streams. Otter densities in our study areas ranged from 0.16 to 0.28 otters per stream kilometre. The age of scats and the level of spatial scale were determining factors when evaluating the suitability of scat abundance as index for otter densities. Covering large parts of an otter’s territory, fresh scat abundance increased with otter density, irrespectively of season. On the spatial scale of single marking sites, the relationship was not well supported, and no relationship could be found when using old scats in the models. Otter marking behaviour and differences in marking site use intensity, as well as seasonal differences in traceability and accumulation of old scats were discussed to bias the relationship between scat abundance and otter numbers.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lutra lutra</subject><subject>Lutrinae</subject><subject>Marking behavior</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>2199-2401</issn><issn>2199-241X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUuP0zAQjhBIrHb3D3AaiQscws7YaR5cEFotD6mIC0jcrIk7ab2kTrGdov4m_iTuBsGNy8x3-B6j-YriGeErQmxuImldVyUqLBGrti5Pj4oLRV1Xqoq-Pf6LkZ4W1zHeIyI1lVKdvih-feLw3fkt9LLjo5vmAOw3YMXHOcI0wN0cODr2MKUkIcKL9ZwCw3ieL8F5CO4owXmBHfcucYqv4eeOE9isiTYD7me_YW8lPlj7yZfOH7PpUWArXpKzEHl_GM9nJBlHyMncT3NaMsHP-z5Hv7kqngw8Rrn-sy-Lr-_uvtx-KNef33-8fbsura51KhtFWqhBlI221naiW7Wy1UD1UBGKYNt0mgeLtKots62J2n7V8arBvu3qQV8WzxffQ5h-zBKTuc9_8TnSKN0ikdLYZZZaWDZMMQYZzCG4PYeTITTnXszSi8m9mIdezCmL9CKKmey3Ev5Z_0f1G5B2k9Y</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Sittenthaler, Marcia</creator><creator>Schöll, Eva Maria</creator><creator>Leeb, Christoph</creator><creator>Haring, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie</creator><creator>Hackländer, Klaus</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7727-6246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3414-1576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3096-5885</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-435X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-7143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-1879</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?</title><author>Sittenthaler, Marcia ; Schöll, Eva Maria ; Leeb, Christoph ; Haring, Elisabeth ; Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie ; Hackländer, Klaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7213e1700ed3ccc9e3825c4f16f410ee08793afc0156caac6118b59a570b896f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lutra lutra</topic><topic>Lutrinae</topic><topic>Marking behavior</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sittenthaler, Marcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöll, Eva Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeb, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haring, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackländer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Mammal research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sittenthaler, Marcia</au><au>Schöll, Eva Maria</au><au>Leeb, Christoph</au><au>Haring, Elisabeth</au><au>Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie</au><au>Hackländer, Klaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?</atitle><jtitle>Mammal research</jtitle><stitle>Mamm Res</stitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>191-202</pages><issn>2199-2401</issn><eissn>2199-241X</eissn><abstract>Growing human-wildlife conflicts and legal conservation obligations increased the need for precise information on Eurasian otter (
Lutra lutra
) population parameters for species status assessment and wildlife management measures. Scat surveys have become the method of choice to monitor species distribution range, abundance and habitat use. Although methodological concerns exist, scat abundance is often used as main indicator for otter population estimates and trends. To evaluate whether scat counts serve as good proxy for otter densities in linear stream habitats, we modelled the relationship between old/fresh scat abundance and otter numbers on two spatial scales, including also seasonal effects. Actual otter densities and marking behaviour were ascertained by genotyping of otter faeces collected at 218 marking sites along 132.6 km of four salmonid streams. Otter densities in our study areas ranged from 0.16 to 0.28 otters per stream kilometre. The age of scats and the level of spatial scale were determining factors when evaluating the suitability of scat abundance as index for otter densities. Covering large parts of an otter’s territory, fresh scat abundance increased with otter density, irrespectively of season. On the spatial scale of single marking sites, the relationship was not well supported, and no relationship could be found when using old scats in the models. Otter marking behaviour and differences in marking site use intensity, as well as seasonal differences in traceability and accumulation of old scats were discussed to bias the relationship between scat abundance and otter numbers.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7727-6246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3414-1576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3096-5885</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-435X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-7143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-1879</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2199-2401 |
ispartof | Mammal research, 2020-04, Vol.65 (2), p.191-202 |
issn | 2199-2401 2199-241X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2380112309 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abundance Animal Ecology Biomedical and Life Sciences Evolutionary Biology Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management Genotyping Geographical distribution Habitat utilization Life Sciences Lutra lutra Lutrinae Marking behavior Original Paper Wildlife conservation Wildlife management Zoology |
title | Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marking%20behaviour%20and%20census%20of%20Eurasian%20otters%20(Lutra%20lutra)%20in%20riverine%20habitats:%20what%20can%20scat%20abundances%20and%20non-invasive%20genetic%20sampling%20tell%20us%20about%20otter%20numbers?&rft.jtitle=Mammal%20research&rft.au=Sittenthaler,%20Marcia&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=191-202&rft.issn=2199-2401&rft.eissn=2199-241X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2380112309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2380112309&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |