Process design and evaluations for producing pyrolytic jet fuel
In this study, process simulation and techno‐economic analysis (TEA) were conducted to evaluate the production of renewable jet fuel (RJF) through the pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process. The process model was developed based on experimental results for the renewable jet fuel production process using the fast...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining bioproducts and biorefining, 2020-03, Vol.14 (2), p.249-264 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 264 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 249 |
| container_title | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Liu, Yu‐Cheng Wang, Wei‐Cheng |
| description | In this study, process simulation and techno‐economic analysis (TEA) were conducted to evaluate the production of renewable jet fuel (RJF) through the pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process. The process model was developed based on experimental results for the renewable jet fuel production process using the fast pyrolysis of rice husk, hydro‐processing of pyrolytic oil, and hydro‐cracking / isomerization of hydro‐processed oil. The mass and energy flows were input into the TEA model, which was established based on local conditions in Taiwan. The study included three parts: (1) the mass, energy and carbon balances – the major product, RJF, gave an energy yield of 26.8%, a mass yield of 9%, and a carbon yield of 21%; (2) an economic analysis – the MJSP of RJF for the pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process was $3.21/L, based on the plant capacity of 600 tonnes per day; (3) a sensitivity analysis: the impacts of the feedstock cost, catalyst life, co‐product selling price, catalyst cost, hydrogen cost, and plant capacity were discussed. This study demonstrated the economic potential of locally developing a pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process to produce RJF from solid biomass. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bbb.2061 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2375446587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2375446587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3301-17c9199b22dc40ee5f381ecf1b0afcc3bd72846650ce4d4b5f44df3a413612ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFKxV8BEG3LhJnTOXpFmJLd6goAsFd8NcS0LM1JlEydubGnHn6pzFx38OP0LnQBZACL3SWi8oyeEAzaBkNAPC4PBv52_H6CSlmhCRCy5m6Po5BuNSwtalatti1VrsPlXTq64KbcI-RLyLwfamard4N8TQDF1lcO067HvXnKIjr5rkzn7nHL3e3b6sH7LN0_3j-maTGcYIZFCYEspSU2oNJ84Jz5bgjAdNlDeGaVvQJc9zQYzjlmvhObeeKQ4sB6o0m6OLKXd85qN3qZN16GM7npSUFYLzXCyLUV1OysSQUnRe7mL1ruIggch9PXKsR-7rGWk20a-qccO_Tq5Wqx__DRSHZao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375446587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Process design and evaluations for producing pyrolytic jet fuel</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Liu, Yu‐Cheng ; Wang, Wei‐Cheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu‐Cheng ; Wang, Wei‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, process simulation and techno‐economic analysis (TEA) were conducted to evaluate the production of renewable jet fuel (RJF) through the pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process. The process model was developed based on experimental results for the renewable jet fuel production process using the fast pyrolysis of rice husk, hydro‐processing of pyrolytic oil, and hydro‐cracking / isomerization of hydro‐processed oil. The mass and energy flows were input into the TEA model, which was established based on local conditions in Taiwan. The study included three parts: (1) the mass, energy and carbon balances – the major product, RJF, gave an energy yield of 26.8%, a mass yield of 9%, and a carbon yield of 21%; (2) an economic analysis – the MJSP of RJF for the pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process was $3.21/L, based on the plant capacity of 600 tonnes per day; (3) a sensitivity analysis: the impacts of the feedstock cost, catalyst life, co‐product selling price, catalyst cost, hydrogen cost, and plant capacity were discussed. This study demonstrated the economic potential of locally developing a pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process to produce RJF from solid biomass. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-104X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-1031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Catalysts ; Computer simulation ; Cost analysis ; Economic analysis ; Energy ; Energy flow ; Fuel production ; hydro‐cracking/isomerization ; hydro‐processing ; Isomerization ; Jet engine fuels ; Mass ; process simulation ; Pyrolysis ; renewable jet fuel ; Sensitivity analysis ; techno‐economic analysis ; Yield</subject><ispartof>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2020-03, Vol.14 (2), p.249-264</ispartof><rights>2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><rights>2020 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3301-17c9199b22dc40ee5f381ecf1b0afcc3bd72846650ce4d4b5f44df3a413612ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3301-17c9199b22dc40ee5f381ecf1b0afcc3bd72846650ce4d4b5f44df3a413612ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbbb.2061$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbbb.2061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><title>Process design and evaluations for producing pyrolytic jet fuel</title><title>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</title><description>In this study, process simulation and techno‐economic analysis (TEA) were conducted to evaluate the production of renewable jet fuel (RJF) through the pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process. The process model was developed based on experimental results for the renewable jet fuel production process using the fast pyrolysis of rice husk, hydro‐processing of pyrolytic oil, and hydro‐cracking / isomerization of hydro‐processed oil. The mass and energy flows were input into the TEA model, which was established based on local conditions in Taiwan. The study included three parts: (1) the mass, energy and carbon balances – the major product, RJF, gave an energy yield of 26.8%, a mass yield of 9%, and a carbon yield of 21%; (2) an economic analysis – the MJSP of RJF for the pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process was $3.21/L, based on the plant capacity of 600 tonnes per day; (3) a sensitivity analysis: the impacts of the feedstock cost, catalyst life, co‐product selling price, catalyst cost, hydrogen cost, and plant capacity were discussed. This study demonstrated the economic potential of locally developing a pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process to produce RJF from solid biomass. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy flow</subject><subject>Fuel production</subject><subject>hydro‐cracking/isomerization</subject><subject>hydro‐processing</subject><subject>Isomerization</subject><subject>Jet engine fuels</subject><subject>Mass</subject><subject>process simulation</subject><subject>Pyrolysis</subject><subject>renewable jet fuel</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>techno‐economic analysis</subject><subject>Yield</subject><issn>1932-104X</issn><issn>1932-1031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFKxV8BEG3LhJnTOXpFmJLd6goAsFd8NcS0LM1JlEydubGnHn6pzFx38OP0LnQBZACL3SWi8oyeEAzaBkNAPC4PBv52_H6CSlmhCRCy5m6Po5BuNSwtalatti1VrsPlXTq64KbcI-RLyLwfamard4N8TQDF1lcO067HvXnKIjr5rkzn7nHL3e3b6sH7LN0_3j-maTGcYIZFCYEspSU2oNJ84Jz5bgjAdNlDeGaVvQJc9zQYzjlmvhObeeKQ4sB6o0m6OLKXd85qN3qZN16GM7npSUFYLzXCyLUV1OysSQUnRe7mL1ruIggch9PXKsR-7rGWk20a-qccO_Tq5Wqx__DRSHZao</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Liu, Yu‐Cheng</creator><creator>Wang, Wei‐Cheng</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Process design and evaluations for producing pyrolytic jet fuel</title><author>Liu, Yu‐Cheng ; Wang, Wei‐Cheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3301-17c9199b22dc40ee5f381ecf1b0afcc3bd72846650ce4d4b5f44df3a413612ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy flow</topic><topic>Fuel production</topic><topic>hydro‐cracking/isomerization</topic><topic>hydro‐processing</topic><topic>Isomerization</topic><topic>Jet engine fuels</topic><topic>Mass</topic><topic>process simulation</topic><topic>Pyrolysis</topic><topic>renewable jet fuel</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>techno‐economic analysis</topic><topic>Yield</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Yu‐Cheng</au><au>Wang, Wei‐Cheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Process design and evaluations for producing pyrolytic jet fuel</atitle><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>249-264</pages><issn>1932-104X</issn><eissn>1932-1031</eissn><abstract>In this study, process simulation and techno‐economic analysis (TEA) were conducted to evaluate the production of renewable jet fuel (RJF) through the pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process. The process model was developed based on experimental results for the renewable jet fuel production process using the fast pyrolysis of rice husk, hydro‐processing of pyrolytic oil, and hydro‐cracking / isomerization of hydro‐processed oil. The mass and energy flows were input into the TEA model, which was established based on local conditions in Taiwan. The study included three parts: (1) the mass, energy and carbon balances – the major product, RJF, gave an energy yield of 26.8%, a mass yield of 9%, and a carbon yield of 21%; (2) an economic analysis – the MJSP of RJF for the pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process was $3.21/L, based on the plant capacity of 600 tonnes per day; (3) a sensitivity analysis: the impacts of the feedstock cost, catalyst life, co‐product selling price, catalyst cost, hydrogen cost, and plant capacity were discussed. This study demonstrated the economic potential of locally developing a pyrolysis‐to‐RJF process to produce RJF from solid biomass. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/bbb.2061</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-104X |
| ispartof | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2020-03, Vol.14 (2), p.249-264 |
| issn | 1932-104X 1932-1031 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2375446587 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Carbon Catalysts Computer simulation Cost analysis Economic analysis Energy Energy flow Fuel production hydro‐cracking/isomerization hydro‐processing Isomerization Jet engine fuels Mass process simulation Pyrolysis renewable jet fuel Sensitivity analysis techno‐economic analysis Yield |
| title | Process design and evaluations for producing pyrolytic jet fuel |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T20%3A11%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Process%20design%20and%20evaluations%20for%20producing%20pyrolytic%20jet%20fuel&rft.jtitle=Biofuels,%20bioproducts%20and%20biorefining&rft.au=Liu,%20Yu%E2%80%90Cheng&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=249-264&rft.issn=1932-104X&rft.eissn=1932-1031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bbb.2061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375446587%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375446587&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |