Research productivity in Australian general practice: what has changed since the 1990s?
The Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) Strategy aims to improve Australia's output of high-quality research from primary care. We compared publication rates from general practice, medicine and surgery for the period 2000-2007, and found that general practice publi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Medical journal of Australia 2008-07, Vol.189 (2), p.103-104 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 104 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 103 |
| container_title | Medical journal of Australia |
| container_volume | 189 |
| creator | Askew, Deborah A Schluter, Philip J Gunn, Jane M |
| description | The Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) Strategy aims to improve Australia's output of high-quality research from primary care. We compared publication rates from general practice, medicine and surgery for the period 2000-2007, and found that general practice publications increased since 1990-1999 from 1.0 to 3.0 publications per 1000 general practitioners per year. However, general practice publication rates have plateaued since 2000, and represent only 2%-5% of the equivalent rates for medicine and surgery. This finding suggests that more time and sustained investment in PHCRED are essential to see tangible outputs from funded research in general practice. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01931.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_235696793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.200808768</informt_id><sourcerecordid>69329416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4951-48340ccb7850f48760e6f6e26c165bd9706d833997bcd6b47859f1f704c158213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV2L1DAUhoMo7rj6FyQs6F1rPtqk2RsZFtddWRFE0btDmqbTDJ12TFJ359-bzpQVvPMqJ5znvDk8QeiCkrwUqni3zSlnIiu5lDkjpMpjTajiNH94glaPradoRQgrM8nUzzP0IoRtutKSyefojFYiERVdoR9fbbDamw7v_dhMJrrfLh6wG_B6CtHr3ukBb-xgU5kQnQBjL_F9pyPudMCm08PGNji4wVgcO4upUiS8f4metboP9tVynqPv1x--Xd1kd18-3l6t7zJTqJJmRcULYkwtq5K0RSUFsaIVlglDRVk3ShLRVJwrJWvTiLpInGppK0lhaFkxys_R21NuWv_XZEOEnQvG9r0e7DgFEIozVVCRwIt_wO04-SHtBownrUIqnqDLE2T8GIK3Ley922l_AEpgdg9bmAXDLBhm97C4h4c0_Hp5Yap3tvk7ushOwJsF0MHovvV6MC48cozMqcW86vrE3bveHv5jBfj8ac2Odcq4PmX4nYug97qN0MW4D9DoqMEN7XjsjH4DzejmcM6pAGf7BB9zSfqOiv8BhAq4Rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235696793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research productivity in Australian general practice: what has changed since the 1990s?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Askew, Deborah A ; Schluter, Philip J ; Gunn, Jane M</creator><creatorcontrib>Askew, Deborah A ; Schluter, Philip J ; Gunn, Jane M</creatorcontrib><description>The Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) Strategy aims to improve Australia's output of high-quality research from primary care. We compared publication rates from general practice, medicine and surgery for the period 2000-2007, and found that general practice publications increased since 1990-1999 from 1.0 to 3.0 publications per 1000 general practitioners per year. However, general practice publication rates have plateaued since 2000, and represent only 2%-5% of the equivalent rates for medicine and surgery. This finding suggests that more time and sustained investment in PHCRED are essential to see tangible outputs from funded research in general practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-729X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1326-5377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01931.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18637781</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MJAUAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Australia ; Author productivity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical Research - trends ; Efficiency ; Family physicians ; Family Practice - statistics & numerical data ; Family Practice - trends ; General aspects ; General medicine ; Medical practitioners ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Periodicals as Topic - trends ; Practice research ; Primary care ; Productivity ; Publishing - trends ; Scholarships & fellowships ; Statistics ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Medical journal of Australia, 2008-07, Vol.189 (2), p.103-104</ispartof><rights>2008 AMPCo Pty Ltd. All rights reserved</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Australasian Medical Publishing Company Proprietary, Ltd. Jul 21, 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4951-48340ccb7850f48760e6f6e26c165bd9706d833997bcd6b47859f1f704c158213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4951-48340ccb7850f48760e6f6e26c165bd9706d833997bcd6b47859f1f704c158213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.5694%2Fj.1326-5377.2008.tb01931.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.5694%2Fj.1326-5377.2008.tb01931.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20537746$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18637781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Askew, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schluter, Philip J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Jane M</creatorcontrib><title>Research productivity in Australian general practice: what has changed since the 1990s?</title><title>Medical journal of Australia</title><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><description>The Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) Strategy aims to improve Australia's output of high-quality research from primary care. We compared publication rates from general practice, medicine and surgery for the period 2000-2007, and found that general practice publications increased since 1990-1999 from 1.0 to 3.0 publications per 1000 general practitioners per year. However, general practice publication rates have plateaued since 2000, and represent only 2%-5% of the equivalent rates for medicine and surgery. This finding suggests that more time and sustained investment in PHCRED are essential to see tangible outputs from funded research in general practice.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - trends</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Family Practice - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Family Practice - trends</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General medicine</subject><subject>Medical practitioners</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - trends</subject><subject>Practice research</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Publishing - trends</subject><subject>Scholarships & fellowships</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0025-729X</issn><issn>1326-5377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV2L1DAUhoMo7rj6FyQs6F1rPtqk2RsZFtddWRFE0btDmqbTDJ12TFJ359-bzpQVvPMqJ5znvDk8QeiCkrwUqni3zSlnIiu5lDkjpMpjTajiNH94glaPradoRQgrM8nUzzP0IoRtutKSyefojFYiERVdoR9fbbDamw7v_dhMJrrfLh6wG_B6CtHr3ukBb-xgU5kQnQBjL_F9pyPudMCm08PGNji4wVgcO4upUiS8f4metboP9tVynqPv1x--Xd1kd18-3l6t7zJTqJJmRcULYkwtq5K0RSUFsaIVlglDRVk3ShLRVJwrJWvTiLpInGppK0lhaFkxys_R21NuWv_XZEOEnQvG9r0e7DgFEIozVVCRwIt_wO04-SHtBownrUIqnqDLE2T8GIK3Ley922l_AEpgdg9bmAXDLBhm97C4h4c0_Hp5Yap3tvk7ushOwJsF0MHovvV6MC48cozMqcW86vrE3bveHv5jBfj8ac2Odcq4PmX4nYug97qN0MW4D9DoqMEN7XjsjH4DzejmcM6pAGf7BB9zSfqOiv8BhAq4Rg</recordid><startdate>20080721</startdate><enddate>20080721</enddate><creator>Askew, Deborah A</creator><creator>Schluter, Philip J</creator><creator>Gunn, Jane M</creator><general>Australasian Medical Publishing Company</general><general>Australasian Medical Publishing Company Proprietary, Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080721</creationdate><title>Research productivity in Australian general practice: what has changed since the 1990s?</title><author>Askew, Deborah A ; Schluter, Philip J ; Gunn, Jane M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4951-48340ccb7850f48760e6f6e26c165bd9706d833997bcd6b47859f1f704c158213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - trends</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Family Practice - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Family Practice - trends</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General medicine</topic><topic>Medical practitioners</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - trends</topic><topic>Practice research</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Publishing - trends</topic><topic>Scholarships & fellowships</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Askew, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schluter, Philip J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Jane M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Askew, Deborah A</au><au>Schluter, Philip J</au><au>Gunn, Jane M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research productivity in Australian general practice: what has changed since the 1990s?</atitle><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><date>2008-07-21</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>189</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>103-104</pages><issn>0025-729X</issn><eissn>1326-5377</eissn><coden>MJAUAJ</coden><abstract>The Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) Strategy aims to improve Australia's output of high-quality research from primary care. We compared publication rates from general practice, medicine and surgery for the period 2000-2007, and found that general practice publications increased since 1990-1999 from 1.0 to 3.0 publications per 1000 general practitioners per year. However, general practice publication rates have plateaued since 2000, and represent only 2%-5% of the equivalent rates for medicine and surgery. This finding suggests that more time and sustained investment in PHCRED are essential to see tangible outputs from funded research in general practice.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Australasian Medical Publishing Company</pub><pmid>18637781</pmid><doi>10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01931.x</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0025-729X |
| ispartof | Medical journal of Australia, 2008-07, Vol.189 (2), p.103-104 |
| issn | 0025-729X 1326-5377 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_235696793 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Australia Author productivity Biological and medical sciences Biomedical Research - trends Efficiency Family physicians Family Practice - statistics & numerical data Family Practice - trends General aspects General medicine Medical practitioners Medical research Medical sciences Medicine Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data Periodicals as Topic - trends Practice research Primary care Productivity Publishing - trends Scholarships & fellowships Statistics Surgeons Surgery Workforce |
| title | Research productivity in Australian general practice: what has changed since the 1990s? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T08%3A47%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20productivity%20in%20Australian%20general%20practice:%20what%20has%20changed%20since%20the%201990s?&rft.jtitle=Medical%20journal%20of%20Australia&rft.au=Askew,%20Deborah%20A&rft.date=2008-07-21&rft.volume=189&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=103-104&rft.issn=0025-729X&rft.eissn=1326-5377&rft.coden=MJAUAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01931.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E69329416%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235696793&rft_id=info:pmid/18637781&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.200808768&rfr_iscdi=true |