Element length calculation in B-spline meshes for complex geometries

Variational multiscale methods, and their precursors, stabilized methods, have been playing a core-method role in semi-discrete and space–time (ST) flow computations for decades. These methods are sometimes supplemented with discontinuity-capturing (DC) methods. The stabilization and DC parameters e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computational mechanics 2020-04, Vol.65 (4), p.1085-1103
Hauptverfasser: Otoguro, Yuto, Takizawa, Kenji, Tezduyar, Tayfun E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1103
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1085
container_title Computational mechanics
container_volume 65
creator Otoguro, Yuto
Takizawa, Kenji
Tezduyar, Tayfun E.
description Variational multiscale methods, and their precursors, stabilized methods, have been playing a core-method role in semi-discrete and space–time (ST) flow computations for decades. These methods are sometimes supplemented with discontinuity-capturing (DC) methods. The stabilization and DC parameters embedded in most of these methods play a significant role. Various well-performing stabilization and DC parameters have been introduced in both the semi-discrete and ST contexts. The parameters almost always involve some element length expressions, most of the time in specific directions, such as the direction of the flow or solution gradient. Until recently, stabilization and DC parameters originally intended for finite element discretization were being used also for isogeometric discretization. Recently, element lengths and stabilization and DC parameters targeting isogeometric discretization were introduced for ST and semi-discrete computations, and these expressions are also applicable to finite element discretization. The key stages of deriving the direction-dependent element length expression were mapping the direction vector from the physical (ST or space-only) element to the parent element in the parametric space, accounting for the discretization spacing along each of the parametric coordinates, and mapping what has been obtained back to the physical element. Targeting B-spline meshes for complex geometries, we introduce here new element length expressions, which are outcome of a clear and convincing derivation and more suitable for element-level evaluation. The new expressions are based on a preferred parametric space and a transformation tensor that represents the relationship between the integration and preferred parametric spaces. The test computations we present for advection-dominated cases, including 2D computations with complex meshes, show that the proposed element length expressions result in good solution profiles.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00466-019-01809-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2377860118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A617841236</galeid><sourcerecordid>A617841236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-9ed31a49bff37322570e07ff8ab6e11ef9416d323885ee4ef67a1ce772ae2b913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuCV1505qNN2supUwcDwY_rkHUnXUeb1CRj898brSC7kUM4EJ4n55AXoUuCJwRjceMxzjhPMSnjKXCZ7o7QiGSMprik2TEaYSKKVHCRn6Iz7zcYk7xg-Qjdz1rowISkBVOHdVKpttq2KjTWJI1JblPft42BpAO_Bp9o65LKdn0L-6QG20FwDfhzdKJV6-Hit4_R-8Ps7e4pXTw_zu-mi7TKMQ1pCStGVFYutWaCUZoLDFhoXaglB0JAlxnhK0ZZUeQAGWguFKlACKqALkvCxuhqeLd39mMLPsiN3ToTR0rKhCg4JqSI1GSgatWCbIy2wakq1gq6prIGdBPvpzz-SEYo41G4PhAiE2AfarX1Xs5fXw5ZOrCVs9470LJ3TafcpyRYfkchhyhkjEL-RCF3UWKD5CNsanB_e_9jfQGUv4sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2377860118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Element length calculation in B-spline meshes for complex geometries</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Otoguro, Yuto ; Takizawa, Kenji ; Tezduyar, Tayfun E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Otoguro, Yuto ; Takizawa, Kenji ; Tezduyar, Tayfun E.</creatorcontrib><description>Variational multiscale methods, and their precursors, stabilized methods, have been playing a core-method role in semi-discrete and space–time (ST) flow computations for decades. These methods are sometimes supplemented with discontinuity-capturing (DC) methods. The stabilization and DC parameters embedded in most of these methods play a significant role. Various well-performing stabilization and DC parameters have been introduced in both the semi-discrete and ST contexts. The parameters almost always involve some element length expressions, most of the time in specific directions, such as the direction of the flow or solution gradient. Until recently, stabilization and DC parameters originally intended for finite element discretization were being used also for isogeometric discretization. Recently, element lengths and stabilization and DC parameters targeting isogeometric discretization were introduced for ST and semi-discrete computations, and these expressions are also applicable to finite element discretization. The key stages of deriving the direction-dependent element length expression were mapping the direction vector from the physical (ST or space-only) element to the parent element in the parametric space, accounting for the discretization spacing along each of the parametric coordinates, and mapping what has been obtained back to the physical element. Targeting B-spline meshes for complex geometries, we introduce here new element length expressions, which are outcome of a clear and convincing derivation and more suitable for element-level evaluation. The new expressions are based on a preferred parametric space and a transformation tensor that represents the relationship between the integration and preferred parametric spaces. The test computations we present for advection-dominated cases, including 2D computations with complex meshes, show that the proposed element length expressions result in good solution profiles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0178-7675</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00466-019-01809-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Classical and Continuum Physics ; Computational Science and Engineering ; Discretization ; Engineering ; Mapping ; Mathematical analysis ; Multiscale analysis ; Original Paper ; Parameters ; Stabilization ; Tensors ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><ispartof>Computational mechanics, 2020-04, Vol.65 (4), p.1085-1103</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Computational Mechanics is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-9ed31a49bff37322570e07ff8ab6e11ef9416d323885ee4ef67a1ce772ae2b913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-9ed31a49bff37322570e07ff8ab6e11ef9416d323885ee4ef67a1ce772ae2b913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00466-019-01809-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00466-019-01809-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Otoguro, Yuto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takizawa, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tezduyar, Tayfun E.</creatorcontrib><title>Element length calculation in B-spline meshes for complex geometries</title><title>Computational mechanics</title><addtitle>Comput Mech</addtitle><description>Variational multiscale methods, and their precursors, stabilized methods, have been playing a core-method role in semi-discrete and space–time (ST) flow computations for decades. These methods are sometimes supplemented with discontinuity-capturing (DC) methods. The stabilization and DC parameters embedded in most of these methods play a significant role. Various well-performing stabilization and DC parameters have been introduced in both the semi-discrete and ST contexts. The parameters almost always involve some element length expressions, most of the time in specific directions, such as the direction of the flow or solution gradient. Until recently, stabilization and DC parameters originally intended for finite element discretization were being used also for isogeometric discretization. Recently, element lengths and stabilization and DC parameters targeting isogeometric discretization were introduced for ST and semi-discrete computations, and these expressions are also applicable to finite element discretization. The key stages of deriving the direction-dependent element length expression were mapping the direction vector from the physical (ST or space-only) element to the parent element in the parametric space, accounting for the discretization spacing along each of the parametric coordinates, and mapping what has been obtained back to the physical element. Targeting B-spline meshes for complex geometries, we introduce here new element length expressions, which are outcome of a clear and convincing derivation and more suitable for element-level evaluation. The new expressions are based on a preferred parametric space and a transformation tensor that represents the relationship between the integration and preferred parametric spaces. The test computations we present for advection-dominated cases, including 2D computations with complex meshes, show that the proposed element length expressions result in good solution profiles.</description><subject>Classical and Continuum Physics</subject><subject>Computational Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Discretization</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Multiscale analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Stabilization</subject><subject>Tensors</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><issn>0178-7675</issn><issn>1432-0924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuCV1505qNN2supUwcDwY_rkHUnXUeb1CRj898brSC7kUM4EJ4n55AXoUuCJwRjceMxzjhPMSnjKXCZ7o7QiGSMprik2TEaYSKKVHCRn6Iz7zcYk7xg-Qjdz1rowISkBVOHdVKpttq2KjTWJI1JblPft42BpAO_Bp9o65LKdn0L-6QG20FwDfhzdKJV6-Hit4_R-8Ps7e4pXTw_zu-mi7TKMQ1pCStGVFYutWaCUZoLDFhoXaglB0JAlxnhK0ZZUeQAGWguFKlACKqALkvCxuhqeLd39mMLPsiN3ToTR0rKhCg4JqSI1GSgatWCbIy2wakq1gq6prIGdBPvpzz-SEYo41G4PhAiE2AfarX1Xs5fXw5ZOrCVs9470LJ3TafcpyRYfkchhyhkjEL-RCF3UWKD5CNsanB_e_9jfQGUv4sg</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Otoguro, Yuto</creator><creator>Takizawa, Kenji</creator><creator>Tezduyar, Tayfun E.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Element length calculation in B-spline meshes for complex geometries</title><author>Otoguro, Yuto ; Takizawa, Kenji ; Tezduyar, Tayfun E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-9ed31a49bff37322570e07ff8ab6e11ef9416d323885ee4ef67a1ce772ae2b913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Classical and Continuum Physics</topic><topic>Computational Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Discretization</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Multiscale analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Stabilization</topic><topic>Tensors</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Otoguro, Yuto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takizawa, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tezduyar, Tayfun E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Computational mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Otoguro, Yuto</au><au>Takizawa, Kenji</au><au>Tezduyar, Tayfun E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Element length calculation in B-spline meshes for complex geometries</atitle><jtitle>Computational mechanics</jtitle><stitle>Comput Mech</stitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1085</spage><epage>1103</epage><pages>1085-1103</pages><issn>0178-7675</issn><eissn>1432-0924</eissn><abstract>Variational multiscale methods, and their precursors, stabilized methods, have been playing a core-method role in semi-discrete and space–time (ST) flow computations for decades. These methods are sometimes supplemented with discontinuity-capturing (DC) methods. The stabilization and DC parameters embedded in most of these methods play a significant role. Various well-performing stabilization and DC parameters have been introduced in both the semi-discrete and ST contexts. The parameters almost always involve some element length expressions, most of the time in specific directions, such as the direction of the flow or solution gradient. Until recently, stabilization and DC parameters originally intended for finite element discretization were being used also for isogeometric discretization. Recently, element lengths and stabilization and DC parameters targeting isogeometric discretization were introduced for ST and semi-discrete computations, and these expressions are also applicable to finite element discretization. The key stages of deriving the direction-dependent element length expression were mapping the direction vector from the physical (ST or space-only) element to the parent element in the parametric space, accounting for the discretization spacing along each of the parametric coordinates, and mapping what has been obtained back to the physical element. Targeting B-spline meshes for complex geometries, we introduce here new element length expressions, which are outcome of a clear and convincing derivation and more suitable for element-level evaluation. The new expressions are based on a preferred parametric space and a transformation tensor that represents the relationship between the integration and preferred parametric spaces. The test computations we present for advection-dominated cases, including 2D computations with complex meshes, show that the proposed element length expressions result in good solution profiles.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00466-019-01809-w</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0178-7675
ispartof Computational mechanics, 2020-04, Vol.65 (4), p.1085-1103
issn 0178-7675
1432-0924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2377860118
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Classical and Continuum Physics
Computational Science and Engineering
Discretization
Engineering
Mapping
Mathematical analysis
Multiscale analysis
Original Paper
Parameters
Stabilization
Tensors
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
title Element length calculation in B-spline meshes for complex geometries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T09%3A50%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Element%20length%20calculation%20in%20B-spline%20meshes%20for%20complex%20geometries&rft.jtitle=Computational%20mechanics&rft.au=Otoguro,%20Yuto&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1085&rft.epage=1103&rft.pages=1085-1103&rft.issn=0178-7675&rft.eissn=1432-0924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00466-019-01809-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA617841236%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2377860118&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A617841236&rfr_iscdi=true