Efficient Reliance and Damage Measures for Breach of Contract

This article considers a situation where the buyer or the seller of a good must engage in expenditures on specific capital before the exchange either to prepare to use the product or to prepare to sell it. It is assumed that postbreach bargaining is possible and carried out in a cooperative fashion,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Rand journal of economics 1984-04, Vol.15 (1), p.39-53
1. Verfasser: Rogerson, William P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53
container_issue 1
container_start_page 39
container_title The Rand journal of economics
container_volume 15
creator Rogerson, William P.
description This article considers a situation where the buyer or the seller of a good must engage in expenditures on specific capital before the exchange either to prepare to use the product or to prepare to sell it. It is assumed that postbreach bargaining is possible and carried out in a cooperative fashion, and that buyers and sellers form expectations about the outcome of such bargaining in a specific way. Without enforceable contracts, the potential appropriability of specific rents results in inefficiently low levels of investment. Three damage measures commonly used to enforce contracts are shown to produce inefficiently high levels of investment and to be Pareto-ranked from best to worst as follows: specific performance, expectation damages, and reliance damages.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3003668
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236567267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3003668</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3003668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-85ab51dc74ed414cc584684be042580c6073e41a9a87d292cb91ed06525f60813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv4B1wEXbgazTuZhQut9QEtgug6pJk77QztzJhMhf57U6rdeeHcexcf58BB6JySG8aJvuWEcKXMARpQLVXGqKaHaEC0oJliih6jkxhrkoZpNkB347KsfAVNj99hWbnGA3ZNgR_dys0BT8HFdYCIyzbghwDOL3Bb4lHb9MH5_hQdlW4Z4ez3DtHn0_hj9JJN3p5fR_eTzAvC-sxIN5O08FpAIajwXhqhjJgBEUwa4hXRHAR1uTO6YDnzs5xCQZRkslTEUD5ElzvfLrRfa4i9rdt1aFKkZVxJpZnSCbr6D6KpGKq5YVvqekf50MYYoLRdqFYubCwldlug_S0wkdMdGaADv8dCDSE1VIP9ttxRmdZm--RGpFMlxYQ28_R0STy3kttFv0p-Fzu_OvZt2Pv9xf0AnY-CuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307173827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficient Reliance and Damage Measures for Breach of Contract</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Rogerson, William P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rogerson, William P.</creatorcontrib><description>This article considers a situation where the buyer or the seller of a good must engage in expenditures on specific capital before the exchange either to prepare to use the product or to prepare to sell it. It is assumed that postbreach bargaining is possible and carried out in a cooperative fashion, and that buyers and sellers form expectations about the outcome of such bargaining in a specific way. Without enforceable contracts, the potential appropriability of specific rents results in inefficiently low levels of investment. Three damage measures commonly used to enforce contracts are shown to produce inefficiently high levels of investment and to be Pareto-ranked from best to worst as follows: specific performance, expectation damages, and reliance damages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-6261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-2171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3003668</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RJECEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mount Morris, Ill: The Rand Corporation</publisher><subject>Breach of contract ; Buyers ; Capital costs ; Contract breaches ; Contract negotiations ; Contracts ; Economic theory ; Efficiency ; Efficiency metrics ; Expectations ; Expected returns ; Expenditures ; Mathematical analysis ; Negotiations ; Production efficiency ; Scrap value ; Sellers surplus ; Specific performance</subject><ispartof>The Rand journal of economics, 1984-04, Vol.15 (1), p.39-53</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1984 The Rand Corporation</rights><rights>Copyright Rand Corporation Spring 1984</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-85ab51dc74ed414cc584684be042580c6073e41a9a87d292cb91ed06525f60813</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3003668$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3003668$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3994,27848,27903,27904,57994,58227</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/rjerandje/v_3a15_3ay_3a1984_3ai_3aspring_3ap_3a39-53.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rogerson, William P.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficient Reliance and Damage Measures for Breach of Contract</title><title>The Rand journal of economics</title><description>This article considers a situation where the buyer or the seller of a good must engage in expenditures on specific capital before the exchange either to prepare to use the product or to prepare to sell it. It is assumed that postbreach bargaining is possible and carried out in a cooperative fashion, and that buyers and sellers form expectations about the outcome of such bargaining in a specific way. Without enforceable contracts, the potential appropriability of specific rents results in inefficiently low levels of investment. Three damage measures commonly used to enforce contracts are shown to produce inefficiently high levels of investment and to be Pareto-ranked from best to worst as follows: specific performance, expectation damages, and reliance damages.</description><subject>Breach of contract</subject><subject>Buyers</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Contract breaches</subject><subject>Contract negotiations</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Efficiency metrics</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Expected returns</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Production efficiency</subject><subject>Scrap value</subject><subject>Sellers surplus</subject><subject>Specific performance</subject><issn>0741-6261</issn><issn>1756-2171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv4B1wEXbgazTuZhQut9QEtgug6pJk77QztzJhMhf57U6rdeeHcexcf58BB6JySG8aJvuWEcKXMARpQLVXGqKaHaEC0oJliih6jkxhrkoZpNkB347KsfAVNj99hWbnGA3ZNgR_dys0BT8HFdYCIyzbghwDOL3Bb4lHb9MH5_hQdlW4Z4ez3DtHn0_hj9JJN3p5fR_eTzAvC-sxIN5O08FpAIajwXhqhjJgBEUwa4hXRHAR1uTO6YDnzs5xCQZRkslTEUD5ElzvfLrRfa4i9rdt1aFKkZVxJpZnSCbr6D6KpGKq5YVvqekf50MYYoLRdqFYubCwldlug_S0wkdMdGaADv8dCDSE1VIP9ttxRmdZm--RGpFMlxYQ28_R0STy3kttFv0p-Fzu_OvZt2Pv9xf0AnY-CuA</recordid><startdate>19840401</startdate><enddate>19840401</enddate><creator>Rogerson, William P.</creator><general>The Rand Corporation</general><general>The RAND Corporation</general><general>Rand Corp</general><general>Rand Corporation</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840401</creationdate><title>Efficient Reliance and Damage Measures for Breach of Contract</title><author>Rogerson, William P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-85ab51dc74ed414cc584684be042580c6073e41a9a87d292cb91ed06525f60813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Breach of contract</topic><topic>Buyers</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Contract breaches</topic><topic>Contract negotiations</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Efficiency metrics</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Expected returns</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Production efficiency</topic><topic>Scrap value</topic><topic>Sellers surplus</topic><topic>Specific performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rogerson, William P.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Rand journal of economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rogerson, William P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficient Reliance and Damage Measures for Breach of Contract</atitle><jtitle>The Rand journal of economics</jtitle><date>1984-04-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>39-53</pages><issn>0741-6261</issn><eissn>1756-2171</eissn><coden>RJECEA</coden><abstract>This article considers a situation where the buyer or the seller of a good must engage in expenditures on specific capital before the exchange either to prepare to use the product or to prepare to sell it. It is assumed that postbreach bargaining is possible and carried out in a cooperative fashion, and that buyers and sellers form expectations about the outcome of such bargaining in a specific way. Without enforceable contracts, the potential appropriability of specific rents results in inefficiently low levels of investment. Three damage measures commonly used to enforce contracts are shown to produce inefficiently high levels of investment and to be Pareto-ranked from best to worst as follows: specific performance, expectation damages, and reliance damages.</abstract><cop>Mount Morris, Ill</cop><pub>The Rand Corporation</pub><doi>10.2307/3003668</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-6261
ispartof The Rand journal of economics, 1984-04, Vol.15 (1), p.39-53
issn 0741-6261
1756-2171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_236567267
source Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Breach of contract
Buyers
Capital costs
Contract breaches
Contract negotiations
Contracts
Economic theory
Efficiency
Efficiency metrics
Expectations
Expected returns
Expenditures
Mathematical analysis
Negotiations
Production efficiency
Scrap value
Sellers surplus
Specific performance
title Efficient Reliance and Damage Measures for Breach of Contract
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A52%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficient%20Reliance%20and%20Damage%20Measures%20for%20Breach%20of%20Contract&rft.jtitle=The%20Rand%20journal%20of%20economics&rft.au=Rogerson,%20William%20P.&rft.date=1984-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=39-53&rft.issn=0741-6261&rft.eissn=1756-2171&rft.coden=RJECEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3003668&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3003668%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307173827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3003668&rfr_iscdi=true