JIT scheduling rules: a simulation evaluation

Just-In-Time (JIT) production systems capitalize on simplicity and the ability of workers to make decisions in a decentralized manner. In a multiproduct line operating under kanban control, the production worker at a given station must schedule the different jobs awaiting processing using informatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Omega (Oxford) 1998-06, Vol.26 (3), p.381-395
Hauptverfasser: Hum, Sin-Hoon, Lee, Chee-Kwong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 395
container_issue 3
container_start_page 381
container_title Omega (Oxford)
container_volume 26
creator Hum, Sin-Hoon
Lee, Chee-Kwong
description Just-In-Time (JIT) production systems capitalize on simplicity and the ability of workers to make decisions in a decentralized manner. In a multiproduct line operating under kanban control, the production worker at a given station must schedule the different jobs awaiting processing using information available locally. In practice, the first-come-first-served (FCFS) rule is commonly used. Recent results reported in the literature indicated that the shortest-processing-time (SPT) rule performed better than the FCFS rule. In this paper, we provide a simulation evaluation of the performance of a number of scheduling rules operating under different JIT production scenarios. Our hypothesis is that there are differences in the relative performance of the scheduling rules under different production scenarios. We differentiate among the JIT scenarios by the extent of setup time reduction already carried out (as indicated by the ratio of setup to processing times), the amount of slack in the system (as measured by the number of kanbans circulating), the extent to which uncertainty has been eliminated (as determined by the stochasticity of processing times), and the complexity of production requirements (as specified by the product-mix in mixed-model assembly). In this way, this paper provides further insights into the performance of scheduling rules operating under different JIT production environments, thereby adding to the scope and depth of research in this particular aspect of JIT production systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00066-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236500371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305048397000662</els_id><sourcerecordid>1839906155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-6293de40a99089d3a5b91e10213e2bd2dfad7ca289115836a23dcead8e5bb25c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUgRsIBFwI84sdkgVPFoVYkFZW059rS4SpNiJ5X697gPdYdYjO8szswdXSN0SfA9wSR_-MQM8xRngt3K4g5jnOcpPUI9IgqWclpkx6h3QE7RWQjzCBGBWQ-lo-EkCeYbbFe5epb4roLwmOgkuEVX6dY1dQIrXXXb9hydTHUV4GKvffT1-jIZvKfjj7fh4HmcmoyLNs2pZBYyrKXEQlqmeSkJEEwJA1paaqfaFkZTIQnhguWaMmtAWwG8LCk3rI-udnuXvvnpILRq3nS-jpaKspxjzAoSoeu_ICJYtM4J55HiO8r4JgQPU7X0bqH9WhGsNvGpbXxqk42ShdrGF136aLSb87AEcxgCgHmzgJlWK8U0zeOzjkWkFFFcLBZruVFBFJNcfbeLuOxmf6oORldTr2vjwmEpjX8ktrc-7TCI2a4ceBWMg9qAdR5Mq2zj_rn6F6N6ml0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839906155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>JIT scheduling rules: a simulation evaluation</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hum, Sin-Hoon ; Lee, Chee-Kwong</creator><creatorcontrib>Hum, Sin-Hoon ; Lee, Chee-Kwong</creatorcontrib><description>Just-In-Time (JIT) production systems capitalize on simplicity and the ability of workers to make decisions in a decentralized manner. In a multiproduct line operating under kanban control, the production worker at a given station must schedule the different jobs awaiting processing using information available locally. In practice, the first-come-first-served (FCFS) rule is commonly used. Recent results reported in the literature indicated that the shortest-processing-time (SPT) rule performed better than the FCFS rule. In this paper, we provide a simulation evaluation of the performance of a number of scheduling rules operating under different JIT production scenarios. Our hypothesis is that there are differences in the relative performance of the scheduling rules under different production scenarios. We differentiate among the JIT scenarios by the extent of setup time reduction already carried out (as indicated by the ratio of setup to processing times), the amount of slack in the system (as measured by the number of kanbans circulating), the extent to which uncertainty has been eliminated (as determined by the stochasticity of processing times), and the complexity of production requirements (as specified by the product-mix in mixed-model assembly). In this way, this paper provides further insights into the performance of scheduling rules operating under different JIT production environments, thereby adding to the scope and depth of research in this particular aspect of JIT production systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00066-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OMEGA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Exeter: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Comparative analysis ; Decision making ; Exact sciences and technology ; Inventory control, production control. Distribution ; Job shops ; Just in time ; Just-In-Time scheduling simulation ; Management science ; Operational research and scientific management ; Operational research. Management science ; Production scheduling ; scheduling ; Scheduling, sequencing ; Simulation ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Omega (Oxford), 1998-06, Vol.26 (3), p.381-395</ispartof><rights>1997 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jun 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-6293de40a99089d3a5b91e10213e2bd2dfad7ca289115836a23dcead8e5bb25c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-6293de40a99089d3a5b91e10213e2bd2dfad7ca289115836a23dcead8e5bb25c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048397000662$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27846,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2274855$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejomega/v_3a26_3ay_3a1998_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a381-395.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hum, Sin-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chee-Kwong</creatorcontrib><title>JIT scheduling rules: a simulation evaluation</title><title>Omega (Oxford)</title><description>Just-In-Time (JIT) production systems capitalize on simplicity and the ability of workers to make decisions in a decentralized manner. In a multiproduct line operating under kanban control, the production worker at a given station must schedule the different jobs awaiting processing using information available locally. In practice, the first-come-first-served (FCFS) rule is commonly used. Recent results reported in the literature indicated that the shortest-processing-time (SPT) rule performed better than the FCFS rule. In this paper, we provide a simulation evaluation of the performance of a number of scheduling rules operating under different JIT production scenarios. Our hypothesis is that there are differences in the relative performance of the scheduling rules under different production scenarios. We differentiate among the JIT scenarios by the extent of setup time reduction already carried out (as indicated by the ratio of setup to processing times), the amount of slack in the system (as measured by the number of kanbans circulating), the extent to which uncertainty has been eliminated (as determined by the stochasticity of processing times), and the complexity of production requirements (as specified by the product-mix in mixed-model assembly). In this way, this paper provides further insights into the performance of scheduling rules operating under different JIT production environments, thereby adding to the scope and depth of research in this particular aspect of JIT production systems.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Inventory control, production control. Distribution</subject><subject>Job shops</subject><subject>Just in time</subject><subject>Just-In-Time scheduling simulation</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>Operational research and scientific management</subject><subject>Operational research. Management science</subject><subject>Production scheduling</subject><subject>scheduling</subject><subject>Scheduling, sequencing</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0305-0483</issn><issn>1873-5274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUgRsIBFwI84sdkgVPFoVYkFZW059rS4SpNiJ5X697gPdYdYjO8szswdXSN0SfA9wSR_-MQM8xRngt3K4g5jnOcpPUI9IgqWclpkx6h3QE7RWQjzCBGBWQ-lo-EkCeYbbFe5epb4roLwmOgkuEVX6dY1dQIrXXXb9hydTHUV4GKvffT1-jIZvKfjj7fh4HmcmoyLNs2pZBYyrKXEQlqmeSkJEEwJA1paaqfaFkZTIQnhguWaMmtAWwG8LCk3rI-udnuXvvnpILRq3nS-jpaKspxjzAoSoeu_ICJYtM4J55HiO8r4JgQPU7X0bqH9WhGsNvGpbXxqk42ShdrGF136aLSb87AEcxgCgHmzgJlWK8U0zeOzjkWkFFFcLBZruVFBFJNcfbeLuOxmf6oORldTr2vjwmEpjX8ktrc-7TCI2a4ceBWMg9qAdR5Mq2zj_rn6F6N6ml0</recordid><startdate>19980601</startdate><enddate>19980601</enddate><creator>Hum, Sin-Hoon</creator><creator>Lee, Chee-Kwong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980601</creationdate><title>JIT scheduling rules: a simulation evaluation</title><author>Hum, Sin-Hoon ; Lee, Chee-Kwong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-6293de40a99089d3a5b91e10213e2bd2dfad7ca289115836a23dcead8e5bb25c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Inventory control, production control. Distribution</topic><topic>Job shops</topic><topic>Just in time</topic><topic>Just-In-Time scheduling simulation</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>Operational research and scientific management</topic><topic>Operational research. Management science</topic><topic>Production scheduling</topic><topic>scheduling</topic><topic>Scheduling, sequencing</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hum, Sin-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chee-Kwong</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Omega (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hum, Sin-Hoon</au><au>Lee, Chee-Kwong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>JIT scheduling rules: a simulation evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Omega (Oxford)</jtitle><date>1998-06-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>381-395</pages><issn>0305-0483</issn><eissn>1873-5274</eissn><coden>OMEGA6</coden><abstract>Just-In-Time (JIT) production systems capitalize on simplicity and the ability of workers to make decisions in a decentralized manner. In a multiproduct line operating under kanban control, the production worker at a given station must schedule the different jobs awaiting processing using information available locally. In practice, the first-come-first-served (FCFS) rule is commonly used. Recent results reported in the literature indicated that the shortest-processing-time (SPT) rule performed better than the FCFS rule. In this paper, we provide a simulation evaluation of the performance of a number of scheduling rules operating under different JIT production scenarios. Our hypothesis is that there are differences in the relative performance of the scheduling rules under different production scenarios. We differentiate among the JIT scenarios by the extent of setup time reduction already carried out (as indicated by the ratio of setup to processing times), the amount of slack in the system (as measured by the number of kanbans circulating), the extent to which uncertainty has been eliminated (as determined by the stochasticity of processing times), and the complexity of production requirements (as specified by the product-mix in mixed-model assembly). In this way, this paper provides further insights into the performance of scheduling rules operating under different JIT production environments, thereby adding to the scope and depth of research in this particular aspect of JIT production systems.</abstract><cop>Exeter</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00066-2</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-0483
ispartof Omega (Oxford), 1998-06, Vol.26 (3), p.381-395
issn 0305-0483
1873-5274
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_236500371
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Applied sciences
Comparative analysis
Decision making
Exact sciences and technology
Inventory control, production control. Distribution
Job shops
Just in time
Just-In-Time scheduling simulation
Management science
Operational research and scientific management
Operational research. Management science
Production scheduling
scheduling
Scheduling, sequencing
Simulation
Studies
title JIT scheduling rules: a simulation evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A15%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=JIT%20scheduling%20rules:%20a%20simulation%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Omega%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Hum,%20Sin-Hoon&rft.date=1998-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=381-395&rft.issn=0305-0483&rft.eissn=1873-5274&rft.coden=OMEGA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00066-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839906155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839906155&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0305048397000662&rfr_iscdi=true