Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon
Effects of riparian vegetation on fluvial sediment dynamics depend on morphological traits of the constituent species. Determining the effects of different morphological guilds on sedimentation rates, as influenced by multiple aspects of dam operations, can help identify viable strategies for stream...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | River research and applications 2020-03, Vol.36 (3), p.410-421 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 421 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 410 |
container_title | River research and applications |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Butterfield, Bradley J. Grams, Paul E. Durning, Laura E. Hazel, Joseph Palmquist, Emily C. Ralston, Barbara E. Sankey, Joel B. |
description | Effects of riparian vegetation on fluvial sediment dynamics depend on morphological traits of the constituent species. Determining the effects of different morphological guilds on sedimentation rates, as influenced by multiple aspects of dam operations, can help identify viable strategies for streamflow and vegetation management to achieve riparian resource goals. Plants of increasing size and branching density or complexity have been found to have greater effects on sedimentation in free‐flowing systems; however, this relationship could differ in regulated rivers. We tested the hypothesis that plant guilds of increasing height and branching complexity would be positively associated with sedimentation rates on 23 sandbars deposited in zones of recirculating flow (eddies) along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. We used an image‐based vegetation classification and digital elevation models from annual topographic surveys to track associations between six plant morphological guilds and topographic change over 5 years. Vegetation had significant associations with deposition after accounting for geomorphic setting, but the ordinal guild scale was not positively correlated with deposition magnitude. Instead, low‐statured rhizomatous and herbaceous guilds were particularly effective at capturing sediment in the separation zone of sandbars, whereas tall herbs and large shrubs were most effective at capturing sediment in reattachment zones. These nuanced interactions between geomorphic position and morphological guild may be a direct consequence of flow regulation through modifications to physical deposition and erosion processes. Flow regulation may also select for a narrow subset of morphological guilds, reducing the diversity of vegetation feedbacks on sedimentation and emphasizing geomorphic drivers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rra.3589 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2369025927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369025927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-4a0d075d625bb164d248fb7b2104cf8b1aad752c42d9ba410184bf73eb15fd423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10N9KwzAUBvAiCs4p-AgBb7zpTNKkfy5H0SkMhKHX5aRJu4w0qUk72SP41nZOvPMqh5wf34Evim4JXhCM6YP3sEh4XpxFM8ITHhOWZud_My8uo6sQdhiTLC_yWfS1DMHVGgbtbEBCDZ9KWeR1D16DRb0BO6DO-X7rjGt1DQa1ozYyILASNWbc6-krKKk7NUl5sNDpetoaZ1s0bBXyqh0NDEqicorwIB3a6L3ySFu08seUEuzB2evoogET1M3vO4_enx7fyud4_bp6KZfruKZFUsQMsMQZlynlQpCUScryRmSCEszqJhcEQGac1ozKQgAjmORMNFmiBOGNZDSZR3en3N67j1GFodq50dvpZEWTtMCUFzSb1P1J1d6F4FVT9V534A8VwdWx6GoqujoWPdH4RD-1UYd_XbXZLH_8N9B7gc8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369025927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Butterfield, Bradley J. ; Grams, Paul E. ; Durning, Laura E. ; Hazel, Joseph ; Palmquist, Emily C. ; Ralston, Barbara E. ; Sankey, Joel B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Butterfield, Bradley J. ; Grams, Paul E. ; Durning, Laura E. ; Hazel, Joseph ; Palmquist, Emily C. ; Ralston, Barbara E. ; Sankey, Joel B.</creatorcontrib><description>Effects of riparian vegetation on fluvial sediment dynamics depend on morphological traits of the constituent species. Determining the effects of different morphological guilds on sedimentation rates, as influenced by multiple aspects of dam operations, can help identify viable strategies for streamflow and vegetation management to achieve riparian resource goals. Plants of increasing size and branching density or complexity have been found to have greater effects on sedimentation in free‐flowing systems; however, this relationship could differ in regulated rivers. We tested the hypothesis that plant guilds of increasing height and branching complexity would be positively associated with sedimentation rates on 23 sandbars deposited in zones of recirculating flow (eddies) along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. We used an image‐based vegetation classification and digital elevation models from annual topographic surveys to track associations between six plant morphological guilds and topographic change over 5 years. Vegetation had significant associations with deposition after accounting for geomorphic setting, but the ordinal guild scale was not positively correlated with deposition magnitude. Instead, low‐statured rhizomatous and herbaceous guilds were particularly effective at capturing sediment in the separation zone of sandbars, whereas tall herbs and large shrubs were most effective at capturing sediment in reattachment zones. These nuanced interactions between geomorphic position and morphological guild may be a direct consequence of flow regulation through modifications to physical deposition and erosion processes. Flow regulation may also select for a narrow subset of morphological guilds, reducing the diversity of vegetation feedbacks on sedimentation and emphasizing geomorphic drivers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.3589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>biotic feedbacks ; Branching ; Canyons ; Complexity ; Deposition ; Digital Elevation Models ; Digital imaging ; Eddies ; environmental flows ; Fluvial sediments ; Geomorphology ; Guilds ; hydropeaking ; Image classification ; Morphology ; Plants ; Plants (botany) ; Regulated rivers ; Resource management ; Riparian vegetation ; River regulations ; Rivers ; Sand bars ; Sediment ; sediment deposition ; Sediment dynamics ; Sedimentation ; Sedimentation & deposition ; Sedimentation rates ; Sediments ; Shrubs ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Topographic maps ; Topographic surveying ; Topographic surveys ; Topography ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2020-03, Vol.36 (3), p.410-421</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-4a0d075d625bb164d248fb7b2104cf8b1aad752c42d9ba410184bf73eb15fd423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-4a0d075d625bb164d248fb7b2104cf8b1aad752c42d9ba410184bf73eb15fd423</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0974-9811 ; 0000-0003-1069-2154</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.3589$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.3589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butterfield, Bradley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grams, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durning, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazel, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmquist, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralston, Barbara E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankey, Joel B.</creatorcontrib><title>Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon</title><title>River research and applications</title><description>Effects of riparian vegetation on fluvial sediment dynamics depend on morphological traits of the constituent species. Determining the effects of different morphological guilds on sedimentation rates, as influenced by multiple aspects of dam operations, can help identify viable strategies for streamflow and vegetation management to achieve riparian resource goals. Plants of increasing size and branching density or complexity have been found to have greater effects on sedimentation in free‐flowing systems; however, this relationship could differ in regulated rivers. We tested the hypothesis that plant guilds of increasing height and branching complexity would be positively associated with sedimentation rates on 23 sandbars deposited in zones of recirculating flow (eddies) along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. We used an image‐based vegetation classification and digital elevation models from annual topographic surveys to track associations between six plant morphological guilds and topographic change over 5 years. Vegetation had significant associations with deposition after accounting for geomorphic setting, but the ordinal guild scale was not positively correlated with deposition magnitude. Instead, low‐statured rhizomatous and herbaceous guilds were particularly effective at capturing sediment in the separation zone of sandbars, whereas tall herbs and large shrubs were most effective at capturing sediment in reattachment zones. These nuanced interactions between geomorphic position and morphological guild may be a direct consequence of flow regulation through modifications to physical deposition and erosion processes. Flow regulation may also select for a narrow subset of morphological guilds, reducing the diversity of vegetation feedbacks on sedimentation and emphasizing geomorphic drivers.</description><subject>biotic feedbacks</subject><subject>Branching</subject><subject>Canyons</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Digital Elevation Models</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Eddies</subject><subject>environmental flows</subject><subject>Fluvial sediments</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Guilds</subject><subject>hydropeaking</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Regulated rivers</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Riparian vegetation</subject><subject>River regulations</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sand bars</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>sediment deposition</subject><subject>Sediment dynamics</subject><subject>Sedimentation</subject><subject>Sedimentation & deposition</subject><subject>Sedimentation rates</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Topographic maps</subject><subject>Topographic surveying</subject><subject>Topographic surveys</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10N9KwzAUBvAiCs4p-AgBb7zpTNKkfy5H0SkMhKHX5aRJu4w0qUk72SP41nZOvPMqh5wf34Evim4JXhCM6YP3sEh4XpxFM8ITHhOWZud_My8uo6sQdhiTLC_yWfS1DMHVGgbtbEBCDZ9KWeR1D16DRb0BO6DO-X7rjGt1DQa1ozYyILASNWbc6-krKKk7NUl5sNDpetoaZ1s0bBXyqh0NDEqicorwIB3a6L3ySFu08seUEuzB2evoogET1M3vO4_enx7fyud4_bp6KZfruKZFUsQMsMQZlynlQpCUScryRmSCEszqJhcEQGac1ozKQgAjmORMNFmiBOGNZDSZR3en3N67j1GFodq50dvpZEWTtMCUFzSb1P1J1d6F4FVT9V534A8VwdWx6GoqujoWPdH4RD-1UYd_XbXZLH_8N9B7gc8</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Butterfield, Bradley J.</creator><creator>Grams, Paul E.</creator><creator>Durning, Laura E.</creator><creator>Hazel, Joseph</creator><creator>Palmquist, Emily C.</creator><creator>Ralston, Barbara E.</creator><creator>Sankey, Joel B.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-9811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-2154</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon</title><author>Butterfield, Bradley J. ; Grams, Paul E. ; Durning, Laura E. ; Hazel, Joseph ; Palmquist, Emily C. ; Ralston, Barbara E. ; Sankey, Joel B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-4a0d075d625bb164d248fb7b2104cf8b1aad752c42d9ba410184bf73eb15fd423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>biotic feedbacks</topic><topic>Branching</topic><topic>Canyons</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Digital Elevation Models</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Eddies</topic><topic>environmental flows</topic><topic>Fluvial sediments</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Guilds</topic><topic>hydropeaking</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Regulated rivers</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Riparian vegetation</topic><topic>River regulations</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sand bars</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>sediment deposition</topic><topic>Sediment dynamics</topic><topic>Sedimentation</topic><topic>Sedimentation & deposition</topic><topic>Sedimentation rates</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Topographic maps</topic><topic>Topographic surveying</topic><topic>Topographic surveys</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butterfield, Bradley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grams, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durning, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazel, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmquist, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralston, Barbara E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankey, Joel B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butterfield, Bradley J.</au><au>Grams, Paul E.</au><au>Durning, Laura E.</au><au>Hazel, Joseph</au><au>Palmquist, Emily C.</au><au>Ralston, Barbara E.</au><au>Sankey, Joel B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>410</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>410-421</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>Effects of riparian vegetation on fluvial sediment dynamics depend on morphological traits of the constituent species. Determining the effects of different morphological guilds on sedimentation rates, as influenced by multiple aspects of dam operations, can help identify viable strategies for streamflow and vegetation management to achieve riparian resource goals. Plants of increasing size and branching density or complexity have been found to have greater effects on sedimentation in free‐flowing systems; however, this relationship could differ in regulated rivers. We tested the hypothesis that plant guilds of increasing height and branching complexity would be positively associated with sedimentation rates on 23 sandbars deposited in zones of recirculating flow (eddies) along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. We used an image‐based vegetation classification and digital elevation models from annual topographic surveys to track associations between six plant morphological guilds and topographic change over 5 years. Vegetation had significant associations with deposition after accounting for geomorphic setting, but the ordinal guild scale was not positively correlated with deposition magnitude. Instead, low‐statured rhizomatous and herbaceous guilds were particularly effective at capturing sediment in the separation zone of sandbars, whereas tall herbs and large shrubs were most effective at capturing sediment in reattachment zones. These nuanced interactions between geomorphic position and morphological guild may be a direct consequence of flow regulation through modifications to physical deposition and erosion processes. Flow regulation may also select for a narrow subset of morphological guilds, reducing the diversity of vegetation feedbacks on sedimentation and emphasizing geomorphic drivers.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.3589</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-9811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-2154</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1535-1459 |
ispartof | River research and applications, 2020-03, Vol.36 (3), p.410-421 |
issn | 1535-1459 1535-1467 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2369025927 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | biotic feedbacks Branching Canyons Complexity Deposition Digital Elevation Models Digital imaging Eddies environmental flows Fluvial sediments Geomorphology Guilds hydropeaking Image classification Morphology Plants Plants (botany) Regulated rivers Resource management Riparian vegetation River regulations Rivers Sand bars Sediment sediment deposition Sediment dynamics Sedimentation Sedimentation & deposition Sedimentation rates Sediments Shrubs Stream discharge Stream flow Topographic maps Topographic surveying Topographic surveys Topography Vegetation |
title | Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A44%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associations%20between%20riparian%20plant%20morphological%20guilds%20and%20fluvial%20sediment%20dynamics%20along%20the%20regulated%20Colorado%20River%20in%20Grand%20Canyon&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Butterfield,%20Bradley%20J.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=410-421&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.3589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2369025927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369025927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |