Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil
AbstractThis paper reports on results from a series of 1-g, reduced-scale shake table tests of a 216-m-long portion of an onshore steel gas transmission pipeline embedded in horizontally layered soil. A set of first-order dynamic similitude laws was employed to scale system parameters appropriately....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2020-05, Vol.146 (5) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Psyrras, N Sextos, A Crewe, A Dietz, M Mylonakis, G |
description | AbstractThis paper reports on results from a series of 1-g, reduced-scale shake table tests of a 216-m-long portion of an onshore steel gas transmission pipeline embedded in horizontally layered soil. A set of first-order dynamic similitude laws was employed to scale system parameters appropriately. Two sands of different mean grain diameter and bulk density were used to assemble a compound symmetrical test soil consisting of three uniform blocks in a dense-loose-dense configuration. The sand-pipe interface friction coefficients were measured as 0.23 and 0.27. Modulated harmonics and recorded ground motions were applied as table excitation. To monitor the detailed longitudinal strain profiles in the model pipe, bare Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) cables were deployed. In most cases, the pipe response was predominantly axial while bending became significant at stronger excitations. Strain distributions displayed clear peaks at or near the block interfaces, in accord with numerical predictions, with magnitudes increasing at resonant frequencies and with excitation level. By extension to full scale, peak axial strain amounted to 10−3, a demand half the yield strain, but not negligible given the low in situ soil stiffness contrast and soil-pipe friction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2376864821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2376864821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-aec544ef7f7432aaea8dcc24e7ef452a917ea3c3031de92d4cc326425cd54f873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwHyxYYEjxV5yErapKqFRERcvCYlnOuXWVxiFOh_57ErXAxHSn0_O-Jz0I3VIyokTSx_vxcjJ9yFcjmgkexZLIESGEMcHO0OD3dt7tJCMRYYJeoqsQth0kSMoG6HOxOQRndIlffQGlq9bYW9xuAC_BhZ0z-B1C7asA_T3XAS9c3XMQsKvwXLfQ6LI84Fm18Tu_hgr8PuCld-U1urC6DHBzmkP08TxdTV6i-Vs-m4znkeZp2kYaTCwE2MQmgjOtQaeFMUxAAlbETGc0Ac0NJ5wWkLFCGMOZFCw2RSxsmvAhujv21o3_2kNo1dbvm6p7qRhPZCpFymhHPR0p0_gQGrCqbtxONwdFiepdKtW7VPlK9d5U702dXHZheQzrYOCv_if5f_AbUod46w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376864821</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Psyrras, N ; Sextos, A ; Crewe, A ; Dietz, M ; Mylonakis, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Psyrras, N ; Sextos, A ; Crewe, A ; Dietz, M ; Mylonakis, G</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis paper reports on results from a series of 1-g, reduced-scale shake table tests of a 216-m-long portion of an onshore steel gas transmission pipeline embedded in horizontally layered soil. A set of first-order dynamic similitude laws was employed to scale system parameters appropriately. Two sands of different mean grain diameter and bulk density were used to assemble a compound symmetrical test soil consisting of three uniform blocks in a dense-loose-dense configuration. The sand-pipe interface friction coefficients were measured as 0.23 and 0.27. Modulated harmonics and recorded ground motions were applied as table excitation. To monitor the detailed longitudinal strain profiles in the model pipe, bare Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) cables were deployed. In most cases, the pipe response was predominantly axial while bending became significant at stronger excitations. Strain distributions displayed clear peaks at or near the block interfaces, in accord with numerical predictions, with magnitudes increasing at resonant frequencies and with excitation level. By extension to full scale, peak axial strain amounted to 10−3, a demand half the yield strain, but not negligible given the low in situ soil stiffness contrast and soil-pipe friction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Axial strain ; Bend strength ; Bragg gratings ; Bulk density ; Cables ; Coefficient of friction ; Coefficients ; Deformation ; Diameters ; Excitation ; Friction ; Gas pipelines ; Gas transmission ; Inhomogeneous soil ; Interfaces ; Natural gas ; Pipes ; Profiles ; Resonant frequencies ; Seismic activity ; Seismic response ; Shake table tests ; Soil ; Soil dynamics ; Soil layers ; Soil testing ; Soils ; Stiffness ; Submarine pipelines ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2020-05, Vol.146 (5)</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-aec544ef7f7432aaea8dcc24e7ef452a917ea3c3031de92d4cc326425cd54f873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-aec544ef7f7432aaea8dcc24e7ef452a917ea3c3031de92d4cc326425cd54f873</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0661-6346 ; 0000-0001-6694-6905</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,75963,75971</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Psyrras, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sextos, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crewe, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mylonakis, G</creatorcontrib><title>Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil</title><title>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</title><description>AbstractThis paper reports on results from a series of 1-g, reduced-scale shake table tests of a 216-m-long portion of an onshore steel gas transmission pipeline embedded in horizontally layered soil. A set of first-order dynamic similitude laws was employed to scale system parameters appropriately. Two sands of different mean grain diameter and bulk density were used to assemble a compound symmetrical test soil consisting of three uniform blocks in a dense-loose-dense configuration. The sand-pipe interface friction coefficients were measured as 0.23 and 0.27. Modulated harmonics and recorded ground motions were applied as table excitation. To monitor the detailed longitudinal strain profiles in the model pipe, bare Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) cables were deployed. In most cases, the pipe response was predominantly axial while bending became significant at stronger excitations. Strain distributions displayed clear peaks at or near the block interfaces, in accord with numerical predictions, with magnitudes increasing at resonant frequencies and with excitation level. By extension to full scale, peak axial strain amounted to 10−3, a demand half the yield strain, but not negligible given the low in situ soil stiffness contrast and soil-pipe friction.</description><subject>Axial strain</subject><subject>Bend strength</subject><subject>Bragg gratings</subject><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>Cables</subject><subject>Coefficient of friction</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Excitation</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Gas pipelines</subject><subject>Gas transmission</subject><subject>Inhomogeneous soil</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Pipes</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Resonant frequencies</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Shake table tests</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soil testing</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Submarine pipelines</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>1090-0241</issn><issn>1943-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwHyxYYEjxV5yErapKqFRERcvCYlnOuXWVxiFOh_57ErXAxHSn0_O-Jz0I3VIyokTSx_vxcjJ9yFcjmgkexZLIESGEMcHO0OD3dt7tJCMRYYJeoqsQth0kSMoG6HOxOQRndIlffQGlq9bYW9xuAC_BhZ0z-B1C7asA_T3XAS9c3XMQsKvwXLfQ6LI84Fm18Tu_hgr8PuCld-U1urC6DHBzmkP08TxdTV6i-Vs-m4znkeZp2kYaTCwE2MQmgjOtQaeFMUxAAlbETGc0Ac0NJ5wWkLFCGMOZFCw2RSxsmvAhujv21o3_2kNo1dbvm6p7qRhPZCpFymhHPR0p0_gQGrCqbtxONwdFiepdKtW7VPlK9d5U702dXHZheQzrYOCv_if5f_AbUod46w</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Psyrras, N</creator><creator>Sextos, A</creator><creator>Crewe, A</creator><creator>Dietz, M</creator><creator>Mylonakis, G</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0661-6346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-6905</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil</title><author>Psyrras, N ; Sextos, A ; Crewe, A ; Dietz, M ; Mylonakis, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-aec544ef7f7432aaea8dcc24e7ef452a917ea3c3031de92d4cc326425cd54f873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Axial strain</topic><topic>Bend strength</topic><topic>Bragg gratings</topic><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>Cables</topic><topic>Coefficient of friction</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Excitation</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Gas pipelines</topic><topic>Gas transmission</topic><topic>Inhomogeneous soil</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Pipes</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Resonant frequencies</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Shake table tests</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soil testing</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Submarine pipelines</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Psyrras, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sextos, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crewe, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mylonakis, G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Psyrras, N</au><au>Sextos, A</au><au>Crewe, A</au><au>Dietz, M</au><au>Mylonakis, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>1090-0241</issn><eissn>1943-5606</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis paper reports on results from a series of 1-g, reduced-scale shake table tests of a 216-m-long portion of an onshore steel gas transmission pipeline embedded in horizontally layered soil. A set of first-order dynamic similitude laws was employed to scale system parameters appropriately. Two sands of different mean grain diameter and bulk density were used to assemble a compound symmetrical test soil consisting of three uniform blocks in a dense-loose-dense configuration. The sand-pipe interface friction coefficients were measured as 0.23 and 0.27. Modulated harmonics and recorded ground motions were applied as table excitation. To monitor the detailed longitudinal strain profiles in the model pipe, bare Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) cables were deployed. In most cases, the pipe response was predominantly axial while bending became significant at stronger excitations. Strain distributions displayed clear peaks at or near the block interfaces, in accord with numerical predictions, with magnitudes increasing at resonant frequencies and with excitation level. By extension to full scale, peak axial strain amounted to 10−3, a demand half the yield strain, but not negligible given the low in situ soil stiffness contrast and soil-pipe friction.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0661-6346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-6905</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1090-0241 |
ispartof | Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2020-05, Vol.146 (5) |
issn | 1090-0241 1943-5606 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2376864821 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Axial strain Bend strength Bragg gratings Bulk density Cables Coefficient of friction Coefficients Deformation Diameters Excitation Friction Gas pipelines Gas transmission Inhomogeneous soil Interfaces Natural gas Pipes Profiles Resonant frequencies Seismic activity Seismic response Shake table tests Soil Soil dynamics Soil layers Soil testing Soils Stiffness Submarine pipelines Technical Papers |
title | Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A55%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20Modeling%20of%20the%20Seismic%20Response%20of%20Gas%20Pipelines%20in%20Laterally%20Inhomogeneous%20Soil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geotechnical%20and%20geoenvironmental%20engineering&rft.au=Psyrras,%20N&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=1090-0241&rft.eissn=1943-5606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2376864821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376864821&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |