Impact of a combined pulsed electric field (PEF) and enzymatic mash treatment on yield, fermentation behaviour and composition of white wine
The aim of this work was to study the combined application of a pulsed electric field (PEF) and an enzymatic treatment to white wine mash. The resulting impact of membrane permeabilisation by electroporation and pectin degradation by enzymes on fermentation behaviour and quality of white wine was as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European food research & technology 2020-03, Vol.246 (3), p.609-620 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 620 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 609 |
container_title | European food research & technology |
container_volume | 246 |
creator | Fauster, T. Philipp, C. Hanz, K. Scheibelberger, R. Teufl, T. Nauer, S. Scheiblhofer, H. Jaeger, H. |
description | The aim of this work was to study the combined application of a pulsed electric field (PEF) and an enzymatic treatment to white wine mash. The resulting impact of membrane permeabilisation by electroporation and pectin degradation by enzymes on fermentation behaviour and quality of white wine was assessed. The mash of two varieties, Traminer and Grüner Veltliner, was PEF treated (3 and 10 kJ/kg) using a continuous co-linear treatment chamber. Pectinases were added immediately afterwards and maceration was performed for 4 and 24 h. Various physico-chemical parameters were analysed at different stages of the production process and the impact of the combined treatment on volatile compounds such as esters and terpenes was analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and a sensory panel in the final white wine after bottling and storage. Regardless of the PEF treatment intensity, the variety and the maceration time, the release of juice was not significantly influenced. For Traminer, the fermentation time was reduced through the enhanced extraction of nitrogen from 322 to 359 mg/L due to PEF treatment (10 kJ/kg). The release of phenols which were localized in the pulp, were significantly more affected than phenols from the skin. Although the concentration of selective esters especially of the variety Traminer significantly increased, the sensory evaluation indicated no positive effect on the olfactory properties. Overall, the combination of PEF and enzyme pretreatment showed benefits in reducing the fermentation time and increasing the content of selective esters for Traminer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00217-020-03427-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2353918469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2353918469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9ba58b2c8bbfd13a11237336cd7ffc745d89cdce0b6bb75c328687ffc6ed12c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaJgrf6Aq4AbBUfzmEdmKaVVoaALXYckk7FTOg-T1KF-gx_tnY7oztUN97xuDkLnlNxQQrJbTwijWUQYiQiPWRb1B2hCYy4ixkVy-PvOsmN04v2akCRPaTxBX491p0zAbYkVNm2tq8YWuNtuPAy7sSa4yuCyspsCXz7PF1dYNQA0n7taBUBq5Vc4OKtCbRuwafBu4F7j0rphAyTYabtSH1W7dXs1xHStr_YI5ParKljcQ_ApOioVJJ_9zCl6XcxfZg_R8un-cXa3jAxPeYhyrRKhmRFalwXlilL4GOepKbKyNFmcFCI3hbFEp1pnieFMpGKAUltQZiifoovRt3Pt-9b6INdwWwORkvGE51TEaQ4sNrKMa713tpSdq2rldpISObQux9YltC73rcseRHwUeSA3b9b9Wf-j-gZqEIg1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353918469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of a combined pulsed electric field (PEF) and enzymatic mash treatment on yield, fermentation behaviour and composition of white wine</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Fauster, T. ; Philipp, C. ; Hanz, K. ; Scheibelberger, R. ; Teufl, T. ; Nauer, S. ; Scheiblhofer, H. ; Jaeger, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fauster, T. ; Philipp, C. ; Hanz, K. ; Scheibelberger, R. ; Teufl, T. ; Nauer, S. ; Scheiblhofer, H. ; Jaeger, H.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this work was to study the combined application of a pulsed electric field (PEF) and an enzymatic treatment to white wine mash. The resulting impact of membrane permeabilisation by electroporation and pectin degradation by enzymes on fermentation behaviour and quality of white wine was assessed. The mash of two varieties, Traminer and Grüner Veltliner, was PEF treated (3 and 10 kJ/kg) using a continuous co-linear treatment chamber. Pectinases were added immediately afterwards and maceration was performed for 4 and 24 h. Various physico-chemical parameters were analysed at different stages of the production process and the impact of the combined treatment on volatile compounds such as esters and terpenes was analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and a sensory panel in the final white wine after bottling and storage. Regardless of the PEF treatment intensity, the variety and the maceration time, the release of juice was not significantly influenced. For Traminer, the fermentation time was reduced through the enhanced extraction of nitrogen from 322 to 359 mg/L due to PEF treatment (10 kJ/kg). The release of phenols which were localized in the pulp, were significantly more affected than phenols from the skin. Although the concentration of selective esters especially of the variety Traminer significantly increased, the sensory evaluation indicated no positive effect on the olfactory properties. Overall, the combination of PEF and enzyme pretreatment showed benefits in reducing the fermentation time and increasing the content of selective esters for Traminer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-2377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-2385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00217-020-03427-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Analytical Chemistry ; Biotechnology ; Bottling ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Combined treatment ; Electric fields ; Electroporation ; Esters ; Fermentation ; Food Science ; Forestry ; Gas chromatography ; Maceration ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; Olfactory properties ; Organic chemistry ; Original Paper ; Pectin ; Pectinase ; Phenols ; Pretreatment ; Pulp ; Sensory evaluation ; Terpenes ; Volatile compounds ; Wine ; Wines</subject><ispartof>European food research & technology, 2020-03, Vol.246 (3), p.609-620</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>European Food Research and Technology is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9ba58b2c8bbfd13a11237336cd7ffc745d89cdce0b6bb75c328687ffc6ed12c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9ba58b2c8bbfd13a11237336cd7ffc745d89cdce0b6bb75c328687ffc6ed12c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00217-020-03427-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00217-020-03427-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fauster, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philipp, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanz, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheibelberger, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teufl, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nauer, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheiblhofer, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaeger, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of a combined pulsed electric field (PEF) and enzymatic mash treatment on yield, fermentation behaviour and composition of white wine</title><title>European food research & technology</title><addtitle>Eur Food Res Technol</addtitle><description>The aim of this work was to study the combined application of a pulsed electric field (PEF) and an enzymatic treatment to white wine mash. The resulting impact of membrane permeabilisation by electroporation and pectin degradation by enzymes on fermentation behaviour and quality of white wine was assessed. The mash of two varieties, Traminer and Grüner Veltliner, was PEF treated (3 and 10 kJ/kg) using a continuous co-linear treatment chamber. Pectinases were added immediately afterwards and maceration was performed for 4 and 24 h. Various physico-chemical parameters were analysed at different stages of the production process and the impact of the combined treatment on volatile compounds such as esters and terpenes was analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and a sensory panel in the final white wine after bottling and storage. Regardless of the PEF treatment intensity, the variety and the maceration time, the release of juice was not significantly influenced. For Traminer, the fermentation time was reduced through the enhanced extraction of nitrogen from 322 to 359 mg/L due to PEF treatment (10 kJ/kg). The release of phenols which were localized in the pulp, were significantly more affected than phenols from the skin. Although the concentration of selective esters especially of the variety Traminer significantly increased, the sensory evaluation indicated no positive effect on the olfactory properties. Overall, the combination of PEF and enzyme pretreatment showed benefits in reducing the fermentation time and increasing the content of selective esters for Traminer.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Bottling</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Combined treatment</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electroporation</subject><subject>Esters</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Maceration</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Olfactory properties</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pectin</subject><subject>Pectinase</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Pulp</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Terpenes</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Wine</subject><subject>Wines</subject><issn>1438-2377</issn><issn>1438-2385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaJgrf6Aq4AbBUfzmEdmKaVVoaALXYckk7FTOg-T1KF-gx_tnY7oztUN97xuDkLnlNxQQrJbTwijWUQYiQiPWRb1B2hCYy4ixkVy-PvOsmN04v2akCRPaTxBX491p0zAbYkVNm2tq8YWuNtuPAy7sSa4yuCyspsCXz7PF1dYNQA0n7taBUBq5Vc4OKtCbRuwafBu4F7j0rphAyTYabtSH1W7dXs1xHStr_YI5ParKljcQ_ApOioVJJ_9zCl6XcxfZg_R8un-cXa3jAxPeYhyrRKhmRFalwXlilL4GOepKbKyNFmcFCI3hbFEp1pnieFMpGKAUltQZiifoovRt3Pt-9b6INdwWwORkvGE51TEaQ4sNrKMa713tpSdq2rldpISObQux9YltC73rcseRHwUeSA3b9b9Wf-j-gZqEIg1</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Fauster, T.</creator><creator>Philipp, C.</creator><creator>Hanz, K.</creator><creator>Scheibelberger, R.</creator><creator>Teufl, T.</creator><creator>Nauer, S.</creator><creator>Scheiblhofer, H.</creator><creator>Jaeger, H.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Impact of a combined pulsed electric field (PEF) and enzymatic mash treatment on yield, fermentation behaviour and composition of white wine</title><author>Fauster, T. ; Philipp, C. ; Hanz, K. ; Scheibelberger, R. ; Teufl, T. ; Nauer, S. ; Scheiblhofer, H. ; Jaeger, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9ba58b2c8bbfd13a11237336cd7ffc745d89cdce0b6bb75c328687ffc6ed12c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Bottling</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Combined treatment</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electroporation</topic><topic>Esters</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Maceration</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Olfactory properties</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pectin</topic><topic>Pectinase</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Pulp</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Terpenes</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Wine</topic><topic>Wines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fauster, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philipp, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanz, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheibelberger, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teufl, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nauer, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheiblhofer, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaeger, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European food research & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fauster, T.</au><au>Philipp, C.</au><au>Hanz, K.</au><au>Scheibelberger, R.</au><au>Teufl, T.</au><au>Nauer, S.</au><au>Scheiblhofer, H.</au><au>Jaeger, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of a combined pulsed electric field (PEF) and enzymatic mash treatment on yield, fermentation behaviour and composition of white wine</atitle><jtitle>European food research & technology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Food Res Technol</stitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>246</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>620</epage><pages>609-620</pages><issn>1438-2377</issn><eissn>1438-2385</eissn><abstract>The aim of this work was to study the combined application of a pulsed electric field (PEF) and an enzymatic treatment to white wine mash. The resulting impact of membrane permeabilisation by electroporation and pectin degradation by enzymes on fermentation behaviour and quality of white wine was assessed. The mash of two varieties, Traminer and Grüner Veltliner, was PEF treated (3 and 10 kJ/kg) using a continuous co-linear treatment chamber. Pectinases were added immediately afterwards and maceration was performed for 4 and 24 h. Various physico-chemical parameters were analysed at different stages of the production process and the impact of the combined treatment on volatile compounds such as esters and terpenes was analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and a sensory panel in the final white wine after bottling and storage. Regardless of the PEF treatment intensity, the variety and the maceration time, the release of juice was not significantly influenced. For Traminer, the fermentation time was reduced through the enhanced extraction of nitrogen from 322 to 359 mg/L due to PEF treatment (10 kJ/kg). The release of phenols which were localized in the pulp, were significantly more affected than phenols from the skin. Although the concentration of selective esters especially of the variety Traminer significantly increased, the sensory evaluation indicated no positive effect on the olfactory properties. Overall, the combination of PEF and enzyme pretreatment showed benefits in reducing the fermentation time and increasing the content of selective esters for Traminer.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00217-020-03427-w</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1438-2377 |
ispartof | European food research & technology, 2020-03, Vol.246 (3), p.609-620 |
issn | 1438-2377 1438-2385 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2353918469 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agriculture Analytical Chemistry Biotechnology Bottling Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Combined treatment Electric fields Electroporation Esters Fermentation Food Science Forestry Gas chromatography Maceration Mass spectrometry Mass spectroscopy Olfactory properties Organic chemistry Original Paper Pectin Pectinase Phenols Pretreatment Pulp Sensory evaluation Terpenes Volatile compounds Wine Wines |
title | Impact of a combined pulsed electric field (PEF) and enzymatic mash treatment on yield, fermentation behaviour and composition of white wine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A57%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20a%20combined%20pulsed%20electric%20field%20(PEF)%20and%20enzymatic%20mash%20treatment%20on%20yield,%20fermentation%20behaviour%20and%20composition%20of%20white%20wine&rft.jtitle=European%20food%20research%20&%20technology&rft.au=Fauster,%20T.&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=246&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=620&rft.pages=609-620&rft.issn=1438-2377&rft.eissn=1438-2385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00217-020-03427-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353918469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353918469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |