Economic development incentive program deadweight: The role of program design features, firm characteristics, and location
This paper examines the effectiveness of state economic development incentive programs in stimulating new business activity. It reviews literature that identifies factors that potentially influence the effectiveness of incentives. Empirical work draws on a 2018 survey of approximately 150 firms that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Growth and change 2020-03, Vol.51 (1), p.58-78 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 78 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 58 |
container_title | Growth and change |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Rephann, Terance J. |
description | This paper examines the effectiveness of state economic development incentive programs in stimulating new business activity. It reviews literature that identifies factors that potentially influence the effectiveness of incentives. Empirical work draws on a 2018 survey of approximately 150 firms that received at least one award for startup, expansion, or relocation purposes during the period SFY2010–SFY2016 from a state economic development incentive program (i.e., grant, tax credit, loan, equity investment) offered by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The paper evaluates the role of program design features (e.g., discretionary vs. automatic, relative size of incentive), firm characteristics (e.g., size of firm, industry), and locational variables (e.g., state boundary location, rurality) on firm assessments of the role of incentives in business growth decisions. It finds that firms that receive up‐front or discretionary program awards and undertake multistate site searches are less likely to report that the incentive was not needed for their project to succeed. These results suggest that automatic, back‐loaded award programs, and programs that fund noncompetitive projects are less likely to affect firm location and expansion decisions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/grow.12363 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2369137144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369137144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-efb509ac49d581ba06a88a54748642f792fc93f3500930c112182f95170d3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsbnyDgTpya21ziTkqtQqGgBZchzSTTlJlJTaYt7dObOi5ceTaHc_4vFz4AbjEa4ViPlXf7ESY0o2dggFlWJISk-TkYIITzhBU4vQRXIaxRnBljA3CcKNe6xipY6p2u3abRbQdtq2KzOw033lVeNjGV5V7batU9wcVKQ-9qDZ35kwdbtdBo2W29Dg_QWN9AtZJeqk57Gzqr4la2Jaydkp117TW4MLIO-ua3D8HHy2Qxfk1m8-nb-HmWKMIpTbRZpohLxXiZFngpUSaLQqYsZ0XGiMk5MYpTQ1OEOEUKY4ILYniKc1TG9RDc9bfGn35tdejE2m19Gx8UURPHNI8iInXfU8q7ELw2YuNtI_1BYCROZsXJrPgxG2Hcw3tb68M_pJi-zz_7M98LxXyp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369137144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic development incentive program deadweight: The role of program design features, firm characteristics, and location</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Rephann, Terance J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rephann, Terance J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the effectiveness of state economic development incentive programs in stimulating new business activity. It reviews literature that identifies factors that potentially influence the effectiveness of incentives. Empirical work draws on a 2018 survey of approximately 150 firms that received at least one award for startup, expansion, or relocation purposes during the period SFY2010–SFY2016 from a state economic development incentive program (i.e., grant, tax credit, loan, equity investment) offered by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The paper evaluates the role of program design features (e.g., discretionary vs. automatic, relative size of incentive), firm characteristics (e.g., size of firm, industry), and locational variables (e.g., state boundary location, rurality) on firm assessments of the role of incentives in business growth decisions. It finds that firms that receive up‐front or discretionary program awards and undertake multistate site searches are less likely to report that the incentive was not needed for their project to succeed. These results suggest that automatic, back‐loaded award programs, and programs that fund noncompetitive projects are less likely to affect firm location and expansion decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-4815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/grow.12363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lexington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Awards ; Business ; Business growth ; Decision making ; Economic development ; Economic policy ; Incentives ; Literature reviews ; Relocation ; Rural areas ; Rurality ; Startups ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Growth and change, 2020-03, Vol.51 (1), p.58-78</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-efb509ac49d581ba06a88a54748642f792fc93f3500930c112182f95170d3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4389-3617</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgrow.12363$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgrow.12363$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27865,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rephann, Terance J.</creatorcontrib><title>Economic development incentive program deadweight: The role of program design features, firm characteristics, and location</title><title>Growth and change</title><description>This paper examines the effectiveness of state economic development incentive programs in stimulating new business activity. It reviews literature that identifies factors that potentially influence the effectiveness of incentives. Empirical work draws on a 2018 survey of approximately 150 firms that received at least one award for startup, expansion, or relocation purposes during the period SFY2010–SFY2016 from a state economic development incentive program (i.e., grant, tax credit, loan, equity investment) offered by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The paper evaluates the role of program design features (e.g., discretionary vs. automatic, relative size of incentive), firm characteristics (e.g., size of firm, industry), and locational variables (e.g., state boundary location, rurality) on firm assessments of the role of incentives in business growth decisions. It finds that firms that receive up‐front or discretionary program awards and undertake multistate site searches are less likely to report that the incentive was not needed for their project to succeed. These results suggest that automatic, back‐loaded award programs, and programs that fund noncompetitive projects are less likely to affect firm location and expansion decisions.</description><subject>Awards</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business growth</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Relocation</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rurality</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0017-4815</issn><issn>1468-2257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsbnyDgTpya21ziTkqtQqGgBZchzSTTlJlJTaYt7dObOi5ceTaHc_4vFz4AbjEa4ViPlXf7ESY0o2dggFlWJISk-TkYIITzhBU4vQRXIaxRnBljA3CcKNe6xipY6p2u3abRbQdtq2KzOw033lVeNjGV5V7batU9wcVKQ-9qDZ35kwdbtdBo2W29Dg_QWN9AtZJeqk57Gzqr4la2Jaydkp117TW4MLIO-ua3D8HHy2Qxfk1m8-nb-HmWKMIpTbRZpohLxXiZFngpUSaLQqYsZ0XGiMk5MYpTQ1OEOEUKY4ILYniKc1TG9RDc9bfGn35tdejE2m19Gx8UURPHNI8iInXfU8q7ELw2YuNtI_1BYCROZsXJrPgxG2Hcw3tb68M_pJi-zz_7M98LxXyp</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Rephann, Terance J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-3617</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Economic development incentive program deadweight: The role of program design features, firm characteristics, and location</title><author>Rephann, Terance J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-efb509ac49d581ba06a88a54748642f792fc93f3500930c112182f95170d3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Awards</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business growth</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Relocation</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rurality</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rephann, Terance J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Growth and change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rephann, Terance J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic development incentive program deadweight: The role of program design features, firm characteristics, and location</atitle><jtitle>Growth and change</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>58-78</pages><issn>0017-4815</issn><eissn>1468-2257</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the effectiveness of state economic development incentive programs in stimulating new business activity. It reviews literature that identifies factors that potentially influence the effectiveness of incentives. Empirical work draws on a 2018 survey of approximately 150 firms that received at least one award for startup, expansion, or relocation purposes during the period SFY2010–SFY2016 from a state economic development incentive program (i.e., grant, tax credit, loan, equity investment) offered by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The paper evaluates the role of program design features (e.g., discretionary vs. automatic, relative size of incentive), firm characteristics (e.g., size of firm, industry), and locational variables (e.g., state boundary location, rurality) on firm assessments of the role of incentives in business growth decisions. It finds that firms that receive up‐front or discretionary program awards and undertake multistate site searches are less likely to report that the incentive was not needed for their project to succeed. These results suggest that automatic, back‐loaded award programs, and programs that fund noncompetitive projects are less likely to affect firm location and expansion decisions.</abstract><cop>Lexington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/grow.12363</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-3617</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-4815 |
ispartof | Growth and change, 2020-03, Vol.51 (1), p.58-78 |
issn | 0017-4815 1468-2257 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2369137144 |
source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Awards Business Business growth Decision making Economic development Economic policy Incentives Literature reviews Relocation Rural areas Rurality Startups Taxation |
title | Economic development incentive program deadweight: The role of program design features, firm characteristics, and location |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A06%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20development%20incentive%20program%20deadweight:%20The%20role%20of%20program%20design%20features,%20firm%20characteristics,%20and%20location&rft.jtitle=Growth%20and%20change&rft.au=Rephann,%20Terance%20J.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=58-78&rft.issn=0017-4815&rft.eissn=1468-2257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/grow.12363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2369137144%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369137144&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |