Feeding of fish inhabiting native and non-native macrophyte stands in a Neotropical reservoir
Owning to dissimilarity with native macrophytes, invasive macrophytes may negatively affect the diet and foraging efficiency of fishes. We evaluated the invertebrate availability, diet composition, and foraging efficiency of four fish species that use macrophytes as habitat in a native and a highly...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2020-03, Vol.847 (6), p.1553-1563 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1563 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1553 |
| container_title | Hydrobiologia |
| container_volume | 847 |
| creator | Carniatto, Natália Cunha, Eduardo Ribeiro Thomaz, Sidinei Magela Quirino, Bárbara Angélio Fugi, Rosemara |
| description | Owning to dissimilarity with native macrophytes, invasive macrophytes may negatively affect the diet and foraging efficiency of fishes. We evaluated the invertebrate availability, diet composition, and foraging efficiency of four fish species that use macrophytes as habitat in a native and a highly invasive macrophyte. The samples were taken in a reservoir in Brazil (22° 33′ S, 52°54′ W). We collected invertebrates and fishes simultaneously in macrophyte stands dominated by the invasive Poaceae
Urochloa arrecta
and the native
Eichhornia azurea
. We evaluated the foraging efficiency by the total number of prey consumed and by the degree of stomach fullness. We used an approach based on resampling procedures to compare differences in composition of invertebrates, composition of fish diet, and the similarity between invertebrates and fish diet. The abundance of invertebrates and the diet composition differed significantly between plants. On the other hand, fish foraging efficiency did not differ between macrophytes. Despite this lack of difference of foraging efficiency, the lower abundance of food items in the invasive macrophyte and the significant changes in fish diet suggest that
U. arrecta
is not a favorable feeding habitat for fishes, compared to the native
E. azurea
. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-020-04212-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2375654079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A617043621</galeid><sourcerecordid>A617043621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-6acf88f4440c85d7d682eb9f9e1512307cadff170d11cc8c857a6c65ec6206f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LBCEUhiUK2rb-QFdCV11MqTPq7GVEXxAFfVyGmHPcNXadTd2l_n1n2yAWIkTE4_O-enwJOeTshDOmTzNnWrKKCZyN4KISW2TApa4rybneJgPGeFu1XLa7ZC_nN4aikWAD8nIJ0IU4pr2nPuQJDXFiX0NZlaItYQnUxo7GPlY_25l1qZ9PPgvQXPAso4Raegd9wXpwdkoTZEjLPqR9suPtNMPBzzokz5cXT-fX1e391c352W3lGsFKpazzbeubpmGulZ3uVCvgdeRHwCUXNdPOdt5zzTrOnWuR0VY5JcEpwZTn9ZAcrX3nqX9fQC7mrV-kiFcaUWupZIPt_lJjOwUToscXWzcL2Zkzhe5NrcTK6-QPCkcHs-D6CD5gfUNwvCFApsBHGdtFzubm8WGTFWsW_zDnBN7MU5jZ9Gk4M6skzTpJg0ma7ySxgSGp16KMcBxD-u3uH9UXFUSevA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375654079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feeding of fish inhabiting native and non-native macrophyte stands in a Neotropical reservoir</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Carniatto, Natália ; Cunha, Eduardo Ribeiro ; Thomaz, Sidinei Magela ; Quirino, Bárbara Angélio ; Fugi, Rosemara</creator><creatorcontrib>Carniatto, Natália ; Cunha, Eduardo Ribeiro ; Thomaz, Sidinei Magela ; Quirino, Bárbara Angélio ; Fugi, Rosemara</creatorcontrib><description>Owning to dissimilarity with native macrophytes, invasive macrophytes may negatively affect the diet and foraging efficiency of fishes. We evaluated the invertebrate availability, diet composition, and foraging efficiency of four fish species that use macrophytes as habitat in a native and a highly invasive macrophyte. The samples were taken in a reservoir in Brazil (22° 33′ S, 52°54′ W). We collected invertebrates and fishes simultaneously in macrophyte stands dominated by the invasive Poaceae
Urochloa arrecta
and the native
Eichhornia azurea
. We evaluated the foraging efficiency by the total number of prey consumed and by the degree of stomach fullness. We used an approach based on resampling procedures to compare differences in composition of invertebrates, composition of fish diet, and the similarity between invertebrates and fish diet. The abundance of invertebrates and the diet composition differed significantly between plants. On the other hand, fish foraging efficiency did not differ between macrophytes. Despite this lack of difference of foraging efficiency, the lower abundance of food items in the invasive macrophyte and the significant changes in fish diet suggest that
U. arrecta
is not a favorable feeding habitat for fishes, compared to the native
E. azurea
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-020-04212-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animal behavior ; Aquatic plants ; Benzocaine ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Composition ; Diet ; Ecology ; Efficiency ; Evaluation ; Feeding ; Fish ; Fish diets ; Fishes ; Food ; Foraging ; Foraging habitats ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater plants ; Habitats ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Macrophytes ; Prey ; Primary Research Paper ; Resampling ; Reservoirs ; Stomach ; Winter ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2020-03, Vol.847 (6), p.1553-1563</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Hydrobiologia is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-6acf88f4440c85d7d682eb9f9e1512307cadff170d11cc8c857a6c65ec6206f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-6acf88f4440c85d7d682eb9f9e1512307cadff170d11cc8c857a6c65ec6206f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7858-2133 ; 0000-0002-7230-0817 ; 0000-0003-0596-3781 ; 0000-0002-5236-1364 ; 0000-0002-7734-3795</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-020-04212-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-020-04212-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carniatto, Natália</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, Eduardo Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomaz, Sidinei Magela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quirino, Bárbara Angélio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fugi, Rosemara</creatorcontrib><title>Feeding of fish inhabiting native and non-native macrophyte stands in a Neotropical reservoir</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Owning to dissimilarity with native macrophytes, invasive macrophytes may negatively affect the diet and foraging efficiency of fishes. We evaluated the invertebrate availability, diet composition, and foraging efficiency of four fish species that use macrophytes as habitat in a native and a highly invasive macrophyte. The samples were taken in a reservoir in Brazil (22° 33′ S, 52°54′ W). We collected invertebrates and fishes simultaneously in macrophyte stands dominated by the invasive Poaceae
Urochloa arrecta
and the native
Eichhornia azurea
. We evaluated the foraging efficiency by the total number of prey consumed and by the degree of stomach fullness. We used an approach based on resampling procedures to compare differences in composition of invertebrates, composition of fish diet, and the similarity between invertebrates and fish diet. The abundance of invertebrates and the diet composition differed significantly between plants. On the other hand, fish foraging efficiency did not differ between macrophytes. Despite this lack of difference of foraging efficiency, the lower abundance of food items in the invasive macrophyte and the significant changes in fish diet suggest that
U. arrecta
is not a favorable feeding habitat for fishes, compared to the native
E. azurea
.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Benzocaine</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish diets</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater plants</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Primary Research Paper</subject><subject>Resampling</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LBCEUhiUK2rb-QFdCV11MqTPq7GVEXxAFfVyGmHPcNXadTd2l_n1n2yAWIkTE4_O-enwJOeTshDOmTzNnWrKKCZyN4KISW2TApa4rybneJgPGeFu1XLa7ZC_nN4aikWAD8nIJ0IU4pr2nPuQJDXFiX0NZlaItYQnUxo7GPlY_25l1qZ9PPgvQXPAso4Raegd9wXpwdkoTZEjLPqR9suPtNMPBzzokz5cXT-fX1e391c352W3lGsFKpazzbeubpmGulZ3uVCvgdeRHwCUXNdPOdt5zzTrOnWuR0VY5JcEpwZTn9ZAcrX3nqX9fQC7mrV-kiFcaUWupZIPt_lJjOwUToscXWzcL2Zkzhe5NrcTK6-QPCkcHs-D6CD5gfUNwvCFApsBHGdtFzubm8WGTFWsW_zDnBN7MU5jZ9Gk4M6skzTpJg0ma7ySxgSGp16KMcBxD-u3uH9UXFUSevA</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Carniatto, Natália</creator><creator>Cunha, Eduardo Ribeiro</creator><creator>Thomaz, Sidinei Magela</creator><creator>Quirino, Bárbara Angélio</creator><creator>Fugi, Rosemara</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7858-2133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-0817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0596-3781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5236-1364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7734-3795</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Feeding of fish inhabiting native and non-native macrophyte stands in a Neotropical reservoir</title><author>Carniatto, Natália ; Cunha, Eduardo Ribeiro ; Thomaz, Sidinei Magela ; Quirino, Bárbara Angélio ; Fugi, Rosemara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-6acf88f4440c85d7d682eb9f9e1512307cadff170d11cc8c857a6c65ec6206f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Benzocaine</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish diets</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater plants</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Primary Research Paper</topic><topic>Resampling</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carniatto, Natália</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, Eduardo Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomaz, Sidinei Magela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quirino, Bárbara Angélio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fugi, Rosemara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carniatto, Natália</au><au>Cunha, Eduardo Ribeiro</au><au>Thomaz, Sidinei Magela</au><au>Quirino, Bárbara Angélio</au><au>Fugi, Rosemara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feeding of fish inhabiting native and non-native macrophyte stands in a Neotropical reservoir</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>847</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1553</spage><epage>1563</epage><pages>1553-1563</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Owning to dissimilarity with native macrophytes, invasive macrophytes may negatively affect the diet and foraging efficiency of fishes. We evaluated the invertebrate availability, diet composition, and foraging efficiency of four fish species that use macrophytes as habitat in a native and a highly invasive macrophyte. The samples were taken in a reservoir in Brazil (22° 33′ S, 52°54′ W). We collected invertebrates and fishes simultaneously in macrophyte stands dominated by the invasive Poaceae
Urochloa arrecta
and the native
Eichhornia azurea
. We evaluated the foraging efficiency by the total number of prey consumed and by the degree of stomach fullness. We used an approach based on resampling procedures to compare differences in composition of invertebrates, composition of fish diet, and the similarity between invertebrates and fish diet. The abundance of invertebrates and the diet composition differed significantly between plants. On the other hand, fish foraging efficiency did not differ between macrophytes. Despite this lack of difference of foraging efficiency, the lower abundance of food items in the invasive macrophyte and the significant changes in fish diet suggest that
U. arrecta
is not a favorable feeding habitat for fishes, compared to the native
E. azurea
.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-020-04212-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7858-2133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-0817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0596-3781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5236-1364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7734-3795</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
| ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2020-03, Vol.847 (6), p.1553-1563 |
| issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2375654079 |
| source | SpringerLink (Online service) |
| subjects | Abundance Animal behavior Aquatic plants Benzocaine Biomedical and Life Sciences Composition Diet Ecology Efficiency Evaluation Feeding Fish Fish diets Fishes Food Foraging Foraging habitats Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater plants Habitats Invertebrates Life Sciences Macrophytes Prey Primary Research Paper Resampling Reservoirs Stomach Winter Zoology |
| title | Feeding of fish inhabiting native and non-native macrophyte stands in a Neotropical reservoir |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A23%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feeding%20of%20fish%20inhabiting%20native%20and%20non-native%20macrophyte%20stands%20in%20a%20Neotropical%20reservoir&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Carniatto,%20Nat%C3%A1lia&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=847&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1553&rft.epage=1563&rft.pages=1553-1563&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-020-04212-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA617043621%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375654079&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A617043621&rfr_iscdi=true |