Continuous Bioethanol Production Using Uncontrolled Process in a Laboratory Scale of Integrated Aerobic–Anaerobic Baffled Reactor

The expensiveness of bioethanol has made it unattractive and uncompetitive for alternative energy sources. Therefore, several ways to reduce the production cost of bioethanol become interesting topics, e.g. increasing its productivity. This research investigated the performance sensitivity of a labo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Periodica polytechnica. Chemical engineering. 2020-01, Vol.64 (2), p.172-178
Hauptverfasser: Margono, Margono, Kaavessina, Mujtahid, Khushairi Mohd Zahari, Mior Ahmad, Hisyam, Anwaruddin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 2
container_start_page 172
container_title Periodica polytechnica. Chemical engineering.
container_volume 64
creator Margono, Margono
Kaavessina, Mujtahid
Khushairi Mohd Zahari, Mior Ahmad
Hisyam, Anwaruddin
description The expensiveness of bioethanol has made it unattractive and uncompetitive for alternative energy sources. Therefore, several ways to reduce the production cost of bioethanol become interesting topics, e.g. increasing its productivity. This research investigated the performance sensitivity of a laboratory scale of integrated aerobic–anaerobic baffled reactor (IAABR) towards the residence time. The ethanol productivity was monitored to know the optimum residence time. The difference residence times were varied between at 19.2 h and 26.7 h by using difference volume of fermenters i.e. 10 and 100 l, respectively. Molasses as a medium was fed into a reactor containing one compartment of aerobic fermentation and three compartments of anaerobic fermentation. Total sugar and bioethanol concentration were measured for each compartment to determine the production yield to sugar consumption and bioethanol productivity. The fermentation process was conducted at 30 °C, medium pH (4-5), and feed sugar concentration of 170 g/l. The results showed that the optimum residence time in this investigation range is 19.2 h. The ethanol productivity was recorded at 4.63 g/l.h and the production yield to sugar was obtained at 46 % (equivalent to 86 % of theoretical yield) with average feeding of molasses at 0.52 l/h.
doi_str_mv 10.3311/PPch.14653
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2369697500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369697500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-4f563a4ad0bc079c45cc2d36f9a42df55e4ee9b58fa49f50805927761b823453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1KAzEQx4MoWGovPkHAm7A1m8_NsS1-FAoWbc9LNpu0kTWpye6hN8FH8A19EnetpxlmfvMf-AFwnaMpIXl-t17r_TSnnJEzMMpZITIiODsHI0QwzVjByCWYpOQqhDguGBdiBL4WwbfOd6FLcO6CaffKhwauY6g73brg4TY5v4Nbr3swhqYx9bDVJiXoPFRwpaoQVRviEb5q1RgYLFz61uz6Yc_OTAyV0z-f3zOvTj2cK2uHnBejdH94BS6sapKZ_Ncx2DzcbxZP2er5cbmYrTKNJWszahkniqoaVRoJqSnTGteEW6kori1jhhojK1ZYRaVlqEBMYiF4XhWYUEbG4OYUe4jhozOpLd9CF33_scSESy4FQ6inbk-UjiGlaGx5iO5dxWOZo3LQXA6ayz_N5BcAmnKZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369697500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuous Bioethanol Production Using Uncontrolled Process in a Laboratory Scale of Integrated Aerobic–Anaerobic Baffled Reactor</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Margono, Margono ; Kaavessina, Mujtahid ; Khushairi Mohd Zahari, Mior Ahmad ; Hisyam, Anwaruddin</creator><creatorcontrib>Margono, Margono ; Kaavessina, Mujtahid ; Khushairi Mohd Zahari, Mior Ahmad ; Hisyam, Anwaruddin</creatorcontrib><description>The expensiveness of bioethanol has made it unattractive and uncompetitive for alternative energy sources. Therefore, several ways to reduce the production cost of bioethanol become interesting topics, e.g. increasing its productivity. This research investigated the performance sensitivity of a laboratory scale of integrated aerobic–anaerobic baffled reactor (IAABR) towards the residence time. The ethanol productivity was monitored to know the optimum residence time. The difference residence times were varied between at 19.2 h and 26.7 h by using difference volume of fermenters i.e. 10 and 100 l, respectively. Molasses as a medium was fed into a reactor containing one compartment of aerobic fermentation and three compartments of anaerobic fermentation. Total sugar and bioethanol concentration were measured for each compartment to determine the production yield to sugar consumption and bioethanol productivity. The fermentation process was conducted at 30 °C, medium pH (4-5), and feed sugar concentration of 170 g/l. The results showed that the optimum residence time in this investigation range is 19.2 h. The ethanol productivity was recorded at 4.63 g/l.h and the production yield to sugar was obtained at 46 % (equivalent to 86 % of theoretical yield) with average feeding of molasses at 0.52 l/h.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0324-5853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1587-3765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3311/PPch.14653</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Budapest: Periodica Polytechnica, Budapest University of Technology and Economics</publisher><subject>Alternative energy ; Alternative energy sources ; Anaerobic processes ; Ethanol ; Fermentation ; Laboratories ; Molasses ; Production costs ; Productivity ; Residence time distribution ; Syrups &amp; sweeteners</subject><ispartof>Periodica polytechnica. Chemical engineering., 2020-01, Vol.64 (2), p.172-178</ispartof><rights>Copyright Periodica Polytechnica, Budapest University of Technology and Economics 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-4f563a4ad0bc079c45cc2d36f9a42df55e4ee9b58fa49f50805927761b823453</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Margono, Margono</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaavessina, Mujtahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khushairi Mohd Zahari, Mior Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hisyam, Anwaruddin</creatorcontrib><title>Continuous Bioethanol Production Using Uncontrolled Process in a Laboratory Scale of Integrated Aerobic–Anaerobic Baffled Reactor</title><title>Periodica polytechnica. Chemical engineering.</title><description>The expensiveness of bioethanol has made it unattractive and uncompetitive for alternative energy sources. Therefore, several ways to reduce the production cost of bioethanol become interesting topics, e.g. increasing its productivity. This research investigated the performance sensitivity of a laboratory scale of integrated aerobic–anaerobic baffled reactor (IAABR) towards the residence time. The ethanol productivity was monitored to know the optimum residence time. The difference residence times were varied between at 19.2 h and 26.7 h by using difference volume of fermenters i.e. 10 and 100 l, respectively. Molasses as a medium was fed into a reactor containing one compartment of aerobic fermentation and three compartments of anaerobic fermentation. Total sugar and bioethanol concentration were measured for each compartment to determine the production yield to sugar consumption and bioethanol productivity. The fermentation process was conducted at 30 °C, medium pH (4-5), and feed sugar concentration of 170 g/l. The results showed that the optimum residence time in this investigation range is 19.2 h. The ethanol productivity was recorded at 4.63 g/l.h and the production yield to sugar was obtained at 46 % (equivalent to 86 % of theoretical yield) with average feeding of molasses at 0.52 l/h.</description><subject>Alternative energy</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Anaerobic processes</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Molasses</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Residence time distribution</subject><subject>Syrups &amp; sweeteners</subject><issn>0324-5853</issn><issn>1587-3765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotkM1KAzEQx4MoWGovPkHAm7A1m8_NsS1-FAoWbc9LNpu0kTWpye6hN8FH8A19EnetpxlmfvMf-AFwnaMpIXl-t17r_TSnnJEzMMpZITIiODsHI0QwzVjByCWYpOQqhDguGBdiBL4WwbfOd6FLcO6CaffKhwauY6g73brg4TY5v4Nbr3swhqYx9bDVJiXoPFRwpaoQVRviEb5q1RgYLFz61uz6Yc_OTAyV0z-f3zOvTj2cK2uHnBejdH94BS6sapKZ_Ncx2DzcbxZP2er5cbmYrTKNJWszahkniqoaVRoJqSnTGteEW6kori1jhhojK1ZYRaVlqEBMYiF4XhWYUEbG4OYUe4jhozOpLd9CF33_scSESy4FQ6inbk-UjiGlaGx5iO5dxWOZo3LQXA6ayz_N5BcAmnKZ</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Margono, Margono</creator><creator>Kaavessina, Mujtahid</creator><creator>Khushairi Mohd Zahari, Mior Ahmad</creator><creator>Hisyam, Anwaruddin</creator><general>Periodica Polytechnica, Budapest University of Technology and Economics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Continuous Bioethanol Production Using Uncontrolled Process in a Laboratory Scale of Integrated Aerobic–Anaerobic Baffled Reactor</title><author>Margono, Margono ; Kaavessina, Mujtahid ; Khushairi Mohd Zahari, Mior Ahmad ; Hisyam, Anwaruddin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-4f563a4ad0bc079c45cc2d36f9a42df55e4ee9b58fa49f50805927761b823453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Anaerobic processes</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Molasses</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Residence time distribution</topic><topic>Syrups &amp; sweeteners</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Margono, Margono</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaavessina, Mujtahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khushairi Mohd Zahari, Mior Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hisyam, Anwaruddin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Periodica polytechnica. Chemical engineering.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Margono, Margono</au><au>Kaavessina, Mujtahid</au><au>Khushairi Mohd Zahari, Mior Ahmad</au><au>Hisyam, Anwaruddin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuous Bioethanol Production Using Uncontrolled Process in a Laboratory Scale of Integrated Aerobic–Anaerobic Baffled Reactor</atitle><jtitle>Periodica polytechnica. Chemical engineering.</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>172-178</pages><issn>0324-5853</issn><eissn>1587-3765</eissn><abstract>The expensiveness of bioethanol has made it unattractive and uncompetitive for alternative energy sources. Therefore, several ways to reduce the production cost of bioethanol become interesting topics, e.g. increasing its productivity. This research investigated the performance sensitivity of a laboratory scale of integrated aerobic–anaerobic baffled reactor (IAABR) towards the residence time. The ethanol productivity was monitored to know the optimum residence time. The difference residence times were varied between at 19.2 h and 26.7 h by using difference volume of fermenters i.e. 10 and 100 l, respectively. Molasses as a medium was fed into a reactor containing one compartment of aerobic fermentation and three compartments of anaerobic fermentation. Total sugar and bioethanol concentration were measured for each compartment to determine the production yield to sugar consumption and bioethanol productivity. The fermentation process was conducted at 30 °C, medium pH (4-5), and feed sugar concentration of 170 g/l. The results showed that the optimum residence time in this investigation range is 19.2 h. The ethanol productivity was recorded at 4.63 g/l.h and the production yield to sugar was obtained at 46 % (equivalent to 86 % of theoretical yield) with average feeding of molasses at 0.52 l/h.</abstract><cop>Budapest</cop><pub>Periodica Polytechnica, Budapest University of Technology and Economics</pub><doi>10.3311/PPch.14653</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0324-5853
ispartof Periodica polytechnica. Chemical engineering., 2020-01, Vol.64 (2), p.172-178
issn 0324-5853
1587-3765
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2369697500
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Alternative energy
Alternative energy sources
Anaerobic processes
Ethanol
Fermentation
Laboratories
Molasses
Production costs
Productivity
Residence time distribution
Syrups & sweeteners
title Continuous Bioethanol Production Using Uncontrolled Process in a Laboratory Scale of Integrated Aerobic–Anaerobic Baffled Reactor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T10%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuous%20Bioethanol%20Production%20Using%20Uncontrolled%20Process%20in%20a%20Laboratory%20Scale%20of%20Integrated%20Aerobic%E2%80%93Anaerobic%20Baffled%20Reactor&rft.jtitle=Periodica%20polytechnica.%20Chemical%20engineering.&rft.au=Margono,%20Margono&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=172-178&rft.issn=0324-5853&rft.eissn=1587-3765&rft_id=info:doi/10.3311/PPch.14653&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2369697500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369697500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true