Interspecific plant functional variation prevails over intraspecific variation in driving spider beta diversity
1. Non‐trophic interactions between plants and animals can affect community structure and species trait composition. However, it is unclear how changes in intra‐ and interspecific morphological traits of plant species affect non‐trophic interactions at a metacommunity scale. Additionally, whether pl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological entomology 2020-04, Vol.45 (2), p.202-212 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 212 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 202 |
container_title | Ecological entomology |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Gusmão, Paulo H. P. Sena, Pedro H. A. Bernabé, Tiago N. Ouchi‐Melo, Lilian S. Gonçalves‐Souza, Thiago |
description | 1. Non‐trophic interactions between plants and animals can affect community structure and species trait composition. However, it is unclear how changes in intra‐ and interspecific morphological traits of plant species affect non‐trophic interactions at a metacommunity scale. Additionally, whether plant evolutionary history determines taxonomic and functional diversity of plant‐dwelling predators is an open question.
2. To address these gaps, this study used a published dataset with spiders dwelling exclusively on bromeliads to investigate if: (i) intra‐ and interspecific variability in host plant morphological traits affects spider taxonomic and functional diversity; and (ii) bromeliad trait evolution determines present‐day patterns of spider trait diversity.
3. Spider and bromeliad traits were measured, and a new statistical framework was used to quantify the response of spider beta diversity to intra‐ and interspecific variation in bromeliad traits. In addition, bromeliad traits were decomposed across its phylogenetic tree to check whether the current variation in morphological traits of bromeliads is a result of either ancestral or recent diversification.
4. Bromeliad intraspecific variation did not affect spiders, but leaf length variation between bromeliad species had a positive effect on spider functional beta diversity. Interestingly, the most ancestral split between two subfamilies explained most of the variation in bromeliad species, which suggests that spider functional diversity could represent an outcome of bromeliad evolutionary history.
5. Overall, the results of this study suggest that interactions between plants and organisms that do not feed directly on their tissues could be shaped by plant evolutionary history, which in turn suggests that non‐trophic interactions can be maintained over time.
Whether plant functional trait variation and its evolutionary history determine taxonomic and functional diversity of plant‐dwelling predators is an open question.
This study found that interspecific variation in bromeliad leaf length has a positive effect on spider functional beta diversity.
The results suggest that interactions between plants and organisms that do not feed directly on their tissues, such as spiders, could be shaped by plant evolutionary history. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/een.12789 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2369497238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369497238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-890a80f60db03794fd9a5cb98c9a03ac79d24967352edde1d55276df504096923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAk8i2k2R3szlKqVoQveh5SZOspKzZNUlX-u9NP6gnwbnMHJ53mHkQuiYwIammxrgJobwSJ2hEWFlklBFyikbAgGelyMtzdBHCCoBQUYoR6hYuGh96o2xjFe5b6SJu1k5F2znZ4kF6K7cz7r0ZpG0D7gbjsXXRy2Psl7IOa28H6z5w6K1O5NJEibVNoWDj5hKdNbIN5urQx-j9Yf42e8qeXx8Xs_vnTFHBRVYJkBU0JeglMC7yRgtZqKWolJDApOJC01yUnBXUaG2ILgrKS90UkEP6i7Ixutnv7X33tTYh1qtu7dNHoaYseRCcsipRt3tK-S4Eb5q69_ZT-k1NoN76rJPPeuczsdWe_TbLrgnKGqfMkQeAnIsyB5omIDMbdz5m3drFFL37fzTR0wNtW7P5-6J6Pn_Zn_YDLBeZsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369497238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interspecific plant functional variation prevails over intraspecific variation in driving spider beta diversity</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Gusmão, Paulo H. P. ; Sena, Pedro H. A. ; Bernabé, Tiago N. ; Ouchi‐Melo, Lilian S. ; Gonçalves‐Souza, Thiago</creator><creatorcontrib>Gusmão, Paulo H. P. ; Sena, Pedro H. A. ; Bernabé, Tiago N. ; Ouchi‐Melo, Lilian S. ; Gonçalves‐Souza, Thiago</creatorcontrib><description>1. Non‐trophic interactions between plants and animals can affect community structure and species trait composition. However, it is unclear how changes in intra‐ and interspecific morphological traits of plant species affect non‐trophic interactions at a metacommunity scale. Additionally, whether plant evolutionary history determines taxonomic and functional diversity of plant‐dwelling predators is an open question.
2. To address these gaps, this study used a published dataset with spiders dwelling exclusively on bromeliads to investigate if: (i) intra‐ and interspecific variability in host plant morphological traits affects spider taxonomic and functional diversity; and (ii) bromeliad trait evolution determines present‐day patterns of spider trait diversity.
3. Spider and bromeliad traits were measured, and a new statistical framework was used to quantify the response of spider beta diversity to intra‐ and interspecific variation in bromeliad traits. In addition, bromeliad traits were decomposed across its phylogenetic tree to check whether the current variation in morphological traits of bromeliads is a result of either ancestral or recent diversification.
4. Bromeliad intraspecific variation did not affect spiders, but leaf length variation between bromeliad species had a positive effect on spider functional beta diversity. Interestingly, the most ancestral split between two subfamilies explained most of the variation in bromeliad species, which suggests that spider functional diversity could represent an outcome of bromeliad evolutionary history.
5. Overall, the results of this study suggest that interactions between plants and organisms that do not feed directly on their tissues could be shaped by plant evolutionary history, which in turn suggests that non‐trophic interactions can be maintained over time.
Whether plant functional trait variation and its evolutionary history determine taxonomic and functional diversity of plant‐dwelling predators is an open question.
This study found that interspecific variation in bromeliad leaf length has a positive effect on spider functional beta diversity.
The results suggest that interactions between plants and organisms that do not feed directly on their tissues, such as spiders, could be shaped by plant evolutionary history.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-6946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2311</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/een.12789</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Arthropods ; biotic filter ; bromeliads ; Community structure ; Entomology ; Evolution ; evolutionary history ; Herbivores ; Host plants ; Interspecific ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Morphology ; non‐trophic interactions ; Phylogeny ; Plant diversity ; Predators ; Science & Technology ; Species ; Species diversity ; Spiders ; Taxonomy ; Trophic relationships ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Ecological entomology, 2020-04, Vol.45 (2), p.202-212</ispartof><rights>2019 The Royal Entomological Society</rights><rights>2020 The Royal Entomological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000479640200001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-890a80f60db03794fd9a5cb98c9a03ac79d24967352edde1d55276df504096923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-890a80f60db03794fd9a5cb98c9a03ac79d24967352edde1d55276df504096923</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8471-7479 ; 0000-0001-5820-2076</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Feen.12789$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Feen.12789$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,28255,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gusmão, Paulo H. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sena, Pedro H. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernabé, Tiago N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouchi‐Melo, Lilian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves‐Souza, Thiago</creatorcontrib><title>Interspecific plant functional variation prevails over intraspecific variation in driving spider beta diversity</title><title>Ecological entomology</title><addtitle>ECOL ENTOMOL</addtitle><description>1. Non‐trophic interactions between plants and animals can affect community structure and species trait composition. However, it is unclear how changes in intra‐ and interspecific morphological traits of plant species affect non‐trophic interactions at a metacommunity scale. Additionally, whether plant evolutionary history determines taxonomic and functional diversity of plant‐dwelling predators is an open question.
2. To address these gaps, this study used a published dataset with spiders dwelling exclusively on bromeliads to investigate if: (i) intra‐ and interspecific variability in host plant morphological traits affects spider taxonomic and functional diversity; and (ii) bromeliad trait evolution determines present‐day patterns of spider trait diversity.
3. Spider and bromeliad traits were measured, and a new statistical framework was used to quantify the response of spider beta diversity to intra‐ and interspecific variation in bromeliad traits. In addition, bromeliad traits were decomposed across its phylogenetic tree to check whether the current variation in morphological traits of bromeliads is a result of either ancestral or recent diversification.
4. Bromeliad intraspecific variation did not affect spiders, but leaf length variation between bromeliad species had a positive effect on spider functional beta diversity. Interestingly, the most ancestral split between two subfamilies explained most of the variation in bromeliad species, which suggests that spider functional diversity could represent an outcome of bromeliad evolutionary history.
5. Overall, the results of this study suggest that interactions between plants and organisms that do not feed directly on their tissues could be shaped by plant evolutionary history, which in turn suggests that non‐trophic interactions can be maintained over time.
Whether plant functional trait variation and its evolutionary history determine taxonomic and functional diversity of plant‐dwelling predators is an open question.
This study found that interspecific variation in bromeliad leaf length has a positive effect on spider functional beta diversity.
The results suggest that interactions between plants and organisms that do not feed directly on their tissues, such as spiders, could be shaped by plant evolutionary history.</description><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>biotic filter</subject><subject>bromeliads</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>evolutionary history</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>non‐trophic interactions</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Spiders</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Trophic relationships</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>0307-6946</issn><issn>1365-2311</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAk8i2k2R3szlKqVoQveh5SZOspKzZNUlX-u9NP6gnwbnMHJ53mHkQuiYwIammxrgJobwSJ2hEWFlklBFyikbAgGelyMtzdBHCCoBQUYoR6hYuGh96o2xjFe5b6SJu1k5F2znZ4kF6K7cz7r0ZpG0D7gbjsXXRy2Psl7IOa28H6z5w6K1O5NJEibVNoWDj5hKdNbIN5urQx-j9Yf42e8qeXx8Xs_vnTFHBRVYJkBU0JeglMC7yRgtZqKWolJDApOJC01yUnBXUaG2ILgrKS90UkEP6i7Ixutnv7X33tTYh1qtu7dNHoaYseRCcsipRt3tK-S4Eb5q69_ZT-k1NoN76rJPPeuczsdWe_TbLrgnKGqfMkQeAnIsyB5omIDMbdz5m3drFFL37fzTR0wNtW7P5-6J6Pn_Zn_YDLBeZsg</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Gusmão, Paulo H. P.</creator><creator>Sena, Pedro H. A.</creator><creator>Bernabé, Tiago N.</creator><creator>Ouchi‐Melo, Lilian S.</creator><creator>Gonçalves‐Souza, Thiago</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8471-7479</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5820-2076</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Interspecific plant functional variation prevails over intraspecific variation in driving spider beta diversity</title><author>Gusmão, Paulo H. P. ; Sena, Pedro H. A. ; Bernabé, Tiago N. ; Ouchi‐Melo, Lilian S. ; Gonçalves‐Souza, Thiago</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-890a80f60db03794fd9a5cb98c9a03ac79d24967352edde1d55276df504096923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>biotic filter</topic><topic>bromeliads</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>evolutionary history</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>non‐trophic interactions</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Spiders</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Trophic relationships</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gusmão, Paulo H. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sena, Pedro H. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernabé, Tiago N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouchi‐Melo, Lilian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves‐Souza, Thiago</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gusmão, Paulo H. P.</au><au>Sena, Pedro H. A.</au><au>Bernabé, Tiago N.</au><au>Ouchi‐Melo, Lilian S.</au><au>Gonçalves‐Souza, Thiago</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interspecific plant functional variation prevails over intraspecific variation in driving spider beta diversity</atitle><jtitle>Ecological entomology</jtitle><stitle>ECOL ENTOMOL</stitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>202-212</pages><issn>0307-6946</issn><eissn>1365-2311</eissn><abstract>1. Non‐trophic interactions between plants and animals can affect community structure and species trait composition. However, it is unclear how changes in intra‐ and interspecific morphological traits of plant species affect non‐trophic interactions at a metacommunity scale. Additionally, whether plant evolutionary history determines taxonomic and functional diversity of plant‐dwelling predators is an open question.
2. To address these gaps, this study used a published dataset with spiders dwelling exclusively on bromeliads to investigate if: (i) intra‐ and interspecific variability in host plant morphological traits affects spider taxonomic and functional diversity; and (ii) bromeliad trait evolution determines present‐day patterns of spider trait diversity.
3. Spider and bromeliad traits were measured, and a new statistical framework was used to quantify the response of spider beta diversity to intra‐ and interspecific variation in bromeliad traits. In addition, bromeliad traits were decomposed across its phylogenetic tree to check whether the current variation in morphological traits of bromeliads is a result of either ancestral or recent diversification.
4. Bromeliad intraspecific variation did not affect spiders, but leaf length variation between bromeliad species had a positive effect on spider functional beta diversity. Interestingly, the most ancestral split between two subfamilies explained most of the variation in bromeliad species, which suggests that spider functional diversity could represent an outcome of bromeliad evolutionary history.
5. Overall, the results of this study suggest that interactions between plants and organisms that do not feed directly on their tissues could be shaped by plant evolutionary history, which in turn suggests that non‐trophic interactions can be maintained over time.
Whether plant functional trait variation and its evolutionary history determine taxonomic and functional diversity of plant‐dwelling predators is an open question.
This study found that interspecific variation in bromeliad leaf length has a positive effect on spider functional beta diversity.
The results suggest that interactions between plants and organisms that do not feed directly on their tissues, such as spiders, could be shaped by plant evolutionary history.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/een.12789</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8471-7479</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5820-2076</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0307-6946 |
ispartof | Ecological entomology, 2020-04, Vol.45 (2), p.202-212 |
issn | 0307-6946 1365-2311 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2369497238 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Arthropods biotic filter bromeliads Community structure Entomology Evolution evolutionary history Herbivores Host plants Interspecific Life Sciences & Biomedicine Morphology non‐trophic interactions Phylogeny Plant diversity Predators Science & Technology Species Species diversity Spiders Taxonomy Trophic relationships Variation |
title | Interspecific plant functional variation prevails over intraspecific variation in driving spider beta diversity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T08%3A12%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interspecific%20plant%20functional%20variation%20prevails%20over%20intraspecific%20variation%20in%20driving%20spider%20beta%20diversity&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20entomology&rft.au=Gusm%C3%A3o,%20Paulo%20H.%20P.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=202-212&rft.issn=0307-6946&rft.eissn=1365-2311&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/een.12789&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2369497238%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369497238&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |