Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA
Sediment is the most valuable natural resource for deltaic environments because it is required to build new land. For land building to occur, sediment must be retained in the delta instead of being transported offshore. Despite this, we do not know what controls sediment retention within a delta. He...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface 2020-01, Vol.125 (1), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Olliver, E. A. Edmonds, D. A. Shaw, J. B. |
description | Sediment is the most valuable natural resource for deltaic environments because it is required to build new land. For land building to occur, sediment must be retained in the delta instead of being transported offshore. Despite this, we do not know what controls sediment retention within a delta. Here we use a calibrated numerical model of Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA to analyze sediment retention for different riverine flood magnitudes, tidal amplitudes, and vegetation extents. Our results show that as riverine flood magnitude increases, areally averaged vertical accretion increases from 0.33 to 2 cm per 60‐day flood, but sediment retention decreases from 72% to 34%. For the uniform vegetation characteristics considered, the buffering effect, defined as the reduction of sediment flux onto the islands in the presence of vegetation, reduces the sediment flux onto the islands 14 to 22% on a fully vegetated delta. When sediment is transported onto the islands, vegetation enhances retention, which we refer to as the trapping effect, by ~10%. But, this does not offset the buffering effect, and vegetation decreases vertical accretion and retention in the delta up to 6% (or ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood). We suggest that vegetation will increase sedimentation only when trapping compensates for buffering. Finally, greater tidal amplitude at higher discharges enhances vertical accretion by ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood compared to smaller tidal amplitudes. These results provide insight on the mechanisms behind coastal systems growth, and suggest how sediment diversions might be operated more efficiently in deltas with reduced sediment supply.
Key Points
Sediment retention analysis on a delta varying riverine flood magnitude, tidal amplitude, and vegetation cover using numerical modeling
Vertical accretion increases with flood size as input normalized retention decreases, while tides increase retention during large floods
Vegetation as parameterized reduced accretion and retention due to the greater effect of the buffering effect versus the trapping effect |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019JF005316 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2367028141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2367028141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3683-b7e1a4080da05b59150938abe6c455dd6ae0e3aab61db68a3a3c26a2569954673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFTf_AELvja6l2SbPJZqaktA6EUfwySZyNZ0t2YTtP_eLRXxyWHgHA4fM3AIueHsjjOR3AvGk0XKWCS5OiMDwVUSJIzz81_P5CW5dm7L_MQ-4mJAirmpmx5NidTWNG2srdyIrnWFXsBU9AXfsINOW0P9rrDSOzQdXWLn5ZhqQ1_hi2bwjvQBmw5GNLO9dhqMt5vV5Ipc1NA4vP7RIdmkj-vpU5A9z-bTSRaAVLEMijFyCFnMKmBRESU8YomMoUBVhlFUVQqQoQQoFK8KFYMEWQoFIlJJEoVqLIfk9nR339qPHl2Xb23fGv8yF1KNmYh5yD01OlFla51rsc73rd5Be8g5y49F5n-L9Lg84Z-6wcO_bL6YLVPBeSjlNxQ1cYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2367028141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><creator>Olliver, E. A. ; Edmonds, D. A. ; Shaw, J. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Olliver, E. A. ; Edmonds, D. A. ; Shaw, J. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Sediment is the most valuable natural resource for deltaic environments because it is required to build new land. For land building to occur, sediment must be retained in the delta instead of being transported offshore. Despite this, we do not know what controls sediment retention within a delta. Here we use a calibrated numerical model of Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA to analyze sediment retention for different riverine flood magnitudes, tidal amplitudes, and vegetation extents. Our results show that as riverine flood magnitude increases, areally averaged vertical accretion increases from 0.33 to 2 cm per 60‐day flood, but sediment retention decreases from 72% to 34%. For the uniform vegetation characteristics considered, the buffering effect, defined as the reduction of sediment flux onto the islands in the presence of vegetation, reduces the sediment flux onto the islands 14 to 22% on a fully vegetated delta. When sediment is transported onto the islands, vegetation enhances retention, which we refer to as the trapping effect, by ~10%. But, this does not offset the buffering effect, and vegetation decreases vertical accretion and retention in the delta up to 6% (or ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood). We suggest that vegetation will increase sedimentation only when trapping compensates for buffering. Finally, greater tidal amplitude at higher discharges enhances vertical accretion by ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood compared to smaller tidal amplitudes. These results provide insight on the mechanisms behind coastal systems growth, and suggest how sediment diversions might be operated more efficiently in deltas with reduced sediment supply.
Key Points
Sediment retention analysis on a delta varying riverine flood magnitude, tidal amplitude, and vegetation cover using numerical modeling
Vertical accretion increases with flood size as input normalized retention decreases, while tides increase retention during large floods
Vegetation as parameterized reduced accretion and retention due to the greater effect of the buffering effect versus the trapping effect</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JF005316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accretion ; Amplitudes ; Buffers ; deltaic land building ; Deltas ; Deposition ; ecohydrological controls ; Flood magnitude ; Floods ; Fluvial sediments ; Islands ; Lake sediments ; Lakes ; Mathematical models ; Natural resources ; numerical modeling ; Numerical models ; Offshore ; Retention ; Sediment ; sediment retention ; Sedimentation ; Sediments ; Tidal amplitude ; Trapping ; Vegetation ; Wax Lake Delta ; Waxes</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface, 2020-01, Vol.125 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3683-b7e1a4080da05b59150938abe6c455dd6ae0e3aab61db68a3a3c26a2569954673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3683-b7e1a4080da05b59150938abe6c455dd6ae0e3aab61db68a3a3c26a2569954673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JF005316$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JF005316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olliver, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, J. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</title><description>Sediment is the most valuable natural resource for deltaic environments because it is required to build new land. For land building to occur, sediment must be retained in the delta instead of being transported offshore. Despite this, we do not know what controls sediment retention within a delta. Here we use a calibrated numerical model of Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA to analyze sediment retention for different riverine flood magnitudes, tidal amplitudes, and vegetation extents. Our results show that as riverine flood magnitude increases, areally averaged vertical accretion increases from 0.33 to 2 cm per 60‐day flood, but sediment retention decreases from 72% to 34%. For the uniform vegetation characteristics considered, the buffering effect, defined as the reduction of sediment flux onto the islands in the presence of vegetation, reduces the sediment flux onto the islands 14 to 22% on a fully vegetated delta. When sediment is transported onto the islands, vegetation enhances retention, which we refer to as the trapping effect, by ~10%. But, this does not offset the buffering effect, and vegetation decreases vertical accretion and retention in the delta up to 6% (or ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood). We suggest that vegetation will increase sedimentation only when trapping compensates for buffering. Finally, greater tidal amplitude at higher discharges enhances vertical accretion by ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood compared to smaller tidal amplitudes. These results provide insight on the mechanisms behind coastal systems growth, and suggest how sediment diversions might be operated more efficiently in deltas with reduced sediment supply.
Key Points
Sediment retention analysis on a delta varying riverine flood magnitude, tidal amplitude, and vegetation cover using numerical modeling
Vertical accretion increases with flood size as input normalized retention decreases, while tides increase retention during large floods
Vegetation as parameterized reduced accretion and retention due to the greater effect of the buffering effect versus the trapping effect</description><subject>Accretion</subject><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>deltaic land building</subject><subject>Deltas</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>ecohydrological controls</subject><subject>Flood magnitude</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Fluvial sediments</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Lake sediments</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>numerical modeling</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>sediment retention</subject><subject>Sedimentation</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Tidal amplitude</subject><subject>Trapping</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wax Lake Delta</subject><subject>Waxes</subject><issn>2169-9003</issn><issn>2169-9011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFTf_AELvja6l2SbPJZqaktA6EUfwySZyNZ0t2YTtP_eLRXxyWHgHA4fM3AIueHsjjOR3AvGk0XKWCS5OiMDwVUSJIzz81_P5CW5dm7L_MQ-4mJAirmpmx5NidTWNG2srdyIrnWFXsBU9AXfsINOW0P9rrDSOzQdXWLn5ZhqQ1_hi2bwjvQBmw5GNLO9dhqMt5vV5Ipc1NA4vP7RIdmkj-vpU5A9z-bTSRaAVLEMijFyCFnMKmBRESU8YomMoUBVhlFUVQqQoQQoFK8KFYMEWQoFIlJJEoVqLIfk9nR339qPHl2Xb23fGv8yF1KNmYh5yD01OlFla51rsc73rd5Be8g5y49F5n-L9Lg84Z-6wcO_bL6YLVPBeSjlNxQ1cYk</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Olliver, E. A.</creator><creator>Edmonds, D. A.</creator><creator>Shaw, J. B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA</title><author>Olliver, E. A. ; Edmonds, D. A. ; Shaw, J. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3683-b7e1a4080da05b59150938abe6c455dd6ae0e3aab61db68a3a3c26a2569954673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accretion</topic><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>deltaic land building</topic><topic>Deltas</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>ecohydrological controls</topic><topic>Flood magnitude</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Fluvial sediments</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Lake sediments</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>numerical modeling</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>sediment retention</topic><topic>Sedimentation</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Tidal amplitude</topic><topic>Trapping</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wax Lake Delta</topic><topic>Waxes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olliver, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, J. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olliver, E. A.</au><au>Edmonds, D. A.</au><au>Shaw, J. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9003</issn><eissn>2169-9011</eissn><abstract>Sediment is the most valuable natural resource for deltaic environments because it is required to build new land. For land building to occur, sediment must be retained in the delta instead of being transported offshore. Despite this, we do not know what controls sediment retention within a delta. Here we use a calibrated numerical model of Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA to analyze sediment retention for different riverine flood magnitudes, tidal amplitudes, and vegetation extents. Our results show that as riverine flood magnitude increases, areally averaged vertical accretion increases from 0.33 to 2 cm per 60‐day flood, but sediment retention decreases from 72% to 34%. For the uniform vegetation characteristics considered, the buffering effect, defined as the reduction of sediment flux onto the islands in the presence of vegetation, reduces the sediment flux onto the islands 14 to 22% on a fully vegetated delta. When sediment is transported onto the islands, vegetation enhances retention, which we refer to as the trapping effect, by ~10%. But, this does not offset the buffering effect, and vegetation decreases vertical accretion and retention in the delta up to 6% (or ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood). We suggest that vegetation will increase sedimentation only when trapping compensates for buffering. Finally, greater tidal amplitude at higher discharges enhances vertical accretion by ~0.5 cm per 60‐day flood compared to smaller tidal amplitudes. These results provide insight on the mechanisms behind coastal systems growth, and suggest how sediment diversions might be operated more efficiently in deltas with reduced sediment supply.
Key Points
Sediment retention analysis on a delta varying riverine flood magnitude, tidal amplitude, and vegetation cover using numerical modeling
Vertical accretion increases with flood size as input normalized retention decreases, while tides increase retention during large floods
Vegetation as parameterized reduced accretion and retention due to the greater effect of the buffering effect versus the trapping effect</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JF005316</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9003 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface, 2020-01, Vol.125 (1), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-9003 2169-9011 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2367028141 |
source | Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection |
subjects | Accretion Amplitudes Buffers deltaic land building Deltas Deposition ecohydrological controls Flood magnitude Floods Fluvial sediments Islands Lake sediments Lakes Mathematical models Natural resources numerical modeling Numerical models Offshore Retention Sediment sediment retention Sedimentation Sediments Tidal amplitude Trapping Vegetation Wax Lake Delta Waxes |
title | Influence of Floods, Tides, and Vegetation on Sediment Retention in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A15%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Floods,%20Tides,%20and%20Vegetation%20on%20Sediment%20Retention%20in%20Wax%20Lake%20Delta,%20Louisiana,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Earth%20surface&rft.au=Olliver,%20E.%20A.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9003&rft.eissn=2169-9011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JF005316&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2367028141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2367028141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |