Control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat in southern Australia

Two field experiments were conducted during 2018 at Paskeville and Arthurton, South Australia, to identify effective herbicide options for the control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass in wheat. Dose–response experiments confirmed resistance in both field populations (T1 and A18) of rigid ry...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2020-02, Vol.34 (1), p.19-24
Hauptverfasser: Brunton, David J, Boutsalis, Peter, Gill, Gurjeet, Preston, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 34
creator Brunton, David J
Boutsalis, Peter
Gill, Gurjeet
Preston, Christopher
description Two field experiments were conducted during 2018 at Paskeville and Arthurton, South Australia, to identify effective herbicide options for the control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass in wheat. Dose–response experiments confirmed resistance in both field populations (T1 and A18) of rigid ryegrass to triallate, prosulfocarb, trifluralin, and pyroxasulfone. T1 and A18 were 17.9- and 20-fold more resistant to triallate than susceptible SLR4. The level of resistance detected in T1 to prosulfocarb (5.9-fold) and pyroxasulfone (4-fold) was lower compared to A18, which displayed 12.1- and 7.8-fold resistance to both herbicides, respectively. Despite resistance, the mixture of two different preplant-incorporated (PPI) site-of-action herbicides improved rigid ryegrass control and wheat yield compared to a single PPI herbicide only. Prosulfocarb + triallate and prosulfocarb + S-metolachlor + triallate did not reduce rigid ryegrass seed set when compared to prosulfocarb applied alone at the higher rate (2,400 g ai ha–1). Pyroxasulfone + triallate PPI followed by glyphosate (1,880 g ai ha-1) as a weed seed set control treatment reduced rigid ryegrass seed production by 93% and 95% at both sites, respectively. These herbicides also significantly improved grain yield of wheat at Paskeville (22%) and Arthurton (38%) compared to the untreated. Nomenclature: Prosulfocarb; triallate; pyroxasulfone; S-metolachlor; trifluralin; glyphosate; rigid ryegrass, Lolium rigidum Gaudin LOLRI; wheat; Triticum aestivum L. ‘Chief CL Plus'
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wet.2019.72
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2355897354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26903089</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26903089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-59127581e2f4f9a9b79be32fee73f46656046c954b1cbdda7e9c9f756fe311d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsnz0LAi0W25mOzaY5S_IKCFwVvIbs7aVN2NzXJUvrv3bLi0dMM8z68Aw9C15TMKaHyYQ9pzghVc8lO0IQKQTImc3KKJmShSEa4_DpHFzFuCaEFY2SCzNJ3KfgGe4vTxvnKhNK0JkEWILqYTJdwcGtX43CAdTAx4ruVb1zfjue-nWHX4f0GTDou0fdpA6HDj31MwTTOXKIza5oIV79zij6fnz6Wr9nq_eVt-bjKSk5lyoSiTIoFBWZzq4wqpSqBMwsguc2LQhQkLyol8pJWZV0bCapSVorCAqe0pnyKbsfeXfDfPcSkt74P3fBSMy7EQkku8oG6H6kq-BgDWL0LrjXhoCnRR4d6cKiPDrVkA30z0tuYfPhDWaEIH4wO-WzMS-d9B_92_QCoP3zM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2355897354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat in southern Australia</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Brunton, David J ; Boutsalis, Peter ; Gill, Gurjeet ; Preston, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Brunton, David J ; Boutsalis, Peter ; Gill, Gurjeet ; Preston, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Two field experiments were conducted during 2018 at Paskeville and Arthurton, South Australia, to identify effective herbicide options for the control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass in wheat. Dose–response experiments confirmed resistance in both field populations (T1 and A18) of rigid ryegrass to triallate, prosulfocarb, trifluralin, and pyroxasulfone. T1 and A18 were 17.9- and 20-fold more resistant to triallate than susceptible SLR4. The level of resistance detected in T1 to prosulfocarb (5.9-fold) and pyroxasulfone (4-fold) was lower compared to A18, which displayed 12.1- and 7.8-fold resistance to both herbicides, respectively. Despite resistance, the mixture of two different preplant-incorporated (PPI) site-of-action herbicides improved rigid ryegrass control and wheat yield compared to a single PPI herbicide only. Prosulfocarb + triallate and prosulfocarb + S-metolachlor + triallate did not reduce rigid ryegrass seed set when compared to prosulfocarb applied alone at the higher rate (2,400 g ai ha–1). Pyroxasulfone + triallate PPI followed by glyphosate (1,880 g ai ha-1) as a weed seed set control treatment reduced rigid ryegrass seed production by 93% and 95% at both sites, respectively. These herbicides also significantly improved grain yield of wheat at Paskeville (22%) and Arthurton (38%) compared to the untreated. Nomenclature: Prosulfocarb; triallate; pyroxasulfone; S-metolachlor; trifluralin; glyphosate; rigid ryegrass, Lolium rigidum Gaudin LOLRI; wheat; Triticum aestivum L. ‘Chief CL Plus'</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2019.72</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Crop yield ; Evolution ; Experiments ; Field tests ; Glyphosate ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; Metolachlor ; preplant incorporated ; Seed set ; Seeds ; Thiocarbamates ; Trifluralin ; weed control ; weed seed set control ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2020-02, Vol.34 (1), p.19-24</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2019.</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-59127581e2f4f9a9b79be32fee73f46656046c954b1cbdda7e9c9f756fe311d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-59127581e2f4f9a9b79be32fee73f46656046c954b1cbdda7e9c9f756fe311d13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9694-904X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26903089$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26903089$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brunton, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutsalis, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Gurjeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat in southern Australia</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Two field experiments were conducted during 2018 at Paskeville and Arthurton, South Australia, to identify effective herbicide options for the control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass in wheat. Dose–response experiments confirmed resistance in both field populations (T1 and A18) of rigid ryegrass to triallate, prosulfocarb, trifluralin, and pyroxasulfone. T1 and A18 were 17.9- and 20-fold more resistant to triallate than susceptible SLR4. The level of resistance detected in T1 to prosulfocarb (5.9-fold) and pyroxasulfone (4-fold) was lower compared to A18, which displayed 12.1- and 7.8-fold resistance to both herbicides, respectively. Despite resistance, the mixture of two different preplant-incorporated (PPI) site-of-action herbicides improved rigid ryegrass control and wheat yield compared to a single PPI herbicide only. Prosulfocarb + triallate and prosulfocarb + S-metolachlor + triallate did not reduce rigid ryegrass seed set when compared to prosulfocarb applied alone at the higher rate (2,400 g ai ha–1). Pyroxasulfone + triallate PPI followed by glyphosate (1,880 g ai ha-1) as a weed seed set control treatment reduced rigid ryegrass seed production by 93% and 95% at both sites, respectively. These herbicides also significantly improved grain yield of wheat at Paskeville (22%) and Arthurton (38%) compared to the untreated. Nomenclature: Prosulfocarb; triallate; pyroxasulfone; S-metolachlor; trifluralin; glyphosate; rigid ryegrass, Lolium rigidum Gaudin LOLRI; wheat; Triticum aestivum L. ‘Chief CL Plus'</description><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Metolachlor</subject><subject>preplant incorporated</subject><subject>Seed set</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Thiocarbamates</subject><subject>Trifluralin</subject><subject>weed control</subject><subject>weed seed set control</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsnz0LAi0W25mOzaY5S_IKCFwVvIbs7aVN2NzXJUvrv3bLi0dMM8z68Aw9C15TMKaHyYQ9pzghVc8lO0IQKQTImc3KKJmShSEa4_DpHFzFuCaEFY2SCzNJ3KfgGe4vTxvnKhNK0JkEWILqYTJdwcGtX43CAdTAx4ruVb1zfjue-nWHX4f0GTDou0fdpA6HDj31MwTTOXKIza5oIV79zij6fnz6Wr9nq_eVt-bjKSk5lyoSiTIoFBWZzq4wqpSqBMwsguc2LQhQkLyol8pJWZV0bCapSVorCAqe0pnyKbsfeXfDfPcSkt74P3fBSMy7EQkku8oG6H6kq-BgDWL0LrjXhoCnRR4d6cKiPDrVkA30z0tuYfPhDWaEIH4wO-WzMS-d9B_92_QCoP3zM</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Brunton, David J</creator><creator>Boutsalis, Peter</creator><creator>Gill, Gurjeet</creator><creator>Preston, Christopher</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9694-904X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat in southern Australia</title><author>Brunton, David J ; Boutsalis, Peter ; Gill, Gurjeet ; Preston, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-59127581e2f4f9a9b79be32fee73f46656046c954b1cbdda7e9c9f756fe311d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Metolachlor</topic><topic>preplant incorporated</topic><topic>Seed set</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Thiocarbamates</topic><topic>Trifluralin</topic><topic>weed control</topic><topic>weed seed set control</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brunton, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutsalis, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Gurjeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brunton, David J</au><au>Boutsalis, Peter</au><au>Gill, Gurjeet</au><au>Preston, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat in southern Australia</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>19-24</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Two field experiments were conducted during 2018 at Paskeville and Arthurton, South Australia, to identify effective herbicide options for the control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass in wheat. Dose–response experiments confirmed resistance in both field populations (T1 and A18) of rigid ryegrass to triallate, prosulfocarb, trifluralin, and pyroxasulfone. T1 and A18 were 17.9- and 20-fold more resistant to triallate than susceptible SLR4. The level of resistance detected in T1 to prosulfocarb (5.9-fold) and pyroxasulfone (4-fold) was lower compared to A18, which displayed 12.1- and 7.8-fold resistance to both herbicides, respectively. Despite resistance, the mixture of two different preplant-incorporated (PPI) site-of-action herbicides improved rigid ryegrass control and wheat yield compared to a single PPI herbicide only. Prosulfocarb + triallate and prosulfocarb + S-metolachlor + triallate did not reduce rigid ryegrass seed set when compared to prosulfocarb applied alone at the higher rate (2,400 g ai ha–1). Pyroxasulfone + triallate PPI followed by glyphosate (1,880 g ai ha-1) as a weed seed set control treatment reduced rigid ryegrass seed production by 93% and 95% at both sites, respectively. These herbicides also significantly improved grain yield of wheat at Paskeville (22%) and Arthurton (38%) compared to the untreated. Nomenclature: Prosulfocarb; triallate; pyroxasulfone; S-metolachlor; trifluralin; glyphosate; rigid ryegrass, Lolium rigidum Gaudin LOLRI; wheat; Triticum aestivum L. ‘Chief CL Plus'</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2019.72</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9694-904X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2020-02, Vol.34 (1), p.19-24
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2355897354
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Crop yield
Evolution
Experiments
Field tests
Glyphosate
Herbicide resistance
Herbicides
Metolachlor
preplant incorporated
Seed set
Seeds
Thiocarbamates
Trifluralin
weed control
weed seed set control
Wheat
title Control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat in southern Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A20%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Control%20of%20thiocarbamate-resistant%20rigid%20ryegrass%20(Lolium%20rigidum)%20in%20wheat%20in%20southern%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Brunton,%20David%20J&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=19-24&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2019.72&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26903089%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2355897354&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26903089&rfr_iscdi=true