Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements

Particle-resolved CFD simulations are widely used for the predictions of particle-scale flow, transport processes and chemical reactions. However, the effect of turbulence models used in such simulations is not quantitatively established. In the present work, particle-resolved simulations are perfor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Powder technology 2020-02, Vol.361, p.474-489
Hauptverfasser: Karthik, G.M., Thaker, Abhijeet H., Buwa, Vivek V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 489
container_issue
container_start_page 474
container_title Powder technology
container_volume 361
creator Karthik, G.M.
Thaker, Abhijeet H.
Buwa, Vivek V.
description Particle-resolved CFD simulations are widely used for the predictions of particle-scale flow, transport processes and chemical reactions. However, the effect of turbulence models used in such simulations is not quantitatively established. In the present work, particle-resolved simulations are performed to understand the influence of different turbulence models (standard k − ε (KE), SST k − ω (SST), SSG Reynolds-stress (SSG), BSL Reynolds-stress (BSL) and LES WALE (LES)) on the particle-scale predictions of the flow, heat transfer and reactions. A comparison of the PIV measurements and particle-resolved simulations of a square column containing 72 spherical particles with a tube-to-particle diameter ratio (TPDR) of ∼3.6 and Rebed of 9765 was performed. The ε−based models (KE and SSG) under-predicted the velocity (Vx and Vy) profiles due to the over-estimation of the turbulence parameters (k and ε) and an opposite behaviour was observed for the ω−based models (SST and BSL). The LES model showed a better agreement with the measurements. In addition, numerical investigations of methane steam reforming reactions were performed in a packed bed containing 30 randomly packed 7-hole cylindrical particles with a TPDR of 5, and Ret of 50,000. The ε−based models predicted lower values of velocities, temperature and species concentration in the bulk region (and higher values on the particle surfaces) resulting into higher CH4 conversion compared to the ω−based models, whereas the LES model showed the highest ΔP and CH4 conversion. Overall, the predictions of the LES model were found to be closer to the experiments. The predictions of the RSM (SSG and BSL) models did not show any improvements over the eddy-viscosity (KE and SST) models. [Display omitted] •Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurements of turbulent flow in packed bed.•Validation of particle-resolved CFD simulations of turbulent flow•Effect of different turbulence models on particle-resolved flow predictions analyzed.•Influence of different turbulence models on heat transfer and reactions predictions quantified.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2376728537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0032591019303523</els_id><sourcerecordid>2376728537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-903de3186cf4dd23fe41b4bc43e5db273e9ab219410668a66404b44716eb1f8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAUhUVoINMk_6ALQbe1c_WwbHdRKMPkAQMd6IPshCxdgwbbmkpykvn39TBZd3G5i3vOuZyPkE8MSgZM3e3LQ3jNaEsOrC2hKoHxC7JiTS0KwZvnD2QFIHhRtQyuyMeU9gCgBIMVeduZmL0dsIiYwvCCjiY_zoPJPkyJhp5ak81wXDS092_LuVsmorE5xPSVrsN4MNGnMJ20eY7dPOBkkY7B4ZC-0O3mJzWTo7unP3REk-aII0453ZDL3gwJb9_3Nfl9v_m1fiy2Px6e1t-3heWyzUULwqFgjbK9dI6LHiXrZGelwMp1vBbYmo6zVjJQqjFKSZCdlDVT2LG-seKafD7nHmL4O2PKeh_mOC0vNRe1qnlTiXpRybPKxpBSxF4foh9NPGoG-sRY7_WZsT4x1lDphfFi-3a2LVXxxWPUyfpTfecj2qxd8P8P-AejX4iQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376728537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Karthik, G.M. ; Thaker, Abhijeet H. ; Buwa, Vivek V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Karthik, G.M. ; Thaker, Abhijeet H. ; Buwa, Vivek V.</creatorcontrib><description>Particle-resolved CFD simulations are widely used for the predictions of particle-scale flow, transport processes and chemical reactions. However, the effect of turbulence models used in such simulations is not quantitatively established. In the present work, particle-resolved simulations are performed to understand the influence of different turbulence models (standard k − ε (KE), SST k − ω (SST), SSG Reynolds-stress (SSG), BSL Reynolds-stress (BSL) and LES WALE (LES)) on the particle-scale predictions of the flow, heat transfer and reactions. A comparison of the PIV measurements and particle-resolved simulations of a square column containing 72 spherical particles with a tube-to-particle diameter ratio (TPDR) of ∼3.6 and Rebed of 9765 was performed. The ε−based models (KE and SSG) under-predicted the velocity (Vx and Vy) profiles due to the over-estimation of the turbulence parameters (k and ε) and an opposite behaviour was observed for the ω−based models (SST and BSL). The LES model showed a better agreement with the measurements. In addition, numerical investigations of methane steam reforming reactions were performed in a packed bed containing 30 randomly packed 7-hole cylindrical particles with a TPDR of 5, and Ret of 50,000. The ε−based models predicted lower values of velocities, temperature and species concentration in the bulk region (and higher values on the particle surfaces) resulting into higher CH4 conversion compared to the ω−based models, whereas the LES model showed the highest ΔP and CH4 conversion. Overall, the predictions of the LES model were found to be closer to the experiments. The predictions of the RSM (SSG and BSL) models did not show any improvements over the eddy-viscosity (KE and SST) models. [Display omitted] •Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurements of turbulent flow in packed bed.•Validation of particle-resolved CFD simulations of turbulent flow•Effect of different turbulence models on particle-resolved flow predictions analyzed.•Influence of different turbulence models on heat transfer and reactions predictions quantified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-328X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Chemical reactions ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; Conversion ; Diameters ; Fixed bed reactors ; Fixed beds ; Heat transfer ; Large eddy simulations ; Methane ; Methane steam reforming reactions ; Packed bed ; Packed beds ; Parameter estimation ; Particle image velocimetry ; Particle size ; Particle-resolved CFD simulations ; Predictions ; Reforming ; Simulation ; Steam ; Transport processes ; Turbulence ; Turbulence models ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>Powder technology, 2020-02, Vol.361, p.474-489</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 1, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-903de3186cf4dd23fe41b4bc43e5db273e9ab219410668a66404b44716eb1f8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-903de3186cf4dd23fe41b4bc43e5db273e9ab219410668a66404b44716eb1f8c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2335-6379</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032591019303523$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karthik, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaker, Abhijeet H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buwa, Vivek V.</creatorcontrib><title>Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements</title><title>Powder technology</title><description>Particle-resolved CFD simulations are widely used for the predictions of particle-scale flow, transport processes and chemical reactions. However, the effect of turbulence models used in such simulations is not quantitatively established. In the present work, particle-resolved simulations are performed to understand the influence of different turbulence models (standard k − ε (KE), SST k − ω (SST), SSG Reynolds-stress (SSG), BSL Reynolds-stress (BSL) and LES WALE (LES)) on the particle-scale predictions of the flow, heat transfer and reactions. A comparison of the PIV measurements and particle-resolved simulations of a square column containing 72 spherical particles with a tube-to-particle diameter ratio (TPDR) of ∼3.6 and Rebed of 9765 was performed. The ε−based models (KE and SSG) under-predicted the velocity (Vx and Vy) profiles due to the over-estimation of the turbulence parameters (k and ε) and an opposite behaviour was observed for the ω−based models (SST and BSL). The LES model showed a better agreement with the measurements. In addition, numerical investigations of methane steam reforming reactions were performed in a packed bed containing 30 randomly packed 7-hole cylindrical particles with a TPDR of 5, and Ret of 50,000. The ε−based models predicted lower values of velocities, temperature and species concentration in the bulk region (and higher values on the particle surfaces) resulting into higher CH4 conversion compared to the ω−based models, whereas the LES model showed the highest ΔP and CH4 conversion. Overall, the predictions of the LES model were found to be closer to the experiments. The predictions of the RSM (SSG and BSL) models did not show any improvements over the eddy-viscosity (KE and SST) models. [Display omitted] •Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurements of turbulent flow in packed bed.•Validation of particle-resolved CFD simulations of turbulent flow•Effect of different turbulence models on particle-resolved flow predictions analyzed.•Influence of different turbulence models on heat transfer and reactions predictions quantified.</description><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Fixed bed reactors</subject><subject>Fixed beds</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Large eddy simulations</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane steam reforming reactions</subject><subject>Packed bed</subject><subject>Packed beds</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Particle image velocimetry</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Particle-resolved CFD simulations</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Reforming</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Steam</subject><subject>Transport processes</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulence models</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>0032-5910</issn><issn>1873-328X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAUhUVoINMk_6ALQbe1c_WwbHdRKMPkAQMd6IPshCxdgwbbmkpykvn39TBZd3G5i3vOuZyPkE8MSgZM3e3LQ3jNaEsOrC2hKoHxC7JiTS0KwZvnD2QFIHhRtQyuyMeU9gCgBIMVeduZmL0dsIiYwvCCjiY_zoPJPkyJhp5ak81wXDS092_LuVsmorE5xPSVrsN4MNGnMJ20eY7dPOBkkY7B4ZC-0O3mJzWTo7unP3REk-aII0453ZDL3gwJb9_3Nfl9v_m1fiy2Px6e1t-3heWyzUULwqFgjbK9dI6LHiXrZGelwMp1vBbYmo6zVjJQqjFKSZCdlDVT2LG-seKafD7nHmL4O2PKeh_mOC0vNRe1qnlTiXpRybPKxpBSxF4foh9NPGoG-sRY7_WZsT4x1lDphfFi-3a2LVXxxWPUyfpTfecj2qxd8P8P-AejX4iQ</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Karthik, G.M.</creator><creator>Thaker, Abhijeet H.</creator><creator>Buwa, Vivek V.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2335-6379</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements</title><author>Karthik, G.M. ; Thaker, Abhijeet H. ; Buwa, Vivek V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-903de3186cf4dd23fe41b4bc43e5db273e9ab219410668a66404b44716eb1f8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Fixed bed reactors</topic><topic>Fixed beds</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Large eddy simulations</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane steam reforming reactions</topic><topic>Packed bed</topic><topic>Packed beds</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Particle image velocimetry</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Particle-resolved CFD simulations</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Reforming</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Steam</topic><topic>Transport processes</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulence models</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karthik, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaker, Abhijeet H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buwa, Vivek V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Powder technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karthik, G.M.</au><au>Thaker, Abhijeet H.</au><au>Buwa, Vivek V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements</atitle><jtitle>Powder technology</jtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>361</volume><spage>474</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>474-489</pages><issn>0032-5910</issn><eissn>1873-328X</eissn><abstract>Particle-resolved CFD simulations are widely used for the predictions of particle-scale flow, transport processes and chemical reactions. However, the effect of turbulence models used in such simulations is not quantitatively established. In the present work, particle-resolved simulations are performed to understand the influence of different turbulence models (standard k − ε (KE), SST k − ω (SST), SSG Reynolds-stress (SSG), BSL Reynolds-stress (BSL) and LES WALE (LES)) on the particle-scale predictions of the flow, heat transfer and reactions. A comparison of the PIV measurements and particle-resolved simulations of a square column containing 72 spherical particles with a tube-to-particle diameter ratio (TPDR) of ∼3.6 and Rebed of 9765 was performed. The ε−based models (KE and SSG) under-predicted the velocity (Vx and Vy) profiles due to the over-estimation of the turbulence parameters (k and ε) and an opposite behaviour was observed for the ω−based models (SST and BSL). The LES model showed a better agreement with the measurements. In addition, numerical investigations of methane steam reforming reactions were performed in a packed bed containing 30 randomly packed 7-hole cylindrical particles with a TPDR of 5, and Ret of 50,000. The ε−based models predicted lower values of velocities, temperature and species concentration in the bulk region (and higher values on the particle surfaces) resulting into higher CH4 conversion compared to the ω−based models, whereas the LES model showed the highest ΔP and CH4 conversion. Overall, the predictions of the LES model were found to be closer to the experiments. The predictions of the RSM (SSG and BSL) models did not show any improvements over the eddy-viscosity (KE and SST) models. [Display omitted] •Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurements of turbulent flow in packed bed.•Validation of particle-resolved CFD simulations of turbulent flow•Effect of different turbulence models on particle-resolved flow predictions analyzed.•Influence of different turbulence models on heat transfer and reactions predictions quantified.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.012</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2335-6379</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5910
ispartof Powder technology, 2020-02, Vol.361, p.474-489
issn 0032-5910
1873-328X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2376728537
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Chemical reactions
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer simulation
Conversion
Diameters
Fixed bed reactors
Fixed beds
Heat transfer
Large eddy simulations
Methane
Methane steam reforming reactions
Packed bed
Packed beds
Parameter estimation
Particle image velocimetry
Particle size
Particle-resolved CFD simulations
Predictions
Reforming
Simulation
Steam
Transport processes
Turbulence
Turbulence models
Viscosity
title Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T14%3A31%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Particle-resolved%20simulations%20of%20catalytic%20fixed%20bed%20reactors:%20Comparison%20of%20turbulence%20models,%20LES%20and%20PIV%20measurements&rft.jtitle=Powder%20technology&rft.au=Karthik,%20G.M.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=361&rft.spage=474&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=474-489&rft.issn=0032-5910&rft.eissn=1873-328X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2376728537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376728537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0032591019303523&rfr_iscdi=true