Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation

There are often benefits to consumers and to firms from standardization of a product. We examine whether these standardization benefits can "trap" an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available. With complete information and identical preferenc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Rand journal of economics 1985-04, Vol.16 (1), p.70-83
Hauptverfasser: Farrell, Joseph, Saloner, Garth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 83
container_issue 1
container_start_page 70
container_title The Rand journal of economics
container_volume 16
creator Farrell, Joseph
Saloner, Garth
description There are often benefits to consumers and to firms from standardization of a product. We examine whether these standardization benefits can "trap" an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available. With complete information and identical preferences among firms the answer is no; but when information is incomplete this "excess inertia" can occur. We also discuss the extent to which the problem can be overcome by communication.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2555589
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236567635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2555589</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2555589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-784dd5847e77261c14b2bc805056fcd51fea8031926c236b91747e8ab250bde63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFbxD7gounDT1HlkHllKqVqouFDXw2Qy0YQ2E2fSQv313pranRfuA-7HOXAQuiR4QhmWd5RDqewIDYjkIqFEkmM0wDIliaCCnKKzGGsMRSUdoMlrZ5rChKL6Nl3lm_Fo6lctnHm1rLrteATf0bxp_Ob3fY5OSrOM7mK_h-j9YfY2fUoWL4_z6f0isUzwLpEqLQquUumkBE9L0pzmVmGOuShtwUnpjMKMZFRYykSeEQmsMjnlOC-cYEN03eu2wX-tXex07dehAUsNPBdSMA7QzX8QgSSIBNEUqNuessHHGFyp21CtTNhqgvUuMb1PDMjnngyudfaAhdoFSKF2eqOZIQLGdndkisOqoCOgzQccLbTEWjH92a1A76rXq2Pnw0Hvz-4HdD5-oA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307177474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Farrell, Joseph ; Saloner, Garth</creator><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Joseph ; Saloner, Garth</creatorcontrib><description>There are often benefits to consumers and to firms from standardization of a product. We examine whether these standardization benefits can "trap" an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available. With complete information and identical preferences among firms the answer is no; but when information is incomplete this "excess inertia" can occur. We also discuss the extent to which the problem can be overcome by communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-6261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-2171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2555589</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RJECEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mount Morris, Ill: The Rand Corporation</publisher><subject>Consumer goods ; Economic benefits ; Economic externalities ; Economic models ; Economies of scale ; Emerging technology ; Government standards ; Inertia ; Innovations ; Mathematical analysis ; Nash equilibrium ; Oligopoly ; Product innovation ; Standardization ; Technological innovation ; Technology ; Typewriters</subject><ispartof>The Rand journal of economics, 1985-04, Vol.16 (1), p.70-83</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 The Rand Corporation</rights><rights>Copyright Rand Corporation Spring 1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-784dd5847e77261c14b2bc805056fcd51fea8031926c236b91747e8ab250bde63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2555589$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2555589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4006,27868,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/rjerandje/v_3a16_3ay_3a1985_3ai_3aspring_3ap_3a70-83.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saloner, Garth</creatorcontrib><title>Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation</title><title>The Rand journal of economics</title><description>There are often benefits to consumers and to firms from standardization of a product. We examine whether these standardization benefits can "trap" an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available. With complete information and identical preferences among firms the answer is no; but when information is incomplete this "excess inertia" can occur. We also discuss the extent to which the problem can be overcome by communication.</description><subject>Consumer goods</subject><subject>Economic benefits</subject><subject>Economic externalities</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economies of scale</subject><subject>Emerging technology</subject><subject>Government standards</subject><subject>Inertia</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Nash equilibrium</subject><subject>Oligopoly</subject><subject>Product innovation</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Typewriters</subject><issn>0741-6261</issn><issn>1756-2171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFbxD7gounDT1HlkHllKqVqouFDXw2Qy0YQ2E2fSQv313pranRfuA-7HOXAQuiR4QhmWd5RDqewIDYjkIqFEkmM0wDIliaCCnKKzGGsMRSUdoMlrZ5rChKL6Nl3lm_Fo6lctnHm1rLrteATf0bxp_Ob3fY5OSrOM7mK_h-j9YfY2fUoWL4_z6f0isUzwLpEqLQquUumkBE9L0pzmVmGOuShtwUnpjMKMZFRYykSeEQmsMjnlOC-cYEN03eu2wX-tXex07dehAUsNPBdSMA7QzX8QgSSIBNEUqNuessHHGFyp21CtTNhqgvUuMb1PDMjnngyudfaAhdoFSKF2eqOZIQLGdndkisOqoCOgzQccLbTEWjH92a1A76rXq2Pnw0Hvz-4HdD5-oA</recordid><startdate>19850401</startdate><enddate>19850401</enddate><creator>Farrell, Joseph</creator><creator>Saloner, Garth</creator><general>The Rand Corporation</general><general>The RAND Corporation</general><general>Rand Corp</general><general>Rand Corporation</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850401</creationdate><title>Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation</title><author>Farrell, Joseph ; Saloner, Garth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-784dd5847e77261c14b2bc805056fcd51fea8031926c236b91747e8ab250bde63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Consumer goods</topic><topic>Economic benefits</topic><topic>Economic externalities</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economies of scale</topic><topic>Emerging technology</topic><topic>Government standards</topic><topic>Inertia</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Nash equilibrium</topic><topic>Oligopoly</topic><topic>Product innovation</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Typewriters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saloner, Garth</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Rand journal of economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farrell, Joseph</au><au>Saloner, Garth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation</atitle><jtitle>The Rand journal of economics</jtitle><date>1985-04-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>70-83</pages><issn>0741-6261</issn><eissn>1756-2171</eissn><coden>RJECEA</coden><abstract>There are often benefits to consumers and to firms from standardization of a product. We examine whether these standardization benefits can "trap" an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available. With complete information and identical preferences among firms the answer is no; but when information is incomplete this "excess inertia" can occur. We also discuss the extent to which the problem can be overcome by communication.</abstract><cop>Mount Morris, Ill</cop><pub>The Rand Corporation</pub><doi>10.2307/2555589</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-6261
ispartof The Rand journal of economics, 1985-04, Vol.16 (1), p.70-83
issn 0741-6261
1756-2171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_236567635
source RePEc; Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Consumer goods
Economic benefits
Economic externalities
Economic models
Economies of scale
Emerging technology
Government standards
Inertia
Innovations
Mathematical analysis
Nash equilibrium
Oligopoly
Product innovation
Standardization
Technological innovation
Technology
Typewriters
title Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A39%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardization,%20Compatibility,%20and%20Innovation&rft.jtitle=The%20Rand%20journal%20of%20economics&rft.au=Farrell,%20Joseph&rft.date=1985-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=70-83&rft.issn=0741-6261&rft.eissn=1756-2171&rft.coden=RJECEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2555589&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2555589%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307177474&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2555589&rfr_iscdi=true