THE IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 13 UPON THE CALIFORNIA POLITICAL SYSTEM: RE-REGULATING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM

Acclaimed or condemned, the Fiscal Limits Movement achieved national prominence with passage of Proposition 13 in June, 1978, broadening its significance far beyond the California local governments whose revenues were immediately impacted. The appeal of the concept of limiting governmental revenues...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Public choice 1982-04, Vol.39 (1), p.2147
1. Verfasser:	Kirlin, John J
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adaptation Expenditures Federal aid to local governments Federal aid to states Political systems Politics
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page
container_issue	1
container_start_page	2147
container_title	Public choice
container_volume	39
creator	Kirlin, John J
description	Acclaimed or condemned, the Fiscal Limits Movement achieved national prominence with passage of Proposition 13 in June, 1978, broadening its significance far beyond the California local governments whose revenues were immediately impacted. The appeal of the concept of limiting governmental revenues or expenditures spread widely. Thirty-one of the states have now adopted one or another form of a fiscal limit (ACIR, 1980). Recent voter approval of Proposition 2 1/2 in Massachusetts demonstrates the continued allure of such policies, and the election of Ronald Reagan to the Presidency can be interpreted as part of the same movement.
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236994622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>608420161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2369946223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyk0LgjAAxvERBdnLdxjdhel87TZk6kC3MWfQSTrYQUJL8_u3Ijp3-sPz_BbAcvwQ26GDnCWwEPIi24_ceA0209QhhHAQ-RbodU4hKyVJdAVFCqUSUlRMM8Ghg2EtTd8kIQVLheKMQCkK85sBVudK0_IIFbUVzeqCaMazD2dcU5WJE1W8pFz_7A6srpfb1O6_3YJDSnWS2_dxeMzt9Gy6YR57czUuDuLYC1wX_4VettZAZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236994622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 13 UPON THE CALIFORNIA POLITICAL SYSTEM: RE-REGULATING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Kirlin, John J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirlin, John J</creatorcontrib><description>Acclaimed or condemned, the Fiscal Limits Movement achieved national prominence with passage of Proposition 13 in June, 1978, broadening its significance far beyond the California local governments whose revenues were immediately impacted. The appeal of the concept of limiting governmental revenues or expenditures spread widely. Thirty-one of the states have now adopted one or another form of a fiscal limit (ACIR, 1980). Recent voter approval of Proposition 2 1/2 in Massachusetts demonstrates the continued allure of such policies, and the election of Ronald Reagan to the Presidency can be interpreted as part of the same movement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leiden: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Expenditures ; Federal aid to local governments ; Federal aid to states ; Political systems ; Politics</subject><ispartof>Public choice, 1982-04, Vol.39 (1), p.2147</ispartof><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers Apr 1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirlin, John J</creatorcontrib><title>THE IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 13 UPON THE CALIFORNIA POLITICAL SYSTEM: RE-REGULATING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM</title><title>Public choice</title><description>Acclaimed or condemned, the Fiscal Limits Movement achieved national prominence with passage of Proposition 13 in June, 1978, broadening its significance far beyond the California local governments whose revenues were immediately impacted. The appeal of the concept of limiting governmental revenues or expenditures spread widely. Thirty-one of the states have now adopted one or another form of a fiscal limit (ACIR, 1980). Recent voter approval of Proposition 2 1/2 in Massachusetts demonstrates the continued allure of such policies, and the election of Ronald Reagan to the Presidency can be interpreted as part of the same movement.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Federal aid to local governments</subject><subject>Federal aid to states</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>0048-5829</issn><issn>1573-7101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyk0LgjAAxvERBdnLdxjdhel87TZk6kC3MWfQSTrYQUJL8_u3Ijp3-sPz_BbAcvwQ26GDnCWwEPIi24_ceA0209QhhHAQ-RbodU4hKyVJdAVFCqUSUlRMM8Ghg2EtTd8kIQVLheKMQCkK85sBVudK0_IIFbUVzeqCaMazD2dcU5WJE1W8pFz_7A6srpfb1O6_3YJDSnWS2_dxeMzt9Gy6YR57czUuDuLYC1wX_4VettZAZg</recordid><startdate>19820401</startdate><enddate>19820401</enddate><creator>Kirlin, John J</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820401</creationdate><title>THE IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 13 UPON THE CALIFORNIA POLITICAL SYSTEM: RE-REGULATING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM</title><author>Kirlin, John J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2369946223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Federal aid to local governments</topic><topic>Federal aid to states</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirlin, John J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Archive</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirlin, John J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 13 UPON THE CALIFORNIA POLITICAL SYSTEM: RE-REGULATING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM</atitle><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle><date>1982-04-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2147</spage><pages>2147-</pages><issn>0048-5829</issn><eissn>1573-7101</eissn><abstract>Acclaimed or condemned, the Fiscal Limits Movement achieved national prominence with passage of Proposition 13 in June, 1978, broadening its significance far beyond the California local governments whose revenues were immediately impacted. The appeal of the concept of limiting governmental revenues or expenditures spread widely. Thirty-one of the states have now adopted one or another form of a fiscal limit (ACIR, 1980). Recent voter approval of Proposition 2 1/2 in Massachusetts demonstrates the continued allure of such policies, and the election of Ronald Reagan to the Presidency can be interpreted as part of the same movement.</abstract><cop>Leiden</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0048-5829
ispartof	Public choice, 1982-04, Vol.39 (1), p.2147
issn	0048-5829 1573-7101
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_236994622
source	Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete
subjects	Adaptation Expenditures Federal aid to local governments Federal aid to states Political systems Politics
title	THE IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 13 UPON THE CALIFORNIA POLITICAL SYSTEM: RE-REGULATING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A18%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20IMPACTS%20OF%20PROPOSITION%2013%20UPON%20THE%20CALIFORNIA%20POLITICAL%20SYSTEM:%20RE-REGULATING%20THE%20INTERGOVERNMENTAL%20SYSTEM&rft.jtitle=Public%20choice&rft.au=Kirlin,%20John%20J&rft.date=1982-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2147&rft.pages=2147-&rft.issn=0048-5829&rft.eissn=1573-7101&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E608420161%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236994622&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true