Small-Strain Stiffness of Natural Pumiceous Sand

AbstractThis paper focuses on the small-strain shear modulus (Gmax) of natural pumiceous (NP) sands, a type of crushable volcanic soil commonly found in the North Island of New Zealand. These sands are also compressible and lightweight, resulting in difficulty to accurately evaluate their geotechnic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2020-06, Vol.146 (6)
Hauptverfasser: Asadi, Mohammad Bagher, Asadi, Mohammad Sadeq, Orense, Rolando. P, Pender, Michael. J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering
container_volume 146
creator Asadi, Mohammad Bagher
Asadi, Mohammad Sadeq
Orense, Rolando. P
Pender, Michael. J
description AbstractThis paper focuses on the small-strain shear modulus (Gmax) of natural pumiceous (NP) sands, a type of crushable volcanic soil commonly found in the North Island of New Zealand. These sands are also compressible and lightweight, resulting in difficulty to accurately evaluate their geotechnical properties. To better understand the Gmax dependency of these NP sands on effective confining pressure (σc′) and void ratio (e), bender element tests are performed on three types of locally sourced NP sands and, for comparison purposes, similar tests are conducted on hard-grained Toyoura sand. The results illustrate that the Gmax of NP sands are considerably lower than that of Toyoura sand over a wide range of e and σc′. Furthermore, materials with higher pumice content show higher dependency on σc′ and lower dependency on e compared with those with lower pumice content as well as Toyoura sand. Particle characteristics (e.g., particle shape, particle-size distribution, particle crushing, pumice content, compressibility, and fines content) are taken into consideration to explain the different response of the tested materials.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002256
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2378641878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2378641878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-cd1ed2b9b590550534f17b9573fc6bb3aff4827304eafc85dcac4478fcbf17aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_Q9CLHlJnvzfeSqlVKCqknpfNZhdS0qTuJgf_fRNa9eRphuF534EHoVsMMwwCP97P88XyYbWZ4YzRlAsQMwAghIszNPm9nQ87ZJACYfgSXcW4HSAGikwQ5DtT12neBVM1Sd5V3jcuxqT1yZvp-mDq5KPfVda1fUxy05TX6MKbOrqb05yiz-flZvGSrt9Xr4v5OjWUyi61JXYlKbKCZ8A5cMo8lkXGJfVWFAU13jNFJAXmjLeKl9ZYxqTythhAY-gU3R1796H96l3s9LbtQzO81IRKJRhWUg3U05GyoY0xOK_3odqZ8K0x6NGQ1qMhvdro0YYebeiToSEsjmETrfur_0n-HzwAIk1prA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2378641878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small-Strain Stiffness of Natural Pumiceous Sand</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Asadi, Mohammad Bagher ; Asadi, Mohammad Sadeq ; Orense, Rolando. P ; Pender, Michael. J</creator><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Mohammad Bagher ; Asadi, Mohammad Sadeq ; Orense, Rolando. P ; Pender, Michael. J</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis paper focuses on the small-strain shear modulus (Gmax) of natural pumiceous (NP) sands, a type of crushable volcanic soil commonly found in the North Island of New Zealand. These sands are also compressible and lightweight, resulting in difficulty to accurately evaluate their geotechnical properties. To better understand the Gmax dependency of these NP sands on effective confining pressure (σc′) and void ratio (e), bender element tests are performed on three types of locally sourced NP sands and, for comparison purposes, similar tests are conducted on hard-grained Toyoura sand. The results illustrate that the Gmax of NP sands are considerably lower than that of Toyoura sand over a wide range of e and σc′. Furthermore, materials with higher pumice content show higher dependency on σc′ and lower dependency on e compared with those with lower pumice content as well as Toyoura sand. Particle characteristics (e.g., particle shape, particle-size distribution, particle crushing, pumice content, compressibility, and fines content) are taken into consideration to explain the different response of the tested materials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Compressibility ; Dependence ; Fines ; Particle shape ; Particle size distribution ; Pumice ; Sand ; Shear modulus ; Size distribution ; Soil compressibility ; Soil properties ; Stiffness ; Technical Note ; Technical Notes ; Void ratio ; Volcanic soils</subject><ispartof>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2020-06, Vol.146 (6)</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-cd1ed2b9b590550534f17b9573fc6bb3aff4827304eafc85dcac4478fcbf17aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-cd1ed2b9b590550534f17b9573fc6bb3aff4827304eafc85dcac4478fcbf17aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0581-9563 ; 0000-0001-8191-3757</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002256$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002256$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Mohammad Bagher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Mohammad Sadeq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orense, Rolando. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pender, Michael. J</creatorcontrib><title>Small-Strain Stiffness of Natural Pumiceous Sand</title><title>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</title><description>AbstractThis paper focuses on the small-strain shear modulus (Gmax) of natural pumiceous (NP) sands, a type of crushable volcanic soil commonly found in the North Island of New Zealand. These sands are also compressible and lightweight, resulting in difficulty to accurately evaluate their geotechnical properties. To better understand the Gmax dependency of these NP sands on effective confining pressure (σc′) and void ratio (e), bender element tests are performed on three types of locally sourced NP sands and, for comparison purposes, similar tests are conducted on hard-grained Toyoura sand. The results illustrate that the Gmax of NP sands are considerably lower than that of Toyoura sand over a wide range of e and σc′. Furthermore, materials with higher pumice content show higher dependency on σc′ and lower dependency on e compared with those with lower pumice content as well as Toyoura sand. Particle characteristics (e.g., particle shape, particle-size distribution, particle crushing, pumice content, compressibility, and fines content) are taken into consideration to explain the different response of the tested materials.</description><subject>Compressibility</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Fines</subject><subject>Particle shape</subject><subject>Particle size distribution</subject><subject>Pumice</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Shear modulus</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Soil compressibility</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Technical Note</subject><subject>Technical Notes</subject><subject>Void ratio</subject><subject>Volcanic soils</subject><issn>1090-0241</issn><issn>1943-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_Q9CLHlJnvzfeSqlVKCqknpfNZhdS0qTuJgf_fRNa9eRphuF534EHoVsMMwwCP97P88XyYbWZ4YzRlAsQMwAghIszNPm9nQ87ZJACYfgSXcW4HSAGikwQ5DtT12neBVM1Sd5V3jcuxqT1yZvp-mDq5KPfVda1fUxy05TX6MKbOrqb05yiz-flZvGSrt9Xr4v5OjWUyi61JXYlKbKCZ8A5cMo8lkXGJfVWFAU13jNFJAXmjLeKl9ZYxqTythhAY-gU3R1796H96l3s9LbtQzO81IRKJRhWUg3U05GyoY0xOK_3odqZ8K0x6NGQ1qMhvdro0YYebeiToSEsjmETrfur_0n-HzwAIk1prA</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Asadi, Mohammad Bagher</creator><creator>Asadi, Mohammad Sadeq</creator><creator>Orense, Rolando. P</creator><creator>Pender, Michael. J</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0581-9563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8191-3757</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Small-Strain Stiffness of Natural Pumiceous Sand</title><author>Asadi, Mohammad Bagher ; Asadi, Mohammad Sadeq ; Orense, Rolando. P ; Pender, Michael. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-cd1ed2b9b590550534f17b9573fc6bb3aff4827304eafc85dcac4478fcbf17aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Compressibility</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Fines</topic><topic>Particle shape</topic><topic>Particle size distribution</topic><topic>Pumice</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Shear modulus</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Soil compressibility</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Technical Note</topic><topic>Technical Notes</topic><topic>Void ratio</topic><topic>Volcanic soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Mohammad Bagher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Mohammad Sadeq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orense, Rolando. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pender, Michael. J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asadi, Mohammad Bagher</au><au>Asadi, Mohammad Sadeq</au><au>Orense, Rolando. P</au><au>Pender, Michael. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Small-Strain Stiffness of Natural Pumiceous Sand</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>1090-0241</issn><eissn>1943-5606</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis paper focuses on the small-strain shear modulus (Gmax) of natural pumiceous (NP) sands, a type of crushable volcanic soil commonly found in the North Island of New Zealand. These sands are also compressible and lightweight, resulting in difficulty to accurately evaluate their geotechnical properties. To better understand the Gmax dependency of these NP sands on effective confining pressure (σc′) and void ratio (e), bender element tests are performed on three types of locally sourced NP sands and, for comparison purposes, similar tests are conducted on hard-grained Toyoura sand. The results illustrate that the Gmax of NP sands are considerably lower than that of Toyoura sand over a wide range of e and σc′. Furthermore, materials with higher pumice content show higher dependency on σc′ and lower dependency on e compared with those with lower pumice content as well as Toyoura sand. Particle characteristics (e.g., particle shape, particle-size distribution, particle crushing, pumice content, compressibility, and fines content) are taken into consideration to explain the different response of the tested materials.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002256</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0581-9563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8191-3757</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-0241
ispartof Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2020-06, Vol.146 (6)
issn 1090-0241
1943-5606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2378641878
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Compressibility
Dependence
Fines
Particle shape
Particle size distribution
Pumice
Sand
Shear modulus
Size distribution
Soil compressibility
Soil properties
Stiffness
Technical Note
Technical Notes
Void ratio
Volcanic soils
title Small-Strain Stiffness of Natural Pumiceous Sand
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A30%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Small-Strain%20Stiffness%20of%20Natural%20Pumiceous%20Sand&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geotechnical%20and%20geoenvironmental%20engineering&rft.au=Asadi,%20Mohammad%20Bagher&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=1090-0241&rft.eissn=1943-5606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2378641878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2378641878&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true