Evaluation of energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions in rice cultivation in Guilan province, northern Iran

The agricultural sector as a supplier of nutritional needs is becoming increasingly dependent on energy consumption. The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of paddy farm level of mechanization on the energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions as well as their effect on rice cul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Paddy and water environment 2020, Vol.18 (1), p.261-272
Hauptverfasser: Salar Ashayeri, M., Khaledian, M. R., Kavoosi-Kalashami, M., Rezaei, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 272
container_issue 1
container_start_page 261
container_title Paddy and water environment
container_volume 18
creator Salar Ashayeri, M.
Khaledian, M. R.
Kavoosi-Kalashami, M.
Rezaei, M.
description The agricultural sector as a supplier of nutritional needs is becoming increasingly dependent on energy consumption. The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of paddy farm level of mechanization on the energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions as well as their effect on rice cultivation in Guilan province, Iran. The survey contains a strategy for assessing sustainable development in the agricultural sector and protecting the environment. To this end, the indicators of energy efficiency and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from inputs were analyzed. The data used in this study were gathered from questionnaires during the crop years of 2013–2014. Data were grouped based on the level of mechanization. According to the results of the two groups, there was a significant difference in terms of energy input consumption, and direct, renewable, and non-renewable energies, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Net energy in high and low mechanization levels of 19,340.55 and 20,237.18 MJ ha −1 was calculated for the crop season, respectively. The share of indirect energy in both groups was approximately 80%. The renewable and non-renewable energy usages based on input were 35 and 65% in high mechanization level. Similarly, for low mechanization level, these ratios were 37 and 63%. In the high mechanization level, 44% of total greenhouse gas emissions were from diesel, 31% from nitrogen, and 13.5% from machinery. Also, in the low mechanization group, 40% of the total greenhouse gas emissions were due to nitrogen fertilization, 35.5% of diesel consumption and 11% of machinery. It should be noted that in both groups, agricultural pesticides account for less than 10% of greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon efficiencies, being the ratio of yield’s carbon content to carbon emissions, were estimated to be 10.67 and 12.85 in high and low mechanization levels, respectively. Therefore, it is implied that the low mechanization level group is more eco-friendly. The results of the Cobb–Douglas model in the low mechanization level showed that the impact of the energy input of irrigation water was positive, while that of the energy inputs of diesel fuel, chemical fertilizers, labor, and pesticides was negative.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10333-019-00778-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2363168110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2363168110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6b2ee779808f026b97df31abf561ff7abe1c70f39337abc33e38dd7c622e804f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscSVge9M4OaKqlEqVuMDZcpJ16qq1i51U6ttjCIgbp_3RzOzqI-SWswfOmHyMnAFAxniVpVGWGZyRCS84z8SM5ee_fV6xS3IV45YxIXPgE-IXR70bdG-9o95QdBi6E631TrsGqXYt7QKi2_ghIu10pLi3MSZ1pNbRYJOoGXa9PY4RabccbDLTQ_BHmzLuqfOh32BwdBW0uyYXRu8i3vzUKXl_XrzNX7L163I1f1pnDfCqz4paIEpZlaw0TBR1JVsDXNdmVnBjpK6RN5IZqADS0AAglG0rm0IILFluYEruxtz0x8eAsVdbPwSXTioBBfCi5AnZlIhR1QQfY0CjDsHudTgpztQXWDWCVQms-garIJlgNMUkdh2Gv-h_XJ9zlnzk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2363168110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions in rice cultivation in Guilan province, northern Iran</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Salar Ashayeri, M. ; Khaledian, M. R. ; Kavoosi-Kalashami, M. ; Rezaei, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salar Ashayeri, M. ; Khaledian, M. R. ; Kavoosi-Kalashami, M. ; Rezaei, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The agricultural sector as a supplier of nutritional needs is becoming increasingly dependent on energy consumption. The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of paddy farm level of mechanization on the energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions as well as their effect on rice cultivation in Guilan province, Iran. The survey contains a strategy for assessing sustainable development in the agricultural sector and protecting the environment. To this end, the indicators of energy efficiency and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from inputs were analyzed. The data used in this study were gathered from questionnaires during the crop years of 2013–2014. Data were grouped based on the level of mechanization. According to the results of the two groups, there was a significant difference in terms of energy input consumption, and direct, renewable, and non-renewable energies, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Net energy in high and low mechanization levels of 19,340.55 and 20,237.18 MJ ha −1 was calculated for the crop season, respectively. The share of indirect energy in both groups was approximately 80%. The renewable and non-renewable energy usages based on input were 35 and 65% in high mechanization level. Similarly, for low mechanization level, these ratios were 37 and 63%. In the high mechanization level, 44% of total greenhouse gas emissions were from diesel, 31% from nitrogen, and 13.5% from machinery. Also, in the low mechanization group, 40% of the total greenhouse gas emissions were due to nitrogen fertilization, 35.5% of diesel consumption and 11% of machinery. It should be noted that in both groups, agricultural pesticides account for less than 10% of greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon efficiencies, being the ratio of yield’s carbon content to carbon emissions, were estimated to be 10.67 and 12.85 in high and low mechanization levels, respectively. Therefore, it is implied that the low mechanization level group is more eco-friendly. The results of the Cobb–Douglas model in the low mechanization level showed that the impact of the energy input of irrigation water was positive, while that of the energy inputs of diesel fuel, chemical fertilizers, labor, and pesticides was negative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1611-2490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1611-2504</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10333-019-00778-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Agricultural industry ; Agriculture ; Agrochemicals ; Biological fertilization ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon ; Carbon content ; Chemical fertilizers ; Cultivation ; Diesel ; Diesel fuels ; Ecotoxicology ; Emissions ; Energy ; Energy balance ; Energy consumption ; Energy efficiency ; Environmental management ; Environmental protection ; Farm buildings ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Grain cultivation ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Irrigation water ; Labour ; Levels ; Life Sciences ; Machinery ; Mechanization ; Nitrogen ; Organic chemistry ; Pesticides ; Ratios ; Renewable energy ; Renewable resources ; Resource management ; Rice ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Surveying ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Paddy and water environment, 2020, Vol.18 (1), p.261-272</ispartof><rights>The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering 2019</rights><rights>2019© The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6b2ee779808f026b97df31abf561ff7abe1c70f39337abc33e38dd7c622e804f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6b2ee779808f026b97df31abf561ff7abe1c70f39337abc33e38dd7c622e804f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10333-019-00778-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10333-019-00778-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salar Ashayeri, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khaledian, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavoosi-Kalashami, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions in rice cultivation in Guilan province, northern Iran</title><title>Paddy and water environment</title><addtitle>Paddy Water Environ</addtitle><description>The agricultural sector as a supplier of nutritional needs is becoming increasingly dependent on energy consumption. The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of paddy farm level of mechanization on the energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions as well as their effect on rice cultivation in Guilan province, Iran. The survey contains a strategy for assessing sustainable development in the agricultural sector and protecting the environment. To this end, the indicators of energy efficiency and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from inputs were analyzed. The data used in this study were gathered from questionnaires during the crop years of 2013–2014. Data were grouped based on the level of mechanization. According to the results of the two groups, there was a significant difference in terms of energy input consumption, and direct, renewable, and non-renewable energies, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Net energy in high and low mechanization levels of 19,340.55 and 20,237.18 MJ ha −1 was calculated for the crop season, respectively. The share of indirect energy in both groups was approximately 80%. The renewable and non-renewable energy usages based on input were 35 and 65% in high mechanization level. Similarly, for low mechanization level, these ratios were 37 and 63%. In the high mechanization level, 44% of total greenhouse gas emissions were from diesel, 31% from nitrogen, and 13.5% from machinery. Also, in the low mechanization group, 40% of the total greenhouse gas emissions were due to nitrogen fertilization, 35.5% of diesel consumption and 11% of machinery. It should be noted that in both groups, agricultural pesticides account for less than 10% of greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon efficiencies, being the ratio of yield’s carbon content to carbon emissions, were estimated to be 10.67 and 12.85 in high and low mechanization levels, respectively. Therefore, it is implied that the low mechanization level group is more eco-friendly. The results of the Cobb–Douglas model in the low mechanization level showed that the impact of the energy input of irrigation water was positive, while that of the energy inputs of diesel fuel, chemical fertilizers, labor, and pesticides was negative.</description><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Biological fertilization</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>Chemical fertilizers</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Diesel</subject><subject>Diesel fuels</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy balance</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Farm buildings</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Grain cultivation</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>Labour</subject><subject>Levels</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Machinery</subject><subject>Mechanization</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>1611-2490</issn><issn>1611-2504</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscSVge9M4OaKqlEqVuMDZcpJ16qq1i51U6ttjCIgbp_3RzOzqI-SWswfOmHyMnAFAxniVpVGWGZyRCS84z8SM5ee_fV6xS3IV45YxIXPgE-IXR70bdG-9o95QdBi6E631TrsGqXYt7QKi2_ghIu10pLi3MSZ1pNbRYJOoGXa9PY4RabccbDLTQ_BHmzLuqfOh32BwdBW0uyYXRu8i3vzUKXl_XrzNX7L163I1f1pnDfCqz4paIEpZlaw0TBR1JVsDXNdmVnBjpK6RN5IZqADS0AAglG0rm0IILFluYEruxtz0x8eAsVdbPwSXTioBBfCi5AnZlIhR1QQfY0CjDsHudTgpztQXWDWCVQms-garIJlgNMUkdh2Gv-h_XJ9zlnzk</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Salar Ashayeri, M.</creator><creator>Khaledian, M. R.</creator><creator>Kavoosi-Kalashami, M.</creator><creator>Rezaei, M.</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Evaluation of energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions in rice cultivation in Guilan province, northern Iran</title><author>Salar Ashayeri, M. ; Khaledian, M. R. ; Kavoosi-Kalashami, M. ; Rezaei, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6b2ee779808f026b97df31abf561ff7abe1c70f39337abc33e38dd7c622e804f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Biological fertilization</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>Chemical fertilizers</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Diesel</topic><topic>Diesel fuels</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy balance</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Farm buildings</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Grain cultivation</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>Labour</topic><topic>Levels</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Machinery</topic><topic>Mechanization</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salar Ashayeri, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khaledian, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavoosi-Kalashami, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Paddy and water environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salar Ashayeri, M.</au><au>Khaledian, M. R.</au><au>Kavoosi-Kalashami, M.</au><au>Rezaei, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions in rice cultivation in Guilan province, northern Iran</atitle><jtitle>Paddy and water environment</jtitle><stitle>Paddy Water Environ</stitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>261-272</pages><issn>1611-2490</issn><eissn>1611-2504</eissn><abstract>The agricultural sector as a supplier of nutritional needs is becoming increasingly dependent on energy consumption. The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of paddy farm level of mechanization on the energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions as well as their effect on rice cultivation in Guilan province, Iran. The survey contains a strategy for assessing sustainable development in the agricultural sector and protecting the environment. To this end, the indicators of energy efficiency and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from inputs were analyzed. The data used in this study were gathered from questionnaires during the crop years of 2013–2014. Data were grouped based on the level of mechanization. According to the results of the two groups, there was a significant difference in terms of energy input consumption, and direct, renewable, and non-renewable energies, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Net energy in high and low mechanization levels of 19,340.55 and 20,237.18 MJ ha −1 was calculated for the crop season, respectively. The share of indirect energy in both groups was approximately 80%. The renewable and non-renewable energy usages based on input were 35 and 65% in high mechanization level. Similarly, for low mechanization level, these ratios were 37 and 63%. In the high mechanization level, 44% of total greenhouse gas emissions were from diesel, 31% from nitrogen, and 13.5% from machinery. Also, in the low mechanization group, 40% of the total greenhouse gas emissions were due to nitrogen fertilization, 35.5% of diesel consumption and 11% of machinery. It should be noted that in both groups, agricultural pesticides account for less than 10% of greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon efficiencies, being the ratio of yield’s carbon content to carbon emissions, were estimated to be 10.67 and 12.85 in high and low mechanization levels, respectively. Therefore, it is implied that the low mechanization level group is more eco-friendly. The results of the Cobb–Douglas model in the low mechanization level showed that the impact of the energy input of irrigation water was positive, while that of the energy inputs of diesel fuel, chemical fertilizers, labor, and pesticides was negative.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s10333-019-00778-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1611-2490
ispartof Paddy and water environment, 2020, Vol.18 (1), p.261-272
issn 1611-2490
1611-2504
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2363168110
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agricultural industry
Agriculture
Agrochemicals
Biological fertilization
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Carbon
Carbon content
Chemical fertilizers
Cultivation
Diesel
Diesel fuels
Ecotoxicology
Emissions
Energy
Energy balance
Energy consumption
Energy efficiency
Environmental management
Environmental protection
Farm buildings
Fertilization
Fertilizers
Geoecology/Natural Processes
Grain cultivation
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse gases
Hydrogeology
Hydrology/Water Resources
Irrigation water
Labour
Levels
Life Sciences
Machinery
Mechanization
Nitrogen
Organic chemistry
Pesticides
Ratios
Renewable energy
Renewable resources
Resource management
Rice
Soil Science & Conservation
Surveying
Sustainable development
title Evaluation of energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions in rice cultivation in Guilan province, northern Iran
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A19%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20energy%20balance%20and%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20in%20rice%20cultivation%20in%20Guilan%20province,%20northern%20Iran&rft.jtitle=Paddy%20and%20water%20environment&rft.au=Salar%20Ashayeri,%20M.&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=261-272&rft.issn=1611-2490&rft.eissn=1611-2504&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10333-019-00778-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2363168110%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2363168110&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true