Multiple lines of genetic inquiry reveal effects of local and landscape factors on an amphibian metapopulation
Context A central tenet of landscape ecology is that both characteristics of patches and the matrix between them influence functional connectivity. Landscape genetics seeks to evaluate functional connectivity by determining the role of spatial processes in the distribution of genetic diversity on th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Landscape ecology 2020-02, Vol.35 (2), p.319-335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 335 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 319 |
container_title | Landscape ecology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Parsley, Meghan B. Torres, Melanie L. Banerjee, Shreya M. Tobias, Zachary J. C. Goldberg, Caren S. Murphy, Melanie A. Mims, Meryl C. |
description | Context
A central tenet of landscape ecology is that both characteristics of patches and the matrix between them influence functional connectivity. Landscape genetics seeks to evaluate functional connectivity by determining the role of spatial processes in the distribution of genetic diversity on the landscape. However, landscape genetics studies often consider only the landscape matrix, ignoring patch-level characteristics, and possibly missing significant drivers of functional connectivity.
Objectives
(1) Evaluate drivers of functional connectivity for an amphibian metapopulation, and (2) determine whether local characteristics are as important as landscape features to functional connectivity of this species.
Methods
We used gravity models to evaluate the evidence for hypothesized drivers of functional connectivity for
Dryophytes wrightorum
that included both local and landscape attributes and a novel combination of methods of genetic inquiry: landscape genetics and environmental DNA (eDNA). Hypothesized drivers of connectivity included effects of hydrology, canopy cover, and species interactions.
Results
Evidence weights indicated that stream networks were the most likely driver of functional connectivity, and connectivity along stream networks was positively correlated with gene flow. We also found a strong correlation between abundance of
D. wrightorum
from eDNA data and effective population size estimates from microsatellite data.
Conclusions
We found evidence that functional connectivity of
D. wrightorum
was strongly driven by stream networks, despite considering multiple local and landscape processes. This suggests that management of this species focused on landscape hydrologic connectivity as gene flow corridors while maintaining current local management action is likely to have a positive effect on species conservation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10980-019-00948-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2359906175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2359906175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4223b60ce395b58e3b9382cd89de86cb166661db28c79bca56828b523481e73c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLxDAQDqLguvoHPAU8VyfJtk2OsviCFS96Dmk6XbN0027SCv33xq3gzTnMDPM9Bj5CrhncMoDyLjJQEjJgKgNQK5lNJ2TB8pJnqizYKVmA4izjqhTn5CLGHQAIAbAg_nVsB9e3SFvnMdKuoVv0ODhLnT-MLkw04BealmLToB2OjLaz6WB8TdvUojU90sbYoQsJ9gmgZt9_usqlbY-D6bt-bM3gOn9JzhrTRrz6nUvy8fjwvn7ONm9PL-v7TWYFU0O24lxUBVgUKq9yiaJSQnJbS1WjLGzFilSsrri0paqsyQvJZZVzsZIMS2HFktzMvn3oDiPGQe-6Mfj0UnORKwUFK_PE4jPLhi7GgI3ug9ubMGkG-idXPeeqU676mKuekkjMopjIfovhz_of1TcbSXzb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2359906175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple lines of genetic inquiry reveal effects of local and landscape factors on an amphibian metapopulation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Parsley, Meghan B. ; Torres, Melanie L. ; Banerjee, Shreya M. ; Tobias, Zachary J. C. ; Goldberg, Caren S. ; Murphy, Melanie A. ; Mims, Meryl C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parsley, Meghan B. ; Torres, Melanie L. ; Banerjee, Shreya M. ; Tobias, Zachary J. C. ; Goldberg, Caren S. ; Murphy, Melanie A. ; Mims, Meryl C.</creatorcontrib><description>Context
A central tenet of landscape ecology is that both characteristics of patches and the matrix between them influence functional connectivity. Landscape genetics seeks to evaluate functional connectivity by determining the role of spatial processes in the distribution of genetic diversity on the landscape. However, landscape genetics studies often consider only the landscape matrix, ignoring patch-level characteristics, and possibly missing significant drivers of functional connectivity.
Objectives
(1) Evaluate drivers of functional connectivity for an amphibian metapopulation, and (2) determine whether local characteristics are as important as landscape features to functional connectivity of this species.
Methods
We used gravity models to evaluate the evidence for hypothesized drivers of functional connectivity for
Dryophytes wrightorum
that included both local and landscape attributes and a novel combination of methods of genetic inquiry: landscape genetics and environmental DNA (eDNA). Hypothesized drivers of connectivity included effects of hydrology, canopy cover, and species interactions.
Results
Evidence weights indicated that stream networks were the most likely driver of functional connectivity, and connectivity along stream networks was positively correlated with gene flow. We also found a strong correlation between abundance of
D. wrightorum
from eDNA data and effective population size estimates from microsatellite data.
Conclusions
We found evidence that functional connectivity of
D. wrightorum
was strongly driven by stream networks, despite considering multiple local and landscape processes. This suggests that management of this species focused on landscape hydrologic connectivity as gene flow corridors while maintaining current local management action is likely to have a positive effect on species conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-019-00948-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Corridors ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Ecology ; Environmental DNA ; Environmental Management ; Gene flow ; Genetic diversity ; Genetics ; Hydrology ; Landscape ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life Sciences ; Metapopulations ; Nature Conservation ; Networks ; Population number ; Research Article ; Species ; Sustainable Development ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2020-02, Vol.35 (2), p.319-335</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Landscape Ecology is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4223b60ce395b58e3b9382cd89de86cb166661db28c79bca56828b523481e73c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4223b60ce395b58e3b9382cd89de86cb166661db28c79bca56828b523481e73c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4603-3142</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10980-019-00948-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10980-019-00948-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parsley, Meghan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Melanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Shreya M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobias, Zachary J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Caren S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Melanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mims, Meryl C.</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple lines of genetic inquiry reveal effects of local and landscape factors on an amphibian metapopulation</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landscape Ecol</addtitle><description>Context
A central tenet of landscape ecology is that both characteristics of patches and the matrix between them influence functional connectivity. Landscape genetics seeks to evaluate functional connectivity by determining the role of spatial processes in the distribution of genetic diversity on the landscape. However, landscape genetics studies often consider only the landscape matrix, ignoring patch-level characteristics, and possibly missing significant drivers of functional connectivity.
Objectives
(1) Evaluate drivers of functional connectivity for an amphibian metapopulation, and (2) determine whether local characteristics are as important as landscape features to functional connectivity of this species.
Methods
We used gravity models to evaluate the evidence for hypothesized drivers of functional connectivity for
Dryophytes wrightorum
that included both local and landscape attributes and a novel combination of methods of genetic inquiry: landscape genetics and environmental DNA (eDNA). Hypothesized drivers of connectivity included effects of hydrology, canopy cover, and species interactions.
Results
Evidence weights indicated that stream networks were the most likely driver of functional connectivity, and connectivity along stream networks was positively correlated with gene flow. We also found a strong correlation between abundance of
D. wrightorum
from eDNA data and effective population size estimates from microsatellite data.
Conclusions
We found evidence that functional connectivity of
D. wrightorum
was strongly driven by stream networks, despite considering multiple local and landscape processes. This suggests that management of this species focused on landscape hydrologic connectivity as gene flow corridors while maintaining current local management action is likely to have a positive effect on species conservation.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Corridors</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental DNA</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Gene flow</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Metapopulations</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UEtLxDAQDqLguvoHPAU8VyfJtk2OsviCFS96Dmk6XbN0027SCv33xq3gzTnMDPM9Bj5CrhncMoDyLjJQEjJgKgNQK5lNJ2TB8pJnqizYKVmA4izjqhTn5CLGHQAIAbAg_nVsB9e3SFvnMdKuoVv0ODhLnT-MLkw04BealmLToB2OjLaz6WB8TdvUojU90sbYoQsJ9gmgZt9_usqlbY-D6bt-bM3gOn9JzhrTRrz6nUvy8fjwvn7ONm9PL-v7TWYFU0O24lxUBVgUKq9yiaJSQnJbS1WjLGzFilSsrri0paqsyQvJZZVzsZIMS2HFktzMvn3oDiPGQe-6Mfj0UnORKwUFK_PE4jPLhi7GgI3ug9ubMGkG-idXPeeqU676mKuekkjMopjIfovhz_of1TcbSXzb</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Parsley, Meghan B.</creator><creator>Torres, Melanie L.</creator><creator>Banerjee, Shreya M.</creator><creator>Tobias, Zachary J. C.</creator><creator>Goldberg, Caren S.</creator><creator>Murphy, Melanie A.</creator><creator>Mims, Meryl C.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4603-3142</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Multiple lines of genetic inquiry reveal effects of local and landscape factors on an amphibian metapopulation</title><author>Parsley, Meghan B. ; Torres, Melanie L. ; Banerjee, Shreya M. ; Tobias, Zachary J. C. ; Goldberg, Caren S. ; Murphy, Melanie A. ; Mims, Meryl C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4223b60ce395b58e3b9382cd89de86cb166661db28c79bca56828b523481e73c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Corridors</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental DNA</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Gene flow</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Metapopulations</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parsley, Meghan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Melanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Shreya M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobias, Zachary J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Caren S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Melanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mims, Meryl C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parsley, Meghan B.</au><au>Torres, Melanie L.</au><au>Banerjee, Shreya M.</au><au>Tobias, Zachary J. C.</au><au>Goldberg, Caren S.</au><au>Murphy, Melanie A.</au><au>Mims, Meryl C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple lines of genetic inquiry reveal effects of local and landscape factors on an amphibian metapopulation</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landscape Ecol</stitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>319-335</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context
A central tenet of landscape ecology is that both characteristics of patches and the matrix between them influence functional connectivity. Landscape genetics seeks to evaluate functional connectivity by determining the role of spatial processes in the distribution of genetic diversity on the landscape. However, landscape genetics studies often consider only the landscape matrix, ignoring patch-level characteristics, and possibly missing significant drivers of functional connectivity.
Objectives
(1) Evaluate drivers of functional connectivity for an amphibian metapopulation, and (2) determine whether local characteristics are as important as landscape features to functional connectivity of this species.
Methods
We used gravity models to evaluate the evidence for hypothesized drivers of functional connectivity for
Dryophytes wrightorum
that included both local and landscape attributes and a novel combination of methods of genetic inquiry: landscape genetics and environmental DNA (eDNA). Hypothesized drivers of connectivity included effects of hydrology, canopy cover, and species interactions.
Results
Evidence weights indicated that stream networks were the most likely driver of functional connectivity, and connectivity along stream networks was positively correlated with gene flow. We also found a strong correlation between abundance of
D. wrightorum
from eDNA data and effective population size estimates from microsatellite data.
Conclusions
We found evidence that functional connectivity of
D. wrightorum
was strongly driven by stream networks, despite considering multiple local and landscape processes. This suggests that management of this species focused on landscape hydrologic connectivity as gene flow corridors while maintaining current local management action is likely to have a positive effect on species conservation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-019-00948-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4603-3142</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-2973 |
ispartof | Landscape ecology, 2020-02, Vol.35 (2), p.319-335 |
issn | 0921-2973 1572-9761 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2359906175 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Corridors Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Ecology Environmental DNA Environmental Management Gene flow Genetic diversity Genetics Hydrology Landscape Landscape Ecology Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Life Sciences Metapopulations Nature Conservation Networks Population number Research Article Species Sustainable Development Wildlife conservation |
title | Multiple lines of genetic inquiry reveal effects of local and landscape factors on an amphibian metapopulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T10%3A58%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple%20lines%20of%20genetic%20inquiry%20reveal%20effects%20of%20local%20and%20landscape%20factors%20on%20an%20amphibian%20metapopulation&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Parsley,%20Meghan%20B.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=319-335&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-019-00948-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2359906175%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2359906175&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |