Differences between adolescents who do and do not successfully complete their program within a non-residential alternative education facility
•Younger age and disruptive behavior are risks for unsuccessful program completion.•Adolescents from one-parent families are at risk for unsuccessful program completion.•Alternative educational facilities should be improved to target these risks. In this retrospective longitudinal study we examined...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Children and youth services review 2020-02, Vol.109, p.104735, Article 104735 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 104735 |
| container_title | Children and youth services review |
| container_volume | 109 |
| creator | Pronk, S. Mulder, E.A. van den Berg, G. Stams, G.J.J.M. Popma, A. Kuiper, C. |
| description | •Younger age and disruptive behavior are risks for unsuccessful program completion.•Adolescents from one-parent families are at risk for unsuccessful program completion.•Alternative educational facilities should be improved to target these risks.
In this retrospective longitudinal study we examined which characteristics of 114 Dutch adolescents, aged 12–18 years, and their environment, predicted (un)successful completion of a non-residential alternative educational program for adolescents with complex problems, who are at risk for school drop-out or residential placement. The adolescents received care and education in a non-residential alternative educational facility (School2Care) for a mean period of 9.6 months (SD = 5.5 months). 69% successfully completed the program, and 31% unsuccessfully completed the program, ending in residential placement or living at home without school attendance, work or internship. Case file analyses showed that younger age, disruptive behavior disorder and one-parent families predicted unsuccessful program completion. It should therefore be examined whether the alternative educational program can be improved to better meet the needs of younger adolescents, adolescents with disruptive behavior disorder, and from one-parent families. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104735 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2374202710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0190740919307881</els_id><sourcerecordid>2374202710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b030aa696d32c847d2b18b17466ef61301e9cf404c8f5fd474be622dc5d7b1223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFuGyEQhlGVSnWSvgNSz-sAy8LusXWbtJKlXJIzYmHoYuHFBdaWHyLvXCxH6rGnGc38_6-ZDyFMyZoSKh52azP5YM9xKdOaETrUMZdt9wGtaC_bRkrR3aBVXZBGcjJ8Qrc57wghnejYCr19985BgtlAxiOUE8CMtY0BsoG5ZHyaIrYR69leyhwLzoup4uyWEM7YxP0hQAFcJvAJH1L8nfQen3yZfA2qhrlJkL2tYV4HrEOBNOvij4DBLqZ2ccZOGx98Od-jj06HDJ_f6x16ffzxsvnZbJ-ffm2-bhvTDqI0I2mJ1mIQtmWm59KykfYjlVwIcIK2hMJgHCfc9K5zlks-gmDMms7KkTLW3qEv19x6758FclG7uNSzQlaslZwRJimpqv6qMinmnMCpQ_J7nc6KEnWBr3bqH3x1ga-u8Kv129UK9Yujh6Sy8RfI1icwRdno_x_yFxk6lnI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2374202710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences between adolescents who do and do not successfully complete their program within a non-residential alternative education facility</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Pronk, S. ; Mulder, E.A. ; van den Berg, G. ; Stams, G.J.J.M. ; Popma, A. ; Kuiper, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pronk, S. ; Mulder, E.A. ; van den Berg, G. ; Stams, G.J.J.M. ; Popma, A. ; Kuiper, C.</creatorcontrib><description>•Younger age and disruptive behavior are risks for unsuccessful program completion.•Adolescents from one-parent families are at risk for unsuccessful program completion.•Alternative educational facilities should be improved to target these risks.
In this retrospective longitudinal study we examined which characteristics of 114 Dutch adolescents, aged 12–18 years, and their environment, predicted (un)successful completion of a non-residential alternative educational program for adolescents with complex problems, who are at risk for school drop-out or residential placement. The adolescents received care and education in a non-residential alternative educational facility (School2Care) for a mean period of 9.6 months (SD = 5.5 months). 69% successfully completed the program, and 31% unsuccessfully completed the program, ending in residential placement or living at home without school attendance, work or internship. Case file analyses showed that younger age, disruptive behavior disorder and one-parent families predicted unsuccessful program completion. It should therefore be examined whether the alternative educational program can be improved to better meet the needs of younger adolescents, adolescents with disruptive behavior disorder, and from one-parent families.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-7409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Alternative approaches ; Alternative education ; Alternatives ; Behavior disorders ; Characteristics ; Correctional treatment programs ; Disruptive behaviour ; Dropping out ; Educational programs ; Independent living ; Parent education ; School attendance ; School dropouts ; Single parent family ; Success ; Teenagers</subject><ispartof>Children and youth services review, 2020-02, Vol.109, p.104735, Article 104735</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b030aa696d32c847d2b18b17466ef61301e9cf404c8f5fd474be622dc5d7b1223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b030aa696d32c847d2b18b17466ef61301e9cf404c8f5fd474be622dc5d7b1223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740919307881$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,33751,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pronk, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Berg, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stams, G.J.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popma, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences between adolescents who do and do not successfully complete their program within a non-residential alternative education facility</title><title>Children and youth services review</title><description>•Younger age and disruptive behavior are risks for unsuccessful program completion.•Adolescents from one-parent families are at risk for unsuccessful program completion.•Alternative educational facilities should be improved to target these risks.
In this retrospective longitudinal study we examined which characteristics of 114 Dutch adolescents, aged 12–18 years, and their environment, predicted (un)successful completion of a non-residential alternative educational program for adolescents with complex problems, who are at risk for school drop-out or residential placement. The adolescents received care and education in a non-residential alternative educational facility (School2Care) for a mean period of 9.6 months (SD = 5.5 months). 69% successfully completed the program, and 31% unsuccessfully completed the program, ending in residential placement or living at home without school attendance, work or internship. Case file analyses showed that younger age, disruptive behavior disorder and one-parent families predicted unsuccessful program completion. It should therefore be examined whether the alternative educational program can be improved to better meet the needs of younger adolescents, adolescents with disruptive behavior disorder, and from one-parent families.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Alternative approaches</subject><subject>Alternative education</subject><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Behavior disorders</subject><subject>Characteristics</subject><subject>Correctional treatment programs</subject><subject>Disruptive behaviour</subject><subject>Dropping out</subject><subject>Educational programs</subject><subject>Independent living</subject><subject>Parent education</subject><subject>School attendance</subject><subject>School dropouts</subject><subject>Single parent family</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><issn>0190-7409</issn><issn>1873-7765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFuGyEQhlGVSnWSvgNSz-sAy8LusXWbtJKlXJIzYmHoYuHFBdaWHyLvXCxH6rGnGc38_6-ZDyFMyZoSKh52azP5YM9xKdOaETrUMZdt9wGtaC_bRkrR3aBVXZBGcjJ8Qrc57wghnejYCr19985BgtlAxiOUE8CMtY0BsoG5ZHyaIrYR69leyhwLzoup4uyWEM7YxP0hQAFcJvAJH1L8nfQen3yZfA2qhrlJkL2tYV4HrEOBNOvij4DBLqZ2ccZOGx98Od-jj06HDJ_f6x16ffzxsvnZbJ-ffm2-bhvTDqI0I2mJ1mIQtmWm59KykfYjlVwIcIK2hMJgHCfc9K5zlks-gmDMms7KkTLW3qEv19x6758FclG7uNSzQlaslZwRJimpqv6qMinmnMCpQ_J7nc6KEnWBr3bqH3x1ga-u8Kv129UK9Yujh6Sy8RfI1icwRdno_x_yFxk6lnI</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Pronk, S.</creator><creator>Mulder, E.A.</creator><creator>van den Berg, G.</creator><creator>Stams, G.J.J.M.</creator><creator>Popma, A.</creator><creator>Kuiper, C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Differences between adolescents who do and do not successfully complete their program within a non-residential alternative education facility</title><author>Pronk, S. ; Mulder, E.A. ; van den Berg, G. ; Stams, G.J.J.M. ; Popma, A. ; Kuiper, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b030aa696d32c847d2b18b17466ef61301e9cf404c8f5fd474be622dc5d7b1223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Alternative approaches</topic><topic>Alternative education</topic><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Behavior disorders</topic><topic>Characteristics</topic><topic>Correctional treatment programs</topic><topic>Disruptive behaviour</topic><topic>Dropping out</topic><topic>Educational programs</topic><topic>Independent living</topic><topic>Parent education</topic><topic>School attendance</topic><topic>School dropouts</topic><topic>Single parent family</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pronk, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Berg, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stams, G.J.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popma, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Children and youth services review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pronk, S.</au><au>Mulder, E.A.</au><au>van den Berg, G.</au><au>Stams, G.J.J.M.</au><au>Popma, A.</au><au>Kuiper, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences between adolescents who do and do not successfully complete their program within a non-residential alternative education facility</atitle><jtitle>Children and youth services review</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>109</volume><spage>104735</spage><pages>104735-</pages><artnum>104735</artnum><issn>0190-7409</issn><eissn>1873-7765</eissn><abstract>•Younger age and disruptive behavior are risks for unsuccessful program completion.•Adolescents from one-parent families are at risk for unsuccessful program completion.•Alternative educational facilities should be improved to target these risks.
In this retrospective longitudinal study we examined which characteristics of 114 Dutch adolescents, aged 12–18 years, and their environment, predicted (un)successful completion of a non-residential alternative educational program for adolescents with complex problems, who are at risk for school drop-out or residential placement. The adolescents received care and education in a non-residential alternative educational facility (School2Care) for a mean period of 9.6 months (SD = 5.5 months). 69% successfully completed the program, and 31% unsuccessfully completed the program, ending in residential placement or living at home without school attendance, work or internship. Case file analyses showed that younger age, disruptive behavior disorder and one-parent families predicted unsuccessful program completion. It should therefore be examined whether the alternative educational program can be improved to better meet the needs of younger adolescents, adolescents with disruptive behavior disorder, and from one-parent families.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104735</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0190-7409 |
| ispartof | Children and youth services review, 2020-02, Vol.109, p.104735, Article 104735 |
| issn | 0190-7409 1873-7765 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2374202710 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Adolescents Alternative approaches Alternative education Alternatives Behavior disorders Characteristics Correctional treatment programs Disruptive behaviour Dropping out Educational programs Independent living Parent education School attendance School dropouts Single parent family Success Teenagers |
| title | Differences between adolescents who do and do not successfully complete their program within a non-residential alternative education facility |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A14%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20between%20adolescents%20who%20do%20and%20do%20not%20successfully%20complete%20their%20program%20within%20a%20non-residential%20alternative%20education%20facility&rft.jtitle=Children%20and%20youth%20services%20review&rft.au=Pronk,%20S.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=109&rft.spage=104735&rft.pages=104735-&rft.artnum=104735&rft.issn=0190-7409&rft.eissn=1873-7765&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104735&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2374202710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2374202710&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0190740919307881&rfr_iscdi=true |