Estimation of Planar Trend Model Parameters for Midlatitude Ionosphere
Being under influence of the polar and equatorial regions, the midlatitude ionosphere poses an important challenge in structural modeling. In this study, the general understanding of regional planar trend model is investigated for 2011 by estimation of trend coefficients in the least squares sense....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2020-02, Vol.125 (2), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Kumbay Yildiz, S. Arikan, F. |
description | Being under influence of the polar and equatorial regions, the midlatitude ionosphere poses an important challenge in structural modeling. In this study, the general understanding of regional planar trend model is investigated for 2011 by estimation of trend coefficients in the least squares sense. The northern midlatitude is divided into 24 nonoverlapping regions of 10° by 20° in latitude and longitude, respectively. The magnetic conjugates of 24 regions in the Southern Hemisphere are also extracted. The total electron content values are obtained from global ionospheric maps (GIM) with spatial resolution of 2.5° by 5° in latitude and longitude, respectively. The temporal resolution of GIM can be 1 or 2 hr. Estimated planar trend coefficients are used to reconstruct model maps. The difference between GIM and the estimated planar model is obtained in normalized
L2 norm squares sense. It is observed that the planar trend model in latitude and longitude is an agreeable model for total electron content over midlatitude regions for both Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The estimated model parameters generally follow the diurnal, seasonal, and semiannual trend structures of midlatitude ionosphere. The deviations from the model occur mostly during severe disturbances such as geomagnetic storms. The difference between the reconstructed model maps with estimated parameters and GIM is generally under 1% for land and 2% to 5% for ocean regions. The only region that has a very high spread and mostly up to 10% difference with the GIM throughout the year is on the California Current.
Plain Language Summary
The manuscript contains a very comprehensive analysis of midlatitude planar trend structure for 2011. The coefficients of the model are estimated in the least squares sense from the global ionospheric maps. The results of the study indicate the validity of the locally linear trend of midlatitude ionosphere in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The highest deviations from the planar model occurred during high variability of solar activity with multiple maxima of sunspot number, geomagnetic disturbances, for regions over the passage between different pressure zones, and the saddle structure longitude of main field intensity around 165° in geomagnetic longitude. Overall, for almost all land and for some ocean regions, the annual difference is under 2%. Even for the regions with higher variability, the difference is generally under 10%.
Key Points
Planar trend |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019JA027223 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2363144429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2363144429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2371-a061df7b1c811a0a5cd4cbecc64f4a087f65194d29ba2abe615f4e300830fe7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGpv_oCAV1czSfbrWEo_abFIPS_ZZIJbtpuabJH-eyNV8ORcZhge3nnnJeQe2BMwXj5zBuVqzHjOubgiAw5ZmZSS8evfWRTsloxC2LNYRVxBOiCzaeibg-ob11Fn6bZVnfJ057EzdOMMtnSrvDpgjz5Q6zzdNKaNeH8ySJeuc-H4jh7vyI1VbcDRTx-St9l0N1kk65f5cjJeJ5qLHBLFMjA2r0EXAIqpVBupa9Q6k1YqVuQ2S6GUhpe14qrGDFIrUUS7glnMrRiSh4vu0buPE4a-2ruT7-LJiotMgJSSl5F6vFDauxA82uro45P-XAGrvsOq_oYVcXHBP5sWz_-y1Wr-Ok7TlIH4Ak1EagE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2363144429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation of Planar Trend Model Parameters for Midlatitude Ionosphere</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><creator>Kumbay Yildiz, S. ; Arikan, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumbay Yildiz, S. ; Arikan, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Being under influence of the polar and equatorial regions, the midlatitude ionosphere poses an important challenge in structural modeling. In this study, the general understanding of regional planar trend model is investigated for 2011 by estimation of trend coefficients in the least squares sense. The northern midlatitude is divided into 24 nonoverlapping regions of 10° by 20° in latitude and longitude, respectively. The magnetic conjugates of 24 regions in the Southern Hemisphere are also extracted. The total electron content values are obtained from global ionospheric maps (GIM) with spatial resolution of 2.5° by 5° in latitude and longitude, respectively. The temporal resolution of GIM can be 1 or 2 hr. Estimated planar trend coefficients are used to reconstruct model maps. The difference between GIM and the estimated planar model is obtained in normalized
L2 norm squares sense. It is observed that the planar trend model in latitude and longitude is an agreeable model for total electron content over midlatitude regions for both Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The estimated model parameters generally follow the diurnal, seasonal, and semiannual trend structures of midlatitude ionosphere. The deviations from the model occur mostly during severe disturbances such as geomagnetic storms. The difference between the reconstructed model maps with estimated parameters and GIM is generally under 1% for land and 2% to 5% for ocean regions. The only region that has a very high spread and mostly up to 10% difference with the GIM throughout the year is on the California Current.
Plain Language Summary
The manuscript contains a very comprehensive analysis of midlatitude planar trend structure for 2011. The coefficients of the model are estimated in the least squares sense from the global ionospheric maps. The results of the study indicate the validity of the locally linear trend of midlatitude ionosphere in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The highest deviations from the planar model occurred during high variability of solar activity with multiple maxima of sunspot number, geomagnetic disturbances, for regions over the passage between different pressure zones, and the saddle structure longitude of main field intensity around 165° in geomagnetic longitude. Overall, for almost all land and for some ocean regions, the annual difference is under 2%. Even for the regions with higher variability, the difference is generally under 10%.
Key Points
Planar trend model represents midlatitude GIM‐TEC successfully in both hemispheres
Diurnal, seasonal, and semiannual periodicities are observed in planar model coefficients
Estimated values of planar model coefficients and their spread increase during equinoxes</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JA027223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>California Current ; Coefficients ; Disturbances ; Equatorial regions ; estimation ; Geomagnetic disturbances ; Geomagnetic storms ; Geomagnetism ; Ionosphere ; Ionospheric electron content ; Ionospheric models ; Latitude ; Least squares ; Longitude ; Magnetic storms ; Mathematical models ; midlatitude ionosphere ; Oceans ; Parameter estimation ; planar model ; Polar regions ; Regions ; Solar activity ; Southern Hemisphere ; Spatial resolution ; Sunspot numbers ; Sunspots ; Temporal resolution ; Total Electron Content</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2020-02, Vol.125 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2371-a061df7b1c811a0a5cd4cbecc64f4a087f65194d29ba2abe615f4e300830fe7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2371-a061df7b1c811a0a5cd4cbecc64f4a087f65194d29ba2abe615f4e300830fe7f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4042-2374 ; 0000-0002-6481-1385</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JA027223$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JA027223$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumbay Yildiz, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arikan, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation of Planar Trend Model Parameters for Midlatitude Ionosphere</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>Being under influence of the polar and equatorial regions, the midlatitude ionosphere poses an important challenge in structural modeling. In this study, the general understanding of regional planar trend model is investigated for 2011 by estimation of trend coefficients in the least squares sense. The northern midlatitude is divided into 24 nonoverlapping regions of 10° by 20° in latitude and longitude, respectively. The magnetic conjugates of 24 regions in the Southern Hemisphere are also extracted. The total electron content values are obtained from global ionospheric maps (GIM) with spatial resolution of 2.5° by 5° in latitude and longitude, respectively. The temporal resolution of GIM can be 1 or 2 hr. Estimated planar trend coefficients are used to reconstruct model maps. The difference between GIM and the estimated planar model is obtained in normalized
L2 norm squares sense. It is observed that the planar trend model in latitude and longitude is an agreeable model for total electron content over midlatitude regions for both Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The estimated model parameters generally follow the diurnal, seasonal, and semiannual trend structures of midlatitude ionosphere. The deviations from the model occur mostly during severe disturbances such as geomagnetic storms. The difference between the reconstructed model maps with estimated parameters and GIM is generally under 1% for land and 2% to 5% for ocean regions. The only region that has a very high spread and mostly up to 10% difference with the GIM throughout the year is on the California Current.
Plain Language Summary
The manuscript contains a very comprehensive analysis of midlatitude planar trend structure for 2011. The coefficients of the model are estimated in the least squares sense from the global ionospheric maps. The results of the study indicate the validity of the locally linear trend of midlatitude ionosphere in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The highest deviations from the planar model occurred during high variability of solar activity with multiple maxima of sunspot number, geomagnetic disturbances, for regions over the passage between different pressure zones, and the saddle structure longitude of main field intensity around 165° in geomagnetic longitude. Overall, for almost all land and for some ocean regions, the annual difference is under 2%. Even for the regions with higher variability, the difference is generally under 10%.
Key Points
Planar trend model represents midlatitude GIM‐TEC successfully in both hemispheres
Diurnal, seasonal, and semiannual periodicities are observed in planar model coefficients
Estimated values of planar model coefficients and their spread increase during equinoxes</description><subject>California Current</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Disturbances</subject><subject>Equatorial regions</subject><subject>estimation</subject><subject>Geomagnetic disturbances</subject><subject>Geomagnetic storms</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Ionospheric electron content</subject><subject>Ionospheric models</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Least squares</subject><subject>Longitude</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>midlatitude ionosphere</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>planar model</subject><subject>Polar regions</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Solar activity</subject><subject>Southern Hemisphere</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Sunspot numbers</subject><subject>Sunspots</subject><subject>Temporal resolution</subject><subject>Total Electron Content</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGpv_oCAV1czSfbrWEo_abFIPS_ZZIJbtpuabJH-eyNV8ORcZhge3nnnJeQe2BMwXj5zBuVqzHjOubgiAw5ZmZSS8evfWRTsloxC2LNYRVxBOiCzaeibg-ob11Fn6bZVnfJ057EzdOMMtnSrvDpgjz5Q6zzdNKaNeH8ySJeuc-H4jh7vyI1VbcDRTx-St9l0N1kk65f5cjJeJ5qLHBLFMjA2r0EXAIqpVBupa9Q6k1YqVuQ2S6GUhpe14qrGDFIrUUS7glnMrRiSh4vu0buPE4a-2ruT7-LJiotMgJSSl5F6vFDauxA82uro45P-XAGrvsOq_oYVcXHBP5sWz_-y1Wr-Ok7TlIH4Ak1EagE</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Kumbay Yildiz, S.</creator><creator>Arikan, F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4042-2374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6481-1385</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Estimation of Planar Trend Model Parameters for Midlatitude Ionosphere</title><author>Kumbay Yildiz, S. ; Arikan, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2371-a061df7b1c811a0a5cd4cbecc64f4a087f65194d29ba2abe615f4e300830fe7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>California Current</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Disturbances</topic><topic>Equatorial regions</topic><topic>estimation</topic><topic>Geomagnetic disturbances</topic><topic>Geomagnetic storms</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Ionospheric electron content</topic><topic>Ionospheric models</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Least squares</topic><topic>Longitude</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>midlatitude ionosphere</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>planar model</topic><topic>Polar regions</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Solar activity</topic><topic>Southern Hemisphere</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Sunspot numbers</topic><topic>Sunspots</topic><topic>Temporal resolution</topic><topic>Total Electron Content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumbay Yildiz, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arikan, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumbay Yildiz, S.</au><au>Arikan, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation of Planar Trend Model Parameters for Midlatitude Ionosphere</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>Being under influence of the polar and equatorial regions, the midlatitude ionosphere poses an important challenge in structural modeling. In this study, the general understanding of regional planar trend model is investigated for 2011 by estimation of trend coefficients in the least squares sense. The northern midlatitude is divided into 24 nonoverlapping regions of 10° by 20° in latitude and longitude, respectively. The magnetic conjugates of 24 regions in the Southern Hemisphere are also extracted. The total electron content values are obtained from global ionospheric maps (GIM) with spatial resolution of 2.5° by 5° in latitude and longitude, respectively. The temporal resolution of GIM can be 1 or 2 hr. Estimated planar trend coefficients are used to reconstruct model maps. The difference between GIM and the estimated planar model is obtained in normalized
L2 norm squares sense. It is observed that the planar trend model in latitude and longitude is an agreeable model for total electron content over midlatitude regions for both Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The estimated model parameters generally follow the diurnal, seasonal, and semiannual trend structures of midlatitude ionosphere. The deviations from the model occur mostly during severe disturbances such as geomagnetic storms. The difference between the reconstructed model maps with estimated parameters and GIM is generally under 1% for land and 2% to 5% for ocean regions. The only region that has a very high spread and mostly up to 10% difference with the GIM throughout the year is on the California Current.
Plain Language Summary
The manuscript contains a very comprehensive analysis of midlatitude planar trend structure for 2011. The coefficients of the model are estimated in the least squares sense from the global ionospheric maps. The results of the study indicate the validity of the locally linear trend of midlatitude ionosphere in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The highest deviations from the planar model occurred during high variability of solar activity with multiple maxima of sunspot number, geomagnetic disturbances, for regions over the passage between different pressure zones, and the saddle structure longitude of main field intensity around 165° in geomagnetic longitude. Overall, for almost all land and for some ocean regions, the annual difference is under 2%. Even for the regions with higher variability, the difference is generally under 10%.
Key Points
Planar trend model represents midlatitude GIM‐TEC successfully in both hemispheres
Diurnal, seasonal, and semiannual periodicities are observed in planar model coefficients
Estimated values of planar model coefficients and their spread increase during equinoxes</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JA027223</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4042-2374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6481-1385</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9380 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2020-02, Vol.125 (2), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-9380 2169-9402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2363144429 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content |
subjects | California Current Coefficients Disturbances Equatorial regions estimation Geomagnetic disturbances Geomagnetic storms Geomagnetism Ionosphere Ionospheric electron content Ionospheric models Latitude Least squares Longitude Magnetic storms Mathematical models midlatitude ionosphere Oceans Parameter estimation planar model Polar regions Regions Solar activity Southern Hemisphere Spatial resolution Sunspot numbers Sunspots Temporal resolution Total Electron Content |
title | Estimation of Planar Trend Model Parameters for Midlatitude Ionosphere |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A10%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20of%20Planar%20Trend%20Model%20Parameters%20for%20Midlatitude%20Ionosphere&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Kumbay%20Yildiz,%20S.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JA027223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2363144429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2363144429&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |