Geographic disparities in residential proximity to colorectal and cervical cancer care providers

Background Persistent rural‐urban disparities for colorectal and cervical cancers raise concerns regarding access to treatment providers. To the authors knowledge, little is known regarding rural‐urban differences in residential proximity to cancer specialists. Methods Using the 2018 Physician Compa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2020-03, Vol.126 (5), p.1068-1076
Hauptverfasser: Hung, Peiyin, Deng, Songyuan, Zahnd, Whitney E., Adams, Swann A., Olatosi, Bankole, Crouch, Elizabeth L., Eberth, Jan M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1076
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1068
container_title Cancer
container_volume 126
creator Hung, Peiyin
Deng, Songyuan
Zahnd, Whitney E.
Adams, Swann A.
Olatosi, Bankole
Crouch, Elizabeth L.
Eberth, Jan M.
description Background Persistent rural‐urban disparities for colorectal and cervical cancers raise concerns regarding access to treatment providers. To the authors knowledge, little is known regarding rural‐urban differences in residential proximity to cancer specialists. Methods Using the 2018 Physician Compare data concerning physician practice locations and the 2012 to 2016 American Community Survey, the current study estimated the driving distance from each residential zip code tabulation area (ZCTA) centroid to the nearest cancer provider of the following medical specialties involved in treating patients with colorectal and cervical cancer: medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, general surgery, gynecological oncology, and colorectal surgery. Using population‐weighted multivariable logistic regression, the authors analyzed the associations between ZCTA‐level characteristics and driving distances >60 miles to each type of specialist. ZCTA‐level residential rurality was defined using rural‐urban commuting area codes. Results Nearly 1 in 5 rural Americans lives >60 miles from a medical oncologist. Rural‐urban differences in travel distances to the nearest cancer care provider(s) increased substantially for cancer surgeons; greater than one‐half of rural residents were required to travel 60 miles to reach a gynecological oncologist, compared with 8 miles for their urban counterparts. Individuals residing within ZCTAs with a higher poverty rate, those of American Indian/Alaska Native ethnicity, and/or were located in the South and West regions were more likely than their counterparts to be >60 miles away from any of the aforementioned providers. Conclusions The substantial travel distances required for rural, low‐income residents to reach a cancer specialist should prompt a policy action to increase access to specialized cancer care for millions of rural residents. Travel distances to cancer specialists appear to be greater for individuals residing in rural communities with higher poverty rates and/or with a higher percentage of American Indian/Alaska Native individuals. We must ensure that these accessibility gaps do not compromise cancer treatments and survival for vulnerable populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.32594
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2354130188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2354130188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-b89fa2a9da5d42a54d679499f16b33d32e80b63738495d83d5b97b779b5061183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMobk5f_ABS8E3ozN8meZSiUxgKouBbTZNUM7p2Jt10397UTh99uvdcfudcOACcIjhFEOJL3Wg_JZhJugfGCEqeQkTxPhhDCEXKKHkZgaMQFlFyzMghGBHEIRZYjsHrzLZvXq3enU6MCyvlXedsSFyTeBucsU3nVJ2sfPvllq7bJl2b6LZuvdVdvKvGJNr6jdNRaNXEPQ5ve8Mmun04BgeVqoM92c0JeL65fspv0_nD7C6_mqeaSELTUshKYSWNYoZixajJuKRSVigrCTEEWwHLjHAiqGRGEMNKyUvOZclghpAgE3A-5MbPH2sbumLRrn0TXxaYMIoIRKKnLgZK-zYEb6ti5d1S-W2BYNGXWfRlFj9lRvhsF7kul9b8ob_tRQANwKer7fafqCK_zx-H0G_D-396</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2354130188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geographic disparities in residential proximity to colorectal and cervical cancer care providers</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hung, Peiyin ; Deng, Songyuan ; Zahnd, Whitney E. ; Adams, Swann A. ; Olatosi, Bankole ; Crouch, Elizabeth L. ; Eberth, Jan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hung, Peiyin ; Deng, Songyuan ; Zahnd, Whitney E. ; Adams, Swann A. ; Olatosi, Bankole ; Crouch, Elizabeth L. ; Eberth, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Persistent rural‐urban disparities for colorectal and cervical cancers raise concerns regarding access to treatment providers. To the authors knowledge, little is known regarding rural‐urban differences in residential proximity to cancer specialists. Methods Using the 2018 Physician Compare data concerning physician practice locations and the 2012 to 2016 American Community Survey, the current study estimated the driving distance from each residential zip code tabulation area (ZCTA) centroid to the nearest cancer provider of the following medical specialties involved in treating patients with colorectal and cervical cancer: medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, general surgery, gynecological oncology, and colorectal surgery. Using population‐weighted multivariable logistic regression, the authors analyzed the associations between ZCTA‐level characteristics and driving distances &gt;60 miles to each type of specialist. ZCTA‐level residential rurality was defined using rural‐urban commuting area codes. Results Nearly 1 in 5 rural Americans lives &gt;60 miles from a medical oncologist. Rural‐urban differences in travel distances to the nearest cancer care provider(s) increased substantially for cancer surgeons; greater than one‐half of rural residents were required to travel 60 miles to reach a gynecological oncologist, compared with 8 miles for their urban counterparts. Individuals residing within ZCTAs with a higher poverty rate, those of American Indian/Alaska Native ethnicity, and/or were located in the South and West regions were more likely than their counterparts to be &gt;60 miles away from any of the aforementioned providers. Conclusions The substantial travel distances required for rural, low‐income residents to reach a cancer specialist should prompt a policy action to increase access to specialized cancer care for millions of rural residents. Travel distances to cancer specialists appear to be greater for individuals residing in rural communities with higher poverty rates and/or with a higher percentage of American Indian/Alaska Native individuals. We must ensure that these accessibility gaps do not compromise cancer treatments and survival for vulnerable populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31702829</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>access to care ; Cancer ; Centroids ; Cervical cancer ; Cervix ; Colorectal cancer ; Commuting ; Gynecology ; medical oncology ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Oncology ; Poverty ; professional ; Radiation ; radiation oncology ; Regression analysis ; Rural areas ; Rural populations ; Surgery ; Tabulation ; Travel ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2020-03, Vol.126 (5), p.1068-1076</ispartof><rights>2019 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2019 American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2020 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-b89fa2a9da5d42a54d679499f16b33d32e80b63738495d83d5b97b779b5061183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-b89fa2a9da5d42a54d679499f16b33d32e80b63738495d83d5b97b779b5061183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1529-0819 ; 0000-0001-5174-8666 ; 0000-0001-9500-4212</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.32594$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.32594$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31702829$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hung, Peiyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Songyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahnd, Whitney E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Swann A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olatosi, Bankole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crouch, Elizabeth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberth, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><title>Geographic disparities in residential proximity to colorectal and cervical cancer care providers</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background Persistent rural‐urban disparities for colorectal and cervical cancers raise concerns regarding access to treatment providers. To the authors knowledge, little is known regarding rural‐urban differences in residential proximity to cancer specialists. Methods Using the 2018 Physician Compare data concerning physician practice locations and the 2012 to 2016 American Community Survey, the current study estimated the driving distance from each residential zip code tabulation area (ZCTA) centroid to the nearest cancer provider of the following medical specialties involved in treating patients with colorectal and cervical cancer: medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, general surgery, gynecological oncology, and colorectal surgery. Using population‐weighted multivariable logistic regression, the authors analyzed the associations between ZCTA‐level characteristics and driving distances &gt;60 miles to each type of specialist. ZCTA‐level residential rurality was defined using rural‐urban commuting area codes. Results Nearly 1 in 5 rural Americans lives &gt;60 miles from a medical oncologist. Rural‐urban differences in travel distances to the nearest cancer care provider(s) increased substantially for cancer surgeons; greater than one‐half of rural residents were required to travel 60 miles to reach a gynecological oncologist, compared with 8 miles for their urban counterparts. Individuals residing within ZCTAs with a higher poverty rate, those of American Indian/Alaska Native ethnicity, and/or were located in the South and West regions were more likely than their counterparts to be &gt;60 miles away from any of the aforementioned providers. Conclusions The substantial travel distances required for rural, low‐income residents to reach a cancer specialist should prompt a policy action to increase access to specialized cancer care for millions of rural residents. Travel distances to cancer specialists appear to be greater for individuals residing in rural communities with higher poverty rates and/or with a higher percentage of American Indian/Alaska Native individuals. We must ensure that these accessibility gaps do not compromise cancer treatments and survival for vulnerable populations.</description><subject>access to care</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Centroids</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Commuting</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>medical oncology</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>professional</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>radiation oncology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tabulation</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMobk5f_ABS8E3ozN8meZSiUxgKouBbTZNUM7p2Jt10397UTh99uvdcfudcOACcIjhFEOJL3Wg_JZhJugfGCEqeQkTxPhhDCEXKKHkZgaMQFlFyzMghGBHEIRZYjsHrzLZvXq3enU6MCyvlXedsSFyTeBucsU3nVJ2sfPvllq7bJl2b6LZuvdVdvKvGJNr6jdNRaNXEPQ5ve8Mmun04BgeVqoM92c0JeL65fspv0_nD7C6_mqeaSELTUshKYSWNYoZixajJuKRSVigrCTEEWwHLjHAiqGRGEMNKyUvOZclghpAgE3A-5MbPH2sbumLRrn0TXxaYMIoIRKKnLgZK-zYEb6ti5d1S-W2BYNGXWfRlFj9lRvhsF7kul9b8ob_tRQANwKer7fafqCK_zx-H0G_D-396</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Hung, Peiyin</creator><creator>Deng, Songyuan</creator><creator>Zahnd, Whitney E.</creator><creator>Adams, Swann A.</creator><creator>Olatosi, Bankole</creator><creator>Crouch, Elizabeth L.</creator><creator>Eberth, Jan M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-0819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5174-8666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9500-4212</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Geographic disparities in residential proximity to colorectal and cervical cancer care providers</title><author>Hung, Peiyin ; Deng, Songyuan ; Zahnd, Whitney E. ; Adams, Swann A. ; Olatosi, Bankole ; Crouch, Elizabeth L. ; Eberth, Jan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-b89fa2a9da5d42a54d679499f16b33d32e80b63738495d83d5b97b779b5061183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>access to care</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Centroids</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Commuting</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>medical oncology</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>professional</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>radiation oncology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tabulation</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hung, Peiyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Songyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahnd, Whitney E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Swann A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olatosi, Bankole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crouch, Elizabeth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberth, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hung, Peiyin</au><au>Deng, Songyuan</au><au>Zahnd, Whitney E.</au><au>Adams, Swann A.</au><au>Olatosi, Bankole</au><au>Crouch, Elizabeth L.</au><au>Eberth, Jan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geographic disparities in residential proximity to colorectal and cervical cancer care providers</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1068</spage><epage>1076</epage><pages>1068-1076</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background Persistent rural‐urban disparities for colorectal and cervical cancers raise concerns regarding access to treatment providers. To the authors knowledge, little is known regarding rural‐urban differences in residential proximity to cancer specialists. Methods Using the 2018 Physician Compare data concerning physician practice locations and the 2012 to 2016 American Community Survey, the current study estimated the driving distance from each residential zip code tabulation area (ZCTA) centroid to the nearest cancer provider of the following medical specialties involved in treating patients with colorectal and cervical cancer: medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, general surgery, gynecological oncology, and colorectal surgery. Using population‐weighted multivariable logistic regression, the authors analyzed the associations between ZCTA‐level characteristics and driving distances &gt;60 miles to each type of specialist. ZCTA‐level residential rurality was defined using rural‐urban commuting area codes. Results Nearly 1 in 5 rural Americans lives &gt;60 miles from a medical oncologist. Rural‐urban differences in travel distances to the nearest cancer care provider(s) increased substantially for cancer surgeons; greater than one‐half of rural residents were required to travel 60 miles to reach a gynecological oncologist, compared with 8 miles for their urban counterparts. Individuals residing within ZCTAs with a higher poverty rate, those of American Indian/Alaska Native ethnicity, and/or were located in the South and West regions were more likely than their counterparts to be &gt;60 miles away from any of the aforementioned providers. Conclusions The substantial travel distances required for rural, low‐income residents to reach a cancer specialist should prompt a policy action to increase access to specialized cancer care for millions of rural residents. Travel distances to cancer specialists appear to be greater for individuals residing in rural communities with higher poverty rates and/or with a higher percentage of American Indian/Alaska Native individuals. We must ensure that these accessibility gaps do not compromise cancer treatments and survival for vulnerable populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31702829</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.32594</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-0819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5174-8666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9500-4212</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2020-03, Vol.126 (5), p.1068-1076
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2354130188
source Wiley Online Library Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects access to care
Cancer
Centroids
Cervical cancer
Cervix
Colorectal cancer
Commuting
Gynecology
medical oncology
Minority & ethnic groups
Oncology
Poverty
professional
Radiation
radiation oncology
Regression analysis
Rural areas
Rural populations
Surgery
Tabulation
Travel
Urban areas
title Geographic disparities in residential proximity to colorectal and cervical cancer care providers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T09%3A38%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geographic%20disparities%20in%20residential%20proximity%20to%20colorectal%20and%20cervical%20cancer%20care%20providers&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Hung,%20Peiyin&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1068&rft.epage=1076&rft.pages=1068-1076&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.32594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2354130188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2354130188&rft_id=info:pmid/31702829&rfr_iscdi=true