Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?

Growing human-wildlife conflicts and legal conservation obligations increased the need for precise information on Eurasian otter ( Lutra lutra ) population parameters for species status assessment and wildlife management measures. Scat surveys have become the method of choice to monitor species dist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mammal research 2020-04, Vol.65 (2), p.191-202
Hauptverfasser: Sittenthaler, Marcia, Schöll, Eva Maria, Leeb, Christoph, Haring, Elisabeth, Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie, Hackländer, Klaus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 202
container_issue 2
container_start_page 191
container_title Mammal research
container_volume 65
creator Sittenthaler, Marcia
Schöll, Eva Maria
Leeb, Christoph
Haring, Elisabeth
Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie
Hackländer, Klaus
description Growing human-wildlife conflicts and legal conservation obligations increased the need for precise information on Eurasian otter ( Lutra lutra ) population parameters for species status assessment and wildlife management measures. Scat surveys have become the method of choice to monitor species distribution range, abundance and habitat use. Although methodological concerns exist, scat abundance is often used as main indicator for otter population estimates and trends. To evaluate whether scat counts serve as good proxy for otter densities in linear stream habitats, we modelled the relationship between old/fresh scat abundance and otter numbers on two spatial scales, including also seasonal effects. Actual otter densities and marking behaviour were ascertained by genotyping of otter faeces collected at 218 marking sites along 132.6 km of four salmonid streams. Otter densities in our study areas ranged from 0.16 to 0.28 otters per stream kilometre. The age of scats and the level of spatial scale were determining factors when evaluating the suitability of scat abundance as index for otter densities. Covering large parts of an otter’s territory, fresh scat abundance increased with otter density, irrespectively of season. On the spatial scale of single marking sites, the relationship was not well supported, and no relationship could be found when using old scats in the models. Otter marking behaviour and differences in marking site use intensity, as well as seasonal differences in traceability and accumulation of old scats were discussed to bias the relationship between scat abundance and otter numbers.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2380112309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2380112309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7213e1700ed3ccc9e3825c4f16f410ee08793afc0156caac6118b59a570b896f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUuP0zAQjhBIrHb3D3AaiQscws7YaR5cEFotD6mIC0jcrIk7ab2kTrGdov4m_iTuBsGNy8x3-B6j-YriGeErQmxuImldVyUqLBGrti5Pj4oLRV1Xqoq-Pf6LkZ4W1zHeIyI1lVKdvih-feLw3fkt9LLjo5vmAOw3YMXHOcI0wN0cODr2MKUkIcKL9ZwCw3ieL8F5CO4owXmBHfcucYqv4eeOE9isiTYD7me_YW8lPlj7yZfOH7PpUWArXpKzEHl_GM9nJBlHyMncT3NaMsHP-z5Hv7kqngw8Rrn-sy-Lr-_uvtx-KNef33-8fbsura51KhtFWqhBlI221naiW7Wy1UD1UBGKYNt0mgeLtKots62J2n7V8arBvu3qQV8WzxffQ5h-zBKTuc9_8TnSKN0ikdLYZZZaWDZMMQYZzCG4PYeTITTnXszSi8m9mIdezCmL9CKKmey3Ev5Z_0f1G5B2k9Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2380112309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sittenthaler, Marcia ; Schöll, Eva Maria ; Leeb, Christoph ; Haring, Elisabeth ; Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie ; Hackländer, Klaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Sittenthaler, Marcia ; Schöll, Eva Maria ; Leeb, Christoph ; Haring, Elisabeth ; Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie ; Hackländer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><description>Growing human-wildlife conflicts and legal conservation obligations increased the need for precise information on Eurasian otter ( Lutra lutra ) population parameters for species status assessment and wildlife management measures. Scat surveys have become the method of choice to monitor species distribution range, abundance and habitat use. Although methodological concerns exist, scat abundance is often used as main indicator for otter population estimates and trends. To evaluate whether scat counts serve as good proxy for otter densities in linear stream habitats, we modelled the relationship between old/fresh scat abundance and otter numbers on two spatial scales, including also seasonal effects. Actual otter densities and marking behaviour were ascertained by genotyping of otter faeces collected at 218 marking sites along 132.6 km of four salmonid streams. Otter densities in our study areas ranged from 0.16 to 0.28 otters per stream kilometre. The age of scats and the level of spatial scale were determining factors when evaluating