A Comment on ''Relationship Between Source Expertise and Source Similarity in an Advertising Context''/Response
Bone, Ellen, Easley, and McNeely criticize a study by Swartz (1984) examining the relationship between consumer perceptions of advertising source expertise and similarity. In the study, female college students viewed advertisements for 3 different products, varied by level of endorsement source expe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of advertising 1986-01, Vol.15 (1), p.47 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 47 |
| container_title | Journal of advertising |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Bone, Paula Fitzgerald Ellen, Pam Scholder Easley, Richard W McNeely, Samuel E Swartz, Teresa A |
| description | Bone, Ellen, Easley, and McNeely criticize a study by Swartz (1984) examining the relationship between consumer perceptions of advertising source expertise and similarity. In the study, female college students viewed advertisements for 3 different products, varied by level of endorsement source expertise and similarity to subjects based on specification of source occupation. Subjects subsequently completed measures of perceived source expertise and similarity. It is contended that Swartz failed to: 1. conceptually justify the study, 2. define expertise-similarity constructs, 3. control the research design sufficiently, 4. study a dependent variable, and 5. use an appropriate statistical analysis. Swartz claims that her study was exploratory and designed to test for a relationship between source expertise and similarity. No dependent variable was warranted by the study, and the use of a measure of statistical interdependence was appropriate. She further argues that construct definition and experimental control were apparent within the context of the study. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236619874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1177544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2366198743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjEsLgkAUhYcoyB7_4dLGlaSZr6VJ0Vrbi-StRvSOOWPZv2-I2nc2B853-EbMcDwvsILQ9sbMsO3IsVzXD6ZsJmVl63iRYzARQyKaBkmBIDDNFOtCcUHyxlvYoXoiEmSi784I-6HFTnGJUFD5GzPe8LrouHoBJw0gLh-fF6erVpPCQZnmOkXZaisu2ORS1BKX356z1WF_So5W24l7j1LllfaSRvnG9X0nCoOt-9fpDZM5Spc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236619874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comment on ''Relationship Between Source Expertise and Source Similarity in an Advertising Context''/Response</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bone, Paula Fitzgerald ; Ellen, Pam Scholder ; Easley, Richard W ; McNeely, Samuel E ; Swartz, Teresa A</creator><creatorcontrib>Bone, Paula Fitzgerald ; Ellen, Pam Scholder ; Easley, Richard W ; McNeely, Samuel E ; Swartz, Teresa A</creatorcontrib><description>Bone, Ellen, Easley, and McNeely criticize a study by Swartz (1984) examining the relationship between consumer perceptions of advertising source expertise and similarity. In the study, female college students viewed advertisements for 3 different products, varied by level of endorsement source expertise and similarity to subjects based on specification of source occupation. Subjects subsequently completed measures of perceived source expertise and similarity. It is contended that Swartz failed to: 1. conceptually justify the study, 2. define expertise-similarity constructs, 3. control the research design sufficiently, 4. study a dependent variable, and 5. use an appropriate statistical analysis. Swartz claims that her study was exploratory and designed to test for a relationship between source expertise and similarity. No dependent variable was warranted by the study, and the use of a measure of statistical interdependence was appropriate. She further argues that construct definition and experimental control were apparent within the context of the study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-3367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7805</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOADD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Characteristics ; Endorsements ; Hypotheses ; Perceptions ; Sources ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of advertising, 1986-01, Vol.15 (1), p.47</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Academy of Advertising 1986</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bone, Paula Fitzgerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellen, Pam Scholder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easley, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeely, Samuel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Teresa A</creatorcontrib><title>A Comment on ''Relationship Between Source Expertise and Source Similarity in an Advertising Context''/Response</title><title>Journal of advertising</title><description>Bone, Ellen, Easley, and McNeely criticize a study by Swartz (1984) examining the relationship between consumer perceptions of advertising source expertise and similarity. In the study, female college students viewed advertisements for 3 different products, varied by level of endorsement source expertise and similarity to subjects based on specification of source occupation. Subjects subsequently completed measures of perceived source expertise and similarity. It is contended that Swartz failed to: 1. conceptually justify the study, 2. define expertise-similarity constructs, 3. control the research design sufficiently, 4. study a dependent variable, and 5. use an appropriate statistical analysis. Swartz claims that her study was exploratory and designed to test for a relationship between source expertise and similarity. No dependent variable was warranted by the study, and the use of a measure of statistical interdependence was appropriate. She further argues that construct definition and experimental control were apparent within the context of the study.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Characteristics</subject><subject>Endorsements</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Sources</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0091-3367</issn><issn>1557-7805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjEsLgkAUhYcoyB7_4dLGlaSZr6VJ0Vrbi-StRvSOOWPZv2-I2nc2B853-EbMcDwvsILQ9sbMsO3IsVzXD6ZsJmVl63iRYzARQyKaBkmBIDDNFOtCcUHyxlvYoXoiEmSi784I-6HFTnGJUFD5GzPe8LrouHoBJw0gLh-fF6erVpPCQZnmOkXZaisu2ORS1BKX356z1WF_So5W24l7j1LllfaSRvnG9X0nCoOt-9fpDZM5Spc</recordid><startdate>19860101</startdate><enddate>19860101</enddate><creator>Bone, Paula Fitzgerald</creator><creator>Ellen, Pam Scholder</creator><creator>Easley, Richard W</creator><creator>McNeely, Samuel E</creator><creator>Swartz, Teresa A</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860101</creationdate><title>A Comment on ''Relationship Between Source Expertise and Source Similarity in an Advertising Context''/Response</title><author>Bone, Paula Fitzgerald ; Ellen, Pam Scholder ; Easley, Richard W ; McNeely, Samuel E ; Swartz, Teresa A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2366198743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Characteristics</topic><topic>Endorsements</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Sources</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bone, Paula Fitzgerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellen, Pam Scholder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easley, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeely, Samuel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Teresa A</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of advertising</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bone, Paula Fitzgerald</au><au>Ellen, Pam Scholder</au><au>Easley, Richard W</au><au>McNeely, Samuel E</au><au>Swartz, Teresa A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comment on ''Relationship Between Source Expertise and Source Similarity in an Advertising Context''/Response</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advertising</jtitle><date>1986-01-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><pages>47-</pages><issn>0091-3367</issn><eissn>1557-7805</eissn><coden>JOADD7</coden><abstract>Bone, Ellen, Easley, and McNeely criticize a study by Swartz (1984) examining the relationship between consumer perceptions of advertising source expertise and similarity. In the study, female college students viewed advertisements for 3 different products, varied by level of endorsement source expertise and similarity to subjects based on specification of source occupation. Subjects subsequently completed measures of perceived source expertise and similarity. It is contended that Swartz failed to: 1. conceptually justify the study, 2. define expertise-similarity constructs, 3. control the research design sufficiently, 4. study a dependent variable, and 5. use an appropriate statistical analysis. Swartz claims that her study was exploratory and designed to test for a relationship between source expertise and similarity. No dependent variable was warranted by the study, and the use of a measure of statistical interdependence was appropriate. She further argues that construct definition and experimental control were apparent within the context of the study.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0091-3367 |
| ispartof | Journal of advertising, 1986-01, Vol.15 (1), p.47 |
| issn | 0091-3367 1557-7805 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_236619874 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Advertising Characteristics Endorsements Hypotheses Perceptions Sources Studies |
| title | A Comment on ''Relationship Between Source Expertise and Source Similarity in an Advertising Context''/Response |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A17%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comment%20on%20''Relationship%20Between%20Source%20Expertise%20and%20Source%20Similarity%20in%20an%20Advertising%20Context''/Response&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advertising&rft.au=Bone,%20Paula%20Fitzgerald&rft.date=1986-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.pages=47-&rft.issn=0091-3367&rft.eissn=1557-7805&rft.coden=JOADD7&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1177544%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236619874&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |