Glued to the TV: Distracted Noise Traders and Stock Market Liquidity

In this paper, we study the impact of noise traders' limited attention on financial markets. Specifically, we exploit episodes of sensational news (exogenous to the market) that distract noise traders. We find that on "distraction days," trading activity, liquidity, and volatility dec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of finance (New York) 2020-04, Vol.75 (2), p.1083-1133
Hauptverfasser: PERESS, JOEL, SCHMIDT, DANIEL
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1133
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1083
container_title The Journal of finance (New York)
container_volume 75
creator PERESS, JOEL
SCHMIDT, DANIEL
description In this paper, we study the impact of noise traders' limited attention on financial markets. Specifically, we exploit episodes of sensational news (exogenous to the market) that distract noise traders. We find that on "distraction days," trading activity, liquidity, and volatility decrease, and prices reverse less among stocks owned predominantly by noise traders. These outcomes contrast sharply with those due to the inattention of informed speculators and market makers, and are consistent with noise traders mitigating adverse selection risk. We discuss the evolution of these outcomes over time and the role of technological changes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jofi.12863
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2374137505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45286264</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45286264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3643-c868b2debbff5b1a4bd3b35ed96a968df7864113d05c059fd86dc006a168d2503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsXP0FAvAhb82eT3XqT1lal2oPVa8huEsy2Nm2SRfrtTV0FT85l4M3vzTAPgHOMBjjVdeOMHWBScnoAepjlKOOE40PQQ4iQDKOSHIOTEBq0L8Z6YDxdtVrB6GB813DxdgPHNkQv65jUZ2dDEr1U2gco1wq-RFcv4ZP0Sx3hzG5bq2zcnYIjI1dBn_30Pnid3C1G99lsPn0Y3c6ymvKcZnXJy4ooXVXGsArLvFK0okyrIZdDXipTlDzHmCrEasSGRpVc1QhxidOQMET74KLbu_Fu2-oQReNav04nBaFFjmnBEEvUVUfV3oXgtREbbz-k3wmMxD4lsU9JfKeUYNzBn3ald_-Q4nE-efj1XHaeJkTn_3oIRYXIWaJIevgLXIFz_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2374137505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glued to the TV: Distracted Noise Traders and Stock Market Liquidity</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>PERESS, JOEL ; SCHMIDT, DANIEL</creator><creatorcontrib>PERESS, JOEL ; SCHMIDT, DANIEL</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we study the impact of noise traders' limited attention on financial markets. Specifically, we exploit episodes of sensational news (exogenous to the market) that distract noise traders. We find that on "distraction days," trading activity, liquidity, and volatility decrease, and prices reverse less among stocks owned predominantly by noise traders. These outcomes contrast sharply with those due to the inattention of informed speculators and market makers, and are consistent with noise traders mitigating adverse selection risk. We discuss the evolution of these outcomes over time and the role of technological changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12863</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Attention deficits ; Distraction ; Hypotheses ; Liquidity ; News ; Noise ; Prices ; Securities markets ; Securities trading ; Trading</subject><ispartof>The Journal of finance (New York), 2020-04, Vol.75 (2), p.1083-1133</ispartof><rights>2020 the American Finance Association</rights><rights>2019 the American Finance Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3643-c868b2debbff5b1a4bd3b35ed96a968df7864113d05c059fd86dc006a168d2503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3643-c868b2debbff5b1a4bd3b35ed96a968df7864113d05c059fd86dc006a168d2503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45286264$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45286264$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>PERESS, JOEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHMIDT, DANIEL</creatorcontrib><title>Glued to the TV: Distracted Noise Traders and Stock Market Liquidity</title><title>The Journal of finance (New York)</title><description>In this paper, we study the impact of noise traders' limited attention on financial markets. Specifically, we exploit episodes of sensational news (exogenous to the market) that distract noise traders. We find that on "distraction days," trading activity, liquidity, and volatility decrease, and prices reverse less among stocks owned predominantly by noise traders. These outcomes contrast sharply with those due to the inattention of informed speculators and market makers, and are consistent with noise traders mitigating adverse selection risk. We discuss the evolution of these outcomes over time and the role of technological changes.</description><subject>Attention deficits</subject><subject>Distraction</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>News</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Securities trading</subject><subject>Trading</subject><issn>0022-1082</issn><issn>1540-6261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsXP0FAvAhb82eT3XqT1lal2oPVa8huEsy2Nm2SRfrtTV0FT85l4M3vzTAPgHOMBjjVdeOMHWBScnoAepjlKOOE40PQQ4iQDKOSHIOTEBq0L8Z6YDxdtVrB6GB813DxdgPHNkQv65jUZ2dDEr1U2gco1wq-RFcv4ZP0Sx3hzG5bq2zcnYIjI1dBn_30Pnid3C1G99lsPn0Y3c6ymvKcZnXJy4ooXVXGsArLvFK0okyrIZdDXipTlDzHmCrEasSGRpVc1QhxidOQMET74KLbu_Fu2-oQReNav04nBaFFjmnBEEvUVUfV3oXgtREbbz-k3wmMxD4lsU9JfKeUYNzBn3ald_-Q4nE-efj1XHaeJkTn_3oIRYXIWaJIevgLXIFz_A</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>PERESS, JOEL</creator><creator>SCHMIDT, DANIEL</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Glued to the TV: Distracted Noise Traders and Stock Market Liquidity</title><author>PERESS, JOEL ; SCHMIDT, DANIEL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3643-c868b2debbff5b1a4bd3b35ed96a968df7864113d05c059fd86dc006a168d2503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Attention deficits</topic><topic>Distraction</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>News</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Securities trading</topic><topic>Trading</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PERESS, JOEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHMIDT, DANIEL</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PERESS, JOEL</au><au>SCHMIDT, DANIEL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glued to the TV: Distracted Noise Traders and Stock Market Liquidity</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1083</spage><epage>1133</epage><pages>1083-1133</pages><issn>0022-1082</issn><eissn>1540-6261</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we study the impact of noise traders' limited attention on financial markets. Specifically, we exploit episodes of sensational news (exogenous to the market) that distract noise traders. We find that on "distraction days," trading activity, liquidity, and volatility decrease, and prices reverse less among stocks owned predominantly by noise traders. These outcomes contrast sharply with those due to the inattention of informed speculators and market makers, and are consistent with noise traders mitigating adverse selection risk. We discuss the evolution of these outcomes over time and the role of technological changes.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jofi.12863</doi><tpages>51</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1082
ispartof The Journal of finance (New York), 2020-04, Vol.75 (2), p.1083-1133
issn 0022-1082
1540-6261
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2374137505
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Attention deficits
Distraction
Hypotheses
Liquidity
News
Noise
Prices
Securities markets
Securities trading
Trading
title Glued to the TV: Distracted Noise Traders and Stock Market Liquidity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T15%3A50%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glued%20to%20the%20TV:%20Distracted%20Noise%20Traders%20and%20Stock%20Market%20Liquidity&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20finance%20(New%20York)&rft.au=PERESS,%20JOEL&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1083&rft.epage=1133&rft.pages=1083-1133&rft.issn=0022-1082&rft.eissn=1540-6261&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jofi.12863&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45286264%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2374137505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45286264&rfr_iscdi=true