the suitability of scat abundance as index for otter densities. Covering large parts of an otter’s territory, fresh scat abundance increased with otter density, irrespectively of season. On the spatial scale of single marking sites, the relationship was not well supported, and no relationship could be found when using old scats in the models. Otter marking behaviour and differences in marking site use intensity, as well as seasonal differences in traceability and accumulation of old scats were discussed to bias the relationship between scat abundance and otter numbers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2199-2401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-241X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animal Ecology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Evolutionary Biology ; Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management ; Genotyping ; Geographical distribution ; Habitat utilization ; Life Sciences ; Lutra lutra ; Lutrinae ; Marking behavior ; Original Paper ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Mammal research, 2020-04, Vol.65 (2), p.191-202</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7213e1700ed3ccc9e3825c4f16f410ee08793afc0156caac6118b59a570b896f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7213e1700ed3ccc9e3825c4f16f410ee08793afc0156caac6118b59a570b896f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7727-6246 ; 0000-0003-3414-1576 ; 0000-0003-3096-5885 ; 0000-0002-6774-435X ; 0000-0001-7918-7143 ; 0000-0002-5411-1879</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sittenthaler, Marcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöll, Eva Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeb, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haring, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackländer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><title>Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?</title><title>Mammal research</title><addtitle>Mamm Res</addtitle><description>Growing human-wildlife conflicts and legal conservation obligations increased the need for precise information on Eurasian otter ( Lutra lutra ) population parameters for species status assessment and wildlife management measures. Scat surveys have become the method of choice to monitor species distribution range, abundance and habitat use. Although methodological concerns exist, scat abundance is often used as main indicator for otter population estimates and trends. To evaluate whether scat counts serve as good proxy for otter densities in linear stream habitats, we modelled the relationship between old/fresh scat abundance and otter numbers on two spatial scales, including also seasonal effects. Actual otter densities and marking behaviour were ascertained by genotyping of otter faeces collected at 218 marking sites along 132.6 km of four salmonid streams. Otter densities in our study areas ranged from 0.16 to 0.28 otters per stream kilometre. The age of scats and the level of spatial scale were determining factors when evaluating the suitability of scat abundance as index for otter densities. Covering large parts of an otter’s territory, fresh scat abundance increased with otter density, irrespectively of season. On the spatial scale of single marking sites, the relationship was not well supported, and no relationship could be found when using old scats in the models. Otter marking behaviour and differences in marking site use intensity, as well as seasonal differences in traceability and accumulation of old scats were discussed to bias the relationship between scat abundance and otter numbers.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lutra lutra</subject><subject>Lutrinae</subject><subject>Marking behavior</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>2199-2401</issn><issn>2199-241X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUuP0zAQjhBIrHb3D3AaiQscws7YaR5cEFotD6mIC0jcrIk7ab2kTrGdov4m_iTuBsGNy8x3-B6j-YriGeErQmxuImldVyUqLBGrti5Pj4oLRV1Xqoq-Pf6LkZ4W1zHeIyI1lVKdvih-feLw3fkt9LLjo5vmAOw3YMXHOcI0wN0cODr2MKUkIcKL9ZwCw3ieL8F5CO4owXmBHfcucYqv4eeOE9isiTYD7me_YW8lPlj7yZfOH7PpUWArXpKzEHl_GM9nJBlHyMncT3NaMsHP-z5Hv7kqngw8Rrn-sy-Lr-_uvtx-KNef33-8fbsura51KhtFWqhBlI221naiW7Wy1UD1UBGKYNt0mgeLtKots62J2n7V8arBvu3qQV8WzxffQ5h-zBKTuc9_8TnSKN0ikdLYZZZaWDZMMQYZzCG4PYeTITTnXszSi8m9mIdezCmL9CKKmey3Ev5Z_0f1G5B2k9Y</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Sittenthaler, Marcia</creator><creator>Schöll, Eva Maria</creator><creator>Leeb, Christoph</creator><creator>Haring, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie</creator><creator>Hackländer, Klaus</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7727-6246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3414-1576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3096-5885</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-435X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-7143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-1879</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?</title><author>Sittenthaler, Marcia ; Schöll, Eva Maria ; Leeb, Christoph ; Haring, Elisabeth ; Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie ; Hackländer, Klaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7213e1700ed3ccc9e3825c4f16f410ee08793afc0156caac6118b59a570b896f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lutra lutra</topic><topic>Lutrinae</topic><topic>Marking behavior</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sittenthaler, Marcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöll, Eva Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeb, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haring, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackländer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Mammal research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sittenthaler, Marcia</au><au>Schöll, Eva Maria</au><au>Leeb, Christoph</au><au>Haring, Elisabeth</au><au>Parz-Gollner, Rosemarie</au><au>Hackländer, Klaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?</atitle><jtitle>Mammal research</jtitle><stitle>Mamm Res</stitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>191-202</pages><issn>2199-2401</issn><eissn>2199-241X</eissn><abstract>Growing human-wildlife conflicts and legal conservation obligations increased the need for precise information on Eurasian otter ( Lutra lutra ) population parameters for species status assessment and wildlife management measures. Scat surveys have become the method of choice to monitor species distribution range, abundance and habitat use. Although methodological concerns exist, scat abundance is often used as main indicator for otter population estimates and trends. To evaluate whether scat counts serve as good proxy for otter densities in linear stream habitats, we modelled the relationship between old/fresh scat abundance and otter numbers on two spatial scales, including also seasonal effects. Actual otter densities and marking behaviour were ascertained by genotyping of otter faeces collected at 218 marking sites along 132.6 km of four salmonid streams. Otter densities in our study areas ranged from 0.16 to 0.28 otters per stream kilometre. The age of scats and the level of spatial scale were determining factors when evaluating the suitability of scat abundance as index for otter densities. Covering large parts of an otter’s territory, fresh scat abundance increased with otter density, irrespectively of season. On the spatial scale of single marking sites, the relationship was not well supported, and no relationship could be found when using old scats in the models. Otter marking behaviour and differences in marking site use intensity, as well as seasonal differences in traceability and accumulation of old scats were discussed to bias the relationship between scat abundance and otter numbers.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7727-6246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3414-1576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3096-5885</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-435X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-7143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-1879</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2199-2401
ispartof Mammal research, 2020-04, Vol.65 (2), p.191-202
issn 2199-2401
2199-241X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2380112309
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abundance
Animal Ecology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Evolutionary Biology
Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management
Genotyping
Geographical distribution
Habitat utilization
Life Sciences
Lutra lutra
Lutrinae
Marking behavior
Original Paper
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife management
Zoology
title Marking behaviour and census of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in riverine habitats: what can scat abundances and non-invasive genetic sampling tell us about otter numbers?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marking%20behaviour%20and%20census%20of%20Eurasian%20otters%20(Lutra%20lutra)%20in%20riverine%20habitats:%20what%20can%20scat%20abundances%20and%20non-invasive%20genetic%20sampling%20tell%20us%20about%20otter%20numbers?&rft.jtitle=Mammal%20research&rft.au=Sittenthaler,%20Marcia&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=191-202&rft.issn=2199-2401&rft.eissn=2199-241X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13364-020-00486-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2380112309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2380112309&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true