Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil

AbstractThis paper reports on results from a series of 1-g, reduced-scale shake table tests of a 216-m-long portion of an onshore steel gas transmission pipeline embedded in horizontally layered soil. A set of first-order dynamic similitude laws was employed to scale system parameters appropriately....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2020-05, Vol.146 (5)
Hauptverfasser: Psyrras, N, Sextos, A, Crewe, A, Dietz, M, Mylonakis, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering
container_volume 146
creator Psyrras, N
Sextos, A
Crewe, A
Dietz, M
Mylonakis, G
description AbstractThis paper reports on results from a series of 1-g, reduced-scale shake table tests of a 216-m-long portion of an onshore steel gas transmission pipeline embedded in horizontally layered soil. A set of first-order dynamic similitude laws was employed to scale system parameters appropriately. Two sands of different mean grain diameter and bulk density were used to assemble a compound symmetrical test soil consisting of three uniform blocks in a dense-loose-dense configuration. The sand-pipe interface friction coefficients were measured as 0.23 and 0.27. Modulated harmonics and recorded ground motions were applied as table excitation. To monitor the detailed longitudinal strain profiles in the model pipe, bare Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) cables were deployed. In most cases, the pipe response was predominantly axial while bending became significant at stronger excitations. Strain distributions displayed clear peaks at or near the block interfaces, in accord with numerical predictions, with magnitudes increasing at resonant frequencies and with excitation level. By extension to full scale, peak axial strain amounted to 10−3, a demand half the yield strain, but not negligible given the low in situ soil stiffness contrast and soil-pipe friction.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2376864821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2376864821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-aec544ef7f7432aaea8dcc24e7ef452a917ea3c3031de92d4cc326425cd54f873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwHyxYYEjxV5yErapKqFRERcvCYlnOuXWVxiFOh_57ErXAxHSn0_O-Jz0I3VIyokTSx_vxcjJ9yFcjmgkexZLIESGEMcHO0OD3dt7tJCMRYYJeoqsQth0kSMoG6HOxOQRndIlffQGlq9bYW9xuAC_BhZ0z-B1C7asA_T3XAS9c3XMQsKvwXLfQ6LI84Fm18Tu_hgr8PuCld-U1urC6DHBzmkP08TxdTV6i-Vs-m4znkeZp2kYaTCwE2MQmgjOtQaeFMUxAAlbETGc0Ac0NJ5wWkLFCGMOZFCw2RSxsmvAhujv21o3_2kNo1dbvm6p7qRhPZCpFymhHPR0p0_gQGrCqbtxONwdFiepdKtW7VPlK9d5U702dXHZheQzrYOCv_if5f_AbUod46w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376864821</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Psyrras, N ; Sextos, A ; Crewe, A ; Dietz, M ; Mylonakis, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Psyrras, N ; Sextos, A ; Crewe, A ; Dietz, M ; Mylonakis, G</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis paper reports on results from a series of 1-g, reduced-scale shake table tests of a 216-m-long portion of an onshore steel gas transmission pipeline embedded in horizontally layered soil. A set of first-order dynamic similitude laws was employed to scale system parameters appropriately. Two sands of different mean grain diameter and bulk density were used to assemble a compound symmetrical test soil consisting of three uniform blocks in a dense-loose-dense configuration. The sand-pipe interface friction coefficients were measured as 0.23 and 0.27. Modulated harmonics and recorded ground motions were applied as table excitation. To monitor the detailed longitudinal strain profiles in the model pipe, bare Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) cables were deployed. In most cases, the pipe response was predominantly axial while bending became significant at stronger excitations. Strain distributions displayed clear peaks at or near the block interfaces, in accord with numerical predictions, with magnitudes increasing at resonant frequencies and with excitation level. By extension to full scale, peak axial strain amounted to 10−3, a demand half the yield strain, but not negligible given the low in situ soil stiffness contrast and soil-pipe friction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Axial strain ; Bend strength ; Bragg gratings ; Bulk density ; Cables ; Coefficient of friction ; Coefficients ; Deformation ; Diameters ; Excitation ; Friction ; Gas pipelines ; Gas transmission ; Inhomogeneous soil ; Interfaces ; Natural gas ; Pipes ; Profiles ; Resonant frequencies ; Seismic activity ; Seismic response ; Shake table tests ; Soil ; Soil dynamics ; Soil layers ; Soil testing ; Soils ; Stiffness ; Submarine pipelines ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2020-05, Vol.146 (5)</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-aec544ef7f7432aaea8dcc24e7ef452a917ea3c3031de92d4cc326425cd54f873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-aec544ef7f7432aaea8dcc24e7ef452a917ea3c3031de92d4cc326425cd54f873</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0661-6346 ; 0000-0001-6694-6905</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,75963,75971</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Psyrras, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sextos, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crewe, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mylonakis, G</creatorcontrib><title>Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil</title><title>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</title><description>AbstractThis paper reports on results from a series of 1-g, reduced-scale shake table tests of a 216-m-long portion of an onshore steel gas transmission pipeline embedded in horizontally layered soil. A set of first-order dynamic similitude laws was employed to scale system parameters appropriately. Two sands of different mean grain diameter and bulk density were used to assemble a compound symmetrical test soil consisting of three uniform blocks in a dense-loose-dense configuration. The sand-pipe interface friction coefficients were measured as 0.23 and 0.27. Modulated harmonics and recorded ground motions were applied as table excitation. To monitor the detailed longitudinal strain profiles in the model pipe, bare Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) cables were deployed. In most cases, the pipe response was predominantly axial while bending became significant at stronger excitations. Strain distributions displayed clear peaks at or near the block interfaces, in accord with numerical predictions, with magnitudes increasing at resonant frequencies and with excitation level. By extension to full scale, peak axial strain amounted to 10−3, a demand half the yield strain, but not negligible given the low in situ soil stiffness contrast and soil-pipe friction.</description><subject>Axial strain</subject><subject>Bend strength</subject><subject>Bragg gratings</subject><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>Cables</subject><subject>Coefficient of friction</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Excitation</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Gas pipelines</subject><subject>Gas transmission</subject><subject>Inhomogeneous soil</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Pipes</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Resonant frequencies</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Shake table tests</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soil testing</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Submarine pipelines</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>1090-0241</issn><issn>1943-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwHyxYYEjxV5yErapKqFRERcvCYlnOuXWVxiFOh_57ErXAxHSn0_O-Jz0I3VIyokTSx_vxcjJ9yFcjmgkexZLIESGEMcHO0OD3dt7tJCMRYYJeoqsQth0kSMoG6HOxOQRndIlffQGlq9bYW9xuAC_BhZ0z-B1C7asA_T3XAS9c3XMQsKvwXLfQ6LI84Fm18Tu_hgr8PuCld-U1urC6DHBzmkP08TxdTV6i-Vs-m4znkeZp2kYaTCwE2MQmgjOtQaeFMUxAAlbETGc0Ac0NJ5wWkLFCGMOZFCw2RSxsmvAhujv21o3_2kNo1dbvm6p7qRhPZCpFymhHPR0p0_gQGrCqbtxONwdFiepdKtW7VPlK9d5U702dXHZheQzrYOCv_if5f_AbUod46w</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Psyrras, N</creator><creator>Sextos, A</creator><creator>Crewe, A</creator><creator>Dietz, M</creator><creator>Mylonakis, G</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0661-6346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-6905</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil</title><author>Psyrras, N ; Sextos, A ; Crewe, A ; Dietz, M ; Mylonakis, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-aec544ef7f7432aaea8dcc24e7ef452a917ea3c3031de92d4cc326425cd54f873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Axial strain</topic><topic>Bend strength</topic><topic>Bragg gratings</topic><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>Cables</topic><topic>Coefficient of friction</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Excitation</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Gas pipelines</topic><topic>Gas transmission</topic><topic>Inhomogeneous soil</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Pipes</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Resonant frequencies</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Shake table tests</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soil testing</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Submarine pipelines</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Psyrras, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sextos, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crewe, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mylonakis, G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Psyrras, N</au><au>Sextos, A</au><au>Crewe, A</au><au>Dietz, M</au><au>Mylonakis, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>1090-0241</issn><eissn>1943-5606</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis paper reports on results from a series of 1-g, reduced-scale shake table tests of a 216-m-long portion of an onshore steel gas transmission pipeline embedded in horizontally layered soil. A set of first-order dynamic similitude laws was employed to scale system parameters appropriately. Two sands of different mean grain diameter and bulk density were used to assemble a compound symmetrical test soil consisting of three uniform blocks in a dense-loose-dense configuration. The sand-pipe interface friction coefficients were measured as 0.23 and 0.27. Modulated harmonics and recorded ground motions were applied as table excitation. To monitor the detailed longitudinal strain profiles in the model pipe, bare Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) cables were deployed. In most cases, the pipe response was predominantly axial while bending became significant at stronger excitations. Strain distributions displayed clear peaks at or near the block interfaces, in accord with numerical predictions, with magnitudes increasing at resonant frequencies and with excitation level. By extension to full scale, peak axial strain amounted to 10−3, a demand half the yield strain, but not negligible given the low in situ soil stiffness contrast and soil-pipe friction.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0661-6346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-6905</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-0241
ispartof Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2020-05, Vol.146 (5)
issn 1090-0241
1943-5606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2376864821
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Axial strain
Bend strength
Bragg gratings
Bulk density
Cables
Coefficient of friction
Coefficients
Deformation
Diameters
Excitation
Friction
Gas pipelines
Gas transmission
Inhomogeneous soil
Interfaces
Natural gas
Pipes
Profiles
Resonant frequencies
Seismic activity
Seismic response
Shake table tests
Soil
Soil dynamics
Soil layers
Soil testing
Soils
Stiffness
Submarine pipelines
Technical Papers
title Physical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Gas Pipelines in Laterally Inhomogeneous Soil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A55%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20Modeling%20of%20the%20Seismic%20Response%20of%20Gas%20Pipelines%20in%20Laterally%20Inhomogeneous%20Soil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geotechnical%20and%20geoenvironmental%20engineering&rft.au=Psyrras,%20N&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=1090-0241&rft.eissn=1943-5606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002242&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2376864821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376864821&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true