A critical review of published approaches to nanoscale thermal radiation
Radiative heat transfer across nanoscale-thick layers attracts considerable attention because of its importance for modern technology, and also because of the evidence that conventional methods of radiative heat transfer fail at such small scales. This paper analyzes several approaches to this probl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik 2020-04, Vol.71 (2), Article 69 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Budaev, Bair V. Bogy, David B. |
description | Radiative heat transfer across nanoscale-thick layers attracts considerable attention because of its importance for modern technology, and also because of the evidence that conventional methods of radiative heat transfer fail at such small scales. This paper analyzes several approaches to this problem that have been proposed since the late 1960s when the first adaptations of the classical Stefan–Boltzmann law of radiative heat transfer to smaller scales were presented. It is shown that while all authors agree that thermal radiation is described by Maxwell’s equations for electrodynamics, the methods of these studies drifted from deductive reasoning based on these equations toward heuristic guesses. This paper identifies critical points of several of these previous studies that are responsible for the lack of a suitable theory of radiative heat transfer across nanoscale layers despite almost 50 years of effort. Among these points are: (1) attempts to describe heat transfer using statistical distributions that are limited to equilibrium systems that cannot produce any heat flux; (2) application of the so-called fluctuation–dissipation theorem when its conditions are not satisfied; (3) the failure to distinguish between different kinds of evanescent fields; (4) an unjustified assumption that resonant surface waves can transfer heat by tunneling. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00033-020-1288-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2379669785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2379669785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-77602deda615ee2be34b4daa7d85e79c2be0ccf2cf320685add0ea955eb8953a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C3geXWSbDbZYylqCwUveg7ZZNZuaTdrslV8e1NW8ORpmOH7Z4aPkFsG9wxAPSQAEKIADgXjWhfqjMxYmbsaRH1OZgBlWXCu5CW5SmmXacVAzMhqQV3sxs7ZPY342eEXDS0djs2-S1v01A5DDNZtMdEx0N72IWUU6bjFeDhlrO_s2IX-mly0dp_w5rfOydvT4-tyVWxentfLxaZwvNJjoVQF3KO3FZOIvEFRNqW3VnktUdUuT8C5lrtWcKi0tN4D2lpKbHQthRVzcjftzX99HDGNZheOsc8nDReqrqpaaZkpNlEuhpQitmaI3cHGb8PAnISZSZjJwsxJmFE5w6dMymz_jvFv8_-hH4jkbos</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2379669785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A critical review of published approaches to nanoscale thermal radiation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Budaev, Bair V. ; Bogy, David B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Budaev, Bair V. ; Bogy, David B.</creatorcontrib><description>Radiative heat transfer across nanoscale-thick layers attracts considerable attention because of its importance for modern technology, and also because of the evidence that conventional methods of radiative heat transfer fail at such small scales. This paper analyzes several approaches to this problem that have been proposed since the late 1960s when the first adaptations of the classical Stefan–Boltzmann law of radiative heat transfer to smaller scales were presented. It is shown that while all authors agree that thermal radiation is described by Maxwell’s equations for electrodynamics, the methods of these studies drifted from deductive reasoning based on these equations toward heuristic guesses. This paper identifies critical points of several of these previous studies that are responsible for the lack of a suitable theory of radiative heat transfer across nanoscale layers despite almost 50 years of effort. Among these points are: (1) attempts to describe heat transfer using statistical distributions that are limited to equilibrium systems that cannot produce any heat flux; (2) application of the so-called fluctuation–dissipation theorem when its conditions are not satisfied; (3) the failure to distinguish between different kinds of evanescent fields; (4) an unjustified assumption that resonant surface waves can transfer heat by tunneling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-2275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00033-020-1288-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Critical point ; Electrodynamics ; Engineering ; Heat flux ; Heat transfer ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical Methods in Physics ; Radiative heat transfer ; Statistical distributions ; Surface waves ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics ; Thermal radiation</subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 2020-04, Vol.71 (2), Article 69</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-77602deda615ee2be34b4daa7d85e79c2be0ccf2cf320685add0ea955eb8953a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7548-4773</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00033-020-1288-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00033-020-1288-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Budaev, Bair V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogy, David B.</creatorcontrib><title>A critical review of published approaches to nanoscale thermal radiation</title><title>Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik</title><addtitle>Z. Angew. Math. Phys</addtitle><description>Radiative heat transfer across nanoscale-thick layers attracts considerable attention because of its importance for modern technology, and also because of the evidence that conventional methods of radiative heat transfer fail at such small scales. This paper analyzes several approaches to this problem that have been proposed since the late 1960s when the first adaptations of the classical Stefan–Boltzmann law of radiative heat transfer to smaller scales were presented. It is shown that while all authors agree that thermal radiation is described by Maxwell’s equations for electrodynamics, the methods of these studies drifted from deductive reasoning based on these equations toward heuristic guesses. This paper identifies critical points of several of these previous studies that are responsible for the lack of a suitable theory of radiative heat transfer across nanoscale layers despite almost 50 years of effort. Among these points are: (1) attempts to describe heat transfer using statistical distributions that are limited to equilibrium systems that cannot produce any heat flux; (2) application of the so-called fluctuation–dissipation theorem when its conditions are not satisfied; (3) the failure to distinguish between different kinds of evanescent fields; (4) an unjustified assumption that resonant surface waves can transfer heat by tunneling.</description><subject>Critical point</subject><subject>Electrodynamics</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical Methods in Physics</subject><subject>Radiative heat transfer</subject><subject>Statistical distributions</subject><subject>Surface waves</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><subject>Thermal radiation</subject><issn>0044-2275</issn><issn>1420-9039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C3geXWSbDbZYylqCwUveg7ZZNZuaTdrslV8e1NW8ORpmOH7Z4aPkFsG9wxAPSQAEKIADgXjWhfqjMxYmbsaRH1OZgBlWXCu5CW5SmmXacVAzMhqQV3sxs7ZPY342eEXDS0djs2-S1v01A5DDNZtMdEx0N72IWUU6bjFeDhlrO_s2IX-mly0dp_w5rfOydvT4-tyVWxentfLxaZwvNJjoVQF3KO3FZOIvEFRNqW3VnktUdUuT8C5lrtWcKi0tN4D2lpKbHQthRVzcjftzX99HDGNZheOsc8nDReqrqpaaZkpNlEuhpQitmaI3cHGb8PAnISZSZjJwsxJmFE5w6dMymz_jvFv8_-hH4jkbos</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Budaev, Bair V.</creator><creator>Bogy, David B.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-4773</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>A critical review of published approaches to nanoscale thermal radiation</title><author>Budaev, Bair V. ; Bogy, David B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-77602deda615ee2be34b4daa7d85e79c2be0ccf2cf320685add0ea955eb8953a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Critical point</topic><topic>Electrodynamics</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical Methods in Physics</topic><topic>Radiative heat transfer</topic><topic>Statistical distributions</topic><topic>Surface waves</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><topic>Thermal radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Budaev, Bair V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogy, David B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Budaev, Bair V.</au><au>Bogy, David B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A critical review of published approaches to nanoscale thermal radiation</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik</jtitle><stitle>Z. Angew. Math. Phys</stitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><artnum>69</artnum><issn>0044-2275</issn><eissn>1420-9039</eissn><abstract>Radiative heat transfer across nanoscale-thick layers attracts considerable attention because of its importance for modern technology, and also because of the evidence that conventional methods of radiative heat transfer fail at such small scales. This paper analyzes several approaches to this problem that have been proposed since the late 1960s when the first adaptations of the classical Stefan–Boltzmann law of radiative heat transfer to smaller scales were presented. It is shown that while all authors agree that thermal radiation is described by Maxwell’s equations for electrodynamics, the methods of these studies drifted from deductive reasoning based on these equations toward heuristic guesses. This paper identifies critical points of several of these previous studies that are responsible for the lack of a suitable theory of radiative heat transfer across nanoscale layers despite almost 50 years of effort. Among these points are: (1) attempts to describe heat transfer using statistical distributions that are limited to equilibrium systems that cannot produce any heat flux; (2) application of the so-called fluctuation–dissipation theorem when its conditions are not satisfied; (3) the failure to distinguish between different kinds of evanescent fields; (4) an unjustified assumption that resonant surface waves can transfer heat by tunneling.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s00033-020-1288-7</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-4773</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0044-2275 |
ispartof | Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 2020-04, Vol.71 (2), Article 69 |
issn | 0044-2275 1420-9039 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2379669785 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Critical point Electrodynamics Engineering Heat flux Heat transfer Mathematical analysis Mathematical Methods in Physics Radiative heat transfer Statistical distributions Surface waves Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Thermal radiation |
title | A critical review of published approaches to nanoscale thermal radiation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A28%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20critical%20review%20of%20published%20approaches%20to%20nanoscale%20thermal%20radiation&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20angewandte%20Mathematik%20und%20Physik&rft.au=Budaev,%20Bair%20V.&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.artnum=69&rft.issn=0044-2275&rft.eissn=1420-9039&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00033-020-1288-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2379669785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2379669785&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |