Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA

Sediment is the most valuable natural resource for deltaic environments because it is required to build new land. For land building to occur, sediment must be retained in the delta instead of being transported offshore. Despite this, we do not know what controls sediment retention within a delta. He...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface 2020-01, Vol.125 (1), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Olliver, E. A., Edmonds, D. A., Shaw, J. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface
container_volume 125
creator Olliver, E. A.
Edmonds, D. A.
Shaw, J. B.
description Sediment is the most valuable natural resource for deltaic environments because it is required to build new land. For land building to occur, sediment must be retained in the delta instead of being transported offshore. Despite this, we do not know what controls sediment retention within a delta. Here we use a calibrated numerical model of Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA to analyze sediment retention for different riverine flood magnitudes, tidal amplitudes, and vegetation extents. Our results show that as riverine flood magnitude increases, areally averaged vertical accretion increases from 0.33 to 2 cm per 60‐day flood, but sediment retention decreases from 72% to 34%. For the uniform vegetation characteristics considered, the buffering effect, defined as the reduction of sediment flux onto the islands in the presence of vegetation, reduces the sediment flux onto the islands 14 to 22% on a fully vegetated delta. When sediment is transported onto the islands, vegetation enhances retention, which we refer to as the trapping effect, by ~10%. But, this does not offset the buffering effect, and vegetation decreases vertical accretion and retention in the delta up to 6% (or ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood). We suggest that vegetation will increase sedimentation only when trapping compensates for buffering. Finally, greater tidal amplitude at higher discharges enhances vertical accretion by ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood compared to smaller tidal amplitudes. These results provide insight on the mechanisms behind coastal systems growth, and suggest how sediment diversions might be operated more efficiently in deltas with reduced sediment supply. Key Points Sediment retention analysis on a delta varying riverine flood magnitude, tidal amplitude, and vegetation cover using numerical modeling Vertical accretion increases with flood size as input normalized retention decreases, while tides increase retention during large floods Vegetation as parameterized reduced accretion and retention due to the greater effect of the buffering effect versus the trapping effect
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019JF005316
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2367028141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2367028141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3683-b7e1a4080da05b59150938abe6c455dd6ae0e3aab61db68a3a3c26a2569954673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFTf_AELvja6l2SbPJZqaktA6EUfwySZyNZ0t2YTtP_eLRXxyWHgHA4fM3AIueHsjjOR3AvGk0XKWCS5OiMDwVUSJIzz81_P5CW5dm7L_MQ-4mJAirmpmx5NidTWNG2srdyIrnWFXsBU9AXfsINOW0P9rrDSOzQdXWLn5ZhqQ1_hi2bwjvQBmw5GNLO9dhqMt5vV5Ipc1NA4vP7RIdmkj-vpU5A9z-bTSRaAVLEMijFyCFnMKmBRESU8YomMoUBVhlFUVQqQoQQoFK8KFYMEWQoFIlJJEoVqLIfk9nR339qPHl2Xb23fGv8yF1KNmYh5yD01OlFla51rsc73rd5Be8g5y49F5n-L9Lg84Z-6wcO_bL6YLVPBeSjlNxQ1cYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2367028141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><creator>Olliver, E. A. ; Edmonds, D. A. ; Shaw, J. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Olliver, E. A. ; Edmonds, D. A. ; Shaw, J. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Sediment is the most valuable natural resource for deltaic environments because it is required to build new land. For land building to occur, sediment must be retained in the delta instead of being transported offshore. Despite this, we do not know what controls sediment retention within a delta. Here we use a calibrated numerical model of Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA to analyze sediment retention for different riverine flood magnitudes, tidal amplitudes, and vegetation extents. Our results show that as riverine flood magnitude increases, areally averaged vertical accretion increases from 0.33 to 2 cm per 60‐day flood, but sediment retention decreases from 72% to 34%. For the uniform vegetation characteristics considered, the buffering effect, defined as the reduction of sediment flux onto the islands in the presence of vegetation, reduces the sediment flux onto the islands 14 to 22% on a fully vegetated delta. When sediment is transported onto the islands, vegetation enhances retention, which we refer to as the trapping effect, by ~10%. But, this does not offset the buffering effect, and vegetation decreases vertical accretion and retention in the delta up to 6% (or ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood). We suggest that vegetation will increase sedimentation only when trapping compensates for buffering. Finally, greater tidal amplitude at higher discharges enhances vertical accretion by ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood compared to smaller tidal amplitudes. These results provide insight on the mechanisms behind coastal systems growth, and suggest how sediment diversions might be operated more efficiently in deltas with reduced sediment supply. Key Points Sediment retention analysis on a delta varying riverine flood magnitude, tidal amplitude, and vegetation cover using numerical modeling Vertical accretion increases with flood size as input normalized retention decreases, while tides increase retention during large floods Vegetation as parameterized reduced accretion and retention due to the greater effect of the buffering effect versus the trapping effect</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JF005316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accretion ; Amplitudes ; Buffers ; deltaic land building ; Deltas ; Deposition ; ecohydrological controls ; Flood magnitude ; Floods ; Fluvial sediments ; Islands ; Lake sediments ; Lakes ; Mathematical models ; Natural resources ; numerical modeling ; Numerical models ; Offshore ; Retention ; Sediment ; sediment retention ; Sedimentation ; Sediments ; Tidal amplitude ; Trapping ; Vegetation ; Wax Lake Delta ; Waxes</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface, 2020-01, Vol.125 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3683-b7e1a4080da05b59150938abe6c455dd6ae0e3aab61db68a3a3c26a2569954673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3683-b7e1a4080da05b59150938abe6c455dd6ae0e3aab61db68a3a3c26a2569954673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JF005316$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JF005316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olliver, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, J. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</title><description>Sediment is the most valuable natural resource for deltaic environments because it is required to build new land. For land building to occur, sediment must be retained in the delta instead of being transported offshore. Despite this, we do not know what controls sediment retention within a delta. Here we use a calibrated numerical model of Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA to analyze sediment retention for different riverine flood magnitudes, tidal amplitudes, and vegetation extents. Our results show that as riverine flood magnitude increases, areally averaged vertical accretion increases from 0.33 to 2 cm per 60‐day flood, but sediment retention decreases from 72% to 34%. For the uniform vegetation characteristics considered, the buffering effect, defined as the reduction of sediment flux onto the islands in the presence of vegetation, reduces the sediment flux onto the islands 14 to 22% on a fully vegetated delta. When sediment is transported onto the islands, vegetation enhances retention, which we refer to as the trapping effect, by ~10%. But, this does not offset the buffering effect, and vegetation decreases vertical accretion and retention in the delta up to 6% (or ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood). We suggest that vegetation will increase sedimentation only when trapping compensates for buffering. Finally, greater tidal amplitude at higher discharges enhances vertical accretion by ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood compared to smaller tidal amplitudes. These results provide insight on the mechanisms behind coastal systems growth, and suggest how sediment diversions might be operated more efficiently in deltas with reduced sediment supply. Key Points Sediment retention analysis on a delta varying riverine flood magnitude, tidal amplitude, and vegetation cover using numerical modeling Vertical accretion increases with flood size as input normalized retention decreases, while tides increase retention during large floods Vegetation as parameterized reduced accretion and retention due to the greater effect of the buffering effect versus the trapping effect</description><subject>Accretion</subject><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>deltaic land building</subject><subject>Deltas</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>ecohydrological controls</subject><subject>Flood magnitude</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Fluvial sediments</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Lake sediments</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>numerical modeling</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>sediment retention</subject><subject>Sedimentation</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Tidal amplitude</subject><subject>Trapping</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wax Lake Delta</subject><subject>Waxes</subject><issn>2169-9003</issn><issn>2169-9011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFTf_AELvja6l2SbPJZqaktA6EUfwySZyNZ0t2YTtP_eLRXxyWHgHA4fM3AIueHsjjOR3AvGk0XKWCS5OiMDwVUSJIzz81_P5CW5dm7L_MQ-4mJAirmpmx5NidTWNG2srdyIrnWFXsBU9AXfsINOW0P9rrDSOzQdXWLn5ZhqQ1_hi2bwjvQBmw5GNLO9dhqMt5vV5Ipc1NA4vP7RIdmkj-vpU5A9z-bTSRaAVLEMijFyCFnMKmBRESU8YomMoUBVhlFUVQqQoQQoFK8KFYMEWQoFIlJJEoVqLIfk9nR339qPHl2Xb23fGv8yF1KNmYh5yD01OlFla51rsc73rd5Be8g5y49F5n-L9Lg84Z-6wcO_bL6YLVPBeSjlNxQ1cYk</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Olliver, E. A.</creator><creator>Edmonds, D. A.</creator><creator>Shaw, J. B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA</title><author>Olliver, E. A. ; Edmonds, D. A. ; Shaw, J. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3683-b7e1a4080da05b59150938abe6c455dd6ae0e3aab61db68a3a3c26a2569954673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accretion</topic><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>deltaic land building</topic><topic>Deltas</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>ecohydrological controls</topic><topic>Flood magnitude</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Fluvial sediments</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Lake sediments</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>numerical modeling</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>sediment retention</topic><topic>Sedimentation</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Tidal amplitude</topic><topic>Trapping</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wax Lake Delta</topic><topic>Waxes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olliver, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, J. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olliver, E. A.</au><au>Edmonds, D. A.</au><au>Shaw, J. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9003</issn><eissn>2169-9011</eissn><abstract>Sediment is the most valuable natural resource for deltaic environments because it is required to build new land. For land building to occur, sediment must be retained in the delta instead of being transported offshore. Despite this, we do not know what controls sediment retention within a delta. Here we use a calibrated numerical model of Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA to analyze sediment retention for different riverine flood magnitudes, tidal amplitudes, and vegetation extents. Our results show that as riverine flood magnitude increases, areally averaged vertical accretion increases from 0.33 to 2 cm per 60‐day flood, but sediment retention decreases from 72% to 34%. For the uniform vegetation characteristics considered, the buffering effect, defined as the reduction of sediment flux onto the islands in the presence of vegetation, reduces the sediment flux onto the islands 14 to 22% on a fully vegetated delta. When sediment is transported onto the islands, vegetation enhances retention, which we refer to as the trapping effect, by ~10%. But, this does not offset the buffering effect, and vegetation decreases vertical accretion and retention in the delta up to 6% (or ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood). We suggest that vegetation will increase sedimentation only when trapping compensates for buffering. Finally, greater tidal amplitude at higher discharges enhances vertical accretion by ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood compared to smaller tidal amplitudes. These results provide insight on the mechanisms behind coastal systems growth, and suggest how sediment diversions might be operated more efficiently in deltas with reduced sediment supply. Key Points Sediment retention analysis on a delta varying riverine flood magnitude, tidal amplitude, and vegetation cover using numerical modeling Vertical accretion increases with flood size as input normalized retention decreases, while tides increase retention during large floods Vegetation as parameterized reduced accretion and retention due to the greater effect of the buffering effect versus the trapping effect</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JF005316</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9003
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface, 2020-01, Vol.125 (1), p.n/a
issn 2169-9003
2169-9011
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2367028141
source Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection
subjects Accretion
Amplitudes
Buffers
deltaic land building
Deltas
Deposition
ecohydrological controls
Flood magnitude
Floods
Fluvial sediments
Islands
Lake sediments
Lakes
Mathematical models
Natural resources
numerical modeling
Numerical models
Offshore
Retention
Sediment
sediment retention
Sedimentation
Sediments
Tidal amplitude
Trapping
Vegetation
Wax Lake Delta
Waxes
title Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A15%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Floods,%20Tides,%20and%20Vegetation%20on%20Sediment%20Retention%20in%20Wax%20Lake%20Delta,%20Louisiana,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Earth%20surface&rft.au=Olliver,%20E.%20A.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9003&rft.eissn=2169-9011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JF005316&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2367028141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2367028141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true