Can movable PCM-filled TES units be used to improve the performance of PV panels? Overview and experimental case-study

•Overview on how PCMs can be used for the thermal regulation of PV devices.•Experimental assessment of the performance of new PV/PCM systems.•Movable TES units filled with the PCM RT 22 HC were placed on the PV panels' back.•The TES units have a negative impact on the performance of the PV/PCM...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy and buildings 2020-03, Vol.210, p.109743, Article 109743
Hauptverfasser: Soares, N., Costa, J.J., Gaspar, A.R., Matias, T., Simões, P.N., Durães, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 109743
container_title Energy and buildings
container_volume 210
creator Soares, N.
Costa, J.J.
Gaspar, A.R.
Matias, T.
Simões, P.N.
Durães, L.
description •Overview on how PCMs can be used for the thermal regulation of PV devices.•Experimental assessment of the performance of new PV/PCM systems.•Movable TES units filled with the PCM RT 22 HC were placed on the PV panels' back.•The TES units have a negative impact on the performance of the PV/PCM systems.•A PCM with a higher phase-change temperature must be chosen for Mediterranean climate. This paper provides an overview on how phase change materials (PCMs) can be used for the thermal regulation of photovoltaic (PV) devices, and describes an experimental apparatus to assess whether the performance of 250 W STC-rated commercial polycrystalline silicon PV panels can be improved by placing movable thermal energy storage (TES) units filled with the free-form PCM RT 22 HC on the panels' back. The outdoor apparatus is located at Coimbra, Portugal. Three identical PV panels were separately installed and individually monitored: one panel was taken as reference; the other two were considered together with a TES unit each with horizontally and vertically oriented cavities, PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems, respectively. The time evolutions of the temperature of the PV panels were compared with each other to analyse the possible thermal regulation potential of the TES units. The time evolution of the power output was also assessed to compare the efficiency of the different systems. Finally, the energy produced per day by each system was evaluated. The results showed that the PV operating temperature has increased ca. 16–21 °C and 14–18 °C in the PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems, respectively, in comparison with the reference PV panel (at peak time). Moreover, the daily energy produced by the PV panel of the PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems was, respectively, 3.3–6.5% and 3.3–6.0% lower than that produced by the reference PV panel during the measured short-term summer operation period. Therefore, it was concluded that the movable TES units have a negative impact on the performance of the PV/PCM systems, and that a PCM with a higher phase change temperature must be chosen for Mediterranean climate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109743
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2376211333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378778819328920</els_id><sourcerecordid>2376211333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-54c82cca0cdce92e6ba285b389febc5ed8926f27c4e13a378d7c698133d96d393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKd_ghDwuTMfbZM-DRnzAyYbOH0NaXKLKV07k7a6_96M-e7ThcO5957zQ-iWkhklNL-vZ9CWg2vsjBFaRK0QKT9DEyoFS3Iq5DmaEC5kIoSUl-gqhJoQkmeCTtC40C3edaMuG8CbxWtSuaYBi7fLNzy0rg-4BDyEqPQddru970bA_SfgPfiq8zvdGsBdhTcfeK9baMIcr0fwo4NvrFuL4Sca3Q7aXjfY6ABJ6Ad7uEYXlW4C3PzNKXp_XG4Xz8lq_fSyeFglhsu0T7LUSGaMJsYaKBjkpWYyK7ksKihNBlYWLK-YMClQrmNFK0xeSMq5LXLLCz5Fd6e7MfjXAKFXdTf4Nr5UjIuc0Wjl0ZWdXMZ3IXio1D5m1v6gKFFHxKpWf4jVEbE6IY5789Ne7A2xslfBOIhErPNgemU798-FX9OEiBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376211333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can movable PCM-filled TES units be used to improve the performance of PV panels? Overview and experimental case-study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Soares, N. ; Costa, J.J. ; Gaspar, A.R. ; Matias, T. ; Simões, P.N. ; Durães, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Soares, N. ; Costa, J.J. ; Gaspar, A.R. ; Matias, T. ; Simões, P.N. ; Durães, L.</creatorcontrib><description>•Overview on how PCMs can be used for the thermal regulation of PV devices.•Experimental assessment of the performance of new PV/PCM systems.•Movable TES units filled with the PCM RT 22 HC were placed on the PV panels' back.•The TES units have a negative impact on the performance of the PV/PCM systems.•A PCM with a higher phase-change temperature must be chosen for Mediterranean climate. This paper provides an overview on how phase change materials (PCMs) can be used for the thermal regulation of photovoltaic (PV) devices, and describes an experimental apparatus to assess whether the performance of 250 W STC-rated commercial polycrystalline silicon PV panels can be improved by placing movable thermal energy storage (TES) units filled with the free-form PCM RT 22 HC on the panels' back. The outdoor apparatus is located at Coimbra, Portugal. Three identical PV panels were separately installed and individually monitored: one panel was taken as reference; the other two were considered together with a TES unit each with horizontally and vertically oriented cavities, PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems, respectively. The time evolutions of the temperature of the PV panels were compared with each other to analyse the possible thermal regulation potential of the TES units. The time evolution of the power output was also assessed to compare the efficiency of the different systems. Finally, the energy produced per day by each system was evaluated. The results showed that the PV operating temperature has increased ca. 16–21 °C and 14–18 °C in the PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems, respectively, in comparison with the reference PV panel (at peak time). Moreover, the daily energy produced by the PV panel of the PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems was, respectively, 3.3–6.5% and 3.3–6.0% lower than that produced by the reference PV panel during the measured short-term summer operation period. Therefore, it was concluded that the movable TES units have a negative impact on the performance of the PV/PCM systems, and that a PCM with a higher phase change temperature must be chosen for Mediterranean climate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6178</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Energy storage ; Free form ; Operating temperature ; Outdoor experiment ; Panels ; Performance enhancement ; Phase change material ; Phase change materials ; Photovoltaic cells ; Photovoltaic performance ; Photovoltaics ; PV/PCM system ; Temperature regulation ; Thermal energy</subject><ispartof>Energy and buildings, 2020-03, Vol.210, p.109743, Article 109743</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Mar 1, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-54c82cca0cdce92e6ba285b389febc5ed8926f27c4e13a378d7c698133d96d393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-54c82cca0cdce92e6ba285b389febc5ed8926f27c4e13a378d7c698133d96d393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109743$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soares, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspar, A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matias, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simões, P.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durães, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Can movable PCM-filled TES units be used to improve the performance of PV panels? Overview and experimental case-study</title><title>Energy and buildings</title><description>•Overview on how PCMs can be used for the thermal regulation of PV devices.•Experimental assessment of the performance of new PV/PCM systems.•Movable TES units filled with the PCM RT 22 HC were placed on the PV panels' back.•The TES units have a negative impact on the performance of the PV/PCM systems.•A PCM with a higher phase-change temperature must be chosen for Mediterranean climate. This paper provides an overview on how phase change materials (PCMs) can be used for the thermal regulation of photovoltaic (PV) devices, and describes an experimental apparatus to assess whether the performance of 250 W STC-rated commercial polycrystalline silicon PV panels can be improved by placing movable thermal energy storage (TES) units filled with the free-form PCM RT 22 HC on the panels' back. The outdoor apparatus is located at Coimbra, Portugal. Three identical PV panels were separately installed and individually monitored: one panel was taken as reference; the other two were considered together with a TES unit each with horizontally and vertically oriented cavities, PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems, respectively. The time evolutions of the temperature of the PV panels were compared with each other to analyse the possible thermal regulation potential of the TES units. The time evolution of the power output was also assessed to compare the efficiency of the different systems. Finally, the energy produced per day by each system was evaluated. The results showed that the PV operating temperature has increased ca. 16–21 °C and 14–18 °C in the PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems, respectively, in comparison with the reference PV panel (at peak time). Moreover, the daily energy produced by the PV panel of the PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems was, respectively, 3.3–6.5% and 3.3–6.0% lower than that produced by the reference PV panel during the measured short-term summer operation period. Therefore, it was concluded that the movable TES units have a negative impact on the performance of the PV/PCM systems, and that a PCM with a higher phase change temperature must be chosen for Mediterranean climate.</description><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Free form</subject><subject>Operating temperature</subject><subject>Outdoor experiment</subject><subject>Panels</subject><subject>Performance enhancement</subject><subject>Phase change material</subject><subject>Phase change materials</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Photovoltaic performance</subject><subject>Photovoltaics</subject><subject>PV/PCM system</subject><subject>Temperature regulation</subject><subject>Thermal energy</subject><issn>0378-7788</issn><issn>1872-6178</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKd_ghDwuTMfbZM-DRnzAyYbOH0NaXKLKV07k7a6_96M-e7ThcO5957zQ-iWkhklNL-vZ9CWg2vsjBFaRK0QKT9DEyoFS3Iq5DmaEC5kIoSUl-gqhJoQkmeCTtC40C3edaMuG8CbxWtSuaYBi7fLNzy0rg-4BDyEqPQddru970bA_SfgPfiq8zvdGsBdhTcfeK9baMIcr0fwo4NvrFuL4Sca3Q7aXjfY6ABJ6Ad7uEYXlW4C3PzNKXp_XG4Xz8lq_fSyeFglhsu0T7LUSGaMJsYaKBjkpWYyK7ksKihNBlYWLK-YMClQrmNFK0xeSMq5LXLLCz5Fd6e7MfjXAKFXdTf4Nr5UjIuc0Wjl0ZWdXMZ3IXio1D5m1v6gKFFHxKpWf4jVEbE6IY5789Ne7A2xslfBOIhErPNgemU798-FX9OEiBw</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Soares, N.</creator><creator>Costa, J.J.</creator><creator>Gaspar, A.R.</creator><creator>Matias, T.</creator><creator>Simões, P.N.</creator><creator>Durães, L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Can movable PCM-filled TES units be used to improve the performance of PV panels? Overview and experimental case-study</title><author>Soares, N. ; Costa, J.J. ; Gaspar, A.R. ; Matias, T. ; Simões, P.N. ; Durães, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-54c82cca0cdce92e6ba285b389febc5ed8926f27c4e13a378d7c698133d96d393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Free form</topic><topic>Operating temperature</topic><topic>Outdoor experiment</topic><topic>Panels</topic><topic>Performance enhancement</topic><topic>Phase change material</topic><topic>Phase change materials</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Photovoltaic performance</topic><topic>Photovoltaics</topic><topic>PV/PCM system</topic><topic>Temperature regulation</topic><topic>Thermal energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soares, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspar, A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matias, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simões, P.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durães, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy and buildings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soares, N.</au><au>Costa, J.J.</au><au>Gaspar, A.R.</au><au>Matias, T.</au><au>Simões, P.N.</au><au>Durães, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can movable PCM-filled TES units be used to improve the performance of PV panels? Overview and experimental case-study</atitle><jtitle>Energy and buildings</jtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>210</volume><spage>109743</spage><pages>109743-</pages><artnum>109743</artnum><issn>0378-7788</issn><eissn>1872-6178</eissn><abstract>•Overview on how PCMs can be used for the thermal regulation of PV devices.•Experimental assessment of the performance of new PV/PCM systems.•Movable TES units filled with the PCM RT 22 HC were placed on the PV panels' back.•The TES units have a negative impact on the performance of the PV/PCM systems.•A PCM with a higher phase-change temperature must be chosen for Mediterranean climate. This paper provides an overview on how phase change materials (PCMs) can be used for the thermal regulation of photovoltaic (PV) devices, and describes an experimental apparatus to assess whether the performance of 250 W STC-rated commercial polycrystalline silicon PV panels can be improved by placing movable thermal energy storage (TES) units filled with the free-form PCM RT 22 HC on the panels' back. The outdoor apparatus is located at Coimbra, Portugal. Three identical PV panels were separately installed and individually monitored: one panel was taken as reference; the other two were considered together with a TES unit each with horizontally and vertically oriented cavities, PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems, respectively. The time evolutions of the temperature of the PV panels were compared with each other to analyse the possible thermal regulation potential of the TES units. The time evolution of the power output was also assessed to compare the efficiency of the different systems. Finally, the energy produced per day by each system was evaluated. The results showed that the PV operating temperature has increased ca. 16–21 °C and 14–18 °C in the PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems, respectively, in comparison with the reference PV panel (at peak time). Moreover, the daily energy produced by the PV panel of the PV/PCM1 and PV/PCM2 systems was, respectively, 3.3–6.5% and 3.3–6.0% lower than that produced by the reference PV panel during the measured short-term summer operation period. Therefore, it was concluded that the movable TES units have a negative impact on the performance of the PV/PCM systems, and that a PCM with a higher phase change temperature must be chosen for Mediterranean climate.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109743</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-7788
ispartof Energy and buildings, 2020-03, Vol.210, p.109743, Article 109743
issn 0378-7788
1872-6178
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2376211333
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Energy storage
Free form
Operating temperature
Outdoor experiment
Panels
Performance enhancement
Phase change material
Phase change materials
Photovoltaic cells
Photovoltaic performance
Photovoltaics
PV/PCM system
Temperature regulation
Thermal energy
title Can movable PCM-filled TES units be used to improve the performance of PV panels? Overview and experimental case-study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A29%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20movable%20PCM-filled%20TES%20units%20be%20used%20to%20improve%20the%20performance%20of%20PV%20panels?%20Overview%20and%20experimental%20case-study&rft.jtitle=Energy%20and%20buildings&rft.au=Soares,%20N.&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=210&rft.spage=109743&rft.pages=109743-&rft.artnum=109743&rft.issn=0378-7788&rft.eissn=1872-6178&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109743&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2376211333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376211333&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378778819328920&rfr_iscdi=true