Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements
Particle-resolved CFD simulations are widely used for the predictions of particle-scale flow, transport processes and chemical reactions. However, the effect of turbulence models used in such simulations is not quantitatively established. In the present work, particle-resolved simulations are perfor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Powder technology 2020-02, Vol.361, p.474-489 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 489 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 474 |
container_title | Powder technology |
container_volume | 361 |
creator | Karthik, G.M. Thaker, Abhijeet H. Buwa, Vivek V. |
description | Particle-resolved CFD simulations are widely used for the predictions of particle-scale flow, transport processes and chemical reactions. However, the effect of turbulence models used in such simulations is not quantitatively established. In the present work, particle-resolved simulations are performed to understand the influence of different turbulence models (standard k − ε (KE), SST k − ω (SST), SSG Reynolds-stress (SSG), BSL Reynolds-stress (BSL) and LES WALE (LES)) on the particle-scale predictions of the flow, heat transfer and reactions. A comparison of the PIV measurements and particle-resolved simulations of a square column containing 72 spherical particles with a tube-to-particle diameter ratio (TPDR) of ∼3.6 and Rebed of 9765 was performed. The ε−based models (KE and SSG) under-predicted the velocity (Vx and Vy) profiles due to the over-estimation of the turbulence parameters (k and ε) and an opposite behaviour was observed for the ω−based models (SST and BSL). The LES model showed a better agreement with the measurements. In addition, numerical investigations of methane steam reforming reactions were performed in a packed bed containing 30 randomly packed 7-hole cylindrical particles with a TPDR of 5, and Ret of 50,000. The ε−based models predicted lower values of velocities, temperature and species concentration in the bulk region (and higher values on the particle surfaces) resulting into higher CH4 conversion compared to the ω−based models, whereas the LES model showed the highest ΔP and CH4 conversion. Overall, the predictions of the LES model were found to be closer to the experiments. The predictions of the RSM (SSG and BSL) models did not show any improvements over the eddy-viscosity (KE and SST) models.
[Display omitted]
•Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurements of turbulent flow in packed bed.•Validation of particle-resolved CFD simulations of turbulent flow•Effect of different turbulence models on particle-resolved flow predictions analyzed.•Influence of different turbulence models on heat transfer and reactions predictions quantified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2376728537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0032591019303523</els_id><sourcerecordid>2376728537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-903de3186cf4dd23fe41b4bc43e5db273e9ab219410668a66404b44716eb1f8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAUhUVoINMk_6ALQbe1c_WwbHdRKMPkAQMd6IPshCxdgwbbmkpykvn39TBZd3G5i3vOuZyPkE8MSgZM3e3LQ3jNaEsOrC2hKoHxC7JiTS0KwZvnD2QFIHhRtQyuyMeU9gCgBIMVeduZmL0dsIiYwvCCjiY_zoPJPkyJhp5ak81wXDS092_LuVsmorE5xPSVrsN4MNGnMJ20eY7dPOBkkY7B4ZC-0O3mJzWTo7unP3REk-aII0453ZDL3gwJb9_3Nfl9v_m1fiy2Px6e1t-3heWyzUULwqFgjbK9dI6LHiXrZGelwMp1vBbYmo6zVjJQqjFKSZCdlDVT2LG-seKafD7nHmL4O2PKeh_mOC0vNRe1qnlTiXpRybPKxpBSxF4foh9NPGoG-sRY7_WZsT4x1lDphfFi-3a2LVXxxWPUyfpTfecj2qxd8P8P-AejX4iQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376728537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Karthik, G.M. ; Thaker, Abhijeet H. ; Buwa, Vivek V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Karthik, G.M. ; Thaker, Abhijeet H. ; Buwa, Vivek V.</creatorcontrib><description>Particle-resolved CFD simulations are widely used for the predictions of particle-scale flow, transport processes and chemical reactions. However, the effect of turbulence models used in such simulations is not quantitatively established. In the present work, particle-resolved simulations are performed to understand the influence of different turbulence models (standard k − ε (KE), SST k − ω (SST), SSG Reynolds-stress (SSG), BSL Reynolds-stress (BSL) and LES WALE (LES)) on the particle-scale predictions of the flow, heat transfer and reactions. A comparison of the PIV measurements and particle-resolved simulations of a square column containing 72 spherical particles with a tube-to-particle diameter ratio (TPDR) of ∼3.6 and Rebed of 9765 was performed. The ε−based models (KE and SSG) under-predicted the velocity (Vx and Vy) profiles due to the over-estimation of the turbulence parameters (k and ε) and an opposite behaviour was observed for the ω−based models (SST and BSL). The LES model showed a better agreement with the measurements. In addition, numerical investigations of methane steam reforming reactions were performed in a packed bed containing 30 randomly packed 7-hole cylindrical particles with a TPDR of 5, and Ret of 50,000. The ε−based models predicted lower values of velocities, temperature and species concentration in the bulk region (and higher values on the particle surfaces) resulting into higher CH4 conversion compared to the ω−based models, whereas the LES model showed the highest ΔP and CH4 conversion. Overall, the predictions of the LES model were found to be closer to the experiments. The predictions of the RSM (SSG and BSL) models did not show any improvements over the eddy-viscosity (KE and SST) models.
