Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation
There are often benefits to consumers and to firms from standardization of a product. We examine whether these standardization benefits can "trap" an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available. With complete information and identical preferenc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Rand journal of economics 1985-04, Vol.16 (1), p.70-83 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 83 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 70 |
container_title | The Rand journal of economics |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Farrell, Joseph Saloner, Garth |
description | There are often benefits to consumers and to firms from standardization of a product. We examine whether these standardization benefits can "trap" an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available. With complete information and identical preferences among firms the answer is no; but when information is incomplete this "excess inertia" can occur. We also discuss the extent to which the problem can be overcome by communication. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2555589 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236567635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2555589</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2555589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-784dd5847e77261c14b2bc805056fcd51fea8031926c236b91747e8ab250bde63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFbxD7gounDT1HlkHllKqVqouFDXw2Qy0YQ2E2fSQv313pranRfuA-7HOXAQuiR4QhmWd5RDqewIDYjkIqFEkmM0wDIliaCCnKKzGGsMRSUdoMlrZ5rChKL6Nl3lm_Fo6lctnHm1rLrteATf0bxp_Ob3fY5OSrOM7mK_h-j9YfY2fUoWL4_z6f0isUzwLpEqLQquUumkBE9L0pzmVmGOuShtwUnpjMKMZFRYykSeEQmsMjnlOC-cYEN03eu2wX-tXex07dehAUsNPBdSMA7QzX8QgSSIBNEUqNuessHHGFyp21CtTNhqgvUuMb1PDMjnngyudfaAhdoFSKF2eqOZIQLGdndkisOqoCOgzQccLbTEWjH92a1A76rXq2Pnw0Hvz-4HdD5-oA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307177474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Farrell, Joseph ; Saloner, Garth</creator><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Joseph ; Saloner, Garth</creatorcontrib><description>There are often benefits to consumers and to firms from standardization of a product. We examine whether these standardization benefits can "trap" an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available. With complete information and identical preferences among firms the answer is no; but when information is incomplete this "excess inertia" can occur. We also discuss the extent to which the problem can be overcome by communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-6261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-2171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2555589</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RJECEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mount Morris, Ill: The Rand Corporation</publisher><subject>Consumer goods ; Economic benefits ; Economic externalities ; Economic models ; Economies of scale ; Emerging technology ; Government standards ; Inertia ; Innovations ; Mathematical analysis ; Nash equilibrium ; Oligopoly ; Product innovation ; Standardization ; Technological innovation ; Technology ; Typewriters</subject><ispartof>The Rand journal of economics, 1985-04, Vol.16 (1), p.70-83</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 The Rand Corporation</rights><rights>Copyright Rand Corporation Spring 1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-784dd5847e77261c14b2bc805056fcd51fea8031926c236b91747e8ab250bde63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2555589$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2555589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4006,27868,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/rjerandje/v_3a16_3ay_3a1985_3ai_3aspring_3ap_3a70-83.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saloner, Garth</creatorcontrib><title>Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation</title><title>The Rand journal of economics</title><description>There are often benefits to consumers and to firms from standardization of a product. We examine whether these standardization benefits can "trap" an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available. With complete information and identical preferences among firms the answer is no; but when information is incomplete this "excess inertia" can occur. We also discuss the extent to which the problem can be overcome by communication.</description><subject>Consumer goods</subject><subject>Economic benefits</subject><subject>Economic externalities</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economies of scale</subject><subject>Emerging technology</subject><subject>Government standards</subject><subject>Inertia</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Nash equilibrium</subject><subject>Oligopoly</subject><subject>Product innovation</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Typewriters</subject><issn>0741-6261</issn><issn>1756-2171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFbxD7gounDT1HlkHllKqVqouFDXw2Qy0YQ2E2fSQv313pranRfuA-7HOXAQuiR4QhmWd5RDqewIDYjkIqFEkmM0wDIliaCCnKKzGGsMRSUdoMlrZ5rChKL6Nl3lm_Fo6lctnHm1rLrteATf0bxp_Ob3fY5OSrOM7mK_h-j9YfY2fUoWL4_z6f0isUzwLpEqLQquUumkBE9L0pzmVmGOuShtwUnpjMKMZFRYykSeEQmsMjnlOC-cYEN03eu2wX-tXex07dehAUsNPBdSMA7QzX8QgSSIBNEUqNuessHHGFyp21CtTNhqgvUuMb1PDMjnngyudfaAhdoFSKF2eqOZIQLGdndkisOqoCOgzQccLbTEWjH92a1A76rXq2Pnw0Hvz-4HdD5-oA</recordid><startdate>19850401</startdate><enddate>19850401</enddate><creator>Farrell, Joseph</creator><creator>Saloner, Garth</creator><general>The Rand Corporation</general><general>The RAND Corporation</general><general>Rand Corp</general><general>Rand Corporation</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850401</creationdate><title>Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation</title><author>Farrell, Joseph ; Saloner, Garth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-784dd5847e77261c14b2bc805056fcd51fea8031926c236b91747e8ab250bde63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Consumer goods</topic><topic>Economic benefits</topic><topic>Economic externalities</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economies of scale</topic><topic>Emerging technology</topic><topic>Government standards</topic><topic>Inertia</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Nash equilibrium</topic><topic>Oligopoly</topic><topic>Product innovation</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Typewriters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saloner, Garth</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Rand journal of economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farrell, Joseph</au><au>Saloner, Garth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation</atitle><jtitle>The Rand journal of economics</jtitle><date>1985-04-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>70-83</pages><issn>0741-6261</issn><eissn>1756-2171</eissn><coden>RJECEA</coden><abstract>There are often benefits to consumers and to firms from standardization of a product. We examine whether these standardization benefits can "trap" an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available. With complete information and identical preferences among firms the answer is no; but when information is incomplete this "excess inertia" can occur. We also discuss the extent to which the problem can be overcome by communication.</abstract><cop>Mount Morris, Ill</cop><pub>The Rand Corporation</pub><doi>10.2307/2555589</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-6261 |
ispartof | The Rand journal of economics, 1985-04, Vol.16 (1), p.70-83 |
issn | 0741-6261 1756-2171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_236567635 |
source | RePEc; Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Consumer goods Economic benefits Economic externalities Economic models Economies of scale Emerging technology Government standards Inertia Innovations Mathematical analysis Nash equilibrium Oligopoly Product innovation Standardization Technological innovation Technology Typewriters |
title | Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A39%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardization,%20Compatibility,%20and%20Innovation&rft.jtitle=The%20Rand%20journal%20of%20economics&rft.au=Farrell,%20Joseph&rft.date=1985-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=70-83&rft.issn=0741-6261&rft.eissn=1756-2171&rft.coden=RJECEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2555589&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2555589%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307177474&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2555589&rfr_iscdi=true |