Positive biotic interactions in freshwaters: A review and research directive

Positive interspecific interactions such as mutualism, commensalism, and facilitation are globally ubiquitous. Although research on positive interactions in terrestrial and marine systems has progressed over the past few decades, comparatively little is known about them in freshwater ecosystems. How...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Freshwater biology 2020-04, Vol.65 (4), p.811-832
Hauptverfasser: Silknetter, Samuel, Creed, Robert P., Brown, Bryan L., Frimpong, Emmanuel A., Skelton, James, Peoples, Brandon K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 832
container_issue 4
container_start_page 811
container_title Freshwater biology
container_volume 65
creator Silknetter, Samuel
Creed, Robert P.
Brown, Bryan L.
Frimpong, Emmanuel A.
Skelton, James
Peoples, Brandon K.
description Positive interspecific interactions such as mutualism, commensalism, and facilitation are globally ubiquitous. Although research on positive interactions in terrestrial and marine systems has progressed over the past few decades, comparatively little is known about them in freshwater ecosystems. However, recent advances have brought the study of positive interactions in freshwater systems to a point where synthesis is warranted. In this review, we catalogue the variety of direct positive interactions described to date in freshwater ecosystems, discuss factors that could influence prevalence and impact of these interactions, and provide a framework for future research. In positive interactions, organisms exchange key resources such as nutrients, protection, transportation, or habitat to a net benefit for at least one participant. A few mutualistic relationships have received research attention to date, namely seed‐dispersing fishes, crayfishes and their ectosymbiotic cleaners, and communal‐spawning stream fishes. Similarly, only a handful of commensalisms have been studied, primarily phoretic relationships. Facilitation via ecosystem engineering has received more attention, for example habitat modification by beavers and bioturbation by salmon. It is well known that interaction outcomes vary with abiotic and biotic context. However, only a few of studies have examined context dependency in positive interactions in freshwater systems. Likewise, positive interactions incur costs as well as benefits; conceptualising interactions in terms of net cost/benefit to participants will help to clarify complex interactions. It is likely that there are many positive interactions that have yet to be discovered in freshwater systems. To identify these interactions, we encourage inductive natural history studies combined with hypotheses deduced from general ecological models. Research on positive interactions must move beyond small‐scale experiments and observational studies and adopt a cross‐scale approach. Likewise, we must progress from reducing systems to oversimplified pairwise interactions, toward studying positive interactions in broader community contexts. Positive interactions have been greatly overlooked in applied freshwater ecology, but have great potential for conservation, restoration, and aquaculture.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/fwb.13476
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2370268171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2370268171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-7b7ad19e4aaeed76cd0ad63d8bae912edb9d285938600d261fd7930397832583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv0HAk4dt82c3yXqrxapQ0EPBY8gmszSl7tZk26Xfvqnr1bnMvOE3b-AhdE_JhKaa1n01oTyX4gKNKBdFxnImL9GIkFxkBZHkGt3EuCGEqEKyEVp-ttF3_gC48m3nLfZNB8HYzrdNTALXAeK6N2kZn_AMBzh46LFpXBojmGDX2PkA9uxxi65qs41w99fHaLV4Wc3fsuXH6_t8tsws50xkspLG0RJyYwCcFNYR4wR3qjJQUgauKh1TRcmVIMQxQWsnS054KRVnheJj9DDY7kL7s4fY6U27D036qBmXhAlFJU3U40DZ0MYYoNa74L9NOGpK9DkrnbLSv1kldjqwvd_C8X9QL76eh4sTaMxq9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2370268171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positive biotic interactions in freshwaters: A review and research directive</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Silknetter, Samuel ; Creed, Robert P. ; Brown, Bryan L. ; Frimpong, Emmanuel A. ; Skelton, James ; Peoples, Brandon K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Silknetter, Samuel ; Creed, Robert P. ; Brown, Bryan L. ; Frimpong, Emmanuel A. ; Skelton, James ; Peoples, Brandon K.</creatorcontrib><description>Positive interspecific interactions such as mutualism, commensalism, and facilitation are globally ubiquitous. Although research on positive interactions in terrestrial and marine systems has progressed over the past few decades, comparatively little is known about them in freshwater ecosystems. However, recent advances have brought the study of positive interactions in freshwater systems to a point where synthesis is warranted. In this review, we catalogue the variety of direct positive interactions described to date in freshwater ecosystems, discuss factors that could influence prevalence and impact of these interactions, and provide a framework for future research. In positive interactions, organisms exchange key resources such as nutrients, protection, transportation, or habitat to a net benefit for at least one participant. A few mutualistic relationships have received research attention to date, namely seed‐dispersing fishes, crayfishes and their ectosymbiotic cleaners, and communal‐spawning stream fishes. Similarly, only a handful of commensalisms have been studied, primarily phoretic relationships. Facilitation via ecosystem engineering has received more attention, for example habitat modification by beavers and bioturbation by salmon. It is well known that interaction outcomes vary with abiotic and biotic context. However, only a few of studies have examined context dependency in positive interactions in freshwater systems. Likewise, positive interactions incur costs as well as benefits; conceptualising interactions in terms of net cost/benefit to participants will help to clarify complex interactions. It is likely that there are many positive interactions that have yet to be discovered in freshwater systems. To identify these interactions, we encourage inductive natural history studies combined with hypotheses deduced from general ecological models. Research on positive interactions must move beyond small‐scale experiments and observational studies and adopt a cross‐scale approach. Likewise, we must progress from reducing systems to oversimplified pairwise interactions, toward studying positive interactions in broader community contexts. Positive interactions have been greatly overlooked in applied freshwater ecology, but have great potential for conservation, restoration, and aquaculture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13476</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic mammals ; Bioturbation ; Commensalism ; community ; conservation ; context dependence ; Ecological models ; Ecological monitoring ; ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; facilitation ; Fresh water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecology ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Freshwater fishes ; Freshwater mammals ; Habitats ; Inland water environment ; Interspecific ; Interspecific relationships ; management ; Marine systems ; Mutualism ; Nutrients ; Observational studies ; Restoration ; Salmon ; Spawning ; Symbiosis ; Terrestrial environments ; Transportation</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2020-04, Vol.65 (4), p.811-832</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-7b7ad19e4aaeed76cd0ad63d8bae912edb9d285938600d261fd7930397832583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-7b7ad19e4aaeed76cd0ad63d8bae912edb9d285938600d261fd7930397832583</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2043-8627 ; 0000-0002-2189-1805 ; 0000-0002-3954-4908 ; 0000-0002-3017-5843 ; 0000-0001-9938-5788 ; 0000-0003-4837-7117</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffwb.13476$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffwb.13476$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silknetter, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creed, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Bryan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frimpong, Emmanuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skelton, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peoples, Brandon K.</creatorcontrib><title>Positive biotic interactions in freshwaters: A review and research directive</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>Positive interspecific interactions such as mutualism, commensalism, and facilitation are globally ubiquitous. Although research on positive interactions in terrestrial and marine systems has progressed over the past few decades, comparatively little is known about them in freshwater ecosystems. However, recent advances have brought the study of positive interactions in freshwater systems to a point where synthesis is warranted. In this review, we catalogue the variety of direct positive interactions described to date in freshwater ecosystems, discuss factors that could influence prevalence and impact of these interactions, and provide a framework for future research. In positive interactions, organisms exchange key resources such as nutrients, protection, transportation, or habitat to a net benefit for at least one participant. A few mutualistic relationships have received research attention to date, namely seed‐dispersing fishes, crayfishes and their ectosymbiotic cleaners, and communal‐spawning stream fishes. Similarly, only a handful of commensalisms have been studied, primarily phoretic relationships. Facilitation via ecosystem engineering has received more attention, for example habitat modification by beavers and bioturbation by salmon. It is well known that interaction outcomes vary with abiotic and biotic context. However, only a few of studies have examined context dependency in positive interactions in freshwater systems. Likewise, positive interactions incur costs as well as benefits; conceptualising interactions in terms of net cost/benefit to participants will help to clarify complex interactions. It is likely that there are many positive interactions that have yet to be discovered in freshwater systems. To identify these interactions, we encourage inductive natural history studies combined with hypotheses deduced from general ecological models. Research on positive interactions must move beyond small‐scale experiments and observational studies and adopt a cross‐scale approach. Likewise, we must progress from reducing systems to oversimplified pairwise interactions, toward studying positive interactions in broader community contexts. Positive interactions have been greatly overlooked in applied freshwater ecology, but have great potential for conservation, restoration, and aquaculture.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Bioturbation</subject><subject>Commensalism</subject><subject>community</subject><subject>conservation</subject><subject>context dependence</subject><subject>Ecological models</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>facilitation</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Freshwater mammals</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>Interspecific relationships</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>Marine systems</subject><subject>Mutualism</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv0HAk4dt82c3yXqrxapQ0EPBY8gmszSl7tZk26Xfvqnr1bnMvOE3b-AhdE_JhKaa1n01oTyX4gKNKBdFxnImL9GIkFxkBZHkGt3EuCGEqEKyEVp-ttF3_gC48m3nLfZNB8HYzrdNTALXAeK6N2kZn_AMBzh46LFpXBojmGDX2PkA9uxxi65qs41w99fHaLV4Wc3fsuXH6_t8tsws50xkspLG0RJyYwCcFNYR4wR3qjJQUgauKh1TRcmVIMQxQWsnS054KRVnheJj9DDY7kL7s4fY6U27D036qBmXhAlFJU3U40DZ0MYYoNa74L9NOGpK9DkrnbLSv1kldjqwvd_C8X9QL76eh4sTaMxq9g</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Silknetter, Samuel</creator><creator>Creed, Robert P.</creator><creator>Brown, Bryan L.</creator><creator>Frimpong, Emmanuel A.</creator><creator>Skelton, James</creator><creator>Peoples, Brandon K.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2043-8627</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2189-1805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-4908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3017-5843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9938-5788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4837-7117</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Positive biotic interactions in freshwaters: A review and research directive</title><author>Silknetter, Samuel ; Creed, Robert P. ; Brown, Bryan L. ; Frimpong, Emmanuel A. ; Skelton, James ; Peoples, Brandon K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-7b7ad19e4aaeed76cd0ad63d8bae912edb9d285938600d261fd7930397832583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Bioturbation</topic><topic>Commensalism</topic><topic>community</topic><topic>conservation</topic><topic>context dependence</topic><topic>Ecological models</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>facilitation</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Freshwater mammals</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>Interspecific relationships</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>Marine systems</topic><topic>Mutualism</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silknetter, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creed, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Bryan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frimpong, Emmanuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skelton, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peoples, Brandon K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silknetter, Samuel</au><au>Creed, Robert P.</au><au>Brown, Bryan L.</au><au>Frimpong, Emmanuel A.</au><au>Skelton, James</au><au>Peoples, Brandon K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positive biotic interactions in freshwaters: A review and research directive</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>811</spage><epage>832</epage><pages>811-832</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><abstract>Positive interspecific interactions such as mutualism, commensalism, and facilitation are globally ubiquitous. Although research on positive interactions in terrestrial and marine systems has progressed over the past few decades, comparatively little is known about them in freshwater ecosystems. However, recent advances have brought the study of positive interactions in freshwater systems to a point where synthesis is warranted. In this review, we catalogue the variety of direct positive interactions described to date in freshwater ecosystems, discuss factors that could influence prevalence and impact of these interactions, and provide a framework for future research. In positive interactions, organisms exchange key resources such as nutrients, protection, transportation, or habitat to a net benefit for at least one participant. A few mutualistic relationships have received research attention to date, namely seed‐dispersing fishes, crayfishes and their ectosymbiotic cleaners, and communal‐spawning stream fishes. Similarly, only a handful of commensalisms have been studied, primarily phoretic relationships. Facilitation via ecosystem engineering has received more attention, for example habitat modification by beavers and bioturbation by salmon. It is well known that interaction outcomes vary with abiotic and biotic context. However, only a few of studies have examined context dependency in positive interactions in freshwater systems. Likewise, positive interactions incur costs as well as benefits; conceptualising interactions in terms of net cost/benefit to participants will help to clarify complex interactions. It is likely that there are many positive interactions that have yet to be discovered in freshwater systems. To identify these interactions, we encourage inductive natural history studies combined with hypotheses deduced from general ecological models. Research on positive interactions must move beyond small‐scale experiments and observational studies and adopt a cross‐scale approach. Likewise, we must progress from reducing systems to oversimplified pairwise interactions, toward studying positive interactions in broader community contexts. Positive interactions have been greatly overlooked in applied freshwater ecology, but have great potential for conservation, restoration, and aquaculture.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/fwb.13476</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2043-8627</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2189-1805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-4908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3017-5843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9938-5788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4837-7117</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-5070
ispartof Freshwater biology, 2020-04, Vol.65 (4), p.811-832
issn 0046-5070
1365-2427
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2370268171
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aquaculture
Aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic mammals
Bioturbation
Commensalism
community
conservation
context dependence
Ecological models
Ecological monitoring
ecosystem
Ecosystems
facilitation
Fresh water
Freshwater
Freshwater ecology
Freshwater ecosystems
Freshwater fishes
Freshwater mammals
Habitats
Inland water environment
Interspecific
Interspecific relationships
management
Marine systems
Mutualism
Nutrients
Observational studies
Restoration
Salmon
Spawning
Symbiosis
Terrestrial environments
Transportation
title Positive biotic interactions in freshwaters: A review and research directive
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A21%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positive%20biotic%20interactions%20in%20freshwaters:%20A%20review%20and%20research%20directive&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=Silknetter,%20Samuel&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=811&rft.epage=832&rft.pages=811-832&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fwb.13476&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2370268171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2370268171&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true