[Display omitted]
•Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurements of turbulent flow in packed bed.•Validation of particle-resolved CFD simulations of turbulent flow•Effect of different turbulence models on particle-resolved flow predictions analyzed.•Influence of different turbulence models on heat transfer and reactions predictions quantified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-328X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Chemical reactions ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; Conversion ; Diameters ; Fixed bed reactors ; Fixed beds ; Heat transfer ; Large eddy simulations ; Methane ; Methane steam reforming reactions ; Packed bed ; Packed beds ; Parameter estimation ; Particle image velocimetry ; Particle size ; Particle-resolved CFD simulations ; Predictions ; Reforming ; Simulation ; Steam ; Transport processes ; Turbulence ; Turbulence models ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>Powder technology, 2020-02, Vol.361, p.474-489</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 1, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-903de3186cf4dd23fe41b4bc43e5db273e9ab219410668a66404b44716eb1f8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-903de3186cf4dd23fe41b4bc43e5db273e9ab219410668a66404b44716eb1f8c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2335-6379</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032591019303523$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karthik, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaker, Abhijeet H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buwa, Vivek V.</creatorcontrib><title>Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements</title><title>Powder technology</title><description>Particle-resolved CFD simulations are widely used for the predictions of particle-scale flow, transport processes and chemical reactions. However, the effect of turbulence models used in such simulations is not quantitatively established. In the present work, particle-resolved simulations are performed to understand the influence of different turbulence models (standard k − ε (KE), SST k − ω (SST), SSG Reynolds-stress (SSG), BSL Reynolds-stress (BSL) and LES WALE (LES)) on the particle-scale predictions of the flow, heat transfer and reactions. A comparison of the PIV measurements and particle-resolved simulations of a square column containing 72 spherical particles with a tube-to-particle diameter ratio (TPDR) of ∼3.6 and Rebed of 9765 was performed. The ε−based models (KE and SSG) under-predicted the velocity (Vx and Vy) profiles due to the over-estimation of the turbulence parameters (k and ε) and an opposite behaviour was observed for the ω−based models (SST and BSL). The LES model showed a better agreement with the measurements. In addition, numerical investigations of methane steam reforming reactions were performed in a packed bed containing 30 randomly packed 7-hole cylindrical particles with a TPDR of 5, and Ret of 50,000. The ε−based models predicted lower values of velocities, temperature and species concentration in the bulk region (and higher values on the particle surfaces) resulting into higher CH4 conversion compared to the ω−based models, whereas the LES model showed the highest ΔP and CH4 conversion. Overall, the predictions of the LES model were found to be closer to the experiments. The predictions of the RSM (SSG and BSL) models did not show any improvements over the eddy-viscosity (KE and SST) models.
[Display omitted]
•Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurements of turbulent flow in packed bed.•Validation of particle-resolved CFD simulations of turbulent flow•Effect of different turbulence models on particle-resolved flow predictions analyzed.•Influence of different turbulence models on heat transfer and reactions predictions quantified.</description><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Fixed bed reactors</subject><subject>Fixed beds</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Large eddy simulations</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane steam reforming reactions</subject><subject>Packed bed</subject><subject>Packed beds</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Particle image velocimetry</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Particle-resolved CFD simulations</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Reforming</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Steam</subject><subject>Transport processes</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulence models</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>0032-5910</issn><issn>1873-328X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAUhUVoINMk_6ALQbe1c_WwbHdRKMPkAQMd6IPshCxdgwbbmkpykvn39TBZd3G5i3vOuZyPkE8MSgZM3e3LQ3jNaEsOrC2hKoHxC7JiTS0KwZvnD2QFIHhRtQyuyMeU9gCgBIMVeduZmL0dsIiYwvCCjiY_zoPJPkyJhp5ak81wXDS092_LuVsmorE5xPSVrsN4MNGnMJ20eY7dPOBkkY7B4ZC-0O3mJzWTo7unP3REk-aII0453ZDL3gwJb9_3Nfl9v_m1fiy2Px6e1t-3heWyzUULwqFgjbK9dI6LHiXrZGelwMp1vBbYmo6zVjJQqjFKSZCdlDVT2LG-seKafD7nHmL4O2PKeh_mOC0vNRe1qnlTiXpRybPKxpBSxF4foh9NPGoG-sRY7_WZsT4x1lDphfFi-3a2LVXxxWPUyfpTfecj2qxd8P8P-AejX4iQ</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Karthik, G.M.</creator><creator>Thaker, Abhijeet H.</creator><creator>Buwa, Vivek V.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2335-6379</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements</title><author>Karthik, G.M. ; Thaker, Abhijeet H. ; Buwa, Vivek V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-903de3186cf4dd23fe41b4bc43e5db273e9ab219410668a66404b44716eb1f8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Fixed bed reactors</topic><topic>Fixed beds</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Large eddy simulations</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane steam reforming reactions</topic><topic>Packed bed</topic><topic>Packed beds</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Particle image velocimetry</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Particle-resolved CFD simulations</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Reforming</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Steam</topic><topic>Transport processes</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulence models</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karthik, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaker, Abhijeet H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buwa, Vivek V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Powder technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karthik, G.M.</au><au>Thaker, Abhijeet H.</au><au>Buwa, Vivek V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements</atitle><jtitle>Powder technology</jtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>361</volume><spage>474</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>474-489</pages><issn>0032-5910</issn><eissn>1873-328X</eissn><abstract>Particle-resolved CFD simulations are widely used for the predictions of particle-scale flow, transport processes and chemical reactions. However, the effect of turbulence models used in such simulations is not quantitatively established. In the present work, particle-resolved simulations are performed to understand the influence of different turbulence models (standard k − ε (KE), SST k − ω (SST), SSG Reynolds-stress (SSG), BSL Reynolds-stress (BSL) and LES WALE (LES)) on the particle-scale predictions of the flow, heat transfer and reactions. A comparison of the PIV measurements and particle-resolved simulations of a square column containing 72 spherical particles with a tube-to-particle diameter ratio (TPDR) of ∼3.6 and Rebed of 9765 was performed. The ε−based models (KE and SSG) under-predicted the velocity (Vx and Vy) profiles due to the over-estimation of the turbulence parameters (k and ε) and an opposite behaviour was observed for the ω−based models (SST and BSL). The LES model showed a better agreement with the measurements. In addition, numerical investigations of methane steam reforming reactions were performed in a packed bed containing 30 randomly packed 7-hole cylindrical particles with a TPDR of 5, and Ret of 50,000. The ε−based models predicted lower values of velocities, temperature and species concentration in the bulk region (and higher values on the particle surfaces) resulting into higher CH4 conversion compared to the ω−based models, whereas the LES model showed the highest ΔP and CH4 conversion. Overall, the predictions of the LES model were found to be closer to the experiments. The predictions of the RSM (SSG and BSL) models did not show any improvements over the eddy-viscosity (KE and SST) models.
[Display omitted]
•Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurements of turbulent flow in packed bed.•Validation of particle-resolved CFD simulations of turbulent flow•Effect of different turbulence models on particle-resolved flow predictions analyzed.•Influence of different turbulence models on heat transfer and reactions predictions quantified.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.012</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2335-6379</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-5910 |
ispartof | Powder technology, 2020-02, Vol.361, p.474-489 |
issn | 0032-5910 1873-328X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2376728537 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Chemical reactions Computational fluid dynamics Computer simulation Conversion Diameters Fixed bed reactors Fixed beds Heat transfer Large eddy simulations Methane Methane steam reforming reactions Packed bed Packed beds Parameter estimation Particle image velocimetry Particle size Particle-resolved CFD simulations Predictions Reforming Simulation Steam Transport processes Turbulence Turbulence models Viscosity |
title | Particle-resolved simulations of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Comparison of turbulence models, LES and PIV measurements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T14%3A31%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Particle-resolved%20simulations%20of%20catalytic%20fixed%20bed%20reactors:%20Comparison%20of%20turbulence%20models,%20LES%20and%20PIV%20measurements&rft.jtitle=Powder%20technology&rft.au=Karthik,%20G.M.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=361&rft.spage=474&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=474-489&rft.issn=0032-5910&rft.eissn=1873-328X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2376728537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376728537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0032591019303523&rfr_iscdi=true |