The impact of a hydroelectric dam on Neotropical fish communities: A spatio‐temporal analysis of the Trophic Upsurge Hypothesis

We employed the trophic upsurge hypothesis as an analytical framework to describe the response of Neotropical fish communities to terrestrial inundation associated with river damming. Data were collected for the impact assessment of the Peixe Angical Dam, Tocantins River, Brazil. Monthly surveys wer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology of freshwater fish 2020-04, Vol.29 (2), p.384-397
Hauptverfasser: Monaghan, Kieran A., Agostinho, Carlos S., Pelicice, Fernando M., Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 397
container_issue 2
container_start_page 384
container_title Ecology of freshwater fish
container_volume 29
creator Monaghan, Kieran A.
Agostinho, Carlos S.
Pelicice, Fernando M.
Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.
description We employed the trophic upsurge hypothesis as an analytical framework to describe the response of Neotropical fish communities to terrestrial inundation associated with river damming. Data were collected for the impact assessment of the Peixe Angical Dam, Tocantins River, Brazil. Monthly surveys were conducted at nine sites (seven upstream, two downstream) from 15 months before to 20 months after dam closure and a follow‐up survey 60–83 months after closure. Fish responses differed in timing and magnitude across sites. In the new reservoir, populations peaked 8–13 months after flooding, demonstrating increases in richness (84 ± 52%), biomass (329 ± 266%) and abundance (681 ± 348%) with the maxima for richness and abundance tending to precede biomass maxima. Populations of all families increased but were greatest for Engraulidae, Hemiodontidae, Serrasalmidae and Characidae, and lower for the benthic catfish: Sciaenidae, Dorididae, Pimelodidae. Downstream populations peaked 5–12 months after closure or showed consistent decline. Five years after dam‐closure richness and abundance were lower compared to predam levels, with populations at all sites demonstrating an ongoing decline. Reservoir creation triggers reproductive recruitment and otherwise pools spatially disparate populations from across the flooded valley. If the rise in richness is largely explained by the increased catchability of species otherwise present prior to flooding, it may be more appropriate to estimate species loss with reference to upsurge data. As peak biomass coincides with declining richness, modelling fisheries production from annually aggregated data may risk overestimating the potential for sustainable harvests. Upsurge–response curves can help identify the timing of critical ecological thresholds for flood‐managed fisheries.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/eff.12522
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2376090167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2376090167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-934a334217a604df5b84eff0691bc07dca45dfbd299777fb59d5a6c25ee21e413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2k5iE7aqohSpgqWdLcexiaukNnYilA3egGfkSXAJK7ecdPruv_9-AK4xmuFYc6X1DJOckBMwwRShBNE0PQUTVCCaUFrgc3ARwh4hTApGJuBzWytoWidkB62GAtZD5a1qlOy8kbASLbQH-Kxs560zUjRQm1BDadu2P5jOqHAPFzA40Rn7_fHVqdZZHylxEM0QTDiKdvHENq7XUXDnQu9fFVwPzsZ5JC7BmRZNUFd_fQp2q4ftcp1sXh6flotNIo9OkyLNRJpmBDNBUVbpvLzL4rMovlRKxCopsrzSZUWKgjGmy7yockElyZUiWGU4nYKbUdd5-9ar0PG97X20GThJGY0BYcoidTtS0tsQvNLcedMKP3CM-DFhHo_y34QjOx_Zd9Oo4X-QP6xW48YPrNN_gA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376090167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of a hydroelectric dam on Neotropical fish communities: A spatio‐temporal analysis of the Trophic Upsurge Hypothesis</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Monaghan, Kieran A. ; Agostinho, Carlos S. ; Pelicice, Fernando M. ; Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Kieran A. ; Agostinho, Carlos S. ; Pelicice, Fernando M. ; Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.</creatorcontrib><description>We employed the trophic upsurge hypothesis as an analytical framework to describe the response of Neotropical fish communities to terrestrial inundation associated with river damming. Data were collected for the impact assessment of the Peixe Angical Dam, Tocantins River, Brazil. Monthly surveys were conducted at nine sites (seven upstream, two downstream) from 15 months before to 20 months after dam closure and a follow‐up survey 60–83 months after closure. Fish responses differed in timing and magnitude across sites. In the new reservoir, populations peaked 8–13 months after flooding, demonstrating increases in richness (84 ± 52%), biomass (329 ± 266%) and abundance (681 ± 348%) with the maxima for richness and abundance tending to precede biomass maxima. Populations of all families increased but were greatest for Engraulidae, Hemiodontidae, Serrasalmidae and Characidae, and lower for the benthic catfish: Sciaenidae, Dorididae, Pimelodidae. Downstream populations peaked 5–12 months after closure or showed consistent decline. Five years after dam‐closure richness and abundance were lower compared to predam levels, with populations at all sites demonstrating an ongoing decline. Reservoir creation triggers reproductive recruitment and otherwise pools spatially disparate populations from across the flooded valley. If the rise in richness is largely explained