Curriculum‐based teacher professional development in middle school science: A comparison of training focused on cognitive science principles versus content knowledge

This study investigates, through a cluster‐randomized trial, the effectiveness of two approaches to increasing middle school students’ science learning using a traditional science curriculum. Ninety schools were randomly assigned into one of three arms: (a) a treatment arm in which the textbook curr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of research in science teaching 2020-04, Vol.57 (4), p.536-566
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Rui, Porter, Andrew C., Massey, Christine M., Merlino, Joseph F., Desimone, Laura M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 566
container_issue 4
container_start_page 536
container_title Journal of research in science teaching
container_volume 57
creator Yang, Rui
Porter, Andrew C.
Massey, Christine M.
Merlino, Joseph F.
Desimone, Laura M.
description This study investigates, through a cluster‐randomized trial, the effectiveness of two approaches to increasing middle school students’ science learning using a traditional science curriculum. Ninety schools were randomly assigned into one of three arms: (a) a treatment arm in which the textbook curriculum was modified based on four principles of cognitive science coupled with teacher professional development (PD), (b) a second treatment arm in which teachers received PD designed to improve their knowledge of the science content, and (c) a business‐as‐usual control group. The PD was able to change teacher practice but barely improved teacher knowledge. No significant boost in student achievement was observed, except in a few instances, where there were some promising findings. Exploratory analyses were conducted to examine what makes the interventions more effective. Implications for future research were discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/tea.21605
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2375476753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1246516</ericid><sourcerecordid>2375476753</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-5a939e7e78723c6457bb76ad9f97fc80dfed3b147f1fd0ad67076c2add030ca73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFOGzEQhq2qlZoCBx4AyVJPPSzY610721sUBVqExIWeV449Thy8dmrvJsqNR-hb8F48CU639MZppPm_-UfzD0LnlFxSQsqrHuRlSTmpP6AJJc20KAXjH9Eka2VRMTL9jL6ktCGEsIY2E_Q8H2K0anBD9_L0ZykTaJw91Boi3sZgICUbvHRYww5c2Hbge2w97qzWDnBS6xBcLha8gu94hlXotjLaFDwOBvdRWm_9CpughqN3bquw8ra3O3gby4usV3brIOEdxDSkzPj-uOnRh70DvYJT9MlIl-DsXz1Bv64XD_Mfxd39zc_57K5QjDZ1UcuGNSBATEXJFK9qsVwKLnVjGmHUlGgDmi1pJQw1mkjNBRFclVJrwoiSgp2gr6NvPv73AKlvN2GIOYDUlkzUleCiZpn6NlIqhpQimDaf0Ml4aClpj39oc4bt3z9k9mJkIef8n1vc0rLiNeVZvxr1vXVweN-ofVjMRsdX8fqZFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375476753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Curriculum‐based teacher professional development in middle school science: A comparison of training focused on cognitive science principles versus content knowledge</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yang, Rui ; Porter, Andrew C. ; Massey, Christine M. ; Merlino, Joseph F. ; Desimone, Laura M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Rui ; Porter, Andrew C. ; Massey, Christine M. ; Merlino, Joseph F. ; Desimone, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates, through a cluster‐randomized trial, the effectiveness of two approaches to increasing middle school students’ science learning using a traditional science curriculum. Ninety schools were randomly assigned into one of three arms: (a) a treatment arm in which the textbook curriculum was modified based on four principles of cognitive science coupled with teacher professional development (PD), (b) a second treatment arm in which teachers received PD designed to improve their knowledge of the science content, and (c) a business‐as‐usual control group. The PD was able to change teacher practice but barely improved teacher knowledge. No significant boost in student achievement was observed, except in a few instances, where there were some promising findings. Exploratory analyses were conducted to examine what makes the interventions more effective. Implications for future research were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4308</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2736</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tea.21605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cognitive Science ; Curricula ; Curriculum Design ; Faculty Development ; Instructional Effectiveness ; middle school science ; Middle School Students ; Middle School Teachers ; Middle schools ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Professional development ; randomized controlled trial ; Science ; Science Achievement ; Science Curriculum ; Science Instruction ; Science Teachers ; Secondary School Science ; student achievement ; teacher content knowledge ; teacher professional development ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of research in science teaching, 2020-04, Vol.57 (4), p.536-566</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-5a939e7e78723c6457bb76ad9f97fc80dfed3b147f1fd0ad67076c2add030ca73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-5a939e7e78723c6457bb76ad9f97fc80dfed3b147f1fd0ad67076c2add030ca73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7167-297X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftea.21605$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftea.21605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1246516$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merlino, Joseph F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desimone, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><title>Curriculum‐based teacher professional development in middle school science: A comparison of training focused on cognitive science principles versus content knowledge</title><title>Journal of research in science teaching</title><description>This study investigates, through a cluster‐randomized trial, the effectiveness of two approaches to increasing middle school students’ science learning using a traditional science curriculum. Ninety schools were randomly assigned into one of three arms: (a) a treatment arm in which the textbook curriculum was modified based on four principles of cognitive science coupled with teacher professional development (PD), (b) a second treatment arm in which teachers received PD designed to improve their knowledge of the science content, and (c) a business‐as‐usual control group. The PD was able to change teacher practice but barely improved teacher knowledge. No significant boost in student achievement was observed, except in a few instances, where there were some promising findings. Exploratory analyses were conducted to examine what makes the interventions more effective. Implications for future research were discussed.</description><subject>Cognitive Science</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum Design</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>middle school science</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Middle School Teachers</subject><subject>Middle schools</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science Achievement</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Science Teachers</subject><subject>Secondary School Science</subject><subject>student achievement</subject><subject>teacher content knowledge</subject><subject>teacher professional development</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0022-4308</issn><issn>1098-2736</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFOGzEQhq2qlZoCBx4AyVJPPSzY610721sUBVqExIWeV449Thy8dmrvJsqNR-hb8F48CU639MZppPm_-UfzD0LnlFxSQsqrHuRlSTmpP6AJJc20KAXjH9Eka2VRMTL9jL6ktCGEsIY2E_Q8H2K0anBD9_L0ZykTaJw91Boi3sZgICUbvHRYww5c2Hbge2w97qzWDnBS6xBcLha8gu94hlXotjLaFDwOBvdRWm_9CpughqN3bquw8ra3O3gby4usV3brIOEdxDSkzPj-uOnRh70DvYJT9MlIl-DsXz1Bv64XD_Mfxd39zc_57K5QjDZ1UcuGNSBATEXJFK9qsVwKLnVjGmHUlGgDmi1pJQw1mkjNBRFclVJrwoiSgp2gr6NvPv73AKlvN2GIOYDUlkzUleCiZpn6NlIqhpQimDaf0Ml4aClpj39oc4bt3z9k9mJkIef8n1vc0rLiNeVZvxr1vXVweN-ofVjMRsdX8fqZFw</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Yang, Rui</creator><creator>Porter, Andrew C.</creator><creator>Massey, Christine M.</creator><creator>Merlino, Joseph F.</creator><creator>Desimone, Laura M.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7167-297X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Curriculum‐based teacher professional development in middle school science: A comparison of training focused on cognitive science principles versus content knowledge</title><author>Yang, Rui ; Porter, Andrew C. ; Massey, Christine M. ; Merlino, Joseph F. ; Desimone, Laura M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-5a939e7e78723c6457bb76ad9f97fc80dfed3b147f1fd0ad67076c2add030ca73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Science</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum Design</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>middle school science</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Middle School Teachers</topic><topic>Middle schools</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science Achievement</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Science Teachers</topic><topic>Secondary School Science</topic><topic>student achievement</topic><topic>teacher content knowledge</topic><topic>teacher professional development</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merlino, Joseph F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desimone, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of research in science teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Rui</au><au>Porter, Andrew C.</au><au>Massey, Christine M.</au><au>Merlino, Joseph F.</au><au>Desimone, Laura M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1246516</ericid><atitle>Curriculum‐based teacher professional development in middle school science: A comparison of training focused on cognitive science principles versus content knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Journal of research in science teaching</jtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>566</epage><pages>536-566</pages><issn>0022-4308</issn><eissn>1098-2736</eissn><abstract>This study investigates, through a cluster‐randomized trial, the effectiveness of two approaches to increasing middle school students’ science learning using a traditional science curriculum. Ninety schools were randomly assigned into one of three arms: (a) a treatment arm in which the textbook curriculum was modified based on four principles of cognitive science coupled with teacher professional development (PD), (b) a second treatment arm in which teachers received PD designed to improve their knowledge of the science content, and (c) a business‐as‐usual control group. The PD was able to change teacher practice but barely improved teacher knowledge. No significant boost in student achievement was observed, except in a few instances, where there were some promising findings. Exploratory analyses were conducted to examine what makes the interventions more effective. Implications for future research were discussed.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/tea.21605</doi><tpages>31</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7167-297X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4308
ispartof Journal of research in science teaching, 2020-04, Vol.57 (4), p.536-566
issn 0022-4308
1098-2736
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2375476753
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cognitive Science
Curricula
Curriculum Design
Faculty Development
Instructional Effectiveness
middle school science
Middle School Students
Middle School Teachers
Middle schools
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Professional development
randomized controlled trial
Science
Science Achievement
Science Curriculum
Science Instruction
Science Teachers
Secondary School Science
student achievement
teacher content knowledge
teacher professional development
Teachers
Teaching Methods
title Curriculum‐based teacher professional development in middle school science: A comparison of training focused on cognitive science principles versus content knowledge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A16%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Curriculum%E2%80%90based%20teacher%20professional%20development%20in%20middle%20school%20science:%20A%20comparison%20of%20training%20focused%20on%20cognitive%20science%20principles%20versus%20content%20knowledge&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20research%20in%20science%20teaching&rft.au=Yang,%20Rui&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=566&rft.pages=536-566&rft.issn=0022-4308&rft.eissn=1098-2736&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tea.21605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375476753%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375476753&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1246516&rfr_iscdi=true