Profits and total factor productivity: A comparative analysis
This paper analyses some of the approaches that explain the variation in profits based on the concept of total factor productivity (TFP), using the framework of the neoclassical theory of production. In this field different explanatory decompositions of the variation in profits have been suggested....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Omega (Oxford) 1992-09, Vol.20 (5), p.553-568 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 568 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 553 |
| container_title | Omega (Oxford) |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Garrigosa, E Genescà Tatjé, E Grifell |
| description | This paper analyses some of the approaches that explain the variation in profits based on the concept of total factor productivity (TFP), using the framework of the neoclassical theory of production. In this field different explanatory decompositions of the variation in profits have been suggested. These are based on mathematical expressions that quantify different effects on the profit variations, such as the TFP and the price recovery. We will analyse alternative proposals for the decomposition of profit variations over time, using a common framework which draws on Solow's concept of technical change. We introduce the notionof “duality” among TFP measures which allows us to show that several decompositions of the profit variations suggested in the literature are in fact ‘dual’ to each other and therefore they measure the same thing. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0305-0483(92)90002-O |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236493018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>030504839290002O</els_id><sourcerecordid>1311293070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-8f721222a1d42ebbcfee0882ec76fef387965c51f69a6e78cb7a3a7f9f00ea503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qGzEUhUVIIW7aN-hiaLpIF9Pqd6QpJBBC0hYM7qJdi2vNVStjWxNJNvjtq6mDd83iXgnxncPRIeQdo58YZd1nKqhqqTTiuucfe0opbxdnZMaMFq3iWp6T2Qm5IK9zXlWGGSpm5OZHij6U3MB2aEossG48uBJTM6Y47FwJ-1AOX5q7xsXNCAnqA1YY1occ8hvyysM649vn85L8enz4ef-tnS--fr-_m7dOKl1a4zVnnHNgg-S4XDqPSI3h6HTn0Quj-045xXzXQ4fauKUGAdr3nlIERcUleX_0raGedpiLXcVdqiGy5aKTvai_qdDV_yAmGOOV0pOVPFIuxZwTejumsIF0sIzaqU07VWWnqmzP7b827aLK5kdZwhHdSYOIq7jB32D3VgCndR3qsL5KBYQ6ynZ1j9NNCas6Y_-UTbX78JwVsoO1T7B1IZ9spdBaclmx2yOGtdx9wGSzC7h1OISErtghhpdj_wUrY6Dl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311293070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Profits and total factor productivity: A comparative analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Garrigosa, E Genescà ; Tatjé, E Grifell</creator><creatorcontrib>Garrigosa, E Genescà ; Tatjé, E Grifell</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyses some of the approaches that explain the variation in profits based on the concept of total factor productivity (TFP), using the framework of the neoclassical theory of production. In this field different explanatory decompositions of the variation in profits have been suggested. These are based on mathematical expressions that quantify different effects on the profit variations, such as the TFP and the price recovery. We will analyse alternative proposals for the decomposition of profit variations over time, using a common framework which draws on Solow's concept of technical change. We introduce the notionof “duality” among TFP measures which allows us to show that several decompositions of the profit variations suggested in the literature are in fact ‘dual’ to each other and therefore they measure the same thing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0305-0483(92)90002-O</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OMEGA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Exeter: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Economic theory ; Exact sciences and technology ; Firm modelling ; management ; Operational research and scientific management ; Operational research. Management science ; Productivity ; productivity management profit ; Profit</subject><ispartof>Omega (Oxford), 1992-09, Vol.20 (5), p.553-568</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Sep 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-8f721222a1d42ebbcfee0882ec76fef387965c51f69a6e78cb7a3a7f9f00ea503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-8f721222a1d42ebbcfee0882ec76fef387965c51f69a6e78cb7a3a7f9f00ea503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(92)90002-O$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,3996,27852,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4377424$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejomega/v_3a20_3ay_3a1992_3ai_3a5-6_3ap_3a553-568.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garrigosa, E Genescà</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatjé, E Grifell</creatorcontrib><title>Profits and total factor productivity: A comparative analysis</title><title>Omega (Oxford)</title><description>This paper analyses some of the approaches that explain the variation in profits based on the concept of total factor productivity (TFP), using the framework of the neoclassical theory of production. In this field different explanatory decompositions of the variation in profits have been suggested. These are based on mathematical expressions that quantify different effects on the profit variations, such as the TFP and the price recovery. We will analyse alternative proposals for the decomposition of profit variations over time, using a common framework which draws on Solow's concept of technical change. We introduce the notionof “duality” among TFP measures which allows us to show that several decompositions of the profit variations suggested in the literature are in fact ‘dual’ to each other and therefore they measure the same thing.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Firm modelling</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>Operational research and scientific management</subject><subject>Operational research. Management science</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>productivity management profit</subject><subject>Profit</subject><issn>0305-0483</issn><issn>1873-5274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1qGzEUhUVIIW7aN-hiaLpIF9Pqd6QpJBBC0hYM7qJdi2vNVStjWxNJNvjtq6mDd83iXgnxncPRIeQdo58YZd1nKqhqqTTiuucfe0opbxdnZMaMFq3iWp6T2Qm5IK9zXlWGGSpm5OZHij6U3MB2aEossG48uBJTM6Y47FwJ-1AOX5q7xsXNCAnqA1YY1occ8hvyysM649vn85L8enz4ef-tnS--fr-_m7dOKl1a4zVnnHNgg-S4XDqPSI3h6HTn0Quj-045xXzXQ4fauKUGAdr3nlIERcUleX_0raGedpiLXcVdqiGy5aKTvai_qdDV_yAmGOOV0pOVPFIuxZwTejumsIF0sIzaqU07VWWnqmzP7b827aLK5kdZwhHdSYOIq7jB32D3VgCndR3qsL5KBYQ6ynZ1j9NNCas6Y_-UTbX78JwVsoO1T7B1IZ9spdBaclmx2yOGtdx9wGSzC7h1OISErtghhpdj_wUrY6Dl</recordid><startdate>19920901</startdate><enddate>19920901</enddate><creator>Garrigosa, E Genescà</creator><creator>Tatjé, E Grifell</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920901</creationdate><title>Profits and total factor productivity: A comparative analysis</title><author>Garrigosa, E Genescà ; Tatjé, E Grifell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-8f721222a1d42ebbcfee0882ec76fef387965c51f69a6e78cb7a3a7f9f00ea503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Firm modelling</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>Operational research and scientific management</topic><topic>Operational research. Management science</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>productivity management profit</topic><topic>Profit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garrigosa, E Genescà</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatjé, E Grifell</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Omega (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garrigosa, E Genescà</au><au>Tatjé, E Grifell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Profits and total factor productivity: A comparative analysis</atitle><jtitle>Omega (Oxford)</jtitle><date>1992-09-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>553-568</pages><issn>0305-0483</issn><eissn>1873-5274</eissn><coden>OMEGA6</coden><abstract>This paper analyses some of the approaches that explain the variation in profits based on the concept of total factor productivity (TFP), using the framework of the neoclassical theory of production. In this field different explanatory decompositions of the variation in profits have been suggested. These are based on mathematical expressions that quantify different effects on the profit variations, such as the TFP and the price recovery. We will analyse alternative proposals for the decomposition of profit variations over time, using a common framework which draws on Solow's concept of technical change. We introduce the notionof “duality” among TFP measures which allows us to show that several decompositions of the profit variations suggested in the literature are in fact ‘dual’ to each other and therefore they measure the same thing.</abstract><cop>Exeter</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0305-0483(92)90002-O</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-0483 |
| ispartof | Omega (Oxford), 1992-09, Vol.20 (5), p.553-568 |
| issn | 0305-0483 1873-5274 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_236493018 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; RePEc; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Applied sciences Economic theory Exact sciences and technology Firm modelling management Operational research and scientific management Operational research. Management science Productivity productivity management profit Profit |
| title | Profits and total factor productivity: A comparative analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A53%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Profits%20and%20total%20factor%20productivity:%20A%20comparative%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Omega%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Garrigosa,%20E%20Genesc%C3%A0&rft.date=1992-09-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=553-568&rft.issn=0305-0483&rft.eissn=1873-5274&rft.coden=OMEGA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0305-0483(92)90002-O&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1311293070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311293070&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=030504839290002O&rfr_iscdi=true |