by the increased catchability of species otherwise present prior to flooding, it may be more appropriate to estimate species loss with reference to upsurge data. As peak biomass coincides with declining richness, modelling fisheries production from annually aggregated data may risk overestimating the potential for sustainable harvests. Upsurge–response curves can help identify the timing of critical ecological thresholds for flood‐managed fisheries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-6691</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0633</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eff.12522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Benthos ; Biomass ; Catchability ; Catfish ; controlled flooding ; dam management ; Dams ; designer flows ; Downstream ; Fish ; fish biodiversity ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Flood management ; Flooding ; Floods ; Freshwater fishes ; Hydroelectric dams ; Hydroelectric power ; Hypotheses ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Populations ; reservoir creation ; Reservoirs ; Rivers ; Surveying ; Surveys ; Sustainable harvest ; Terrestrial environments ; terrestrial inundation</subject><ispartof>Ecology of freshwater fish, 2020-04, Vol.29 (2), p.384-397</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-934a334217a604df5b84eff0691bc07dca45dfbd299777fb59d5a6c25ee21e413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-934a334217a604df5b84eff0691bc07dca45dfbd299777fb59d5a6c25ee21e413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3063-7817</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Feff.12522$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Feff.12522$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Kieran A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agostinho, Carlos S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelicice, Fernando M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of a hydroelectric dam on Neotropical fish communities: A spatio‐temporal analysis of the Trophic Upsurge Hypothesis</title><title>Ecology of freshwater fish</title><description>We employed the trophic upsurge hypothesis as an analytical framework to describe the response of Neotropical fish communities to terrestrial inundation associated with river damming. Data were collected for the impact assessment of the Peixe Angical Dam, Tocantins River, Brazil. Monthly surveys were conducted at nine sites (seven upstream, two downstream) from 15 months before to 20 months after dam closure and a follow‐up survey 60–83 months after closure. Fish responses differed in timing and magnitude across sites. In the new reservoir, populations peaked 8–13 months after flooding, demonstrating increases in richness (84 ± 52%), biomass (329 ± 266%) and abundance (681 ± 348%) with the maxima for richness and abundance tending to precede biomass maxima. Populations of all families increased but were greatest for Engraulidae, Hemiodontidae, Serrasalmidae and Characidae, and lower for the benthic catfish: Sciaenidae, Dorididae, Pimelodidae. Downstream populations peaked 5–12 months after closure or showed consistent decline. Five years after dam‐closure richness and abundance were lower compared to predam levels, with populations at all sites demonstrating an ongoing decline. Reservoir creation triggers reproductive recruitment and otherwise pools spatially disparate populations from across the flooded valley. If the rise in richness is largely explained by the increased catchability of species otherwise present prior to flooding, it may be more appropriate to estimate species loss with reference to upsurge data. As peak biomass coincides with declining richness, modelling fisheries production from annually aggregated data may risk overestimating the potential for sustainable harvests. Upsurge–response curves can help identify the timing of critical ecological thresholds for flood‐managed fisheries.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Catchability</subject><subject>Catfish</subject><subject>controlled flooding</subject><subject>dam management</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>designer flows</subject><subject>Downstream</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>fish biodiversity</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Flood management</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Hydroelectric dams</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>reservoir creation</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Sustainable harvest</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>terrestrial inundation</subject><issn>0906-6691</issn><issn>1600-0633</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2k5iE7aqohSpgqWdLcexiaukNnYilA3egGfkSXAJK7ecdPruv_9-AK4xmuFYc6X1DJOckBMwwRShBNE0PQUTVCCaUFrgc3ARwh4hTApGJuBzWytoWidkB62GAtZD5a1qlOy8kbASLbQH-Kxs560zUjRQm1BDadu2P5jOqHAPFzA40Rn7_fHVqdZZHylxEM0QTDiKdvHENq7XUXDnQu9fFVwPzsZ5JC7BmRZNUFd_fQp2q4ftcp1sXh6flotNIo9OkyLNRJpmBDNBUVbpvLzL4rMovlRKxCopsrzSZUWKgjGmy7yockElyZUiWGU4nYKbUdd5-9ar0PG97X20GThJGY0BYcoidTtS0tsQvNLcedMKP3CM-DFhHo_y34QjOx_Zd9Oo4X-QP6xW48YPrNN_gA</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Monaghan, Kieran A.</creator><creator>Agostinho, Carlos S.</creator><creator>Pelicice, Fernando M.</creator><creator>Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3063-7817</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>The impact of a hydroelectric dam on Neotropical fish communities: A spatio‐temporal analysis of the Trophic Upsurge Hypothesis</title><author>Monaghan, Kieran A. ; Agostinho, Carlos S. ; Pelicice, Fernando M. ; Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-934a334217a604df5b84eff0691bc07dca45dfbd299777fb59d5a6c25ee21e413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Catchability</topic><topic>Catfish</topic><topic>controlled flooding</topic><topic>dam management</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>designer flows</topic><topic>Downstream</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>fish biodiversity</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Flood management</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Hydroelectric dams</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>reservoir creation</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Sustainable harvest</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>terrestrial inundation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Kieran A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agostinho, Carlos S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelicice, Fernando M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology of freshwater fish</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monaghan, Kieran A.</au><au>Agostinho, Carlos S.</au><au>Pelicice, Fernando M.</au><au>Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of a hydroelectric dam on Neotropical fish communities: A spatio‐temporal analysis of the Trophic Upsurge Hypothesis</atitle><jtitle>Ecology of freshwater fish</jtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>384</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>384-397</pages><issn>0906-6691</issn><eissn>1600-0633</eissn><abstract>We employed the trophic upsurge hypothesis as an analytical framework to describe the response of Neotropical fish communities to terrestrial inundation associated with river damming. Data were collected for the impact assessment of the Peixe Angical Dam, Tocantins River, Brazil. Monthly surveys were conducted at nine sites (seven upstream, two downstream) from 15 months before to 20 months after dam closure and a follow‐up survey 60–83 months after closure. Fish responses differed in timing and magnitude across sites. In the new reservoir, populations peaked 8–13 months after flooding, demonstrating increases in richness (84 ± 52%), biomass (329 ± 266%) and abundance (681 ± 348%) with the maxima for richness and abundance tending to precede biomass maxima. Populations of all families increased but were greatest for Engraulidae, Hemiodontidae, Serrasalmidae and Characidae, and lower for the benthic catfish: Sciaenidae, Dorididae, Pimelodidae. Downstream populations peaked 5–12 months after closure or showed consistent decline. Five years after dam‐closure richness and abundance were lower compared to predam levels, with populations at all sites demonstrating an ongoing decline. Reservoir creation triggers reproductive recruitment and otherwise pools spatially disparate populations from across the flooded valley. If the rise in richness is largely explained by the increased catchability of species otherwise present prior to flooding, it may be more appropriate to estimate species loss with reference to upsurge data. As peak biomass coincides with declining richness, modelling fisheries production from annually aggregated data may risk overestimating the potential for sustainable harvests. Upsurge–response curves can help identify the timing of critical ecological thresholds for flood‐managed fisheries.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/eff.12522</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3063-7817</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0906-6691
ispartof Ecology of freshwater fish, 2020-04, Vol.29 (2), p.384-397
issn 0906-6691
1600-0633
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2376090167
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Abundance
Benthos
Biomass
Catchability
Catfish
controlled flooding
dam management
Dams
designer flows
Downstream
Fish
fish biodiversity
Fisheries
Fisheries management
Flood management
Flooding
Floods
Freshwater fishes
Hydroelectric dams
Hydroelectric power
Hypotheses
Polls & surveys
Populations
reservoir creation
Reservoirs
Rivers
Surveying
Surveys
Sustainable harvest
Terrestrial environments
terrestrial inundation
title The impact of a hydroelectric dam on Neotropical fish communities: A spatio‐temporal analysis of the Trophic Upsurge Hypothesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T19%3A25%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20a%20hydroelectric%20dam%20on%20Neotropical%20fish%20communities:%20A%20spatio%E2%80%90temporal%20analysis%20of%20the%20Trophic%20Upsurge%20Hypothesis&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20of%20freshwater%20fish&rft.au=Monaghan,%20Kieran%20A.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=384&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=384-397&rft.issn=0906-6691&rft.eissn=1600-0633&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eff.12522&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2376090167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376090167&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true